1
|
Chen L, Wu Y, Yao J, Wu Q, Zhang G, Xu S, Yang P, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Li Z, Xing P, Shen H, Shi H, Liu J, Xu C, Wu P. Effect of Intravenous Alteplase Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Outcome After Unsuccessful Recanalization in the DIRECT-MT Trial. World Neurosurg 2025; 194:123569. [PMID: 39694138 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/08/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are still some patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke experienced unsuccessful recanalization after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). The efficacy of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy for such patients is unknown. We performed this study to investigate whether prior intravenous alteplase could affect the outcome of patients with unsuccessful recanalization. METHODS This is a post-hoc analysis of the DIRECT-MT trial (direct intraarterial thrombectomy in order to revascularize acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals: a multicenter randomized clinical trial). Patients with final extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of 0-2a were included. Patients with successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia 2b-3) or could not be assessed for modified treatment in cerebral ischemia were excluded. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, while secondary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2), recanalization (modified arterial occlusive lesion) rates at 24-72 hours by computed tomography angiography, infarction volume on computed tomography, and rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS Among 656 randomized patients, 92 patients with unsuccessful recanalization were included, of which 55 patients underwent EVT alone (EVT group) and 37 patients underwent EVT preceded by intravenous alteplase (combination group). No statistically significant difference in the 90-day mRS score was observed between the 2 groups (adjusted common odds ratio = 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 3.59). The volume of infarction, the proportion of 90-day functional independence, recanalization rates at 24-72 hours, rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and rates of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that prior intravenous alteplase could affect the clinical or imaging outcome in patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke and unsuccessful recanalization after EVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lining Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yina Wu
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinbiao Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qiaowei Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Guang Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Shancai Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Pengfei Yang
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongwei Zhang
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zifu Li
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Pengfei Xing
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongjian Shen
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Huaizhang Shi
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jianmin Liu
- Neurovascular Center, Naval Medical University Changhai hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenghua Xu
- Department of Neurology, Taizhou First People's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Pei Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siow I, Tan BYQ, Lee KS, Yap DWT, Sia CH, Gopinathan A, Yang C, Bhogal P, Lam E, Spooner O, Meyer L, Fiehler J, Papanagiotou P, Kastrup A, Alexandrou M, Kutschke S, Wu Q, Mpotsaris A, Maus V, Anderson T, Gontu V, Arnberg F, Lee TH, Chan BPL, Seet RC, Teoh HL, Sharma VK, Yeo LLL. Impact of number of passes and futile reperfusion in basilar artery occlusion acute ischaemic stroke. Singapore Med J 2025:00077293-990000000-00171. [PMID: 39754294 DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. A vital modifiable factor is successful reperfusion. While multiple passes improve the rates of successful reperfusion, previous studies have reported progressively diminishing returns. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between number of passes and outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO). METHODS This multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients who were treated with MT for acute BAO from eight comprehensive stroke centres between 2015 and 2020. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome (FFO) defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 measured at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage and mortality. Patients were stratified according to reperfusion status and the number of passes for further analysis. RESULTS The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for FFO 90 days for each additional pass of a thrombectomy device was 0.56 (P = 0.003). When ≤3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion led to higher rates of FFOs. However, when >3 passes of the thrombectomy device were made, achieving reperfusion no longer led to higher rates of FFOs (FFO = 0% in patients who did not achieve reperfusion vs. FFO = 14.5 in patients who achieved reperfusion; P = 0.200). Notably, increasing number of passes was associated with a non-significant trend towards higher rate of parenchymal haemorrhage (OR 1.55, P = 0.055). CONCLUSION Acute BAO patients treated with up to three passes of a thrombectomy device derived improved functional outcomes from reperfusion compared to those with more than three passes. Further prospective cohort studies are necessary to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Siow
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Keng Siang Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (loPPN), King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ching-Hui Sia
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Anil Gopinathan
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Cunli Yang
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Pervinder Bhogal
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erika Lam
- Stroke Department, The Royal London Hospital, Barts NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Spooner
- Stroke Department, The Royal London Hospital, Barts NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lukas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Fiehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Papanagiotou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
- First Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Andreas Kastrup
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Maria Alexandrou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Qingyu Wu
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Maus
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Tommy Anderson
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Vamsi Gontu
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fabian Arnberg
- Department of Medical Imaging, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Tsong Hai Lee
- Department of Neurology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bernard Pak Li Chan
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Raymond Cs Seet
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Hock Luen Teoh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Vijay Kumar Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Leonard Leong Litt Yeo
