Every fifth patient suffered a high nutritional risk—Results of a prospective patient survey in an oncological outpatient center

Effects of integrative telehealth-based nutrition care with and without oral nutritional supplements in patients with liver and colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effects of post-discharge integrative telehealth-based nutritional care alone versus post-discharge integrative telehealth-based nutritional care combined with high-calorie/high-protein oral nutritional supplements (HCHP-ONS) on the nutritional status and quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) at risk of malnutrition.

METHODS

We recruited HCC or CRC patients who were at moderate to high risk of malnutrition, defined as a score of 4-9 on the abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (aPG-SGA), and randomly assigned them to either a telehealth nutritional care-control group (C group) or a telehealth nutritional care combined with HCHP-ONS group (C+O group) for a 3-month intervention. In group C, a dietitian provided monthly telehealth-based nutritional assessments and guidance through a mobile application (LINE) or phone calls. In the C+O group, in addition to telehealth-based nutritional assessments and guidance, patients received a daily can of HCHP-ONS, which provided 425 kcal and 19.1 g of protein per serving. Blood tests, anthropometric indicators, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and a nutritional status assessment were conducted monthly.

RESULTS

Results showed that the C+O group had significantly reduced malnutrition risk scores at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd months. By the 3rd month, the C+O group showed significant improvement in the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and notable improvements in diarrhea and respiratory distress scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HCC and CRC who were at risk of malnutrition, integrative telehealth-based nutritional care via LINE or phone calls effectively reduced malnutrition risk, maintained PNI, and supported quality of life (QOL). The addition of HCHP-ONS further enhanced nutritional outcomes, leading to greater improvements in PNI, diarrhea, and dyspnea by the 3rd month.

Assessing Nutritional Status in Gastric Cancer Patients after Total versus Subtotal Gastrectomy: Cross-Sectional Study

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health concern, ranking as the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Malnutrition is common in GC patients and can negatively impact prognosis and quality of life. Understanding nutritional issues and their management is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This cross-sectional study included 51 GC patients who underwent curative surgery, either total or subtotal gastrectomy. Various nutritional assessments were conducted, including anthropometric measurements, laboratory tests, and scoring systems such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS), Observer-Reported Dysphagia (ORD), Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), and Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ). Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were significantly higher in the subtotal gastrectomy group. Nutritional assessments indicated a higher risk of malnutrition in patients who underwent total gastrectomy, as evidenced by higher scores on ORD, NRS-2002, and PG-SGA. While total gastrectomy was associated with a higher risk of malnutrition, no single nutritional parameter emerged as a strong predictor of surgical approach. PG-SGA predominantly identified malnutrition, with its occurrence linked to demographic factors such as female gender and age exceeding 65 years.

A Narrative Review Comparing Nutritional Screening Tools in Outpatient Management of Cancer Patients

Malnutrition during cancer has a negative impact on prognosis and quality of life. Therefore, it is important to identify those patients at higher nutritional risk to prevent its development. There are nutritional screening tools, such as MUST and NRS-2002, that focus on the patient on admission to hospital. However, most patients will develop malnutrition in the outpatient or ambulatory setting. This study aims to determine which nutritional screening tool is most effective in assessing nutritional risk in the outpatient oncology patient, highlighting the parameters analysed by these tools. Seventeen articles were reviewed, with the most important variables being tumour location, tumour stage, age, and gender, as well as recent weight loss, dietary intake, and digestive disorders. The Nutriscore, NRS-2002, and MUST tools are considered suitable, but the choice varies depending on these parameters. MNA is suitable for elderly patients, while SNAQ was not considered reliable in this population. In conclusion, MUST, NRS-2002, and Nutriscore are suitable tools, but their choice depends on specific characteristics. There is currently no universal tool for nutritional risk assessment in outpatients.

The Prognostic Value of the GNRI in Patients with Stomach Cancer Undergoing Surgery

Malnutrition often induces an adverse prognosis in cancer surgery patients. The elderly nutrition risk index (GNRI) is an example of the objective indicators of nutrition-related risks. We performed a meta-analysis to thoroughly examine the evidence for the GNRI in predicting the outcomes of patients undergoing stomach cancer surgery. Eligible articles were retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar by 24 October 2022. The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and post-operative complications. A total of 11 articles with 5593 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The combined forest plot showed that for every unit increase in the preoperative GNRI score in patients with stomach cancer, their postoperative mortality was reduced by 5.6% (HR: 0.944; 95% CI: 0.933−0.956, p < 0.001). The pooled results also demonstrated that a low GNRI was correlated with poor OS (HR: 2.052; 95% CI: 1.726−2.440, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.684; 95% CI: 1.249−2.270, p = 0.001) in patients who underwent stomach cancer surgery. Postoperative complications were more likely to occur in patients with a low GNRI, as opposed to those with a high GNRI (OR: 1.768; 95% CI: 1.445−2.163, p < 0.001). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity, and the sensitivity analysis supported the stability and dependability of the above results. the GNRI is a valuable predictor of long-term outcomes and complications in stomach cancer patients undergoing surgery.