1
|
Jiao Y, Truong T, Eon-Marchais S, Mebirouk N, Caputo SM, Dondon MG, Karimi M, Le Gal D, Beauvallet J, Le Floch É, Dandine-Roulland C, Bacq-Daian D, Olaso R, Albuisson J, Audebert-Bellanger S, Berthet P, Bonadona V, Buecher B, Caron O, Cavaillé M, Chiesa J, Colas C, Collonge-Rame MA, Coupier I, Delnatte C, De Pauw A, Dreyfus H, Fert-Ferrer S, Gauthier-Villars M, Gesta P, Giraud S, Gladieff L, Golmard L, Lasset C, Lejeune-Dumoulin S, Léoné M, Limacher JM, Lortholary A, Luporsi É, Mari V, Maugard CM, Mortemousque I, Mouret-Fourme E, Nambot S, Noguès C, Popovici C, Prieur F, Pujol P, Sevenet N, Sobol H, Toulas C, Uhrhammer N, Vaur D, Venat L, Boland-Augé A, Guénel P, Deleuze JF, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Andrieu N, Lesueur F. Association and performance of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer among French women presenting or not a familial predisposition to the disease. Eur J Cancer 2023; 179:76-86. [PMID: 36509001 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three partially overlapping breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) comprising 77, 179 and 313 SNPs have been proposed for European-ancestry women by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) for improving risk prediction in the general population. However, the effect of these SNPs may vary from one country to another and within a country because of other factors. OBJECTIVE To assess their associated risk and predictive performance in French women from (1) the CECILE population-based case-control study, (2) BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variant (PV) carriers from the GEMO study, and (3) familial breast cancer cases with no BRCA1/2 PV and unrelated controls from the GENESIS study. RESULTS All three PRS were associated with breast cancer in all studies, with odds ratios per standard deviation varying from 1.7 to 2.0 in CECILE and GENESIS, and hazard ratios varying from 1.1 to 1.4 in GEMO. The predictive performance of PRS313 in CECILE was similar to that reported in BCAC but lower than that in GENESIS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.67 and 0.75, respectively). PRS were less performant in BRCA2 and BRCA1 PV carriers (AUC = 0.58 and 0.54 respectively). CONCLUSION Our results are in line with previous validation studies in the general population and in BRCA1/2 PV carriers. Additionally, we showed that PRS may be of clinical utility for women with a strong family history of breast cancer and no BRCA1/2 PV, and for those carrying a predicted PV in a moderate-risk gene like ATM, CHEK2 or PALB2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Jiao
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, U1018, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Séverine Eon-Marchais
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine M Caputo
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Gabrielle Dondon
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Mojgan Karimi
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, U1018, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Dorothée Le Gal
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Juana Beauvallet
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Édith Le Floch
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Claire Dandine-Roulland
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Delphine Bacq-Daian
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Robert Olaso
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Juliette Albuisson
- Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Pascaline Berthet
- Département de Biopathologie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; INSERM, U1245, Rouen, France
| | - Valérie Bonadona
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Centre Léon Bérard, Unité de Prévention et épidémiologie Génétique, Lyon, France
| | - Bruno Buecher
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Caron
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villejuif, France
| | - Mathias Cavaillé
- Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR INSERM, U1240, Clermont Ferrand, France; Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Jean Chiesa
- UF de Génétique Médicale et Cytogénétique, CHRU Caremeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Chrystelle Colas
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France; INSERM, U830, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame
- Service Génétique et Biologie du Développement - Histologie, CHU Hôpital Saint-Jacques, Besançon, France
| | - Isabelle Coupier
- Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, Service de Génétique Médicale et Oncogénétique, Montpellier, France; INSERM, U896, CRCM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Capucine Delnatte
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Unité d'Oncogénétique, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Dreyfus
- Clinique Sainte Catherine, Avignon, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Département de Génétique, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Marion Gauthier-Villars
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Paul Gesta
- CH Georges Renon, Service d'Oncogénétique Régional Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
