Stent-assisted coiling vs. coiling alone of ruptured tiny intracranial aneurysms: A contemporary cohort study in a high-volume center

Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A single-center experience

Objectives

Endovascular coiling is a minimally invasive method to manage intracranial aneurysms. However, patients who undergo stent-assisted coiling (SAC) for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms need dual antiplatelet treatment. We reported our experience and outcomes of SAC for ruptured intracranial aneurysm.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively collected data on procedure-related complications, rates of aneurysm rebleeding and recurrence, and clinical outcomes of patients with ruptured aneurysms managed by SAC over 2 years.

Results

Among the 17 patients included in this study, there were 14 (82.4%) women and 3 (17.6%) men, with a mean age of 58.59 years (standard deviation = 13.57; range: 40-82 years). There were no periprocedural hemorrhagic complications and no aneurysm rebleeding before discharge. However, two patients developed acute brain infarction because of symptomatic vasospasm. Linear regression revealed significant associations of posterior circulation involvement with the Glasgow Outcome Score and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 6 months after. Besides, Hunt and Hess grade ≥3 has a significant association with mRS at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year after.

Conclusion

SAC for ruptured aneurysm was technically feasible and did not carry an additional risk of postoperative aneurysm rebleeding secondary to antiplatelet treatment. Moreover, it had relatively low rates of aneurysm regrowth and coil compaction. Therefore, it can be a safe and effective endovascular treatment for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysm.

Ictal-interictal continuum following coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms

PURPOSE

The ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) has been reported in various clinical conditions, but its relationship with intravascular treatments remains poorly understood. This study reports three cases of IIC following coil embolization (CE) of cerebral aneurysms and evaluates associated outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records from May 2018 to May 2024 was conducted, focusing on patients with reduced consciousness after CE. IIC was diagnosed based on EEG patterns following the guidelines of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Factors related to outcomes, including IIC development, were analyzed using a multivariable linear regression model with robust standard errors.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients who underwent continuous (3-hour) EEG monitoring post-coiling, three exhibited IIC patterns characterized by lateralized epileptic activity ipsilateral to the coiling site. One patient also displayed repeated electrographic seizures associated with subtle motor phenomena. EEG abnormalities resolved immediately after intravenous benzodiazepines, but coma persisted. Full recovery of consciousness occurred approximately one week after benzodiazepines withdrawal. Adjusting for other risk factors, patients with IIC had a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score 3.13 points higher at 14 days compared to those without IIC (95 % CI, 0.43∼5.84; p = 0.025). Durations of ICU stay (95 %CI, -6.30-8.27; p = 0.782) and total hospital stay (95 %CI, -43.15∼20.79; p = 0.477) were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights IIC as a potential complication of CE. The development of postoperative IIC does not necessarily correlate with worse outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of Stent-Assisted Versus Non-Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Management of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of SAC compared to non-SAC in the treatment of RIA, integrating evidence from high-quality studies to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare SAC with coiling alone and BAC in the treatment of RIA. Primary outcomes were immediate and follow-up aneurysm occlusion rates, along with perioperative hemorrhagic and ischemic complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of thirteen retrospective cohort studies were included, comprising 3,086 patients, with 1,078 in the SAC group and 2,008 in the non-SAC group. The immediate complete occlusion rates were similar between the SAC and non-SAC groups (59.1% vs. 61.4%; RR = 1.00; 95% CI [0.94, 1.07]; p = 0.92). However, the SAC group demonstrated a significantly higher long-term complete occlusion rate (61.3% vs. 40.6%; RR = 1.44; 95% CI [1.22, 1.69]; p < 0.001). The incidence of ischemic complications was greater in the SAC group (12.2% vs. 10.0%; RR = 1.68; 95% CI [1.37, 2.07]; p < 0.001), as was the incidence of hemorrhagic complications (7.3% vs. 5.1%; RR = 1.55; 95% CI [1.15, 2.08]; p = 0.004). Perioperative mortality was also elevated in the SAC group (6.7% vs. 6.8%; RR = 1.37; 95% CI [1.00, 1.88]; p = 0.048), with a non-significant trend towards higher long-term mortality (9.8% vs. 9.2%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI [0.98, 1.87]; p = 0.068). Functional outcomes at discharge (76.0% vs. 71.0%; RR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.92, 1.02]; p = 0.237), six months (57.8% vs. 60.8%; RR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.81, 1.07]; p = 0.296), and at the last follow-up (RR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.97, 1.06]; p = 0.592) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SAC significantly improves long-term occlusion rates for RIA compared to non-SAC, despite a higher incidence of complications. Careful patient selection and optimization of antiplatelet therapy may enhance the safety and efficacy of SAC for RIA treatment.