- Department of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mierzwa AT, Al Kasab S, Nelson A, Gutierrez SO, Vivanco-Suarez J, Farooqui M, Jadhav AP, Desai S, Toth G, Alrohimi A, Nguyen TN, Klein P, Abdalkader M, Salahuddin H, Pandey A, Koduri S, Wilseck Z, Vora N, Aladamat N, Gharaibeh K, Afreen E, Zaidi S, Jumaa M. Thrombectomy Outcomes in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease. Neurosurgery 2024; 95:1388-1394. [PMID: 38904392 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) large vessel occlusion (LVO) is responsible for up to 30% of LVO. In this study, we aimed to determine the likelihood of favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) in acute ICAD-LVO basilar occlusion compared with embolic basilar occlusion. METHODS This is an analysis of the Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Evaluation: Analyzing Radiographic and Intraprocedural Predictors for Mechanical Thrombectomy Registry in which patients with acute basilar artery occlusions from 8 comprehensive stroke centers were included from 2015 to 2021. Patients were dichotomized into with (ICAD-LVO) or without underlying ICAD (embolic). Descriptive statistics for each group and multivariate logistic analysis were performed on the primary outcome. RESULTS Three hundred forty-six patients were included. There were 215 patients with embolic (62%) and 131 patients with ICAD-LVO (38%). Baseline demographics were equivalent between the 2 groups except for sex (male 47% vs 67%; P < .001), history of stroke (12% vs 25%; P = .002), and atrial fibrillation (31% vs 17%; P = .003). At 90 days, patients in the ICAD-LVO cohort were less likely to achieve favorable functional outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.72; P = .003) after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. In addition, ICAD-LVO strokes were less likely to achieve thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.57; P < .001). ICAD-LVO lesions were more likely to require stent placement (OR 14.94, 95% CI 4.91-45.49; P < .001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated favorable functional outcomes in patients who underwent stenting and angioplasty compared with failed recanalization cohort (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.68-14.64; P < .004). CONCLUSION Patients with acute basilar ICAD-LVO have higher morbidity and mortality compared with patients with embolic source. Lower rates of successful recanalization in the ICAD-LVO cohort support this finding. Our subgroup analysis demonstrates that stenting should be considered in patients with recanalization failure. Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the ICAD-LVO and embolic cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam T Mierzwa
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurology, Promedica Stroke Network, Toledo , Ohio , USA
| | - Sami Al Kasab
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston , South Carolina , USA
| | - Ashley Nelson
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston , South Carolina , USA
| | | | - Juan Vivanco-Suarez
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City , Iowa , USA
| | - Mudassir Farooqui
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City , Iowa , USA
| | - Ashutosh P Jadhav
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix , Arizona , USA
| | - Shashvat Desai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix , Arizona , USA
| | - Gabor Toth
- Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Anas Alrohimi
- Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland , Ohio , USA
| | - Thanh N Nguyen
- Department of Neurology, Radiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Piers Klein
- Department of Neurology, Radiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Mohamad Abdalkader
- Department of Neurology, Radiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Hisham Salahuddin
- Department of Neurology, Antelope Valley Hospital, Los Angeles , California , USA
| | - Aditya Pandey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Sravanthi Koduri
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Zachary Wilseck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Nirav Vora
- Department of Neurology, Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus , Ohio , USA
| | - Nameer Aladamat
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo , Ohio , USA
| | - Khaled Gharaibeh
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo , Ohio , USA
| | - Ehad Afreen
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurology, Promedica Stroke Network, Toledo , Ohio , USA
| | - Syed Zaidi
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurology, Promedica Stroke Network, Toledo , Ohio , USA
| | - Mouhammad Jumaa
- Department of Neurology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo , Ohio , USA
- Department of Neurology, Promedica Stroke Network, Toledo , Ohio , USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jia B, Zhang L, Pan Y, Tong X, Zhang X, Mo D, Ma N, Luo G, Song L, Li X, Wang B, Nguyen TN, Gao F, Miao Z. Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting after mechanical thrombectomy: who can benefit? J Neurointerv Surg 2024; 16:1360-1367. [PMID: 38050150 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angioplasty and/or stenting is a rescue therapy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. This study was undertaken to determine whether rescue angioplasty and/or stenting improves the outcome after MT and to investigate whether outcomes differ by subgroup of rescue indication. METHODS We performed propensity score matching (PSM) with data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment. Patients were divided into the MT alone group and the MT with rescue therapy group. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. PSM was also performed in the failed MT (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 0-2a) and the residual severe stenosis (mTICI 2b-3) subgroups, respectively. RESULTS 326 patients of mean±SD age 62.7±12.0 years (90 women, 27.6%) were matched from 1274 patients. In the matched cohort, functional independence at 90 days was higher in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (44.2% vs 29.5%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06, P=0.008). In the failed MT subgroup with 66 matched pairs, more patients had functional independence in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (39.0% vs 17.0%; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.59, P=0.01). In the residual stenosis subgroup with 63 matched pairs, functional independence rates were similar in the rescue therapy and the MT alone groups (51.6% vs 55.7%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72, P=0.65). CONCLUSION Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting could improve the clinical outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with failed MT, while no benefit was seen in those with residual severe stenosis but substantial reperfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BaiXue Jia
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Longhui Zhang
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuesong Pan
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Tong
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuelei Zhang
- Stroke Center, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dapeng Mo
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Ma
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Luo
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ligang Song
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqing Li
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Thanh N Nguyen
- Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Feng Gao
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongrong Miao
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun C, Feng H, Wang J, Zhang Y. Innovative wire stripper technique for rescue balloon angioplasty after failed thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: A case report. Asian J Surg 2024:S1015-9584(24)01953-5. [PMID: 39271321 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.08.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chenglin Sun
- Department of Neurology, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, 441000, China
| | - Huanhuan Feng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, 441000, China
| | - Jiaqi Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, 441000, China
