Role of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone Corticosteroids in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalized Patients: A Review

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Management Strategies

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) that predispose individuals to thrombotic events and pregnancy-related complications. APS can occur as a primary condition or in association with other autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Catastrophic APS (CAPS) is a rare, severe variant of APS, marked by rapid-onset, widespread thrombosis leading to multi-organ failure, often triggered by infections, surgical procedures, or cessation of anticoagulation therapy. Both APS and CAPS present significant clinical challenges due to their potential for severe morbidity and mortality. This comprehensive review aims to provide a detailed overview of the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies for APS and CAPS. The review highlights the immunological mechanisms underlying APS, including the role of aPLs, complement system activation, and endothelial cell dysfunction in developing thrombosis. It also outlines the clinical manifestations of APS, such as venous and arterial thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, and neurological symptoms, along with the diagnostic criteria based on clinical and laboratory findings. The review delves into its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and diagnostic challenges in the context of CAPS, emphasizing the need for immediate and intensive therapy to manage this life-threatening condition. Current management strategies for APS, including anticoagulant therapy, immunomodulatory treatments, and specific interventions for pregnancy-related complications, are discussed. The review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for CAPS, combining anticoagulation, high-dose corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin. The review also addresses the prognosis and long-term outcomes for patients with APS and CAPS, underlining the necessity for ongoing monitoring and follow-up to prevent recurrent thrombotic events and manage chronic complications. Finally, future directions in research are explored, focusing on emerging therapies, biomarkers for early diagnosis, and the need for clinical trials to advance the understanding and treatment of these complex syndromes. By enhancing the understanding of APS and CAPS, this review aims to improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient care, ultimately leading to better health outcomes for those affected by these conditions.

Dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone for multiple organ dysfunction in COVID-19 critically ill patients: a multicenter propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone usually recommended for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to reduce short-term mortality. However, it is uncertain if another corticosteroid, such as methylprednisolone, may be utilized to obtain better clinical outcome. This study assessed dexamethasone's clinical and safety outcomes compared to methylprednisolone.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 01, 2020, and July 31, 2021. It included adult COVID-19 patients who were initiated on either dexamethasone or methylprednisolone therapy within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was the progression of multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) on day three of ICU admission. Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:3 ratio) based on the patient's age and MODS within 24 h of ICU admission.

RESULTS

After Propensity Score (PS) matching, 264 patients were included; 198 received dexamethasone, while 66 patients received methylprednisolone within 24 h of ICU admission. In regression analysis, patients who received methylprednisolone had a higher MODS on day three of ICU admission than those who received dexamethasone (beta coefficient: 0.17 (95% CI 0.02, 0.32), P = 0.03). Moreover, hospital-acquired infection was higher in the methylprednisolone group (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.01, 4.66; p = 0.04). On the other hand, the 30-day and the in-hospital mortality were not statistically significant different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone showed a lower MODS on day three of ICU admission compared to methylprednisolone, with no statistically significant difference in mortality.

Approaches Towards Better Immunosuppressive Agents

Several classes of compounds are applied in clinics due to their immunosuppressive properties in transplantology and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Derivatives of mycophenolic acid, corticosteroids and chemotherapeutics bearing heterocyclic moieties like methotrexate, azathioprine, mizoribine, and ruxolitinib are active substances with investigated mechanisms of action. However, improved synthetic approaches of known drugs and novel derivatives are still being reported to attempt better accessibility and therapeutic properties. In this review article, we present the synthesis of the designed chemical structures based on recent literature reports concerning novel compounds as promising immunosuppressive drugs. Moreover, some of the discussed derivers revealed also other types of activities with prospective medicinal potential.

Statistical modeling and optimization of dexamethasone adsorption from aqueous solution by Fe3O4@NH2-MIL88B nanorods: Isotherm, Kinetics, and Thermodynamic

