1
|
Ormseth BH, ElHawary H, Huayllani MT, Weber KD, Blake P, Janis JE. Comparing Migraine Headache Index versus Monthly Migraine Days after Headache Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:1201e-1211e. [PMID: 37285213 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nerve deactivation surgery for the treatment of migraine has evolved rapidly over the past 2 decades. Studies typically report changes in migraine frequency (attacks/month), attack duration, attack intensity, and their composite score-the Migraine Headache Index-as primary outcomes. However, the neurology literature predominantly reports migraine prophylaxis outcomes as change in monthly migraine days (MMD). The goal of this study was to foster common communication between plastic surgeons and neurologists by assessing the effect of nerve deactivation surgery on MMD and motivating future studies to include MMD in their reported outcomes. METHODS An updated literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant articles. Data were extracted and analyzed from studies that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS A total of 19 studies were included. There was a significant overall reduction in MMDs [mean difference (MD), 14.11; 95% CI, 10.95 to 17.27; I 2 = 92%], total migraine attacks per month (MD, 8.65; 95% CI, 7.84 to 9.46; I 2 = 90%), Migraine Headache Index (MD, 76.59; 95% CI, 60.85 to 92.32; I 2 = 98%), migraine attack intensity (MD, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.35 to 4.33; I 2 = 98%), and migraine attack duration (MD, 11.80; 95% CI, 6.44 to 17.16; I 2 = 99%) at follow-up (range, 6 to 38 months). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the efficacy of nerve deactivation surgery on the outcomes used in both the plastic and reconstructive surgery and neurology literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hassan ElHawary
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center
| | | | - Kevin D Weber
- Neurology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raposio G, Antonini A, Gualdi A, Raposio E. Frontal site surgery for chronic migraine therapy. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2023; 94:e2023253. [PMID: 38054685 PMCID: PMC10734223 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i6.14777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the most current theories, chronic inflammation of some cranial nerves give rise to an inflammatory chain that would result in migraines. As for frontally located attacks, the nerves involved are two (on each side): the supraorbital and the supratrochlear. Surgical treatment includes complete neurolysis of both of these nerves. METHODS In this work, we describe our experience with this type of surgery. From 2011 to 2022, we treated 98 cases suffering from chronic migraine not responsive to drugs with frontal localization. The results were evaluated through a specific questionnaire three months and one year after surgery. RESULTS After three months post-surgery, we observed a success rate (reduction of monthly attacks equivalent to or greater than 50%) in 87% of patients (32% complete recovery). These results were essentially confirmed one year after surgery. The rare complications (mainly paresthesias and dysesthesias of the frontal area) have always resolved spontaneously within a few months. CONCLUSION The surgical approach allowed to obtain good therapeutic results with a low rate of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Raposio
- Plastic Surgery Chair, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Italy.
| | - Andrea Antonini
- Plastic Surgery Chair, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Italy.
| | | | - Edoardo Raposio
- Genova - Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica - Terapia Cura Emicrania Cefalea..
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Macionis V. Neurovascular Compression-Induced Intracranial Allodynia May Be the True Nature of Migraine Headache: an Interpretative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:775-791. [PMID: 37837483 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01174-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Surgical deactivation of migraine trigger sites by extracranial neurovascular decompression has produced encouraging results and challenged previous understanding of primary headaches. However, there is a lack of in-depth discussions on the pathophysiological basis of migraine surgery. This narrative review provides interpretation of relevant literature from the perspective of compressive neuropathic etiology, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of migraine. RECENT FINDINGS Vasodilation, which can be asymptomatic in healthy subjects, may produce compression of cranial nerves in migraineurs at both extracranial and intracranial entrapment-prone sites. This may be predetermined by inherited and acquired anatomical factors and may include double crush-type lesions. Neurovascular compression can lead to sensitization of the trigeminal pathways and resultant cephalic hypersensitivity. While descending (central) trigeminal activation is possible, symptomatic intracranial sensitization can probably only occur in subjects who develop neurovascular entrapment of cranial nerves, which can explain why migraine does not invariably afflict everyone. Nerve compression-induced focal neuroinflammation and sensitization of any cranial nerve may neurogenically spread to other cranial nerves, which can explain the clinical complexity of migraine. Trigger dose-dependent alternating intensity of sensitization and its synchrony with cyclic central neural activities, including asymmetric nasal vasomotor oscillations, may explain the laterality and phasic nature of migraine pain. Intracranial allodynia, i.e., pain sensation upon non-painful stimulation, may better explain migraine pain than merely nociceptive mechanisms, because migraine cannot be associated with considerable intracranial structural changes and consequent painful stimuli. Understanding migraine as an intracranial allodynia could stimulate research aimed at elucidating the possible neuropathic compressive etiology of migraine and other primary headaches.