| | - Yaqiong Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, 441000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ifergan H, Dargazanli C, Ben Hassen W, Hak JF, Gory B, Ognard J, Premat K, Marnat G, Kerleroux B, Zhu F, Bellanger G, Sporns PB, Charbonnier G, Forestier G, Caroff J, Fauché C, Clarençon F, Janot K, Lapergue B, Boulouis G. Rescue intracranial permanent stenting for refractory occlusion following thrombectomy: a propensity matched analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2024; 16:115-123. [PMID: 37080770 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2022-020012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rescue intracranial stenting (RIS) can be used in refractory large vessel occlusion (LVO) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RIS versus a propensity matched sample of patients with persistent LVO. METHODS We retrospectively analysed a multicenter retrospective pooled cohort of patients with anterior LVO (2015-2021) treated with MT, and identified patients with at least three passes and a modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of 0 to 2a. Propensity score matching was used to account for determinants of outcome in patients with or without RIS. The study outcomes included 3 months modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (HT). RESULTS 420 patients with a refractory anterior occlusion were included, of which 101 were treated with RIS (mean age 69 years). Favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was more frequent in patients with a patent stent at day 1 (53% vs 6%, P<0.001), which was independently associated with an early dual antiplatelet regimen (P<0.05). In the propensity matched sample, patients treated with RIS versus without RIS had similar rates of favorable outcomes (36.8% vs 30.3%, P=0.606). Patients with RIS showed a favorable shift in the overall mRS distributions (common adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.91, P=0.006). Symptomatic HT was marginally more frequent in the RIS group (9% vs 3%, P=0.07), and there was no difference in 3-month mortality. CONCLUSION In selected patients with a refractory intracranial occlusion despite at least three thrombectomy passes, RIS may be associated with an overall shift towards more favorable clinical outcome, and no significant increase in the odds of symptomatic HT or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heloise Ifergan
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, Centre, France
| | - Cyril Dargazanli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Centre Montpellier, Montpellier, Occitanie, France
| | - Wagih Ben Hassen
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Saint Anne Hospital Centre, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Francois Hak
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Timone, University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Benjamin Gory
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, University of Lorraine, INSERM U1254, IADI, F-54000, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Julien Ognard
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University and Regional Hospital Centre Brest, Brest, France
| | - Kevin Premat
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Gaultier Marnat
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Basile Kerleroux
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Saint Anne Hospital Centre, Paris, France
| | - François Zhu
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Bellanger
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Peter B Sporns
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Charbonnier
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besancon, France
| | - Géraud Forestier
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Jildaz Caroff
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Cédric Fauché
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Frédéric Clarençon
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Janot
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, Centre, France
| | - Bertrand Lapergue
- Neurology, Stroke Center, University of Versailles and Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Gregoire Boulouis
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, Centre, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pinto CS, Ferreira F, Margarido I, Neves AL, Nunes JPL. Alkaline phosphatase and mortality in stroke patients: a systematic review. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2023; 11:412. [PMID: 38213797 PMCID: PMC10777210 DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Increased plasma levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) have been associated to a worse prognosis in several types of diseases. In the present review, the authors aimed to study the relationship between plasma levels of ALP and overall mortality in patients with stroke. Methods A systematic review was carried out, searching two databases: Web of Science and Medline/PubMed. Results A total of nine studies that included data on overall mortality in stroke patients were selected. The selected studies were published between 2010 and 2022 and were predominantly from Asia. The articles reviewed quantified ALP levels through different methods: highest versus lowest quintiles of plasma ALP (three reports); highest versus lowest quartiles of plasma ALP (four reports); and plasma ALP levels in deceased versus in surviving patients (two reports). All selected studies showed an increased mortality associated to elevated ALP levels, irrespective of stroke type and length of follow-up, from a mean of 10 days to 2.5 years. The studies comparing the highest to the lowest ALP quintiles showed an aggregate value of 1.8 times greater risk of mortality for the former, when compared to the latter. Whereas, the studies comparing the highest to the lowest ALP quartiles showed an aggregate value of 2.4 times greater risk of mortality for the former, when compared to the latter. Conclusions Elevated ALP levels are associated with increased mortality in stroke patients and provide cost effective prognostic indicators of mortality in stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francisca Ferreira
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center of São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Margarido
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center of São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Lídia Neves
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center of São João, Porto, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Imam YZ, Akhtar N, Kamran S, Garcia-Bermejo P, Al Jerdi S, Zakaria A, Own A, Patro S. Rescue Stent Placement for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion Refractory to Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Multiethnic Middle Eastern/African/Asian Cohort. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34:1740-1748. [PMID: 37302471 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and effectiveness of rescue stent placement in patients who experienced acute stroke in whom mechanical thrombectomy failed. METHODS This was a retrospective review of a multiethnic stroke database. After stent placement, an aggressive antiplatelet protocol was followed with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa infusion. The primary outcomes were incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), recanalization score, and favorable prognosis (modified Rankin score ≤ 2) at 90 days. A comparison was made between patients from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and those from other regions. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were included, with 87% being men. The mean age was 51.3 years (SD ±11.8); 32 patients (58%) were from South Asia, 12 (22%) from MENA, 9 (16%) from Southeast Asia, and 2 (4%) from elsewhere. Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score = 2b/3) was achieved in 43 patients (78%), and symptomatic ICH occurred in 2 patients (4%). A favorable outcome at 90 days was seen in 26 of the 55 patients (47%). Apart from significantly older age-mean, 62.8 years (SD ±13; median, 69 years) versus 48.1 years (SD ±9.3; median, 49 years)-and coronary artery disease burden-4 (33%) versus 1 (2%) (P < .05), patients from MENA had risk factors, stroke severity, recanalization rates, ICH rates, and 90-day outcomes similar to those from South and Southeast Asia. CONCLUSION Rescue stent placement showed good outcomes and a low risk of clinically significant bleeding in a multiethnic cohort of patients from MENA and South and Southeast Asia, similar to that in published literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahia Z Imam
