1
|
Zaratim GRR, dos Reis RG, dos Santos MA, Yagi NA, Oliveira e Silva LF. Automated treatment planning for whole breast irradiation with individualized tangential IMRT fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14361. [PMID: 38642406 PMCID: PMC11087165 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSES This study aimed to develop and validate algorithms for automating intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in breast cancer patients, with a focus on patient anatomical characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively selected 400 breast cancer patients without lymph node involvement for automated treatment planning. Automation was achieved using the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) integrated into the Eclipse Treatment Planning System. We employed three beam insertion geometries and three optimization strategies, resulting in 3600 plans, each delivering a 40.05 Gy dose in 15 fractions. Gantry angles in the tangent fields were selected based on a criterion involving the minimum intersection area between the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and the ipsilateral lung in the Beam's Eye View projection. ESAPI was also used to gather patient anatomical data, serving as input for Random Forest models to select the optimal plan. The Random Forest classification considered both beam insertion geometry and optimization strategy. Dosimetric data were evaluated in accordance with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1005 protocol. RESULTS Overall, all approaches generated high-quality plans, with approximately 94% meeting the acceptable dose criteria for organs at risk and/or target coverage as defined by RTOG guidelines. Average automated plan generation time ranged from 6 min and 37 s to 9 min and 22 s, with the mean time increasing with additional fields. The Random Forest approach did not successfully enable automatic planning strategy selection. Instead, our automated planning system allows users to choose from the tested geometry and strategy options. CONCLUSIONS Although our attempt to correlate patient anatomical features with planning strategy using machine learning tools was unsuccessful, the resulting dosimetric outcomes proved satisfactory. Our algorithm consistently produced high-quality plans, offering significant time and efficiency advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulianne Rivelli Rodrigues Zaratim
- Department of Radiation OncologyCONFIAR RadiotherapyGoiâniaGoiásBrazil
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital of BrasiliaBrasiliaFederal DistrictBrazil
| | - Ricardo Gomes dos Reis
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital of BrasiliaBrasiliaFederal DistrictBrazil
| | | | - Nathalya Ala Yagi
- Department of Radiation OncologyCONFIAR RadiotherapyGoiâniaGoiásBrazil
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital of BrasiliaBrasiliaFederal DistrictBrazil
| | - Luis Felipe Oliveira e Silva
- Department of Radiation OncologyCONFIAR RadiotherapyGoiâniaGoiásBrazil
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital of BrasiliaBrasiliaFederal DistrictBrazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
He L, Peng X, Chen N, Wei Z, Wang J, Liu Y, Xiao J. Automated treatment planning for liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3230-3240. [PMID: 37097529 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03196-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the quality of fully automated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning based on volumetric modulated arc therapy, which can reduce the reliance on historical plans and the experience of dosimetrists. METHODS Fully automated re-planning was performed on twenty liver cancer patients, automated plans based on automated SBRT planning (ASP) program and manual plans were conducted and compared. One patient was randomly selected and evaluate the repeatability of ASP, ten automated and ten manual SBRT plans were generated based on the same initial optimization objectives. Then, ten SBRT plans were generated for another selected randomly patient with different initial optimization objectives to assess the reproducibility. All plans were clinically evaluated in a double-blinded manner by five experienced radiation oncologists. RESULTS Fully automated plans provided similar planning target volume dose coverage and statistically better organ at risk sparing compared to the manual plans. Notably, automated plans achieved significant dose reduction in spinal cord, stomach, kidney, duodenum, and colon, with a median dose of D2% reduction ranging from 0.64 to 2.85 Gy. R50% and Dmean of ten rings for automated plans were significantly lower than those of manual plans. The average planning time for automated and manual plans was 59.8 ± 7.9 min vs. 127.1 ± 16.8 min (- 67.3 min). CONCLUSION Automated planning for SBRT, without relying on historical data, can generate comparable or even better plan quality for liver cancer compared with manual planning, along with better reproducibility, and less clinically planning time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling He
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Na Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Chengdu Medical College, Xindu Avenue No. 783, Chengdu, 610500, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhigong Wei
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yingtong Liu
- Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maes D, Holmstrom M, Helander R, Saini J, Fang C, Bowen SR. Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose-mimicking optimization. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14065. [PMID: 37334746 PMCID: PMC10562035 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a deep learning architecture for automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). METHODS A 3-dimensional (3D) U-Net model has been implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) that uses contoured regions of interest (ROI) binary masks as model inputs with a predicted dose distribution as the model output. Predicted dose distributions were converted to deliverable PBS treatment plans using a voxel-wise robust dose mimicking optimization algorithm. This model was leveraged to generate machine learning (ML) optimized plans for patients receiving proton PBS irradiation of the chest wall. Model training was carried out on a retrospective set of 48 previously-treated chest wall patient treatment plans. Model evaluation was carried out by generating ML-optimized plans on a hold-out set of 12 contoured chest wall patient CT datasets from previously treated patients. Clinical goal criteria and gamma analysis were used to compare dose distributions of the ML-optimized plans against the clinically approved plans across the test patients. RESULTS Statistical analysis of mean clinical goal criteria indicates that compared to the clinical plans, the ML optimization workflow generated robust plans with similar dose to the heart, lungs, and esophagus while achieving superior dosimetric coverage to the PTV chest wall (clinical mean V95 = 97.6% vs. ML mean V95 = 99.1%, p < 0.001) across the 12 test patients. CONCLUSIONS ML-based automated treatment plan optimization using the 3D U-Net model can generate treatment plans of similar clinical quality compared to human-driven optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Maes
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | | | - Jatinder Saini
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Christine Fang
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Stephen R. Bowen
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lou Z, Cheng C, Mao R, Li D, Tian L, Li B, Lei H, Ge H. A novel automated planning approach for multi-anatomical sites cancer in Raystation treatment planning system. Phys Med 2023; 109:102586. [PMID: 37062102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an automated planning approach in Raystation and evaluate its feasibility in multiple clinical application scenarios. METHODS An automated planning approach (Ruiplan) was developed by using the scripting platform of Raystation. Radiotherapy plans were re-generated both automatically by using Ruiplan and manually. 60 patients, including 20 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 20 patients with esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), and 20 patients with rectal cancer (RECA) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Dosimetric and planning efficiency parameters of the automated plans (APs) and manual plans (MPs) were statistically compared. RESULTS For target coverage, APs yielded superior dose homogeneity in NPC and RECA, while maintaining similar dose conformity for all studied anatomical sites. For OARs sparing, APs led to significant improvement in most OARs sparing. The average planning time required for APs was reduced by more than 43% compared with MPs. Despite the increased monitor units (MUs) for NPC and RECA in APs, the beam-on time of APs and MPs had no statistical difference. Both the MUs and beam-on time of APs were significantly lower than that of MPs in ESCA. CONCLUSIONS This study developed a new automated planning approach, Ruiplan, it is feasible for multi-treatment techniques and multi-anatomical sites cancer treatment planning. The dose distributions of targets and OARs in the APs were similar or better than those in the MPs, and the planning time of APs showed a sharp reduction compared with the MPs. Thus, Ruiplan provides a promising approach for realizing automated treatment planning in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoyang Lou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chen Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ronghu Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Dingjie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingling Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongchang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hong Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peng J, Yang C, Guo H, Shen L, Zhang M, Wang J, Zhang Z, Cai B, Hu W. Toward real-time automatic treatment planning (RTTP) with a one-step 3D fluence map prediction method and (nonorthogonal) convolution technique. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2023; 231:107263. [PMID: 36731309 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish and evaluate a (quasi) real-time automated treatment planning (RTTP) strategy utilizing a one-step full 3D fluence map prediction model based on a nonorthogonal convolution operation for rectal cancer radiotherapy. METHODS The RTTP approach directly extracts 3D projections from volumetric CT and anatomical data according to the beam incident direction. A 3D deep learning model with a nonorthogonal convolution operation was established that takes projections in cone beam space as input, extracts the features along and around the ray-trace path, and outputs a predicted fluence map (PFM) for each beam. The PFM is then converted to the MLC sequence with deliverable MUs to generate the final treatment plan. A total of 314 rectal adenocarcinoma patients with 2198 projection data samples were used in model training and validation. An extra 20 patients were used to test the feasibility of the RTTP method by comparing the plan quality, efficiency, deliverability performance, and physician blinded review results with the manual plans. RESULTS Overall, the RTTP plans met the clinical dose criteria for target coverage, conformity, homogeneity, and organ-at-risk dose sparing. Compared to manual plans, the RTTP plans showed increases in PTV D1% by only 2.33% (p < 0.001) and a decrease in PTV D99% by 0.45% (p < 0.05). The RTTP plans showed a dose increase in the bladder, with a V50 of 14.01 ± 11.75% vs. 10.74 ± 8.51%, respectively, and no significant increases in the femoral head with the mean dose. The planning efficiency was improved in RTTP planning, with 39 s vs. 944 s in fluence map generation; the deliverability performance was saved by 1.91% (p < 0.001) in total MU. According to the blinded plan review by our physician, 55% of RTTP plans can be directly used in clinical radiotherapy treatment. CONCLUSION The quasi RTTP method improves the planning efficiency and deliverability performance while maintaining a plan quality close to that of the optimized manual plans in rectal radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayuan Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Cui Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongbo Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijun Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TengZhou Central People's hospital, Shandong, China