| | - Sophie Giraud
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Génétique, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - Laurence Gladieff
- Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Lisa Golmard
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Christine Lasset
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Centre Léon Bérard, Unité de Prévention et épidémiologie Génétique, Lyon, France
| | | | - Mélanie Léoné
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Génétique, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | | | - Alain Lortholary
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France; Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
| | - Élisabeth Luporsi
- Service de Génétique UF4128 CHR Metz-Thionville, Hôpital de Mercy, Metz, France
| | - Véronique Mari
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Christine M Maugard
- Génétique Oncologique Moléculaire, UF1422, Département d'Oncobiologie, LBBM, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; UF6948 Génétique Oncologique Clinique, évaluation Familiale et Suivi, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Sophie Nambot
- Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut GIMI, CHU de Dijon, Hôpital d'Enfants, France; Oncogénétique, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - Cornel Popovici
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Fabienne Prieur
- CHU de Saint-Etienne; Hôpital Nord, Service de Génétique, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, Service de Génétique Médicale et Oncogénétique, Montpellier, France; INSERM, U896, CRCM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Hagay Sobol
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Christine Toulas
- Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Nancy Uhrhammer
- Centre Jean Perrin, LBM OncoGenAuvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Dominique Vaur
- Département de Biopathologie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; INSERM, U1245, Rouen, France
| | - Laurence Venat
- Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Limoges, France
| | - Anne Boland-Augé
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, U1018, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-François Deleuze
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bellcross CA. Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2022; 49:117-147. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
3
|
Double heterozygous pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a patient with bilateral metachronous breast cancer. Cancer Genet 2021; 260-261:14-17. [PMID: 34801929 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Double heterozygosity pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are a very rare finding, particularly in non-Ashkenazi individuals. We described the first case of double heterozygosity variants in a non-Ashkenazi Argentinean woman with metachronous bilateral breast cancer. The proband is a 65-year-old female diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma in the left breast at 45 years old and invasive carcinoma in the right breast at 65 years old. She underwent a multi-gene panel testing indicating the presence of two concurrent heterozygous germline deleterious variants NM_007300.4(BRCA1):c.4201C>T (p.Gln1401Ter), and NM_000059.3(BRCA2):c.5146_5149del (p.Tyr1716fs). . The patient's son (40 years-old) was found to have the inherited pathogenic variant in BRCA2 gene. There are few reports of double heterozygosity variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Latin America. The two pathogenic variants identified in our patient have not been described together so far.
Collapse
|
4
|
Caputo SM, Golmard L, Léone M, Damiola F, Guillaud-Bataille M, Revillion F, Rouleau E, Derive N, Buisson A, Basset N, Schwartz M, Vilquin P, Garrec C, Privat M, Gay-Bellile M, Abadie C, Abidallah K, Airaud F, Allary AS, Barouk-Simonet E, Belotti M, Benigni C, Benusiglio PR, Berthemin C, Berthet P, Bertrand O, Bézieau S, Bidart M, Bignon YJ, Birot AM, Blanluet M, Bloucard A, Bombled J, Bonadona V, Bonnet F, Bonnet-Dupeyron MN, Boulaire M, Boulouard F, Bouras A, Bourdon V, Brahimi A, Brayotel F, Bressac de Paillerets B, Bronnec N, Bubien V, Buecher B, Cabaret O, Carriere J, Chiesa J, Chieze-Valéro S, Cohen C, Cohen-Haguenauer O, Colas C, Collonge-Rame MA, Conoy AL, Coulet F, Coupier I, Crivelli L, Cusin V, De Pauw A, Dehainault C, Delhomelle H, Delnatte C, Demontety S, Denizeau P, Devulder P, Dreyfus H, d’Enghein CD, Dupré A, Durlach A, Dussart S, Fajac A, Fekairi S, Fert-Ferrer S, Fiévet A, Fouillet R, Mouret-Fourme E, Gauthier-Villars M, Gesta P, Giraud S, Gladieff L, Goldbarg V, Goussot V, Guibert V, Guillerm E, Guy C, Hardouin A, Heude C, Houdayer C, Ingster O, Jacquot-Sawka C, Jones N, Krieger S, Lacoste S, Lallaoui H, Larbre H, Laugé A, Le Guyadec G, Le Mentec M, Lecerf C, Le Gall J, Legendre B, Legrand C, Legros A, Lejeune S, Lidereau R, Lignon N, Limacher JM, Doriane Livon, Lizard S, Longy M, Lortholary A, Macquere P, Mailliez A, Malsa S, Margot H, Mari V, Maugard C, Meira C, Menjard J, Molière D, Moncoutier V, Moretta-Serra J, Muller E, Nevière Z, Nguyen Minh Tuan TV, Noguchi T, Noguès C, Oca F, Popovici C, Prieur F, Raad S, Rey JM, Ricou A, Salle L, Saule