- Neurosceince Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Naveed Akhtar
- Neurosceince Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | - Saadat Kamran
- Neurosceince Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | | | | | - Ayman Zakaria
- Neurosceince Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ahmed Own
- Neurosceince Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Satya Patro
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oliveira R, Correia MA, Marto JP, Carvalho Dias M, Mohamed GA, Nguyen TN, Nogueira RG, Aboul-Nour H, Marin H, Bou Chebl A, Mohammaden MH, Al-Bayati AR, Haussen DC, Abdalkader M, Fifi JT, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Yavagal DR, Mayer SA, Tsivgoulis G, Neto LL, Aguiar de Sousa D. Reocclusion after successful endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15:964-970. [PMID: 36328479 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the standard of care for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). OBJECTIVE To systematically review the available data on: (1) incidence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with reocclusion after successful EVT for AIS and, (2) the characteristics, complications, and outcomes of patients with reocclusion treated with repeated EVT (rEVT) within 30 days of the first procedure. METHODS PubMed was searched (between January 2012 and April 2021) to identify studies reporting reocclusion following successful EVT (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b) in patients with AIS due to LVO. Pooled incidence of reocclusion per 100 patients with successful recanalization following EVT was calculated using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Extracted incidences of reocclusion according to etiology and use of intravenous thrombolysis were pooled using random-effects meta-analytic models. RESULTS A total of 840 studies was identified and seven studies qualified for the quantitative analysis, which described 91 same-vessel reocclusions occurring within the first 7 days after treatment among 2067 patients (4.9%; 95% CI 3% to 7%, I2=70.2%). Large vessel atherosclerosis was associated with an increased risk of reocclusion (OR=3.44, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.61, I2=50%). We identified 90 patients treated with rEVT for recurrent LVO, described in five studies. The rates of procedural complications, mortality, and unfavorable functional outcome at 3 months were 18.0%, 18.9%, and 60.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION In cohorts of patients with AIS due to LVO, 5% of patients experienced reocclusion within 7 days after successful EVT. Repeated EVT can be a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with reocclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Oliveira
- Department of Neurology, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Geriatrics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Manuel A Correia
- Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Pedro Marto
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Mariana Carvalho Dias
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ghada A Mohamed
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Thanh N Nguyen
- Department of Neurology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raul G Nogueira
- Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hassan Aboul-Nour
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Hospitals, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Horia Marin
- Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Alex Bou Chebl
- Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Alhamza R Al-Bayati
- Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Diogo C Haussen
- Department of Neurology and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mohamad Abdalkader
- Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Johanna T Fifi
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Dileep R Yavagal
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Stephan A Mayer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Georgios Tsivgoulis
- Second Department of Neurology, "Attikon" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Lia Lucas Neto
- Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
- Institute of Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Diana Aguiar de Sousa
- Institute of Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Stroke Center, Lisbon Central University Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meyer L, Politi M, Alexandrou M, Roth C, Kastrup A, Mpotsaris A, Hanning U, Flottmann F, Brekenfeld C, Deb-Chatterji M, Thomalla G, Kniep H, Faizy TD, Bechstein M, Broocks G, Herzberg M, Feil K, Kellert L, Dorn F, Zeleňák K, Fiehler J, Papanagiotou P. Endovascular treatment of acute tandem lesions in patients with mild anterior circulation stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2023; 15:e136-e141. [PMID: 36028317 DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with mild strokes the risk-benefit ratio of endovascular treatment (EVT) for tandem lesions has yet to be evaluated outside of current guideline recommendations. This study investigates the frequency as well as procedural and safety outcomes in daily clinical practice. METHODS Using data from the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (GSR-ET) we analyzed patients with anterior circulation stroke due to tandem-lesions and mild deficits. These patients were defined as ≤5 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Recanalization was assessed with the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scale (mTICI). Early neurological and long-term functional outcomes were assessed with the NIHSS change and modified Rankin scale (mRS), respectively. Safety assessment included periprocedural complications and the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS A total of 61 patients met the inclusion criteria and were treated endovascularly for tandem lesions. The median age was 68 (IQR:59-76) and 32.9% (20) were female. Patients were admitted to the hospital with a median NIHSS score of 4 (IQR:2-5) and a median Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 9 (IQR:8-10). Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) was observed in 86.9% (53). NIHSS decreased non-significantly (p=0.382) from baseline to two points (IQR:1-9) at discharge. Excellent (mRS≤1) and favorable (mRS≤2) long-term functional outcome at 90-days was 55.8% (29) and 69.2% (36), respectively. Mortality rates at 90-days were 9.6% (5) and sICH occurred in 8.2% (5). CONCLUSIONS EVT for tandem lesions in patients with mild anterior circulation stroke appears to be feasible but may lead to increased rates of sICH. Further studies comparing endovascular with best medical treatment (BMT) especially investigating the risk of periprocedural hemorrhagic complications, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria Politi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Alexandrou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
| | - Christian Roth
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kastrup
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
| | - Anastasios Mpotsaris
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Uta Hanning
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Flottmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caspar Brekenfeld
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Milani Deb-Chatterji
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Goetz Thomalla
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Helge Kniep
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias D Faizy
