Brain and spinal cord paired stimulation coupled with locomotor training facilitates motor output in human spinal cord injury

Double-target magnetic stimulation attenuates oligodendrocyte apoptosis and oxidative stress impairment after spinal cord injury via GAP43

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes neural circuit interruption and permanent functional damage. Magnetic stimulation in humans with SCI aims to engage residual neural networks to improve neurological functional, but the detailed mechanism remains unknown.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates functional recovery and neural circuitry improvements in rodent with double-target (brain and spinal cord) magnetic stimulation (DTMS) treatment and explores the effect of DTMS on the modulation of glial cells in vivo and in vitro.

STUDY DESIGN

In vivo animal study.

METHODS

SCI model rats at T10 level were induced via a weight-drop method and underwent long-time DTMS treatment. A series of behavioral assessments and tissue staining were used to evaluate neurological function and neural circuitry improvements. More importantly, single-cell RNA sequencing was conducted to identify the most significant glial cells after DTMS treatment. Furthermore, transmission electron microscopy, western blotting, immunofluorescence staining, TUNEL staining, Annexin V-FITC apoptosis kit and Lipid ROS kit were used to explore the mechanism underlying the observed changes. Study funding sources: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: U22A20297; Dollar amount: 62500); Key Research and Development Program of Guangzhou (Grant number: 202206060003; Dollar amount: 63750). There are no conflicts of interest or disclosures to report.

RESULTS

DTMS promoted the improvements of motor and sensory neural circuitry by modulating remyelination and neuronal survival, while silencing growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43) in oligodendrocytes suppressed these effects of DTMS in vivo. Mechanically, GAP43 played a crucial part to promote the branching and mature of oligodendrocytes and axonal regeneration via anti-apoptotic and antioxidative stress effects. Furthermore, oligodendrocytes subjected to magnetic stimulation exerted neuroprotective effects on neurons by secreting exosomes containing GAP43.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed the neuroprotection of DTMS on SCI. The GAP43 in oligodendrocytes were associated with this relationship between magnetic stimulation and myelin and neuronal regeneration after SCI.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The current study demonstrated the beneficial effects of DTMS on SCI based on functional, electrophysiological, cellular and histological evidence. According to these findings, we expect DTMS to make a positive and significant difference for SCI therapeutic screening.

Differential effects of stimulation waveform and intensity on the neural structures activated by lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSS) evokes synchronized muscle responses, termed spinally evoked motor response (sEMR). Whether the structures TSS activates to evoke sEMRs differ when TSS intensity and waveform are varied is unknown. In 15 participants (9 F, 6 M), sEMRs were evoked by TSS over L1-L3 (at sEMR threshold and suprathreshold intensities) with conventional (one 400-µs biphasic pulse) or high-frequency burst (ten 40-µs biphasic pulses at 10 kHz) stimulus waveforms in vastus medialis (VM), tibialis anterior (TA), and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles. TSS was paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the contralateral motor cortex at relative interstimulus intervals (ISIs) (-10 ms to 11 ms), centered on the ISI when TSS and TMS inputs simultaneously activated VM motoneurons. Doublet TSS was delivered at 80-ms ISI. For VM, the area of the combined response evoked by paired TMS and TSS was not facilitated at any ISI. For TA and MG, combined responses were facilitated by ∼40-100% when TMS activated the motoneurons before or at a similar time as TSS, particularly with suprathreshold TSS. Additionally, for TA, there was greater suppression of the second sEMR evoked by TSS doublets using suprathreshold conventional TSS compared to high-frequency burst TSS (P < 0.001). The results suggest that for VM TSS activated predominantly motor axons, but for TA and MG facilitation of the sEMR by TMS suggests that TSS activated sensory axons. Stimulation waveforms had similar outcomes in most conditions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSS) can evoke muscle responses by activation of sensory and/or motor axons. The relative contribution of these varies across the muscles tested. We found evidence for activation of sensory axons with TSS for tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius but not for vastus medialis. In cases where sensory axons were activated, conventional TSS activated relatively more sensory axons than high-frequency burst TSS.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: Current Status and Perspective

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to devastating dysfunctions and complications, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and aggravating the burden of disease. Since the main pathological mechanism of SCI is the disruption of neuronal circuits, the primary therapeutic strategy for SCI involves reconstructing and activating circuits to restore neural signal transmission. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, can modulate the function or state of the nervous system by pulsed magnetic fields. Here, we discuss the basic principles and potential mechanisms of rTMS for treating SCI, including promoting the reconstruction of damaged circuits in the spinal cord, activating reorganization of the cerebral cortex and circuits, modulating the balance of inputs to motoneurons, improving the microenvironment and intrinsic regeneration ability in SCI. Based on these mechanisms, we provide an overview of the therapeutic effects of rTMS in SCI patients with motor dysfunction, spasticity and neuropathic pain. We also discuss the challenges and prospectives of rTMS, especially the potential of combination therapy of rTMS and neural progenitor cell transplantation, and the synergistic effects on promoting regeneration, relay formation and functional connectivity. This review is expected to offer a relatively comprehensive understanding and new perspectives of rTMS for SCI treatment.