Analysis of Current Evidence in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Proposal for a Reporting Guideline to Enhance Reproducibility and Comparability of Surgical and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has recently become the most widely used treatment method for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with studies assessing and reporting surgical and clinical outcomes in different ways, lacking standardization. We aimed to evaluate the quality of these studies and propose a reporting guideline focusing on essential elements to ensure reproducibility and comparability.

METHODS

After Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies were observational or randomized, reported clinical and/or surgical outcomes of EVTs for IAs, included over 200 patients, and were published in English between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024. Studies were assessed focusing on key domains: (1) reporting on the baseline characteristics of the patient sample, (2) assessment and reporting on imaging methods and aneurysm characteristics, (3) reporting on pivotal concepts definitions, (4) reporting on operator(s) and staff characteristics, (5) reporting on anesthetic protocol, (6) reporting on antiaggregant and anticoagulation therapy, (7) reporting on surgical details, (8) assessing and reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, and (9) reporting retreatment details.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies comprising 79 604 patients were included. Our assessment revealed substantial gaps in the literature on EVTs for IAs, including deficiencies across all domains. An EndoIAs Reporting Guideline was developed, consisting of 74 items distributed across 10 domains, focusing on key surgical and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Substantial deficiencies were identified in data collection and outcomes reporting in the available literature on EVT for IAs, thereby impeding comparability and reproducibility and hindering the building of cumulative evidence. The aim of the proposed EndoIAs Reporting Guideline was to address these fundamental aspects and has the potential to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of future studies, thereby fostering the building of cumulative and reliable evidence of EVT for IAs.

Comparison of LVIS and Enterprise stent-assisted coiling embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study

The role of a low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent (LVIS) and Enterprise in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is well established. Although previous studies have investigated one single type of stent for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIA), the safety and efficacy between the two types of stents has not been fully explored. Herein we conducted a study to compare the outcomes of the two stents for treatment of RIA. This is a prospective registry database of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients admitted to a single institution between 2018 and 2021. We collected patient baseline information, secondary complications, follow-up angiographic data, long-term prognostic outcomes, and conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with 1:1 ratio and a multivariable logistic regression to compare the outcomes of the two types of stents. A total of 231 patients with RIAs were included in this study, with 108 treated using the LVIS device and 123 treated using the Enterprise device. Before PSM analysis, only the incidence of poor prognosis after 12 months was higher in the Enterprise group comparing to the LVIS group (20% vs. 10%, P = 0.049). After PSM analysis, there was a higher occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in the Enterprise group compared to the LVIS group (odds ratio [OR] 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.20-13.01], P = 0.024). However, no significant difference in prognosis was observed after PSM adjustment. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that patients with female (P = 0.019), hypertension (P = 0.048), and anterior circulation aneurysms (P = 0.019) receiving the Enterprise device had a higher risk of DCI. The overall efficacy of LVIS and Enterprise in the treatment of RIA is comparable, while the incidence of DCI in the LVIS group is lower than that in the Enterprise group after PSM analysis. Registration number: NCT05738083 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ).

Endovascular Coiling of Ruptured Tiny Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of endovascular coiling of ruptured tiny saccular intracranial aneurysms (IAs) (≤3 mm) remain unknown.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scorpus databases up to November 15, 2023 was performed. Pooled prevalence was calculated for occlusion rates, recanalization, retreatment, long-term favorable outcome, and procedure-related complications and mortality. Pooled odds ratios were calculated to compare these outcomes between coiling and stent-assisted coiling (SAC).