| | - Jiazhou Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology's Division of Medical Physics & Engineering, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
| | - Weigang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, China; Shanghai key laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yan C, Guo B, Tendulkar R, Xia P. Contour similarity and its implication on inverse prostate SBRT treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13809. [PMID: 36300837 PMCID: PMC9924104 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Success of auto-segmentation is measured by the similarity between auto and manual contours that is often quantified by Dice coefficient (DC). The dosimetric impact of contour variability on inverse planning has been rarely reported. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether automatically generated organs-at-risk (OARs) could be used in inverse prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning and whether the dosimetric parameters are still clinically acceptable after radiation oncologists modify the OARs. METHODS AND MATERIALS Planning computed tomography images from 10 patients treated with SBRT for prostate cancer were selected and automatically segmented by commercially available atlas-based software. The automatically generated OAR contours were compared with the manually drawn contours. Two volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, autoRec-VMAT (where only automatically generated rectums were used in optimization) and autoAll-VMAT (where automatically generated OARs were used in inverse optimization) were generated. Dosimetric parameters based on the manually drawn PTV and OARs were compared with the clinically approved plans. RESULTS The DCs for the rectum contours varied from 0.55 to 0.74 with a mean value of 0.665. Differences of D95 of the PTV between autoRec-VMAT and manu-VMAT plans varied from 0.03% to -2.85% with a mean value of -0.64%. Differences of D0.03cc of manual rectum between the two plans varied from -0.86% to 9.94% with a mean value of 2.71%. D95 of PTV between autoAll-VMAT and manu-VMAT plans varied from 0.28% to -2.9% with a mean value -0.83%. Differences of D0.03cc of manual rectum between the two plans varied from -0.76% to 6.72% with a mean value of 2.62%. CONCLUSION Our study implies that it is possible to use unedited automatically generated OARs to perform initial inverse prostate SBRT planning. After radiation oncologists modify/approve the OARs, the plan qualities based on the manually drawn OARs are still clinically acceptable, and a re-optimization may not be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Yan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Bingqi Guo
- Department of Radiation OncologyCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Rahul Tendulkar
- Department of Radiation OncologyCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Ping Xia
- Department of Radiation OncologyCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li X, Ge Y, Wu Q, Wang C, Sheng Y, Wang W, Stephens H, Yin FF, Wu QJ. Input feature design and its impact on the performance of deep learning models for predicting fluence maps in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:215009. [PMID: 36206747 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Deep learning (DL) models for fluence map prediction (FMP) have great potential to reduce treatment planning time in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by avoiding the lengthy inverse optimization process. This study aims to improve the rigor of input feature design in a DL-FMP model by examining how different designs of input features influence model prediction performance.Approach. This study included 231 head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients. Three input feature designs were investigated. The first design (D1) assumed that information of all critical structures from all beam angles should be combined to predict fluence maps. The second design (D2) assumed that local anatomical information was sufficient for predicting radiation intensity of a beamlet at a respective beam angle. The third design (D3) assumed the need for both local anatomical information and inter-beam modulation to predict radiation intensity values of the beamlets that intersect at a voxel. For each input design, we tailored the DL model accordingly. All models were trained using the same set of ground truth plans (GT plans). The plans generated by DL models (DL plans) were analyzed using key dose-volume metrics. One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons correction (Bonferroni method) was performed (significance level = 0.05).Main results. For PTV-related metrics, all DL plans had significantly higher maximum dose (p < 0.001), conformity index (p < 0.001), and heterogeneity index (p < 0.001) compared to GT plans, with D2 being the worst performer. Meanwhile, except for cord+5 mm (p < 0.001), DL plans of all designs resulted in OAR dose metrics that are comparable to those of GT plans.Significance. Local anatomical information contains most of the information that DL models need to predict fluence maps for clinically acceptable OAR sparing. Input features from beam angles are needed to achieve the best PTV coverage. These results provide valuable insights for further improvement of DL-FMP models and DL models in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Li
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Yaorong Ge
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States of America