The presence of pharmaceutical compounds in the environment poses a significant threat to human and aquatic animal health. Dexamethasone (DEX), a synthetic steroid hormone with endocrine-disrupting effects, is one such compound that needs to be effectively removed before discharging into the environment. This research presents a novel approach utilizing magnetically recyclable Fe3O4@NH2-MIL88B NRs as an efficient adsorbent for the treatment of DEX from aqueous solutions. The synthesized adsorbent was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Response surface methodology based on central composite design (RSM-CCD) was employed to optimize DEX removal efficiency by determining the optimal conditions, including pH, adsorbent dose, time, and DEX concentration. Under the optimized conditions (pH: 5.53, adsorbent dose: 0.185 g/L, time: 16.068 min, and DEX concentration: 33.491 mg/L), Fe3O4@NH2-MIL88B NRs revealed remarkable DEX adsorption efficiency of 91 ± 1.34% and adsorption capacity of 180.01 mg/g. The Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic model were found to fit well with the experimental data, indicating a monolayer and chemical adsorption process. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic. The study also investigated the inhibitory effect of background ions on DEX removal by Fe3O4@NH2-MIL88B NRs. Magnesium exhibited superior competitive ability with dexamethasone to occupy the active sites of the adsorbent compared to other background ions. The reuse of the adsorbent over ten consecutive cycles resulted in a 39.46% decrease in removal efficiency. The Fe3O4@NH2-MIL88B NRs are surrounded by abundant amounts of functional groups and π-electrons bands that can play a key role in the adsorption and separation of DEX from aqueous environments. The promising results obtained under real conditions highlight the potential of Fe3O4@NH2-MIL88B NRs as a practical and efficient adsorbent for the removal of DEX and other similar corticosteroids from aqueous solutions.

What we learned from steroid therapy in the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a pandemic named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that has become the greatest worldwide public health threat. Although different treatment recommendations are offered for COVID-19 infection, steroid treatment remains important.

Aim

We aimed to demonstrate the effect of pulse steroid therapy (PST) on inflammatory markers and patient outcomes in moderate/severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the patients 18 years and older hospitalized in our hospital's COVID-19 clinics between April 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020, and July 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021. Patients in the moderate/severe COVID-19 pneumonia category, according to the World Health Organization COVID-19 guidelines, were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of the patients, treatments, inflammatory markers, and patient outcomes (need for intensive care, length of hospital stay, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) requirement, mechanical ventilation (MV), and mortality rates) were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Patients who received PST had more advanced age (P < 0.01), more comorbidities (P < 0.001), and more HFNO need (P < 001) compared with the patients who did not receive PST. There was no statistically significant difference between clinical outcomes: the need for intensive care, length of hospital stay, need for MV, and mortality rates (P = 0.54, P = 0.3, P = 0.14, and P = 0.09, respectively). When we evaluated the unvaccinated patients, there was a statistically significant difference in the MV need and mortality rates between those who received PST and those who did not (P = 0.017, P = 0.014, respectively).

Conclusion

It was observed that PST provided similar mortality, ICU, and MV requirements in patients with older age and comorbidities. Lower MV requirements and mortality were observed in the unvaccinated group receiving PST compared with the unvaccinated group not receiving steroids. PST is still promising in COVID-19 infection, and more studies are needed for standard doses and applications.

Evaluation of the use of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in asthma critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown mortality benefits with corticosteroids in Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). However, there is inconsistency regarding the use of methylprednisolone over dexamethasone in COVID-19, and this has not been extensively evaluated in patients with a history of asthma. This study aims to investigate and compare the effectiveness and safety of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in critically ill patients with asthma and COVID-19.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the in-hospital mortality. Other endpoints include 30-day mortality, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), acute kidney injury (AKI), acute liver injury, length of stay (LOS), ventilator-free days (VFDs), and hospital-acquired infections. Propensity score (PS) matching, and regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

A total of one hundred-five patients were included. Thirty patients received methylprednisolone, whereas seventy-five patients received dexamethasone. After PS matching (1:1 ratio), patients who received methylprednisolone had higher but insignificant in-hospital mortality in both crude and logistic regression analysis, [(35.0% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.22) and (OR 2.31; CI: 0.56 - 9.59; P = 0.25), respectively]. There were no statistically significant differences in the 30-day mortality, respiratory failure requiring MV, AKI, acute liver injury, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, and hospital-acquired infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Methylprednisolone in COVID-19 patients with asthma may lead to increased in-hospital mortality and shorter VFDs compared to dexamethasone; however, it failed to reach statistical significance. Therefore, it is necessary to interpret these data cautiously, and further large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to establish more conclusive evidence and support these conclusions.