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Bechstein
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Broocks
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moriz Herzberg
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
| | - Katharina Feil
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lars Kellert
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
| | - Franziska Dorn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Kamil Zeleňák
- Clinic of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia
| | - Jens Fiehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Papanagiotou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Bremen, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Areteion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meniscus Sign in Patients with Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke does not Predict Outcome. Clin Neuroradiol 2023; 33:65-72. [PMID: 35750916 PMCID: PMC10014662 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01183-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The angiographic appearance of the occlusion site was suggested to influence outcomes of stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to study the impact of the meniscus sign (MS) on outcomes of stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO. METHODS Based on two prospective registries of acute ischemic stroke, we selected patients with carotid‑T, M1 or M2 occlusion who underwent EVT. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected from the registries or from individual records. Two independent observers blinded to outcomes assessed the presence of MS in digital subtraction angiography before thrombectomy. Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with and without MS were compared. RESULTS We included 903 patients, with median age of 78 years, 59.8% were male, median baseline NIHSS was 14 and 39.5% received intravenous thrombolysis. Patients with MS (n = 170, 18.8%) were more frequently female, presented with higher NIHSS scores and more frequently underwent intravenous thrombolysis. Presence of MS was significantly associated with cardioembolic etiology. Successful reperfusion, number of passes, first pass effect, procedural time, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality and favorable 3‑month functional outcome were similar in the groups of patients with and without MS. In the multivariable analyses, MS was not associated with successful reperfusion (odds ratio, OR = 1.08, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.76-1.55), first pass effect (OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.48-1.92) or favorable 3‑month outcome (OR = 1.40, 95%CI = 0.88-2.24). CONCLUSION The presence of MS in acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who undergo EVT does not appear to influence angiographic or clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
12
|
Meyer L, Stracke P, Wallocha M, Broocks G, Sporns P, Piechowiak EI, Kaesmacher J, Maegerlein C, Hernandez Petzsche MR, Dorn F, Zimmermann H, Naziri W, Abdullayev N, Kabbasch C, Behme D, Jamous A, Maus V, Fischer S, Möhlenbruch M, Weyland CS, Langner S, Meila D, Miszczuk M, Siebert E, Lowens S, Krause LU, Yeo L, Tan B, Gopinathan A, Gory B, Galván-Fernández J, Schüller M, Navia P, Raz E, Shapiro M, Arnberg F, Zeleňák K, Martínez-Galdámez M, Kastrup A, Papanagiotou P, Kemmling A, Psychogios M, Andersson T, Chapot R, Fiehler J, Hanning U. Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Distal, Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke in the Posterior Circulation: A Subanalysis of the TOPMOST Study. Stroke 2022; 53:2449-2457. [PMID: 35443785 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.037792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal endovascular strategy for reperfusing distal medium-vessel occlusions (DMVO) remains unknown. This study evaluates angiographic and clinical outcomes of thrombectomy strategies in DMVO stroke of the posterior circulation. METHODS TOPMOST (Treatment for Primary Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke) is an international, retrospective, multicenter, observational registry of patients treated for DMVO between January 2014 and June 2020. This study analyzed endovascularly treated isolated primary DMVO of the posterior cerebral artery in the P2 and P3 segment. Technical feasibility was evaluated with the first-pass effect defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Scale score of 3. Rates of early neurological improvement and functional modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days were compared. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and intervention-related serious adverse events. RESULTS A total of 141 patients met the inclusion criteria and were treated endovascularly for primary isolated DMVO in the P2 (84.4%, 119) or P3 segment (15.6%, 22) of the posterior cerebral artery. The median age was 75 (IQR, 62-81), and 45.4% (64) were female. The initial reperfusion strategy was aspiration only in 29% (41) and stent retriever in 71% (100), both achieving similar first-pass effect rates of 53.7% (22) and 44% (44; P=0.297), respectively. There were no significant differences in early neurological improvement (aspiration: 64.7% versus stent retriever: 52.2%; P=0.933) and modified Rankin Scale rates (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1, aspiration: 60.5% versus stent retriever 68.6%; P=0.4). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the time from groin puncture to recanalization was associated with the first-pass effect (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.99]; P<0.001) that in turn was associated with early neurological improvement (aOR, 3.27 [95% CI, 1.16-9.21]; P<0.025). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2.8% (4) of all cases. CONCLUSIONS Both first-pass aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy for primary isolated posterior circulation DMVO seem to be safe and technically feasible leading to similar favorable rates of angiographic and clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (L.M., P.S., G.B., P.S., J.F., U.H.)
| | - Paul Stracke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (L.M., P.S., G.B., P.S., J.F., U.H.).,Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany (P.S.).,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (P.S., M.P.)
| | - Marta Wallocha
- Department of Endovascular Therapy, Alfried-Krupp Hospital Essen, Germany (M.W., R.C.)
| | - Gabriel Broocks
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (L.M., P.S., G.B., P.S., J.F., U.H.)
| | - Peter Sporns
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (L.M., P.S., G.B., P.S., J.F., U.H.)
| | - Eike I Piechowiak
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. (E.I.P., J.K.)
| | - Johannes Kaesmacher
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. (E.I.P., J.K.).,Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. (J.K.)
| | - Christian Maegerlein
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (C.M., M.R.H.P.)
| | - Moritz Roman Hernandez Petzsche
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (C.M., M.R.H.P.)
| | - Franziska Dorn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospitals, LMU Munich, Germany (F.D., H.Z.)
| | - Hanna Zimmermann
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospitals, LMU Munich, Germany (F.D., H.Z.)
| | - Weis Naziri
- Department of Neuroradiology, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany (W.N.).,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Luebeck, Germany (W.N.)
| | - Nuran Abdullayev
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Cologne, Germany (N.A., C.K.)
| | - Christoph Kabbasch
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Cologne, Germany (N.A., C.K.)
| | - Daniel Behme
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Goettingen, Germany (D.B., A.J.)
| | - Ala Jamous
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Goettingen, Germany (D.B., A.J.)
| | - Volker Maus
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany (V.M., S.F.)
