Frequency of Neurological Diseases After COVID-19, Influenza A/B and Bacterial Pneumonia

The Influence of Microglia on Neuroplasticity and Long-Term Cognitive Sequelae in Long COVID: Impacts on Brain Development and Beyond

Microglial cells, the immune cells of the central nervous system, are key elements regulating brain development and brain health. These cells are fully responsive to stressors, microenvironmental alterations and are actively involved in the construction of neural circuits in children and the ability to undergo full experience-dependent plasticity in adults. Since neuroinflammation is a known key element in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, one might expect the dysregulation of microglial function to severely impact both functional and structural plasticity, leading to the cognitive sequelae that appear in the pathogenesis of Long COVID. Therefore, understanding this complex scenario is mandatory for establishing the possible molecular mechanisms related to these symptoms. In the present review, we will discuss Long COVID and its association with reduced levels of BDNF, altered crosstalk between circulating immune cells and microglia, increased levels of inflammasomes, cytokines and chemokines, as well as the alterations in signaling pathways that impact neural synaptic remodeling and plasticity, such as fractalkines, the complement system, the expression of SIRPα and CD47 molecules and altered matrix remodeling. Together, these complex mechanisms may help us understand consequences of Long COVID for brain development and its association with altered brain plasticity, impacting learning disabilities, neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as cognitive decline in adults.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Risk of Postacute Psychiatric and Neurologic Diagnoses: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The extent and burden of postacute psychiatric and neurologic manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are not yet fully understood. To evaluate the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and postacute manifestations of psychiatric and neurologic disorders, we conducted a nationwide cohort study including the entire Danish population aged 12 years or older on March 1, 2020.

METHODS

Individuals were followed up for SARS-CoV-2 infection and diagnosis of subsequent psychiatric and neurologic disorders from March 1, 2020, to January 31, 2023, using the Danish nationwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) test surveillance database and the Danish National Patient Registry. The main period of interest was 1-12 months after infection. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of new onset of 11 psychiatric and 30 neurologic disorders were calculated by comparing incidence rates of disorders between SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals and individuals without a positive test (nonpositive individuals). Stratified analyses were conducted according to COVID-19 vaccination status, variant period, age, sex, and severity of infection.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,775,639 individuals in the study cohort (n = 3,239,008) were tested SARS-CoV-2 positive during follow-up. SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals compared with nonpositive individuals were at 24% reduced risk of any psychiatric disease (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78) in the postacute period. The risk of any neurologic disorder was slightly higher among SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals than among those without a positive test (IRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.07). IRRs for specific disorders varied considerably from a 3.9-fold increased risk of change in sense of smell or taste (IRR 3.91, 95% CI 2.77-5.53) to a 29% reduced risk of dementia (IRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.78). The severity of infection and vaccination status, more so than age, sex, and variant, were found to significantly influence the stratified IRRs. Compared with nonpositive individuals, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were at a 2.1-fold (IRR 2.05, 95% CI 1.78-2.37) increased risk of psychiatric disorders and at a 2.4-fold increased risk of neurologic disorders (IRR 2.44, 95% CI 2.29-2.60).

DISCUSSION

Our study does not support previous findings of substantial postacute neurologic and psychiatric morbidities among the general population of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, but does corroborate an elevated risk among the most severe cases with COVID-19.

Persistence and emergence of new neuropsychological deficits following SARS-CoV-2 infection: A follow-up assessment of the Geneva COVID-COG cohort

Background

Despite numerous observations of neuropsychological deficits immediately following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, little is known about what happens to these deficits over time and whether they are affected by changes in fatigue and any psychiatric symptoms. We aimed to assess the prevalence of neuropsychological deficits at 6-9 months and again at 12-15 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to explore whether it was associated with changes in fatigue and psychiatric symptoms.

Methods

We administered a series of neuropsychological tests and psychiatric questionnaires to 95 patients (mean age = 57.12 years, standard deviation (SD) = 10.68; 35.79% women) 222 (time point 1 (T1)) and 441 (time point 2 (T2)) days on average after infection. Patients were categorised according to the severity of their respiratory COVID-19 symptoms in the acute phase: mild (no hospitalisation), moderate (conventional hospitalisation), and severe (hospitalisation in intensive care unit (ICU) plus mechanical ventilation). We ran Monte-Carlo simulation methods at each time point to generate a simulated population and then compared the cumulative percentages of cognitive disorders displayed by the three patient subgroups with the estimated normative data. We calculated generalised estimating equations for the whole sample to assess the longitudinal associations between cumulative neuropsychological deficits, fatigue, and psychiatric data (anxiety, depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, and apathy).