Effect of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Dual-Target Stimulation on Lower Limb Function in Patients with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influence of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) dual-target stimulation on lower limb function in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).

METHODS

A randomized, single -blind, sham-controlled trial was used in this study. Thirty iSCI patients with lower limb dysfunction meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into a sham group and an iTBS group, with 15 cases in each group. The iTBS group received conventional rehabilitation therapy combined with iTBS dual-target stimulation on the central cerebral sulcus and the nerve root of the spinal cord injury segment. The sham group was treated with conventional rehabilitation therapy combined with iTBS dual-target sham stimulation therapy. Comprehensive functional assessment was performed on all patients before treatment, on the day 3 and day 21 of treatment. The main evaluation indicators were as follows: amplitude and latency of motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the anterior tibial muscles of both lower limbs, latency of sensory-evoked potential (SEP) of both lower limbs, knee flexor strength and knee extensor strength, lower extremity motor score (LEMS), lower extremity sensory score, spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) score, and gait parameters (stride speed, stride frequency, stride length, and ground reaction force).

RESULTS

On day 21 of treatment, in the iTBS group, the MEP amplitude of the anterior tibial muscles increased, the latency of MEP shortened, knee flexor strength and knee extensor strength increased, and the LEMS and SCIM score of both lower limbs increased. In addition, there were statistically significant differences in the muscle strength of the knee flexion muscle, knee extensor muscle, MEP amplitude, LEMS, and SCIM between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). Among the 10 patients who could walk with an assisted walker, the step length and step frequency of the iTBS group were increased compared with the sham group after treatment (P < 0.01), and the ground reaction force was increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the lower extremity sensory score of the lower limbs between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ITBS dual-target stimulation can significantly improve the motor function of both lower limbs in patients with iSCI but does not significantly improve the sensory function of both lower limbs. Therefore, this treatment mode may participate in the reconstruction and repair of some nerve circuits in patients with iSCI. In addition, iTBS dual-target stimulation can improve the ability of iSCI patients to perform daily living.

Synergistic implications of combinatorial rehabilitation approaches using spinal stimulation on therapeutic outcomes in spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this narrative review was to locate and assess recent articles employing a combinatorial approach of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation or epidural spinal cord stimulation with additional modalities. We sought to provide relevant knowledge of recent literature and advance understanding on outcomes reported, to better equip those working in neurorehabilitation and neuromodulation.

METHODS

Articles were selected and analyzed based on study approach, stimulation parameters, outcome measures, and presence of neurophysiological data to support findings.

RESULTS

This narrative review analyzed 44 recent articles employing a combinatorial approach of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation or epidural spinal cord stimulation with additional modalities. Our findings showed that limited research exists regarding such combinatorial approaches, particularly when considering modalities beyond activity-based training. There is also limited consistency in neurophysiological and quality of life outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Articles involving transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation or epidural spinal cord stimulation with other modalities are limited in the current body of literature. Authors noted variety in approach, sample size, and use of participant perspective. Opportunities are present to add high quality research to this body of literature.

SIGNIFICANCE

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and epidural spinal cord stimulation are emerging in research as viable avenues for targeting improvement of function after traumatic spinal cord injury, particularly when combined with activity-based training. This body of literature demonstrates viable areas for growth from both neurophysiological and functional perspectives. Further, exploration of novel combinatorial approaches holds potential to offer enhanced contributions to clinical and neurophysiological rehabilitation and research.