Outcomes of corticosteroid treatment in critical Ill adult patients with respiratory viruses-related community acquired pneumonia - a propensity-matched case control study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of corticosteroid treatment in critically ill patients with respiratory virus-related community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and had a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed diagnosis of respiratory virus-related CAP were included. Patients with and without corticosteroid treatment during the hospital course were retrospectively compared using a propensity score-matched case-control analysis.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to December 2020, 194 adult patients were enrolled with 1:1 matching. The 14-day and 28-day mortality rates did not differ significantly between patients treated with and without corticosteroids (14-day mortality: 7% versus 14%, P = 0.11; 28-day mortality: 15% versus 20%, P = 0.35). However, multivariate analysis by using a Cox regression model revealed that corticosteroid treatment was an independent factor predicting decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.97, P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis revealed lower 14-day and 28-day mortality rates in patients younger than 70 years treated with corticosteroids than in those not treated with corticosteroids (14-day mortality: 6% versus 23%; P = 0.01 and 28-day mortality: 12% versus 27%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-elderly patients with severe respiratory virus-related CAP are more likely to benefit from corticosteroid treatment than elderly patients.

Effects of Dexamethasone on Postoperative Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Concerns regarding the effects of dexamethasone on diabetics' glucose control have stymied its use following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two intravenous (IV) perioperative doses of dexamethasone on glucose levels, pain scores, and inpatient opioid consumption following TJA in diabetic patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 523 diabetic patients who underwent primary elective THA and 953 diabetic patients who underwent primary elective TKA between May 6, 2020 and December 17, 2021. Patients who received one dose (1D) of perioperative dexamethasone 10 mg IV were compared to patients who received two doses (2D). Primary outcomes included postoperative glucose levels, opioid consumption as morphine milligram equivalences (MMEs), postoperative pain as Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pain scores, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The 2D TKA cohort had significantly greater average and maximum blood glucose levels from 24 to 60 hours compared to the 1D TKA cohort. The 2D THA cohort had significantly greater average blood glucose levels at 24 to 36 hours compared to the 1D THA cohort. However, the 2D TKA group had significantly reduced opioid consumption from 24 to 72 hours and reduced total consumption compared to the 1D TKA group. VRS pain scores did not differ between cohorts for both TKA and THA at any interval.

CONCLUSION

Administration of a second perioperative dose of dexamethasone was associated with increased postoperative blood glucose levels. However, the observed effect on glucose control may not outweigh the clinical benefits of a second perioperative dose of glucocorticoids.

Elevation of truncated (48 kDa) form of unconventional myosin 1C in blood serum correlates with severe Covid-19

In Covid-19 and autoimmune patients, there are several similarities revealed in the immune responses (Liu et al., 2021; Woodruff et al., 2020). Earlier, we firstly detected a truncated (48 kDa) form of the unconventional Myosin 1C (48/Myo1C) in a fraction of proteins soluble in 10% 2,2,2-trichloroacetic acid (TCA). These proteins were obtained from blood serum of patients with autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis (Kit et al., 2018). Here, we demonstrated that content of 48/Myo1C was also elevated in blood serum of the severe Covid-19 patients. Whereas in blood of 28 clinically healthy human individuals regularly tested for Covid-19 infection, the amount of this protein was undetectable or very low, in blood of 16 of 28 patients hospitalized with severe course of this disease, its amount was significantly increased. Dexamethasone, steroid hormone which is widely used for treatment of severe Covid-19 patients, induced time-dependent elevation of the 48/Myo1C in blood of such patients. The 48/Myo1C dose-dependently suppressed the viability of anti-CD3-activated lymphocytes of human peripheral blood. Recently, we used affinity chromatography on the magnetic poly(glycidyl-methacrylate) (mag-PGMA-NH2) microparticles functionalized with Myo1C and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with molecular modeling in silico in order to identify potential molecular partners of the 48/Myo1C. It was found that 48/Myo1C might bind to component 3 of the complement system and the anti-thrombin-III (Starykovych et al., 2021). Thus, the mechanisms of the pathogenic action of truncated form of Myo1C in severe COVID-19 patients may involve a suppression of the immune cells, as well as modulation of complement and coagulation cascades.