Collapse
|
4
|
Evans AG, Hill DS, Grush AE, Downer MA, Ibrahim MM, Assi PE, Joseph JT, Kassis SH. Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Migraines: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2023; 31:192-205. [PMID: 37188139 PMCID: PMC10170648 DOI: 10.1177/22925503211036701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Migraine surgery at 1 of 6 identified "trigger sites" of a target cranial sensory nerve has rapidly grown in popularity since 2000. This study summarizes the effect of migraine surgery on headache severity, headache frequency, and the migraine headache index score which is derived by multiplying migraine severity, frequency, and duration. Materials and Methods: This is a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of 5 databases searched from inception through May 2020 and is registered under the PROSPERO ID: CRD42020197085. Clinical trials treating headaches with surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed in randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes using a random effects model to determine the pooled mean change from baseline and when possible, to compare treatment to control. Results: 18 studies met criteria including 6 randomized controlled trials, 1 controlled clinical trial, and 11 uncontrolled clinical trials treated 1143 patients with pathologies including migraine, occipital migraine, frontal migraine, occipital nerve triggered headache, frontal headache, occipital neuralgia, and cervicogenic headache. Migraine surgery reduced headache frequency at 1 year postoperative by 13.0 days per month as compared to baseline (I2 = 0%), reduced headache severity at 8 weeks to 5 years postoperative by 4.16 points on a 0 to 10 scale as compared to baseline (I2 = 53%), and reduced migraine headache index at 1 to 5 years postoperative by 83.1 points as compared to baseline (I2 = 2%). These meta-analyses are limited by a small number of studies that could be analyzed, including studies with high risk of bias. Conclusion: Migraine surgery provided a clinically and statistically significant reduction in headache frequency, severity, and migraine headache index scores. Additional studies, including randomized controlled trials with low risk-of-bias should be performed to improve the precision of the outcome improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam G. Evans
- School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dorian S. Hill
- School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andrew E. Grush
- School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Successful Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) with Surgical Cauterization of Temporalis Muscle Trigger Points: A Case Report. Dent J (Basel) 2022; 11:dj11010003. [PMID: 36661540 PMCID: PMC9857744 DOI: 10.3390/dj11010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients suffering from myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) affecting muscles of mastication, traditional trigger point therapy treatment regimens can prove inconvenient, due to the short duration of pain relief after each injection and expense of repeated visits which are often not covered by insurance. We present a case of a patient treated using an alternative technique that could develop into an additional modality for treating MPS patients who are refractory to conservative treatment. This technique involves identifying and marking the patient's trigger points and surgically cauterizing each location using a Bovie electrosurgical unit. While traditional trigger point injection therapy for myofascial pain syndrome is a well-described technique with acceptable pain relief expected for a period of 8-12 weeks, this technique provided up to 24 months of adequate pain relief in a patient. While further studies are indicated before widespread adoption can be recommended, this patient's response suggests that this technique may be useful in offering longer-term pain relief compared with trigger point injection therapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Evans AG, Assi PE, Al Kassis S. A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Headache. JAMA 2021; 326:977. [PMID: 34519805 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.11376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam G Evans
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Patrick E Assi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Salam Al Kassis
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Demarquay G, Mawet J, Guégan-Massardier E, de Gaalon S, Donnet A, Giraud P, Lantéri-Minet M, Lucas C, Moisset X, Roos C, Valade D, Ducros A. Revised guidelines of the French headache society for the diagnosis and management of migraine in adults. Part 3: Non-pharmacological treatment. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2021; 177:753-759. [PMID: 34340809 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The French Headache Society proposes updated French guidelines for the management of migraine. This article presents the third part of the guidelines, which is focused on the non-pharmacological treatment of migraine, including physical exercise, dietary supplements and plants, diets, neuromodulation therapies, acupuncture, behavioral interventions and mindfulness therapy, patent foramen ovale closure and surgical nerve decompression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Demarquay
- Inserm U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Neurological hospital, Lyon, France.