Postsynaptic potentials of soleus motor neurons produced by transspinal stimulation: a human single-motor unit study

Transspinal (or transcutaneous spinal cord) stimulation is a noninvasive, cost-effective, easily applied method with great potential as a therapeutic modality for recovering somatic and nonsomatic functions in upper motor neuron disorders. However, how transspinal stimulation affects motor neuron depolarization is poorly understood, limiting the development of effective transspinal stimulation protocols for rehabilitation. In this study, we characterized the responses of soleus α motor neurons to single-pulse transspinal stimulation using single-motor unit (SMU) discharges as a proxy given the 1:1 discharge activation between the motor neuron and the motor unit. Peristimulus time histogram, peristimulus frequencygram, and surface electromyography (sEMG) were used to characterize the postsynaptic potentials of soleus motor neurons. Transspinal stimulation produced short-latency excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) followed by two distinct phases of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in most soleus motor neurons and only IPSPs in others. Transspinal stimulation generated double discharges at short interspike intervals in a few motor units. The short-latency EPSPs were likely mediated by muscle spindle group Ia and II afferents, and the IPSPs via excitation of group Ib afferents and recurrent collaterals of motor neurons leading to activation of diverse spinal inhibitory interneuronal circuits. Further studies are warranted to understand better how transspinal stimulation affects depolarization of α motor neurons over multiple spinal segments. This knowledge will be seminal for developing effective transspinal stimulation protocols in upper motor neuron lesions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transspinal stimulation produces distinct actions on soleus motor neurons: an early short-latency excitation followed by two inhibitions or only inhibition and doublets. These results show how transspinal stimulation affects depolarization of soleus α motor neurons in healthy humans.

Soleus H-reflex amplitude modulation during walking remains physiological during transspinal stimulation in humans

The soleus H-reflex modulation pattern was investigated during stepping following transspinal stimulation over the thoracolumbar region at 15, 30, and 50 Hz with 10 kHz carry-over frequency above and below the paresthesia threshold. The soleus H-reflex was elicited by posterior tibial nerve stimulation with a single 1 ms pulse at an intensity that the M-wave amplitudes ranged from 0 to 15% of the maximal M-wave evoked 80 ms after the test stimulus, and the soleus H-reflex was half the size of the maximal H-reflex evoked on the ascending portion of the recruitment curve. During treadmill walking, the soleus H-reflex was elicited every 2 or 3 steps, and stimuli were randomly dispersed across the step cycle which was divided in 16 equal bins. For each subject and condition, the soleus M-wave and H-reflex were normalized to the maximal M-wave. The soleus background electromyographic (EMG) activity was estimated as the linear envelope for 50 ms duration starting at 100 ms before posterior tibial nerve stimulation for each bin. The gain was determined as the slope of the relationship between the soleus H-reflex and the soleus background EMG activity. The soleus H-reflex phase-dependent amplitude modulation remained unaltered during transspinal stimulation, regardless frequency, or intensity. Similarly, the H-reflex slope and intercept remained the same for all transspinal stimulation conditions tested. Locomotor EMG activity was increased in knee extensor muscles during transspinal stimulation at 30 and 50 Hz throughout the step cycle while no effects were observed in flexor muscles. These findings suggest that transspinal stimulation above and below the paresthesia threshold at 15, 30, and 50 Hz does not block or impair spinal integration of proprioceptive inputs and increases activity of thigh muscles that affect both hip and knee joint movement. Transspinal stimulation may serve as a neurorecovery strategy to augment standing or walking ability in upper motoneuron lesions.

A bi-cortical neuroprosthesis to modulate locomotion after incomplete spinal cord injury

Neuroprosthetic strategies seek to immediately alleviate deficits and reinstate voluntary control of movement. To facilitate recovery, it is crucial to gain a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms involved in the return of intentional movement. Nevertheless, the precise relationship between the resurgence of cortical commands and the recovery of locomotion remains somewhat elusive. In the study conducted by Duguay, Bonizzato, Delivet-Mongrain, Fortier-Lebel and Martinez, we introduced a neuroprosthesis designed to deliver precise bi-cortical stimulation in a clinically relevant contusive spinal cord injury model. We conducted experiments in both healthy and spinal cord injured cats, where we fine-tuned the timing, duration, amplitude, and site of stimulation to modulate hindlimb locomotor output. In healthy cats, we observed a wide range of motor programs. However, after spinal cord injury, the induced hindlimb movements became highly stereotyped but were effective in modulating gait and reducing bilateral foot dragging. These results suggest that the neural basis for motor recovery traded off selectivity for effectiveness. Through a series of longitudinal assessments, we found that the restoration of locomotion following spinal cord injury was closely linked to the recovery of the descending neural drive. This underscores the importance of directing rehabilitation interventions toward the cortical target. The study results are discussed in terms of their impact and limitations.