Results

Most participants (>50%) exhibited a decrease in their neuropsychological impairments, while approximately 25% showed an escalation in these cognitive deficits. At T2, patients in the mild subgroup remained free of accumulated neuropsychological impairments. Patients with moderate severity of symptoms displayed a decrease in the magnitude of cumulative deficits in perceptual and attentional functions, a persistence of executive, memory and logical reasoning deficits, and the emergence of language deficits. In patients with severe symptoms, perceptual deficits emerged and executive deficits increased, while attentional and memory deficits remained unchanged. Changes in executive functions were significantly associated with changes in depressive symptoms, but the generalised estimating equations failed to reveal any other significant effect.

Conclusion

While most cumulative neuropsychological deficits observed at T1 persisted and even worsened over time in the subgroups of patients with moderate and severe symptoms, a significant proportion of patients, mainly in the mild subgroup, exhibited improved performances. However, we identified heterogeneous neuropsychological profiles both cross-sectionally and over time, suggesting that there may be distinct patient phenotypes. Predictors of these detrimental dynamics have yet to be identified.

Brain Pathology in COVID-19: Clinical Manifestations and Potential Mechanisms

Neurological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are less noticeable than the respiratory symptoms, but they may be associated with disability and mortality in COVID-19. Even though Omicron caused less severe disease than Delta, the incidence of neurological manifestations is similar. More than 30% of patients experienced "brain fog", delirium, stroke, and cognitive impairment, and over half of these patients presented abnormal neuroimaging outcomes. In this review, we summarize current advances in the clinical findings of neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients and compare them with those in patients with influenza infection. We also illustrate the structure and cellular invasion mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 and describe the pathway for central SARS-CoV-2 invasion. In addition, we discuss direct damage and other pathological conditions caused by SARS-CoV-2, such as an aberrant interferon response, cytokine storm, lymphopenia, and hypercoagulation, to provide treatment ideas. This review may offer new insights into preventing or treating brain damage in COVID-19.

Pediatric neuroimaging findings and clinical presentations of COVID-19: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Symptoms from SARS-CoV-2 infection can involve multiple organ systems. Several reviews discussed the neurologic involvement and neuroimaging findings in adults but research on children is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of neurologic involvement in patients diagnosed with pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 (PIMS-TS) or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C); and also to summarize current literature on possible neuroimaging findings in SARS-CoV-2 infected children.

METHODS

A literature search in six electronic databases was performed to retrieve case series, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies on neurologic involvement in COVID-19 patients younger than 21 years of age published between December 2019 to September 2023, including COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2224 patients with MIS-C from 10 cohorts and cross-sectional studies suggested that neurologic involvement in these subsets ranges from 8.5% to 32.1%. Symptoms included acute encephalitis, seizures, stroke, cranial nerve palsy, nausea/vomiting, and intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology findings of 114 children from 50 case reports included splenial or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like lesions, cytotoxic brain edema, autoimmune demyelinating diseases, ischemic stroke and arteritis, venous thrombosis, intracranial hemorrhage, meningitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor autoimmune encephalitis, acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis, hydrocephalus, olfactory bulb atrophy, cerebellitis, and acute necrotizing encephalitis.

CONCLUSION

Radiologic findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pediatric population are diverse. Neuroimaging studies should be considered in critically ill patients to rule out neurologic involvement and facilitate early interventions.

Long-term neurological dysfunction associated with COVID-19: Lessons from influenza and inflammatory diseases?

As the COVID-19 pandemic persists, SARS-CoV-2 infection is increasingly associated with long-term neurological side effects including cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression, and anxiety, colloquially known as "long-COVID." While the full extent of long-COVID neuropathology across years or even decades is not yet known, we can perhaps take direction from long-standing research into other respiratory diseases, such as influenza, that can present with similar long-term neurological consequences. In this review, we highlight commonalities in the neurological impacts of influenza and COVID-19. We first focus on the common potential mechanisms underlying neurological sequelae of long-COVID and influenza, namely (1) viral neurotropism and (2) dysregulated peripheral inflammation. The latter, namely heightened peripheral inflammation leading to central nervous system dysfunction, is emerging as a shared mechanism in various peripheral inflammatory or inflammation-associated diseases and conditions. We then discuss historical and modern examples of influenza- and COVID-19-associated cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, and fatigue, revealing key similarities in their neurological sequelae. Although we are learning that the effects of influenza and COVID differ somewhat in terms of their influence on the brain, as the impacts of long-COVID grow, such comparisons will likely prove valuable in guiding ongoing research into long-COVID, and perhaps foreshadow what could be in store for individuals with COVID-19 and their brain health.