C, Sevenet N, Simaga F, Sobol H, Suybeng V, Tennevet I, Tenreiro H, Tinat J, Toulas C, Turbiez I, Uhrhammer N, Vande Perre P, Vaur D, Venat L, Viellard N, Villy MC, Warcoin M, Yvard A, Zattara H, Caron O, Lasset C, Remenieras A, Boutry-Kryza N, Castéra L, Stoppa-Lyonnet D. Classification of 101 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance by cosegregation study: A powerful approach. Am J Hum Genet 2021; 108:1907-1923. [PMID: 34597585 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Up to 80% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants remain of uncertain clinical significance (VUSs). Only variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic can guide breast and ovarian cancer prevention measures and treatment by PARP inhibitors. We report the first results of the ongoing French national COVAR (cosegregation variant) study, the aim of which is to classify BRCA1/2 VUSs. The classification method was a multifactorial model combining different associations between VUSs and cancer, including cosegregation data. At this time, among the 653 variants selected, 101 (15%) distinct variants shared by 1,624 families were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic or benign/likely benign by the COVAR study. Sixty-six of the 101 (65%) variants classified by COVAR would have remained VUSs without cosegregation data. Of note, among the 34 variants classified as pathogenic by COVAR, 16 remained VUSs or likely pathogenic when following the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Although the initiation and organization of cosegregation analyses require a considerable effort, the growing number of available genetic tests results in an increasing number of families sharing a particular variant, and thereby increases the power of such analyses. Here we demonstrate that variant cosegregation analyses are a powerful tool for the classification of variants in the BRCA1/2 breast-ovarian cancer predisposition genes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruiz de Garibay G, Fernandez-Garcia I, Mazoyer S, Leme de Calais F, Ameri P, Vijayakumar S, Martinez-Ruiz H, Damiola F, Barjhoux L, Thomassen M, Andersen LVB, Herranz C, Mateo F, Palomero L, Espín R, Gómez A, García N, Jimenez D, Bonifaci N, Extremera AI, Castaño J, Raya A, Eyras E, Puente XS, Brunet J, Lázaro C, Radice P, Barnes DR, Antoniou AC, Spurdle AB, de la Hoya M, Baralle D, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Pujana MA. Altered regulation of BRCA1 exon 11 splicing is associated with breast cancer risk in carriers of BRCA1 pathogenic variants. Hum Mutat 2021; 42:1488-1502. [PMID: 34420246 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 confer a high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. The BRCA1 exon 11 (formally exon 10) is one of the largest exons and codes for the nuclear localization signals of the corresponding gene product. This exon can be partially or entirely skipped during pre-mRNA splicing, leading to three major in-frame isoforms that are detectable in most cell types and tissue, and in normal and cancer settings. However, it is unclear whether the splicing imbalance of this exon is associated with cancer risk. Here we identify a common genetic variant in intron 10, rs5820483 (NC_000017.11:g.43095106_43095108dup), which is associated with exon 11 isoform expression and alternative splicing, and with the risk of breast cancer, but not ovarian cancer, in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. The identification of this genetic effect was confirmed by analogous observations in mouse cells and tissue in which a loxP sequence was inserted in the syntenic intronic region. The prediction that the rs5820483 minor allele variant would create a binding site for the splicing silencer hnRNP A1 was confirmed by pull-down assays. Our data suggest that perturbation of BRCA1 exon 11 splicing modifies the breast cancer risk conferred by pathogenic variants of this gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gorka Ruiz de Garibay
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- Equipe GENDEV, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Université St Etienne, Lyon, France
| | - Flavia Leme de Calais
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Pietro Ameri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sangeetha Vijayakumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Haydeliz Martinez-Ruiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Francesca Damiola
- Department of Biopathology, Pathology Research Platform, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Laure Barjhoux
- Department of Biopathology, Pathology Research Platform, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Lars V B Andersen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Carmen Herranz
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Francesca Mateo
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Luis Palomero
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Roderic Espín
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez
- Gene Regulation, Stem Cells and Cancer, Center for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Nadia García
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Daniel Jimenez
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Núria Bonifaci