RESULTS

Forty-two studies with 2166 ruptured tiny saccular IAs treated with coiling were included. The follow-up complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 83.9% (95% CI: 77.2-88.9%). The rates of recanalization and retreatment were 7.7% (95% CI: 5.7-10.2%) and 5.8% (95% CI: 4.5-7.5%). The range of median Hunt and Hess grades was 1.4-2.9 and the favorable outcome rate was 85.6% (95% CI: 81.1-89.2%). The rates of thromboembolism, intraprocedural rupture, and mortality were 4.6% (95% CI: 3.6-5.8%), 5.4% (95% CI: 4.1-7.0%), and 5.6% (95% CI: 4.4-7.2%), respectively. Comparison of coiling and SAC revealed no significant difference, except for a higher likelihood of follow-up complete aneurysm occlusion in SAC (odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.80) and recanalization in the coiling (OR, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.37-7.51]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that coiling for ruptured tiny saccular IA is a feasible, effective, and safe approach that is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in both the short and long term for patients with mild to moderate Hunt and Hess grades.

Clinical Outcomes of Clipping and Coil Embolization for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Categorized by Region and Hospital Size: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea

BACKGROUND

To analyze the outcomes of clipping and coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) based on data from the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea, with a focus on variations according to region and hospital size.

METHODS

This study analyzed the one-year mortality rates for patients with RIAs who underwent clipping or coiling in 2018. Coiling was further categorized into non-stent assisted coiling (NSAC) and stent assisted coiling (SAC). Hospitals were classified as tertiary referral general hospitals (TRGHs), general hospitals (GHs), or semi-general hospitals (sGHs) based on size. South Korea's administrative districts were divided into 15 regions for analysis.

RESULTS

In 2018, there were 2,194 (33.1%) clipping procedures (TRGH, 985; GH, 827; sGH, 382) and 4,431 (66.9%) coiling procedures (TRGH, 1,642; GH, 2076; sGH, 713) performed for RIAs treatment. Among hospitals performing more than 20 treatments, the one-year mortality rates following clipping or coiling were 11.2% and 16.0%, respectively, with no significant difference observed. However, there was a significant difference in one-year mortality between NSAC and SAC (14.3% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.034), with clipping also showing significantly lower mortality compared to SAC (P = 0.019). No significant differences in other treatment modalities were observed according to hospital size, but clipping at TRGHs had significantly lower mortality than at GHs (P = 0.042). While no significant correlation was found between the number of treatments and outcomes at GHs, at TRGHs, a higher volume of clipping procedures was significantly associated with lower total mortality (P = 0.023) and mortality after clipping (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Using Korea NHIS data, mortality rates for RIAs showed no significant variation by hospital size due to coiling's prevalence. However, differences in clipping outcomes by hospital size and volume in TRGH highlight the need for national efforts to improve clipping skills and standardization. Additionally, the higher mortality rate with SAC emphasizes the importance of precise indications for its application.

Outcome after Neuro-interventional Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (as a First Treatment Modality)

Endovascular treatment is widely applied as the first-line treatment for intracranial aneurysms and includes simple coiling (SC), stent-assisted coiling (SAC), flow diversion stent, and flow disruption stent. The present study is a retrospective cohort study performed in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Department of Neurovascular Intervention, between March 2016 and March 2021. A total number of 229 patients with intracranial aneurysms who underwent therapeutic intravascular interventions were enrolled, of which 89 were treated with SC, 111 with SAC, 25 with flow diversion stent, and 4 with flow disruption stent. The mean age of the subjects was 51.8±12.6 years, and 51.1% were male. Modified Raymond-Roy classification (MRRC) was used to define the occlusion outcome. The success rate, considered as Class I and Class II of MRRC at treatment time was 89% (94.4% in SC, and 84.7% in SAC), which was increased to 90.9% (94% in SC, 93% in SAC, 69.6% in flow diversion stenting, 100% in flow disruption) at 6-month follow-up, and 84.6% (80.8% in SC, 87.8% in SAC, 78.3% in flow diversion stenting, and 100% in flow disruption) at 12-month follow-up. The mean modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before the procedure was 0.05±0.26 which was increased to 0.22±0.76 after the procedure, 0.22±0.76 at 6 months, and 0.30±0.95 at 12 months (P<0.001). Similar to previous studies, the present study demonstrates that neurovascular intervention can treat ruptured aneurysms as the first therapeutic modality with favourable outcomes. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial is needed to eliminate the confounding factors and better demonstrate the outcome.