Neurological disorders after severe pneumonia are associated with translocation of endogenous bacteria from the lung to the brain

Neurological disorders are a common feature in patients who recover from severe acute pneumonia. However, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the neurological syndromes after severe acute pneumonia are partly attributed to the translocation of endogenous bacteria from the lung to the brain during pneumonia. Using principal components analysis, similarities were found between the brain's flora species and those of the lungs, indicating that the bacteria detected in the brain may originate from the lungs. We also observed impairment of both the lung-blood and brain-blood barriers, allowing endogenous lung bacteria to invade the brain during pneumonia. An elevated microglia and astrocyte activation signature via bacterial infection-related pathways was observed, indicating a bacterial-induced disruption of brain homeostasis. Collectively, we identify endogenous lung bacteria that play a role in altering brain homeostasis, which provides insight into the mechanism of neurological syndromes after severe pneumonia.

SARS-CoV-2 and autoantibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid of COVID-19 patients: prospective multicentre cohort study

Disease mechanisms underlying neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), termed neuro-COVID, are poorly understood. Investigations of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA and antibodies, as well as autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens, could improve our understanding in that regard. We prospectively collected CSF and blood from patients investigated by lumbar puncture for neurological or neuropsychiatric symptoms during or after COVID-19. Primary outcomes were the presence of (i) SARS-CoV-2 RNA in CSF via polymerase chain reaction (PCR), (ii) SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-S receptor-binding-domain antibodies via the Euroimmun and Wantai assays and (iii) IgG autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens using commercial cell- and tissue-based assays (Euroimmun). Secondary outcomes were (i) routine CSF investigations and (ii) correlation between SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in CSF with serum levels, blood-brain barrier permeability and peripheral inflammation. We obtained CSF from 38 COVID-19 patients (mean age 56.5 ± 19.2 years, 53% women) who developed neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms. CSF pleocytosis (>5 cells) was observed in 9/38 patients (23.7%), elevated CSF protein (>0.50 g/L) in 13/38 (34.2%) and elevated CSF/serum albumin ratio in 12/35 (34.3%). PCR for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in CSF was negative in all. SARS-CoV-2 CSF antibodies were detected in 15/34 (44.1%; Euroimmun assay) and 7/31 (22.6%; Wantai assay) individuals, but there were no signs of intrathecal SARS-CoV-2 IgG production. SARS-CoV-2 CSF antibodies were positively correlated with serum levels (R = 0.93, P < 0.001), blood-brain barrier permeability (R = 0.47, P = 0.006), peripheral inflammation (R = 0.51, P = 0.002) and admission to the intensive care unit [odds ratio (OR) 17.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-264.96; P = 0.04; n = 15]. Cell-based assays detected weakly positive NMDAR, LGI1 and CASPR2 antibodies in serum of 4/34 (11.8%) patients but not in CSF. The tissue-based assay showed anti-neuronal fluorescence in CSF from one individual, staining for Purkinje cells. In summary, whereas we did not detect active SARS-CoV-2 infection in the CSF, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were prevalent. The absence of intrathecal antibody production points towards blood-brain barrier impairment as the origin of CSF SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. In contrast, CSF autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens were rare. There was no evidence for a clinical correlate of these antibodies. We conclude that, rather than specific autoimmune neuronal injury, non-specific effects of critical illness including an impaired blood-brain barrier are more likely to contribute to neuro-COVID.

Oh my gut! Is the microbial origin of neurodegenerative diseases real?

There is no cure or effective treatment for neurodegenerative protein conformational diseases (PCDs), such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's diseases, mainly because the etiology of these diseases remains elusive. Recent data suggest that unique changes in the gut microbial composition are associated with these ailments; however, our current understanding of the bacterial role in the pathogenesis of PCDs is hindered by the complexity of the microbial communities associated with specific microbiomes, such as the gut, oral, or vaginal microbiota. The composition of these specific microbiomes is regarded as a unique fingerprint affected by factors such as infections, diet, lifestyle, and antibiotics. All of these factors also affect the severity of neurodegenerative diseases. The majority of studies that reveal microbial contribution are correlational, and various models, including worm, fly, and mouse, are being utilized to decipher the role of individual microbes that may affect disease onset and progression. Recent evidence from across model organisms and humans shows a positive correlation between the presence of gram-negative enteropathogenic bacteria and the pathogenesis of PCDs. While these correlational studies do not provide a mechanistic explanation, they do reveal contributing bacterial species and provide an important basis for further investigation. One of the lurking concerns related to the microbial contribution to PCDs is the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance and poor antibiotic stewardship, which ultimately select for proteotoxic bacteria, especially the gram-negative species that are known for intrinsic resistance. In this review, we summarize what is known about individual microbial contribution to PCDs and the potential impact of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Vaccination prevents IL-1β-mediated cognitive deficits after COVID-19