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ana I Extremera
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Julio Castaño
- Regenerative Medicine Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL) and Program for Clinical Translation of Regenerative Medicine in Catalonia (P-CMRC), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angel Raya
- Regenerative Medicine Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL) and Program for Clinical Translation of Regenerative Medicine in Catalonia (P-CMRC), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Centre for Networked Biomedical Research on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain.,Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Eyras
- Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Genome Sciences, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, EMBL Australia Partner Laboratory Network, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Xose S Puente
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Institute of Oncology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.,Biomedical Research Centre in Cancer (CIBERONC), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Biomedical Research Centre in Cancer (CIBERONC), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | -
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | -
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Research Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Biomedical Research Centre in Cancer (CIBERONC), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Baralle
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Miquel A Pujana
- ProCURE, Oncobell, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiao Y, Lesueur F, Azencott CA, Laurent M, Mebirouk N, Laborde L, Beauvallet J, Dondon MG, Eon-Marchais S, Laugé A, Noguès C, Andrieu N, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Caputo SM. A new hybrid record linkage process to make epidemiological databases interoperable: application to the GEMO and GENEPSO studies involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:155. [PMID: 34325649 PMCID: PMC8320036 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01299-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linking independent sources of data describing the same individuals enable innovative epidemiological and health studies but require a robust record linkage approach. We describe a hybrid record linkage process to link databases from two independent ongoing French national studies, GEMO (Genetic Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2), which focuses on the identification of genetic factors modifying cancer risk of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, and GENEPSO (prospective cohort of BRCAx mutation carriers), which focuses on environmental and lifestyle risk factors. METHODS To identify as many as possible of the individuals participating in the two studies but not registered by a shared identifier, we combined probabilistic record linkage (PRL) and supervised machine learning (ML). This approach (named "PRL + ML") combined together the candidate matches identified by both approaches. We built the ML model using the gold standard on a first version of the two databases as a training dataset. This gold standard was obtained from PRL-derived matches verified by an exhaustive manual review. Results The Random Forest (RF) algorithm showed a highest recall (0.985) among six widely used ML algorithms: RF, Bagged trees, AdaBoost, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network. Therefore, RF was selected to build the ML model since our goal was to identify the maximum number of true matches. Our combined linkage PRL + ML showed a higher recall (range 0.988-0.992) than either PRL (range 0.916-0.991) or ML (0.981) alone. It identified 1995 individuals participating in both GEMO (6375 participants) and GENEPSO (4925 participants). CONCLUSIONS Our hybrid linkage process represents an efficient tool for linking GEMO and GENEPSO. It may be generalizable to other epidemiological studies involving other databases and registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Jiao
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Chloé-Agathe Azencott
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Mines ParisTech, PSL Research University, CBIO-Centre for Computational Biology, Paris, France
| | - Maïté Laurent
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Lilian Laborde
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre de Traitement des Données IPC-PACA, Département de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Marseille, France
| | - Juana Beauvallet
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Gabrielle Dondon
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Séverine Eon-Marchais
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Anthony Laugé
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Catherine Noguès
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi du Cancer, Oncogénétique clinique, Marseille France Inserm, U830, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.,Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques et Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, Marseille, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- Inserm, U900, Paris, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Paris University, Paris, France.,Inserm, U830, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine M Caputo