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany (V.M., S.F.)
| | - Markus Möhlenbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany (M.M., C.S.W.)
| | - Charlotte S Weyland
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany (M.M., C.S.W.)
| | - Sönke Langner
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Rostock, Germany (S.L.)
| | - Dan Meila
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Johanna-Étienne-Hospital, Neuss, Germany (D.M.)
| | - Milena Miszczuk
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany (M.M., E.S.)
| | - Eberhard Siebert
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany (M.M., E.S.)
| | - Stephan Lowens
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Germany. (S.L.)
| | - Lars Udo Krause
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Germany. (L.U.K.)
| | - Leonard Yeo
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore. (L.Y., B.T.).,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (L.Y., B.T., A.G.)
| | - Benjamin Tan
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore. (L.Y., B.T.).,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (L.Y., B.T., A.G.)
| | - Anil Gopinathan
- Department of Diagnostic imaging, National University Health System, Singapore. (A.G.)
| | - Benjamin Gory
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (L.Y., B.T., A.G.).,Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, France (B.G.).,Université de Lorraine, IADI, INSERM U1254, F-54000 Nancy, France (B.G.)
| | - Jorge Galván-Fernández
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain (J.G.-F., M.S., M.M.-G.)
| | - Miguel Schüller
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain (J.G.-F., M.S., M.M.-G.)
| | - Pedro Navia
- Department of Neuroradiology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (P.N.)
| | - Eytan Raz
- Department of Radiology, New York Langone Medical Center (E.R., M.S.)
| | - Maksim Shapiro
- Department of Radiology, New York Langone Medical Center (E.R., M.S.)
| | - Fabian Arnberg
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., T.A.)
| | - Kamil Zeleňák
- Department of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia (K.Z.)
| | - Mario Martínez-Galdámez
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain (J.G.-F., M.S., M.M.-G.)
| | - Andreas Kastrup
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Germany (A.K.)
| | - Panagiotis Papanagiotou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Germany (P.P.).,Department of Radiology, Areteion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece (P.P.)
| | - André Kemmling
- Department of Medical Imaging, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium (T.A.).,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Marburg, Germany (A.K.)
| | - Marios Psychogios
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (P.S., M.P.)
| | - Tommy Andersson
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., T.A.).,Department of Medical Imaging, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium (T.A.)
| | - Rene Chapot
- Department of Endovascular Therapy, Alfried-Krupp Hospital Essen, Germany (M.W., R.C.)
| | - Jens Fiehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (L.M., P.S., G.B., P.S., J.F., U.H.)
| | - Uta Hanning
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (L.M., P.S., G.B., P.S., J.F., U.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rozes C, Maier B, Gory B, Bourcier R, Kyheng M, Labreuche J, Consoli A, Mazighi M, Blanc R, Caroff J, Eugene F, Naggara O, Gariel F, Sibon I, Lapergue B, Marnat G. Influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis on outcome after failed mechanical thrombectomy: ETIS registry analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 14:688-692. [PMID: 34413246 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite constant improvements in recent years, sufficient reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not reached in up to 15% of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). The outcome of patients with unsuccessful reperfusion after MT especially after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use is not known. We investigated the influence of initial IVT in this particular group of patients with failed intracranial recanalization. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients presenting with LVOS of the anterior circulation and final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score (mTICI) of 0, 1 or 2a were included. Posterior circulation, isolated cervical carotid occlusions and successful reperfusions (mTICI 2b, 2c or 3) were excluded. The primary endpoint was favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) after 3 months. Secondary endpoints were safety outcomes including mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hematoma (PH) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates. RESULTS Among 5076 patients with LVOS treated with MT, 524 patients with insufficient recanalization met inclusion criteria, of which 242 received IVT and 282 did not. Functional outcome was improved in the MT+IVT group compared with the MT alone group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (23.0% vs 12.9%; adjusted OR=1.82; 95% CI 0.98 to 3.38; p=0.058). However, 3 month mRS shift analysis showed a significant benefit of IVT (adjusted OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54). ICH and sICH rates were similar in both groups, although PH rate was higher in the MT+IVT group (adjusted OR=3.20; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with LVOS in the anterior circulation and unsuccessful MT, IVT was associated with improved functional outcome even after unsuccessful MT. Despite recent trials questioning the place of IVT in the LVOS reperfusion strategy, these findings emphasize a subgroup of patients still benefiting from IVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Rozes
- Neuroradiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Benjamin Maier
- Interventional Neuroradiology, Adolphe de Rothschild Ophthalmological Foundation, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Gory
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.,INSERM U1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Romain Bourcier
- Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maeva Kyheng
- CHU Lille, EA 2694, Santé publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, Université de Lille, Lille, Hauts-de-France, France
| | | | | | - Mikael Mazighi
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Raphaël Blanc
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jildaz Caroff
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Olivier Naggara
- Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne, Paris, Île-de-France, France.,INSERM UMR 894, Paris, France
| | - Florent Gariel
- Neuroradiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Igor Sibon
- UMR 5287 CNRS; EPHE PSL Research University, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Neurology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Gaultier Marnat
- Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, CHU Bordeaux GH Pellegrin, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mohammaden MH, Nogueira RG, Tekle W, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Farooqui M, Zevallos CB, Hanel RA, Cortez GM, Aghaebrahim A, Starke RM, Aref H, Elbassiouny A, Gamea A, Alaraj A, Sadeh M, Grigoryan M, Kuybu O, Haussen DC, Sheth SA, Maud A, Cordina SM, Tanweer O, Kan P, Burkhardt JK, Grandhi R, Siddiq F, Hassan AE. Safety and efficacy of balloon-mounted stent in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 14:756-761. [PMID: 34349013 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials have failed to prove that the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is better than that of medical management. A recent study using a self-expandable stent showed acceptable lower rates of periprocedural complications. OBJECTIVE To study the safety and efficacy of a balloon-mounted stent (BMS) in the treatment of symptomatic ICAD. METHODS Prospectively maintained databases from 15 neuroendovascular centers between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis in the target artery, medical management had failed, and they underwent intracranial stenting with BMS after 24 hours of the qualifying event. The primary outcome was the occurrence of stroke and mortality within 72 hours after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and mortality on long-term follow-up. RESULTS A total of 232 patients were eligible for the analysis (mean age 62.8 years, 34.1% female). The intracranial stenotic lesions were located in the anterior circulation in 135 (58.2%) cases. Recurrent stroke was the qualifying event in 165 (71.1%) while recurrent TIA was identified in 67 (28.9%) cases. The median (IQR) time from the qualifying event to stenting was 5 (2-20.75) days. Strokes were reported in 13 (5.6%) patients within 72 hours of the procedure; 9 (3.9%) ischemic and 4 (1.7%) hemorrhagic, and mortality in 2 (0.9%) cases. Among 189 patients with median follow-up time 6 (3-14.5) months, 12 (6.3%) had TIA and 7 (3.7%) had strokes. Three patients (1.6%) died from causes not related to stroke. CONCLUSION Our study has shown that BMS may be a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory symptomatic ICAD. Additional prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud H Mohammaden
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Neurology, South Valley University Faculty of Medicine, Qena, Egypt
| | - Raul G Nogueira
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Wondwossen Tekle
- Department of Neurology, UTRGV School of Medicine, Harlingen, Texas, USA.,Department of Neurology, Valley Baptist Medical Center, Harlingen, Texas, USA
| | - Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
- Department of Neuroloy, Neurosurgery and Radiology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Mudassir Farooqui
- Department of Neurology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Cynthia B Zevallos
- Department of Neurology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Ricardo A Hanel
- Lyerly Neurosurgery, Baptist Medical Center Downtown, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gustavo M Cortez
- Lyerly Neurosurgery, Baptist Medical Center Downtown, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Amin Aghaebrahim
- Lyerly Neurosurgery, Baptist Medical Center Downtown, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert M Starke
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Hany Aref
- Department of Neurology, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Elbassiouny
- Department of Neurology, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ayman Gamea
- Department of Neurology, South Valley University Faculty of Medicine, Qena, Egypt
| | - Ali Alaraj
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Morteza Sadeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Okkes Kuybu
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Diogo C Haussen
- Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sunil A Sheth
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alberto Maud
- Department of Neurology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Steve M Cordina
- Department of Neurology, University of South Alabama Health System, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Omar Tanweer
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter Kan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jan-Karl Burkhardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ramesh Grandhi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Farhan Siddiq
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Ameer E Hassan
- Department of Neurology, UTRGV School of Medicine, Harlingen, Texas, USA .,Department of Neurology, Valley Baptist Medical Center, Harlingen, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meyer L, Stracke CP, Jungi N, Wallocha M, Broocks G, Sporns PB, Maegerlein C, Dorn F, Zimmermann H, Naziri W, Abdullayev N, Kabbasch C, Behme D, Jamous A, Maus V, Fischer S, Möhlenbruch M, Weyland CS, Langner S, Meila D, Miszczuk M, Siebert E, Lowens S, Krause LU, Yeo LLL, Tan BYQ, Anil G, Gory B, Galván J, Arteaga MS, Navia P, Raz E, Shapiro M, Arnberg F, Zelenák K, Martinez-Galdamez M, Fischer U, Kastrup A, Roth C, Papanagiotou P, Kemmling A, Gralla J, Psychogios MN, Andersson T, Chapot R, Fiehler J, Kaesmacher J, Hanning U. Thrombectomy for Primary Distal Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The TOPMOST Study. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:434-444. [PMID: 33616642 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Importance Clinical evidence of the potential treatment benefit of mechanical thrombectomy for posterior circulation distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) is sparse. Objective To investigate the frequency as well as the clinical and safety outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for isolated posterior circulation DMVO stroke and to compare them with the outcomes of standard medical treatment with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in daily clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter case-control study analyzed patients who were treated for primary distal occlusion of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) of the P2 or P3 segment. These patients received mechanical thrombectomy or standard medical treatment (with or without IVT) at 1 of 23 comprehensive stroke centers in Europe, the United States, and Asia between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2020. All patients who met the inclusion criteria were matched using 1:1 propensity score matching. Interventions Mechanical thrombectomy or standard medical treatment with or without IVT. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical end point was the improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at discharge from baseline. Safety end point was the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and hemorrhagic complications were classified based on the Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASSII). Functional outcome was evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90-day follow-up. Results Of 243 patients from all participating centers who met the inclusion criteria, 184 patients were matched. Among these patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 74 (62-81) years and 95 (51.6%) were female individuals. Posterior circulation DMVOs were located in the P2 segment of the PCA in 149 patients (81.0%) and in the P3 segment in 35 patients (19.0%). At discharge, the mean NIHSS score decrease was -2.4 points (95% CI, -3.2 to -1.6) in the standard medical treatment cohort and -3.9 points (95% CI, -5.4 to -2.5) in the mechanical thrombectomy cohort, with a mean difference of -1.5 points (95% CI, 3.2 to -0.8; P = .06). Significant treatment effects of mechanical thrombectomy were observed in the subgroup of patients who had higher NIHSS scores on admission of 10 points or higher (mean difference, -5.6; 95% CI, -10.9 to -0.2; P = .04) and in the subgroup of patients without IVT (mean difference, -3.0; 95% CI, -5.0 to -0.9; P = .005). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4 of 92 patients (4.3%) in each treatment cohort. Conclusions and Relevance This study suggested that, although rarely performed at comprehensive stroke centers, mechanical thrombectomy for posterior circulation DMVO is a safe, and technically feasible treatment option for occlusions of the P2 or P3 segment of the PCA compared with standard medical treatment with or without IVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Paul Stracke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Noël Jungi
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marta Wallocha
- Department of Endovascular Therapy, Alfried-Krupp Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gabriel Broocks
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter B Sporns
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Maegerlein