Up to 25% of SARS-CoV-2 patients exhibit post-acute cognitive sequelae. Although millions of cases of COVID-19-mediated memory dysfunction are accumulating worldwide, the underlying mechanisms and how vaccination lowers risk are unknown. Interleukin-1, a key component of innate immune defense against SARS-CoV-2 infection, is elevated in the hippocampi of COVID-19 patients. Here we show that intranasal infection of C57BL/6J mice with SARS-CoV-2 beta variant, leads to CNS infiltration of Ly6Chi monocytes and microglial activation. Accordingly, SARS-CoV-2, but not H1N1 influenza virus, increases levels of brain IL-1β and induces persistent IL-1R1-mediated loss of hippocampal neurogenesis, which promotes post-acute cognitive deficits. Breakthrough infection after vaccination with a low dose of adenoviral vectored Spike protein prevents hippocampal production of IL-1β during breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, loss of neurogenesis, and subsequent memory deficits. Our study identifies IL-1β as one potential mechanism driving SARS-CoV-2-induced cognitive impairment in a new murine model that is prevented by vaccination.

Long-term neurological outcome after COVID-19 using all SARS-CoV-2 test results and hospitalisations in Denmark with 22-month follow-up

Hospitalisation with COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of neurological sequelae; however, representative nationwide studies comparing to other infections with similar severity and also including milder SARS-CoV-2 infections have been lacking. Using the nationwide Danish registers including all SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results and hospitalisations between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, we estimate the risk of any first neurological disorder diagnosed in inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room settings. We show that positive tests increase the rate of neurological disorders by a hazard ratio of 1.96 (95% confidence interval: 1.88-2.05) compared to individuals not tested and by a hazard ratio of 1.11 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.16) compared to individuals with negative tests only. However, there is no evidence that the risk of neurological disorders is higher for individuals who test positive compared to non-COVID-19 infections treated with anti-infective medication. The risk of neurological disorders is increased after COVID-19-hospitalisation compared to no COVID-19 hospital admission; however, these risks are comparable to hospitalisation with other respiratory infections (P value 0.328). In conclusion, COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of neurological disorders, but no more than that observed after other infections of similar severity.

Neurologic Complications of COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the spectrum of neurologic complications occurring in acute or postacute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as the neurologic risks and benefits of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, reports of neurologic complications of COVID-19 began to surface. A variety of neurologic conditions have since been reported in association with COVID-19. Understanding of the underlying mechanism of COVID-19 neurologic involvement continues to evolve; however, the evidence seems to suggest that aberrant inflammatory responses may play a role. In addition to neurologic symptoms in acute COVID-19, neurologic post-COVID-19 conditions are increasingly recognized. The development of COVID-19 vaccines has been essential in preventing the spread of COVID-19. With increasing numbers of vaccine doses administered, various neurologic adverse events have been reported.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neurologists must be aware of the potential acute, postacute, and vaccine-associated neurologic complications associated with COVID-19 and be poised to serve as integral members of multidisciplinary care teams for patients with COVID-19-related conditions.

Frequency of Parkinson disease following COVID-19 infection: A two-year retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 infection is known to cause various neurological symptoms, and potentially increases the risk of developing subsequent neurodegenerative conditions including parkinsonism. To our knowledge, no study to date has used a large data set in the United States to ascertain the risk of developing incident Parkinson disease in patients with history of COVID-19 infection compared to the risk amongst those without prior COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

We utilized data from TriNetX electronic health records network which includes 73 healthcare organizations and over 107 million patients. We compared adult patients with and without COVID-19 infection, with health records from January 1, 2020 through July 26, 2022, to determine the relative risk of developing Parkinson disease stratified by 3-month intervals. We used propensity score matching to control for patients' age, sex, and smoking history.