| | - J Mawet
- Department of Neurology, Emergency Headache Center (Centre d'urgences céphalées), Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - S de Gaalon
- Department of Neurology, Laënnec Hospital, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - A Donnet
- FHU INOVPAIN, centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, hôpital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - P Giraud
- Department of Neurology, Annecy-Genevois Hospital, Annecy, France
| | - M Lantéri-Minet
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU de Nice, Côte Azur Université, Nice, France
| | - C Lucas
- Service de neurochirurgie, centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, CHRU de Lille, hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
| | - X Moisset
- Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - C Roos
- Department of Neurology, Emergency Headache Center (Centre d'urgences céphalées), Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - D Valade
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Pitié-Sapêtrière, Paris, France
| | - A Ducros
- Department of Neurology, Gui-de-Chauliac Hospital, CHU de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bajaj J, Doddamani R, Chandra SP, Ratre S, Parihar V, Yadav Y, Sharma D. Comparison of Peripheral Neurectomy vs. Medical Treatment for Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurol India 2021; 69:S110-S115. [PMID: 34003156 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.315973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Migraine is a common form of primary neurologic headache. Many patients are chronic migraineurs and suffer from a significant disability and adverse effects of drugs. There are various surgical options available to treat migraines, including peripheral neurectomies. Objective To study the surgical and functional outcomes of migraine surgeries using peripheral neurectomies and compare them with conservatively treated patients. Materials and Methods Migraine patients who had a unilateral onset pain were given local bupivacaine block at the suspected trigger site, and those who were relieved were given the option for surgery. In the operative group, the peripheral nerve of the trigger site was lysed under local anesthesia. The conservative group was continued with the standard treatment. Evaluations with a baseline and 6 months visual analog score (VAS), migraine headache index (MHI), migraine disability assessment test (MIDAS), and pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) scores were done. Results A total of 26 patients got benefitted with the local bupivacaine block, out of which 13 underwent surgery. At baseline, the VAS, MHI, MIDAS, and PSEQ scores were similar in both the groups. The operative group had significant (P < 0.001) improvement in all these parameters 6 months after the surgery. All patients of the operative group got free from prophylactic migraine treatment; however, 11 out of 13 patients still needed occasional use of analgesics. There was one complication of transient temporal numbness. Conclusion Migraine surgery using peripheral neurectomies was more effective than chronic drug treatment in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jitin Bajaj
- Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Ramesh Doddamani
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sarat P Chandra
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shailendra Ratre
- Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Vijay Parihar
- Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Yadram Yadav
- Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Dhananjaya Sharma
- Department of Surgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Site V Surgery for Temporal Migraine Headaches. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e2886. [PMID: 32766051 PMCID: PMC7339250 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background: Auriculotemporal nerve is demonstrated to contribute to migraine pain in temporal area. In particular, its relationship with the superficial temporal artery in the soft tissues superficial to the temporal parietal fascia has attracted researchers’ attention for many decades. The objective of this review was to explore whether site V nerve surgical decompression is effective for pain relief in temporal area. Methods: A literature search, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, was conducted to evaluate the surgical treatment of auriculotemporal migraine. Inclusion was based on studies written in English, published between 2000 and February 2020, containing a diagnosis of migraine in compliance with the classification of the International Headache Society. The treatment must consist of surgical procedures involving the auriculotemporal nerve and/or arteries in site V, with outcome data available for at least 3 months. Results: Three hundred twenty-four records were identified after duplicates were removed, 31 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 2 records were selected for inclusion. A total of 77 patients were included in the review. A direct approach at the anatomical site identified with careful physical examination and confirmed with a handheld Doppler probe is generally performed under local anesthesia. Blunt dissection to the superficial temporal fascia to expose the auriculotemporal nerve and the superficial temporal artery is followed by artery cauterization/ligament and eventual nerve transection/avulsion. Site V surgery results in a success rate from 79% to 97%. Conclusions: Despite the recent advances in extracranial trigger site surgery and a success rate (>50% improvement) from 79% to 97%, site V decompression is still poorly described. Elaborate randomized trials are needed with accurate reporting of patient selection, surgical procedure, adverse events, recurrencies or appearance of new trigger points, quality of life outcome, and longer follow-up times.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sokolov AY, Lyubashina OA, Vaganova YS, Amelin AV. [Peripheral neurostimulation in headache treatment]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2019; 119:79-88. [PMID: 31793548 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro201911910179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
According to rough estimates, at least one third of the population in developed countries suffers, to varying degrees, from certain forms of primary headache, the modern pharmacotherapy of which is not always effective and has a number of limitations. The non-pharmacological treatment of headache can be an alternative to the prescription of pharmacological agents and the only possible assistance option for patients developing drug-resistant cephalalgias. This review describes various methods of electrical neuromodulation that are used for the management of primary headaches. The authors provide information on current stages in implementation of implantable and non-invasive equipment into clinical practice, which makes possible electrical stimulations of peripheral nerves and of the sphenopalatine ganglion, as well as allows transcranial magnetic stimulation. Also the appearance and usage of portable electrical devices available on the world market are described, and mechanisms that can underlie anticephalgic action of neuromodulation therapy are discussed. Special attention is paid to the methods that are applied for electrostimulation of the vagus nerve and occipital nerves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Yu Sokolov
- Valdman Institute of Pharmacology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia; Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - O A Lyubashina
- Valdman Institute of Pharmacology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia; Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Yu S Vaganova
- Valdman Institute of Pharmacology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A V Amelin
- Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elisevich L, Singer J, Walsh M. Recurrent activity-induced headache associated with posttraumatic dural adhesion of the middle meningeal artery: A case report. Cephalalgia 2019; 40:317-320. [PMID: 31635479 DOI: 10.1177/0333102419881682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The middle meningeal artery is surrounded by a plexus of afferent fibers shown to be involved in the progression of some forms of headache, especially migraine. Posttraumatic headache disorders sharing characteristics with migraine and involving the middle meningeal artery are not readily available in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION This report describes a posttraumatic headache disorder in a middle-aged woman in which the causative factor proved to be a pathology of the left middle meningeal artery that resulted from trauma. Her pain could be triggered by moderate accelerative changes, occurring in the left frontotemporal region, and shared characteristics with migraine. Resection of a portion of the left middle meningeal artery has completely eliminated her pain syndrome. CONCLUSION This case further elucidates associations between the middle meningeal artery and headache. The presentation of posttraumatic headache sharing characteristics with migraine should suggest the possibility of a middle meningeal artery abnormality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Elisevich
- Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA
| | - Justin Singer
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Division of Neurosurgery), Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Meggen Walsh
- Department of Pathology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|