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
No Association of Early-Onset Breast or Ovarian Cancer with Early-Onset Cancer in Relatives in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Families. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12071100. [PMID: 34356116 PMCID: PMC8305427 DOI: 10.3390/genes12071100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
According to clinical guidelines, the occurrence of very early-onset breast cancer (VEO-BC) (diagnosed ≤ age 30 years) or VEO ovarian cancer (VEO-OC) (diagnosed ≤ age 40 years) in families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) prompts advancing the age of risk-reducing strategies in relatives. This study aimed to assess the relation between the occurrence of VEO-BC or VEO-OC in families with BRCAm and age at BC or OC diagnosis in relatives. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 448 consecutive families with BRCAm from 2003 to 2018. Mean age and 5-year–span distribution of age at BC or OC in relatives were compared in families with or without VEO-BC or VEO-OC. Conditional probability calculation and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel chi-square tests were used to investigate early-onset cancer occurrence in relatives of VEO-BC and VEO-OC cases. Overall, 15% (19/245) of families with BRCA1m and 9% (19/203) with BRCA2m featured at least one case of VEO-BC; 8% (37/245) and 2% (2/203) featured at least one case of VEO-OC, respectively. The cumulative prevalence of VEO-BC was 5.1% (95% CI 3.6–6.6) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.4–3.6) for families with BRCA1m and BRCA2m, respectively. The distribution of age and mean age at BC diagnosis in relatives did not differ by occurrence of VEO-BC for families with BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Conditional probability calculations did not show an increase of early-onset BC in VEO-BC families with BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Conversely, the probability of VEO-BC was not increased in families with early-onset BC. VEO-BC or VEO-OC occurrence may not be related to young age at BC or OC onset in relatives in families with BRCAm. This finding—together with a relatively high VEO-BC risk for women with BRCAm—advocates for MRI breast screening from age 25 regardless of family history.
Collapse
|
8
|
Julien M, Ghouil R, Petitalot A, Caputo SM, Carreira A, Zinn-Justin S. Intrinsic Disorder and Phosphorylation in BRCA2 Facilitate Tight Regulation of Multiple Conserved Binding Events. Biomolecules 2021; 11:1060. [PMID: 34356684 PMCID: PMC8301801 DOI: 10.3390/biom11071060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The maintenance of genome integrity in the cell is an essential process for the accurate transmission of the genetic material. BRCA2 participates in this process at several levels, including DNA repair by homologous recombination, protection of stalled replication forks, and cell division. These activities are regulated and coordinated via cell-cycle dependent modifications. Pathogenic variants in BRCA2 cause genome instability and are associated with breast and/or ovarian cancers. BRCA2 is a very large protein of 3418 amino acids. Most well-characterized variants causing a strong predisposition to cancer are mutated in the C-terminal 700 residues DNA binding domain of BRCA2. The rest of the BRCA2 protein is predicted to be disordered. Interactions involving intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) remain difficult to identify both using bioinformatics tools and performing experimental assays. However, the lack of well-structured binding sites provides unique functional opportunities for BRCA2 to bind to a large set of partners in a tightly regulated manner. We here summarize the predictive and experimental arguments that support the presence of disorder in BRCA2. We describe how BRCA2 IDRs mediate self-assembly and binding to partners during DNA double-strand break repair, mitosis, and meiosis. We highlight how phosphorylation by DNA repair and cell-cycle kinases regulate these interactions. We finally discuss the impact of cancer-associated variants on the function of BRCA2 IDRs and more generally on genome stability and cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Julien
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; (M.J.); (R.G.)
- L’Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), UMR 9198, Paris-Saclay University, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
| | - Rania Ghouil
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; (M.J.); (R.G.)
- L’Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), UMR 9198, Paris-Saclay University, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
| | - Ambre Petitalot
- Service de Génétique, Unité de Génétique Constitutionnelle, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (A.P.); (S.M.C.)
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Service de Génétique, Unité de Génétique Constitutionnelle, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (A.P.); (S.M.C.)