RESULTS

We collected data on 27,614,510 patients meeting our study criteria: 2,036,930 patients with a positive COVID-19 infection (COVID-19) and 25,577,580 without a positive COVID-19 infection (non-COVID-19). After propensity score matching, age, sex, and smoking history differences became non-significant, with 2,036,930 patients in each cohort. After propensity score matching, we found significantly increased odds of new onset Parkinson disease in the COVID-19 cohort at three, six, nine, and twelve months from the index event, with peak odds ratio at six months. After twelve months there is no significant difference between the COVID-19 group and non-COVID-19 group.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be a transiently increased risk of developing Parkinson disease in the first year following COVID-19 infection.

Exploration of the Shared Molecular Mechanisms between COVID-19 and Neurodegenerative Diseases through Bioinformatic Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of deaths and remains a major public health burden worldwide. Previous studies found that a large number of COVID-19 patients and survivors developed neurological symptoms and might be at high risk of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to explore the shared pathways between COVID-19, AD, and PD by using bioinformatic analysis to reveal potential mechanisms, which may explain the neurological symptoms and degeneration of brain that occur in COVID-19 patients, and to provide early intervention. In this study, gene expression datasets of the frontal cortex were employed to detect common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of COVID-19, AD, and PD. A total of 52 common DEGs were then examined using functional annotation, protein-protein interaction (PPI) construction, candidate drug identification, and regulatory network analysis. We found that the involvement of the synaptic vesicle cycle and down-regulation of synapses were shared by these three diseases, suggesting that synaptic dysfunction might contribute to the onset and progress of neurodegenerative diseases caused by COVID-19. Five hub genes and one key module were obtained from the PPI network. Moreover, 5 drugs and 42 transcription factors (TFs) were also identified on the datasets. In conclusion, the results of our study provide new insights and directions for follow-up studies of the relationship between COVID-19 and neurodegenerative diseases. The hub genes and potential drugs we identified may provide promising treatment strategies to prevent COVID-19 patients from developing these disorders.

Association of COVID-19 with Risk and Progression of Alzheimer's Disease: Non-Overlapping Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis of 2.6 Million Subjects

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies showed that COVID-19 increases risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it remains unknown if there is a potential genetic predispositional effect.

OBJECTIVE

To examine potential effects of genetic susceptibility of COVID-19 on the risk and progression of AD, we performed a non-overlapping 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS).

METHODS

Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of over 2.6 million subjects was used to examine whether genetic susceptibility of COVID-19 is not associated with the risk of AD, cortical amyloid burden, hippocampal volume, or AD progression score. Additionally, a validation analysis was performed on a combined sample size of 536,190 participants.

RESULTS

We show that the AD risk was not associated with genetic susceptibility of COVID-19 risk (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.19) and COVID-19 severity (COVID-19 hospitalization: OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.9-1.07, and critical COVID-19: OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03). Genetic predisposition to COVID-19 is not associated with AD progression as measured by hippocampal volume, cortical amyloid beta load, and AD progression score. These findings were replicated in a set of 536,190 participants. Consistent results were obtained across models based on different GWAS summary statistics, MR estimators and COVID-19 definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated that the genetic susceptibility of COVID-19 is not associated with the risk and progression of AD.

Inflammasome signaling proteins as biomarkers of COVID-19

Introduction

One of the main characteristics of COVID-19 is an exacerbated inflammatory response that results in cardiometabolic complications and dysfunction in the nervous system. Moreover, these complications may extend beyond the period of active SARS-CoV2 infection and even extend over a year. Thus, it is important to better understand the contribution of the inflammatory responses in COVID-19 patients, not just in the acute phase but also after the infection has subsided.

Methods

We measured the protein levels of inflammasome signaling proteins using Simple Plex microfluidics technology in patients with an active SARS-CoV2 infection and in recovered patients to determine their potential use as biomarkers of COVID-19. We carried out statistical analyses to identify which proteins were increased in COVID-19 patients with active infection and in recovered patients. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated for each analyte to determine their potential fit as biomarkers.

Results

The inflammasome proteins caspase-1, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 were elevated in the plasma of patients with active infection and remained elevated after the infection was resolved for approximately 2 months after. Levels of caspase-1 and ASC continued to increase long after patients had recovered from the infection. Furthermore, when measuring biomarkers of inflammation during active infection, analyses with area under the curve (AUC) values above 0.75 indicated that caspase-1, ASC, IL-1β and IL-18 are reliable biomarkers of the inflammatory response during active COVID-19 infection. Moreover, when measuring biomarkers of inflammation after recovery from active infection, caspase-1 and ASC presented AUC values above 0.9.