Increased Circulating CD62E+ Endothelial Extracellular Vesicles Predict Severity and in- Hospital Mortality of COVID-19 Patients

COVID-19 and infectious diseases have been included in strategic development goals (SDG) of United Nations (UN). Severe form of COVID-19 has been described as an endothelial disease. In order to better evaluate Covid-19 endotheliopathy, we characterized several subsets of circulating endothelial extracellular vesicles (EVs) at hospital admission among a cohort of 60 patients whose severity of COVID-19 was classified at the time of inclusion. Degree of COVID-19 severity was determined upon inclusion and categorized as moderate to severe in 40 patients and critical in 20 patients. We measured citrated plasma EVs expressing endothelial membrane markers. Endothelial EVs were defined as harboring VE-cadherin (CD144+), PECAM-1 (CD31 + CD41-) or E-selectin (CD62E+). An increase in CD62E + EV levels on admission to the hospital was significantly associated with critical disease. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CD62E + EV level showed that level ≥ 88,053 EVs/μL at admission was a significant predictor of in hospital mortality (p = 0.004). Moreover, CD62E + EV level ≥ 88,053 EV/μL was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR 6.98, 95% CI 2.1-26.4, p = 0.002) in a univariate logistic regression model, while after adjustment to BMI CD62E + EV level ≥ 88,053 EV/μL was always significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.4-20.0, p = 0.01). The present findings highlight the potential interest of detecting EVs expressing E-selectin (CD62) to discriminate Covid-19 patients at the time of hospital admission and identify individuals with higher risk of fatal outcome.

Repurposing of Chemotherapeutics to Combat COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel strain of SARS coronavirus. The COVID-19 disease caused by this virus was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). SARS-CoV-2 mainly spreads through droplets sprayed by coughs or sneezes of the infected to a healthy person within the vicinity of 6 feet. It also spreads through asymptomatic carriers and has negative impact on the global economy, security and lives of people since 2019. Numerous lives have been lost to this viral infection; hence there is an emergency to build up a potent measure to combat SARS-CoV-2. In view of the non-availability of any drugs or vaccines at the time of its eruption, the existing antivirals, antibacterials, antimalarials, mucolytic agents and antipyretic paracetamol were used to treat the COVID-19 patients. Still there are no specific small molecule chemotherapeutics available to combat COVID-19 except for a few vaccines approved for emergency use only. Thus, the repurposing of chemotherapeutics with the potential to treat COVID-19 infected people is being used. The antiviral activity for COVID-19 and biochemical mechanisms of the repurposed drugs are being explored by the biological assay screening and structure-based in silico docking simulations. The present study describes the various US-FDA approved chemotherapeutics repositioned to combat COVID-19 along with their screening for biological activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.

Clinical effect of early administration of tocilizumab following the initiation of corticosteroid therapy for patients with COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) first broke out in Wuhan in December 2019, and has since caused a global pandemic. The efficacy of several drugs has been evaluated, and it is now evident that tocilizumab has a beneficial effect, especially combined with corticosteroids, in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the optimal timing of tocilizumab administration has not yet been established. The goal of the present study was to determine the optimal timing of tocilizumab administration after starting corticosteroid therapy in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19 and treated with tocilizumab and corticosteroids in our hospital. The patients were divided into concurrent and sequential groups. The concurrent group received tocilizumab ≤24 h after corticosteroids, and the sequential group received tocilizumab >24 h after corticosteroid administration.

RESULTS

The baseline clinical characteristics of tocilizumab administration were similar between the two groups. White blood cell counts were significantly lower and C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the concurrent group than the sequential group. In the concurrent group, tocilizumab administration led to a significant decrease in maximum body temperature. In addition, there were significantly more oxygen-free days in the concurrent group than in the sequential group. However, survival rate was not significantly different between the concurrent and the sequential groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the combination therapy with tocilizumab and corticosteroids, early administration of tocilizumab after starting corticosteroid treatment is effective when treating COVID-19.

Identification of genomic determinants contributing to cytokine release in immunotherapies and human diseases

BACKGROUND

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a strong immune system response that can occur as a result of the reaction of a cellular immunotherapy with malignant cells. While the frequency and management of CRS in CAR T-cell therapy has been well documented, there is emerging interest in pre-emptive treatment to reduce CRS severity and improve overall outcomes. Accordingly, identification of genomic determinants that contribute to cytokine release may lead to the development of targeted therapies to prevent or abrogate the severity of CRS.

METHODS

Forty three clinical CD22 CAR T-cell products were collected for RNA extraction. 100 ng of mRNA was used for Nanostring assay analysis which is based on the nCounter platform. Several public datasets were used for validation purposes.