Priming locomotor training with transspinal stimulation in people with spinal cord injury: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The seemingly simple tasks of standing and walking require continuous integration of complex spinal reflex circuits between descending motor commands and ascending sensory inputs. Spinal cord injury greatly impairs standing and walking ability, but both improve with locomotor training. However, even after multiple locomotor training sessions, abnormal muscle activity and coordination persist. Thus, locomotor training alone cannot fully optimize the neuronal plasticity required to strengthen the synapses connecting the brain, spinal cord, and local circuits and potentiate neuronal activity based on need. Transcutaneous spinal cord (transspinal) stimulation alters motoneuron excitability over multiple segments by bringing motoneurons closer to threshold, a prerequisite for effectively promoting spinal locomotor network neuromodulation and strengthening neural connectivity of the injured human spinal cord. Importantly, whether concurrent treatment with transspinal stimulation and locomotor training maximizes motor recovery after spinal cord injury is unknown.

METHODS

Forty-five individuals with chronic spinal cord injury are receiving 40 sessions of robotic gait training primed with 30 Hz transspinal stimulation at the Thoracic 10 vertebral level. Participants are randomized to receive 30 min of active or sham transspinal stimulation during standing or active transspinal stimulation while supine followed by 30 min of robotic gait training. Over the course of locomotor training, the body weight support, treadmill speed, and leg guidance force are adjusted as needed for each participant based on absence of knee buckling during the stance phase and toe dragging during the swing phase. At baseline and after completion of all therapeutic sessions, neurophysiological recordings registering corticospinal and spinal neural excitability changes along with clinical assessment measures of standing and walking, and autonomic function via questionnaires regarding bowel, bladder, and sexual function are taken.

DISCUSSION

The results of this mechanistic randomized clinical trial will demonstrate that tonic transspinal stimulation strengthens corticomotoneuronal connectivity and dynamic neuromodulation through posture-dependent corticospinal and spinal neuroplasticity. We anticipate that this mechanistic clinical trial will greatly impact clinical practice because, in real-world clinical settings, noninvasive transspinal stimulation can be more easily and widely implemented than invasive epidural stimulation. Additionally, by applying multiple interventions to accelerate motor recovery, we are employing a treatment regimen that reflects a true clinical approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04807764 . Registered on March 19, 2021.

Priming locomotor training with transspinal stimulation in people with spinal cord injury: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial

Background

The seemingly simple tasks of standing and walking require continuous integration of complex spinal reflex circuits between descending motor commands and ascending sensory inputs. Spinal cord injury greatly impairs standing and walking ability, but both improve with locomotor training. However, even after multiple locomotor training sessions, abnormal muscle activity and coordination persist. Thus, locomotor training alone cannot fully optimize the neuronal plasticity required to strengthen the synapses connecting the brain, spinal cord, and local circuits and potentiate neuronal activity based on need. Transcutaneous spinal cord (transspinal) stimulation alters motoneuron excitability over multiple segments by bringing motoneurons closer to threshold, a prerequisite for effectively promoting spinal locomotor network neuromodulation and strengthening neural connectivity of the injured human spinal cord. Importantly, whether concurrent treatment with transspinal stimulation and locomotor training maximizes motor recovery after spinal cord injury is unknown.

Methods

Forty-five individuals with chronic spinal cord injury are receiving 40 sessions of robotic gait training primed with 30 Hz transspinal stimulation at the Thoracic 10 vertebral level. Participants are randomized to receive 30-minutes of active or sham transspinal stimulation during standing or active transspinal stimulation while supine followed by 30-minutes of robotic gait training. Over the course of locomotor training, the body weight support, treadmill speed, and leg guidance force are adjusted as needed for each participant based on absence of knee buckling during the stance phase and toe dragging during the swing phase. At baseline and after completion of all therapeutic sessions, neurophysiological recordings registering corticospinal and spinal neural excitability changes along with clinical assessment measures of standing and walking, and autonomic function via questionnaires regarding bowel, bladder and sexual function are taken.

Discussion

The results of this mechanistic randomized clinical trial will demonstrate that tonic transspinal stimulation strengthens corticomotoneuronal connectivity and dynamic neuromodulation through posture-dependent corticospinal and spinal neuroplasticity. We anticipate that this mechanistic clinical trial will greatly impact clinical practice because in real-world clinical settings, noninvasive transspinal stimulation can be more easily and widely implemented than invasive epidural stimulation. Additionally, by applying multiple interventions to accelerate motor recovery, we are employing a treatment regimen that reflects a true clinical approach.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04807764; Registered on March 19, 2021.