Discussion

These findings indicate that inflammasome signaling proteins can be used to reliably monitor the inflammatory innate immune response in COVID-19 patients.

Investigating neurological symptoms of infectious diseases like COVID-19 leading to a deeper understanding of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease

Apart from common respiratory symptoms, neurological symptoms are prevalent among patients with COVID-19. Research has shown that infection with SARS-CoV-2 accelerated alpha-synuclein aggregation, induced Lewy-body-like pathology, caused dopaminergic neuron senescence, and worsened symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In addition, SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce neuroinflammation and facilitate subsequent neurodegeneration in long COVID, and increase individual vulnerability to PD or parkinsonism. These findings suggest that a post-COVID-19 parkinsonism might follow the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to prevent a possible post-COVID-19 parkinsonism, this paper reviewed neurological symptoms and related findings of COVID-19 and related infectious diseases (influenza and prion disease) and neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer's disease, PD and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), and discussed potential mechanisms underlying the neurological symptoms and the relationship between the infectious diseases and the neurodegenerative disorders, as well as the therapeutic and preventive implications in the neurodegenerative disorders. Infections with a relay of microbes (SARS-CoV-2, influenza A viruses, gut bacteria, etc.) and prion-like alpha-synuclein proteins over time may synergize to induce PD. Therefore, a systematic approach that targets these pathogens and the pathogen-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration may provide cures for neurodegenerative disorders. Further, antiviral/antimicrobial drugs, vaccines, immunotherapies and new therapies (e.g., stem cell therapy) need to work together to treat, manage or prevent these disorders. As medical science and technology advances, it is anticipated that better vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 variants, new antiviral/antimicrobial drugs, effective immunotherapies (alpha-synuclein antibodies, vaccines for PD or parkinsonism, etc.), as well as new therapies will be developed and made available in the near future, which will help prevent a possible post-COVID-19 parkinsonism in the 21st century.

The Role of Ketogenic Diet in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases

Over a hundred years of study on the favourable effect of ketogenic diets in the treatment of epilepsy have contributed to a long-lasting discussion on its potential influence on other neurological diseases. A significant increase in the number of scientific studies in that field has been currently observed. The aim of this paper is a widespread, thorough analysis of the available scientific evidence in respect of the role of the ketogenic diet in the therapy of neurological diseases such as: epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS) and migraine. A wide range of the mechanisms of action of the ketogenic diet has been demonstrated in neurological diseases, including, among other effects, its influence on the reduction in inflammatory conditions and the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the restoration of the myelin sheath of the neurons, the formation and regeneration of mitochondria, neuronal metabolism, the provision of an alternative source of energy for neurons (ketone bodies), the reduction in glucose and insulin concentrations, the reduction in amyloid plaques, the induction of autophagy, the alleviation of microglia activation, the reduction in excessive neuronal activation, the modulation of intestinal microbiota, the expression of genes, dopamine production and the increase in glutamine conversion into GABA. The studies discussed (including randomised controlled studies), conducted in neurological patients, have stressed the effectiveness of the ketogenic diet in the treatment of epilepsy and have demonstrated its promising therapeutic potential in Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS) and migraine. A frequent advantage of the diet was demonstrated over non-ketogenic diets (in the control groups) in the therapy of neurological diseases, with simultaneous safety and feasibility when conducting the nutritional model.

The neurobiology of long COVID

Persistent neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms affect a substantial fraction of people after COVID-19 and represent a major component of the post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, also known as long COVID. Here, we review what is understood about the pathobiology of post-acute COVID-19 impact on the CNS and discuss possible neurobiological underpinnings of the cognitive symptoms affecting COVID-19 survivors. We propose the chief mechanisms that may contribute to this emerging neurological health crisis.

Neurological Consequences, Mental Health, Physical Care, and Appropriate Nutrition in Long-COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused a collapse of the world health systems. Now, vaccines and more effective therapies have reversed this crisis but the scenario is further aggravated by the appearance of a new pathology, occurring as SARS-CoV-2 infection consequence: the long-COVID-19. This term is commonly used to describe signs and symptoms that continue or develop after acute infection of COVID-19 up to several months. In this review, the consequences of the disease on mental health and the neurological implications due to the long-COVID are described. Furthermore, the appropriate nutritional approach and some recommendations to relieve the symptoms of the pathology are presented. Data collected indicated that in the next future the disease will affect an increasing number of individuals and that interdisciplinary action is needed to counteract it.