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Dorn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospitals, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Hanna Zimmermann
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospitals, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Weis Naziri
- Department of Neuroradiology, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Nuran Abdullayev
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Behme
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Ala Jamous
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Volker Maus
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Markus Möhlenbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sönke Langner
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Dan Meila
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Johanna-Étienne-Hospital, Neuss, Germany
| | - Milena Miszczuk
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eberhard Siebert
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Lowens
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Lars Udo Krause
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Leonard L L Yeo
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gopinathan Anil
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Gory
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Université de Lorraine, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.,Université de Lorraine, Imagerie Adaptative Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, INSERM U1254, Nancy, France
| | - Jorge Galván
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Miguel Schüller Arteaga
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pedro Navia
- Department of Neuroradiology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eytan Raz
- Department of Radiology, New York Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Maksim Shapiro
- Department of Radiology, New York Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - Fabian Arnberg
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamil Zelenák
- Department of Radiology, Comenius University's Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Martin, Slovakia
| | - Mario Martinez-Galdamez
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Urs Fischer
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Kastrup
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Christian Roth
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Papanagiotou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany.,Department of Radiology, Areteion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - André Kemmling
- Department of Neuroradiology, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Jan Gralla
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marios-Nikos Psychogios
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tommy Andersson
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rene Chapot
- Department of Endovascular Therapy, Alfried-Krupp Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens Fiehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Kaesmacher
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Uta Hanning
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaesmacher J, Abdullayev N, Maamari B, Dobrocky T, Vynckier J, Piechowiak EI, Pop R, Behme D, Sporns PB, Styczen H, Virtanen P, Meyer L, Meinel TR, Cantré D, Kabbasch C, Maus V, Pekkola J, Fischer S, Hasiu A, Schwarz A, Wildgruber M, Seiffge DJ, Langner S, Martinez-Majander N, Radbruch A, Schlamann M, Mihoc D, Beaujeux R, Strbian D, Fiehler J, Mordasini P, Gralla J, Fischer U. Safety and Angiographic Efficacy of Intra-Arterial Fibrinolytics as Adjunct to Mechanical Thrombectomy: Results from the INFINITY Registry. J Stroke 2021; 23:91-102. [PMID: 33600706 PMCID: PMC7900401 DOI: 10.5853/jos.2020.01788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Data on safety and efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) fibrinolytics as adjunct to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are sparse.
Methods INtra-arterial FIbriNolytics In ThrombectomY (INFINITY) is a retrospective multi-center observational registry of consecutive patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke treated with MT and adjunctive administration of IA fibrinolytics (alteplase [tissue plasminogen activator, tPA] or urokinase [UK]) at 10 European centers. Primary outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II definition. Secondary outcomes were mortality and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 3 months.
Results Of 5,612 patients screened, 311 (median age, 74 years; 44.1% female) received additional IA after or during MT (194 MT+IA tPA, 117 MT+IA UK). IA fibrinolytics were mostly administered for rescue of thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 0-2b after MT (80.4%, 250/311). sICH occurred in 27 of 308 patients (8.8%), with an increased risk in patients with initial TICI0/1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 5.0 per TICI grade decrease) or in those with intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions (aOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 12.5). In patients with attempted rescue of TICI0-2b and available angiographic follow-up, 116 of 228 patients (50.9%) showed any angiographic reperfusion improvement after IA fibrinolytics, which was associated with mRS ≤2 (aOR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.9).
Conclusions Administration of IA fibrinolytics as adjunct to MT is performed rarely, but can improve reperfusion, which is associated with better outcomes. Despite a selection bias, an increased risk of sICH seems possible, which underlines the importance of careful patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Kaesmacher
- University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nuran Abdullayev
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Basel Maamari
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tomas Dobrocky
- University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Vynckier
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eike I Piechowiak
- University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Raoul Pop
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Daniel Behme
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter B Sporns
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Styczen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pekka Virtanen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lukas Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas R Meinel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Cantré
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Christoph Kabbasch
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volker Maus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Johanna Pekkola
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Anca Hasiu
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alexander Schwarz
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Institute of Clinical Radiology University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.,Department of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - David J Seiffge
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sönke Langner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Radbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marc Schlamann
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dan Mihoc
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Rémy Beaujeux
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Daniel Strbian
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jens Fiehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pasquale Mordasini
- University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Gralla
- University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Urs Fischer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mild angioplasty with a stent retriever for acute atherothrombotic middle cerebral artery occlusion: A case report. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.100856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|