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Aura Carreira
- L’Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), UMR 9198, Paris-Saclay University, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, 75005 Paris, France
- Unité Intégrité du Génome, ARN et Cancer, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3348, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Sophie Zinn-Justin
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; (M.J.); (R.G.)
- L’Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), UMR 9198, Paris-Saclay University, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Campos FAB, Rouleau E, Torrezan GT, Carraro DM, Casali da Rocha JC, Mantovani HK, da Silva LR, Osório CABDT, Moraes Sanches S, Caputo SM, Santana dos Santos E. Genetic Landscape of Male Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3535. [PMID: 34298749 PMCID: PMC8305894 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Male breast cancer (MBC) is now considered molecularly different from female breast cancer (FBC). Evidence from studies indicates that common genetic and epigenetic features of FBC are not shared with those diagnosed in men. Genetic predisposition is likely to play a significant role in the tumorigenesis of this rare disease. Inherited germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for around 2% and 10% of MBC cases, respectively, and the lifetime risk of breast cancer for men harboring BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is 1.2% and 6.8%. As for FBC, pathogenic mutations in other breast cancer genes have also been recently associated with an increased risk of MBC, such as PALB2 and CHEK2 mutations. However, while multigene germline panels have been extensively performed for BC female patients, the rarity of MBC has resulted in limited data to allow the understanding of the magnitude of risk and the contribution of recently identified moderate penetrance genes of FBC for MBC predisposition. This review gathers available data about the germline genetic landscape of men affected by breast cancer, estimated risk associated with these genetic variants, and current guidelines for clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Giovana Tardin Torrezan
- Genomics and Molecular Biology Group, International Center of Research CIPE, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo 01509-010, Brazil; (G.T.T.); (D.M.C.)
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics (INCITO), Sao Paulo 01508-010, Brazil
| | - Dirce Maria Carraro
- Genomics and Molecular Biology Group, International Center of Research CIPE, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo 01509-010, Brazil; (G.T.T.); (D.M.C.)
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics (INCITO), Sao Paulo 01508-010, Brazil
| | | | - Higor Kassouf Mantovani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-881, Brazil; (H.K.M.); (L.R.d.S.)
| | - Leonardo Roberto da Silva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-881, Brazil; (H.K.M.); (L.R.d.S.)
| | | | - Solange Moraes Sanches
- Deparment of Medical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo 01509-010, Brazil; (S.M.S.); (E.S.d.S.)
| | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France;
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth Santana dos Santos
- Deparment of Medical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo 01509-010, Brazil; (S.M.S.); (E.S.d.S.)
- Centro de Oncologia, Hospital Sírio Libanês, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Santana dos Santos E, Lallemand F, Petitalot A, Caputo SM, Rouleau E. HRness in Breast and Ovarian Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E3850. [PMID: 32481735 PMCID: PMC7312125 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian and breast cancers are currently defined by the main pathways involved in the tumorigenesis. The majority are carcinomas, originating from epithelial cells that are in constant division and subjected to cyclical variations of the estrogen stimulus during the female hormonal cycle, therefore being vulnerable to DNA damage. A portion of breast and ovarian carcinomas arises in the context of DNA repair defects, in which genetic instability is the backdrop for cancer initiation and progression. For these tumors, DNA repair deficiency is now increasingly recognized as a target for therapeutics. In hereditary breast/ovarian cancers (HBOC), tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations present an impairment of DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). For many years, BRCA1/2 mutations were only screened on germline DNA, but now they are also searched at the tumor level to personalize treatment. The reason of the inactivation of this pathway remains uncertain for most cases, even in the presence of a HR-deficient signature. Evidence indicates that identifying the mechanism of HR inactivation should improve both genetic counseling and therapeutic response, since they can be useful as new biomarkers of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Santana dos Santos
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France;
- Department of Clinical Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01509-010, Brazil
| | - François Lallemand
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (F.L.); (A.P.); (S.M.C.)
- PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Ambre Petitalot
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (F.L.); (A.P.); (S.M.C.)
- PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Sandrine M. Caputo
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France; (F.L.); (A.P.); (S.M.C.)
- PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Etienne Rouleau
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Le Page C, Rahimi K, Rodrigues M, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Recio N, Tommasi S, Bataillon G, Portelance L, Golmard L, Meunier L, Tonin PN, Gotlieb W, Yasmeen A, Ray-Coquard I, Labidi-Galy SI, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM. Clinicopathological features of women with epithelial ovarian cancer and double heterozygosity for BRCA1 and BRCA2: A systematic review and case report analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 156:377-386. [PMID: 31753525 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carriers of pathogenic variants in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as a double mutation (BRCA1/2 DM) have been rarely reported in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS We reviewed the English literature and interrogated three repositories reporting EOC patients carrying BRCA1/2 DM. The clinicopathological parameters of 36 EOC patients carrying germline BRCA1/2 DM were compared to high-grade serous EOC women of the COEUR cohort with known germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier status (n = 376 non-carriers, n = 65 BRCA1 and n = 38 BRCA2). Clinicopathological parameters evaluated were age at diagnosis, stage of disease, loss of heterozygosity, type of mutation, immunohistochemistry profile, progression occurrence and survival. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis of BRCA1/2 DM patients was 51.9 years, similar to BRCA1 mutation carriers (49.7 years, p = .58) and younger than BRCA2 mutation carriers (58.1 years, p = .02). Most patients were diagnosed at advanced stage (III-IV; 82%) and were carriers of founder/frequent mutations (69%). Tissue immunostainings revealed no progesterone receptor expression and low intraepithelial inflammation. The 5-year survival rate (60%) was significantly lower than that of BRCA2 mutation carriers (76%, p = .03) but not of BRCA1 mutation carriers (51%, p = .37). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggests some co-dominant effect of both mutations but the outcome of these patients more closely resembled that of BRCA1 mutation carriers with poor prognosis factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Le Page
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Medical Oncology, INSERM U830 "Cancer, heterogeneity, instability and plasticity", Paris, France
| | - Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
- Gynecological Cancer Centre and Ovarian Cancer Research Group, University Hospital Basel and Department of Biomedicine, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Neil Recio
- Departments of Human Genetics, McGill University; Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Guillaume Bataillon
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Biopathology, Paris, France
| | - Lise Portelance
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lisa Golmard
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Paris, France
| | - Liliane Meunier
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia N Tonin
- Departments of Human Genetics, McGill University; Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amber Yasmeen
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - S Intidhar Labidi-Galy
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Diane Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Gynecology-Oncology, CHUM, QC, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM), and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Germline Missense Variants in BRCA1: New Trends and Challenges for Clinical Annotation. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11040522. [PMID: 31013702 PMCID: PMC6520942 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing allows for the identification of germline DNA variations, which are associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Detection of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant triggers several clinical management actions, which may include increased surveillance and prophylactic surgery for healthy carriers or treatment with the PARP inhibitor therapy for carriers diagnosed with cancer. Thus, standardized validated criteria for the annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants according to their pathogenicity are necessary to support clinical decision-making and ensure improved outcomes. Upon detection, variants whose pathogenicity can be inferred by the genetic code are typically classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, likely benign, or benign. Variants whose impact on function cannot be directly inferred by the genetic code are labeled as variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) and are evaluated by multifactorial likelihood models that use personal and family history of cancer, segregation data, prediction tools, and co-occurrence with a pathogenic BRCA variant. Missense variants, coding alterations that replace a single amino acid residue with another, are a class of variants for which determination of clinical relevance is particularly challenging. Here, we discuss current issues in the missense variant classification by following a typical life cycle of a BRCA1 missense variant through detection, annotation and information dissemination. Advances in massively parallel sequencing have led to a substantial increase in VUS findings. Although the comprehensive assessment and classification of missense variants according to their pathogenicity remains the bottleneck, new developments in functional analysis, high throughput assays, data sharing, and statistical models are rapidly changing this scenario.
Collapse
|