RESULTS

We found the expression of the PFKFB4 gene and glycolytic pathway activity were upregulated in CD22 CAR T-cells given to patients who developed CRS compared to those who did not experience CRS. Moreover, these results were further validated in cohorts with COVID-19, influenza infections and autoimmune diseases, and in tumor tissues. The findings were similar, except that glycolytic pathway activity was not increased in patients with influenza infections and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

CONCLUSION

Our data strongly suggests that PFKFB4 acts as a driving factor in mediating cytokine release in vivo by regulating glycolytic activity. Our results suggest that it would beneficial to develop drugs targeting PFKFB4 and the glycolytic pathway for the treatment of CRS.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Treated with Standard Dose of Dexamethasone or High Dose of Methylprednisolone

The hyperinflammatory phase represents the main cause for the clinical worsening of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to the hypothesis that steroid therapy could be a mainstream treatment in COVID-19 patients. This is an observational study including all consecutive patients admitted to two Italian University Hospitals for COVID-19 from March 2020 to December 2021. The aim of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and outcome parameters of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone 6 mg once daily (standard-dose group) or methylprednisolone 40 mg twice daily (high-dose group). The primary outcome was the impact of these different steroid treatments on 30-day mortality. During the study period, 990 patients were evaluated: 695 (70.2%) receiving standard dosage of dexamethasone and 295 (29.8%) receiving a high dose of methylprednisolone. Cox regression analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.98, CI95% 1.34−9.81, p = 0.002), chronic kidney disease (HR 5.21, CI95% 1.48−22.23, p = 0.001), oncologic disease (HR 2.81, CI95% 1.45−19.8, p = 0.005) and high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation oxygen therapy (HR 61.1, CI95% 5.12−511.1, p < 0.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality; conversely, high-dose steroid therapy was associated with survival (HR 0.42, CI95% 0.38−0.86, p = 0.002) at 30 days. Kaplan−Meier curves for 30-day survival displayed a statistically significant better survival rate in patients treated with high-dose steroid therapy (p = 0.018). The results of this study highlighted that the use of high-dose methylprednisolone, compared to dexamethasone 6 mg once daily, in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 may be associated with a significant reduction in mortality.

Effects of Drugs Formerly Proposed for COVID-19 Treatment on Connexin43 Hemichannels

Connexin43 (Cx43) hemichannels form a pathway for cellular communication between the cell and its extracellular environment. Under pathological conditions, Cx43 hemichannels release adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which triggers inflammation. Over the past two years, azithromycin, chloroquine, dexamethasone, favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir, remdesivir, ribavirin, and ritonavir have been proposed as drugs for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is associated with prominent systemic inflammation. The current study aimed to investigate if Cx43 hemichannels, being key players in inflammation, could be affected by these drugs which were formerly designated as COVID-19 drugs. For this purpose, Cx43-transduced cells were exposed to these drugs. The effects on Cx43 hemichannel activity were assessed by measuring extracellular ATP release, while the effects at the transcriptional and translational levels were monitored by means of real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis and immunoblot analysis, respectively. Exposure to lopinavir and ritonavir combined (4:1 ratio), as well as to remdesivir, reduced Cx43 mRNA levels. None of the tested drugs affected Cx43 protein expression.

A Comprehensive Review on the Therapeutic Potential of Curcuma longa Linn. in Relation to its Major Active Constituent Curcumin

Curcuma longa Linn. (C. longa), popularly known as turmeric, belongs to the Zingiberaceae family and has a long historical background of having healing properties against many diseases. In Unani and Ayurveda medicine, C. longa has been used for liver obstruction and jaundice, and has been applied externally for ulcers and inflammation. Additionally, it is employed in several other ailments such as cough, cold, dental issues, indigestion, skin infections, blood purification, asthma, piles, bronchitis, tumor, wounds, and hepatic disorders, and is used as an antiseptic. Curcumin, a major constituent of C. longa, is well known for its therapeutic potential in numerous disorders. However, there is a lack of literature on the therapeutic potential of C. longa in contrast to curcumin. Hence, the present review aimed to provide in-depth information by highlighting knowledge gaps in traditional and scientific evidence about C. longa in relation to curcumin. The relationship to one another in terms of biological action includes their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anticancer, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, immunomodulatory, antifertility, antimicrobial, antiallergic, antidermatophytic, and antidepressant properties. Furthermore, in-depth discussion of C. longa on its taxonomic categorization, traditional uses, botanical description, phytochemical ingredients, pharmacology, toxicity, and safety aspects in relation to its major compound curcumin is needed to explore the trends and perspectives for future research. Considering all of the promising evidence to date, there is still a lack of supportive evidence especially from clinical trials on the adjunct use of C. longa and curcumin. This prompts further preclinical and clinical investigations on curcumin.