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Yang Sheng
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Wentao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | | | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kneepkens E, Bakx N, van der Sangen M, Theuws J, van der Toorn PP, Rijkaart D, van der Leer J, van Nunen T, Hagelaar E, Bluemink H, Hurkmans C. Clinical evaluation of two AI models for automated breast cancer plan generation. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35123517 PMCID: PMC8817521 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01993-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) shows great potential to streamline the treatment planning process. However, its clinical adoption is slow due to the limited number of clinical evaluation studies and because often, the translation of the predicted dose distribution to a deliverable plan is lacking. This study evaluates two different, deliverable AI plans in terms of their clinical acceptability based on quantitative parameters and qualitative evaluation by four radiation oncologists. Methods For 20 left-sided node-negative breast cancer patients, treated with a prescribed dose of 40.05 Gy, using tangential beam intensity modulated radiotherapy, two model-based treatment plans were evaluated against the corresponding manual plan. The two models used were an in-house developed U-net model and a vendor-developed contextual atlas regression forest model (cARF). Radiation oncologists evaluated the clinical acceptability of each blinded plan and ranked plans according to preference. Furthermore, a comparison with the manual plan was made based on dose volume histogram parameters, clinical evaluation criteria and preparation time. Results The U-net model resulted in a higher average and maximum dose to the PTV (median difference 0.37 Gy and 0.47 Gy respectively) and a slightly higher mean heart dose (MHD) (0.01 Gy). The cARF model led to higher average and maximum doses to the PTV (0.30 and 0.39 Gy respectively) and a slightly higher MHD (0.02 Gy) and mean lung dose (MLD, 0.04 Gy). The maximum MHD/MLD difference was ≤ 0.5 Gy for both AI plans. Regardless of these dose differences, 90–95% of the AI plans were considered clinically acceptable versus 90% of the manual plans. Preferences varied between the radiation oncologists. Plan preparation time was comparable between the U-net model and the manual plan (287 s vs 253 s) while the cARF model took longer (471 s). When only considering user interaction, plan generation time was 121 s for the cARF model and 137 s for the U-net model. Conclusions Two AI models were used to generate deliverable plans for breast cancer patients, in a time-efficient manner, requiring minimal user interaction. Although the AI plans resulted in slightly higher doses overall, radiation oncologists considered 90–95% of the AI plans clinically acceptable. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-01993-9.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pokharel S, Pacheco A, Tanner S. Assessment of efficacy in automated plan generation for Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13539. [PMID: 35084090 PMCID: PMC8992949 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Varian Ethos, a new treatment platform, is capable of automatically generating treatment plans for initial planning and for online, adaptive planning, using an intelligent optimization engine (IOE). The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Varian Ethos IOE for auto‐planning and intercompare different treatment modalities within the Ethos treatment planning system (TPS). A total of 36 retrospective prostate and proximal seminal vesicles cases were selected for this study. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the proximal seminal vesicles, with a simultaneous integrated boost of 70 Gy to the prostate gland. Based on RT intent, three treatment plans were auto‐generated in the Ethos TPS and were exported to the Eclipse TPS for intercomparison with the Eclipse treatment plan. When normalized for the same planning target volume (PTV) coverage, Ethos plans Dmax% were 108.1 ± 1.2%, 108.4 ± 1.6%, and 109.6 ± 2.0%, for the 9‐field IMRT, 12‐field IMRT, and 2‐full arc VMAT plans, respectively. This compared well with Eclipse plan Dmax% values, which was 108.8 ± 1.4%. OAR indices were also evaluated for Ethos plans using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group report 0415 as a guide and were found to be comparable to each other and the Eclipse plans. While all Ethos plans were comparable, we found that, in general, the Ethos 12‐field IMRT plans met most of the dosimetric goals for treatment. Also, Ethos IOE consistently generated dosimetrically hotter VMAT plans versus IMRT plans. On average, Ethos TPS took 13 min to generate 2‐full arc VMAT plans, compared to 5 min for 12‐field IMRT plans. Varian Ethos TPS can generate multiple treatment plans in an efficient time frame and the quality of the plans could be deemed clinically acceptable when compared to manually generated treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam Pokharel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Naples, Florida, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Baptist Health South Florida, Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Abilio Pacheco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Naples, Florida, USA
| | - Suzanne Tanner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Naples, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hito M, Wang W, Stephens H, Xie Y, Li R, Yin FF, Ge Y, Wu QJ, Wu Q, Sheng Y. Assessing the robustness of artificial intelligence powered planning tools in radiotherapy clinical settings-a phantom simulation approach. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:4835-4846. [PMID: 34888193 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) based radiotherapy treatment planning tools have gained interest in automating the treatment planning process. It is essential to understand their overall robustness in various clinical scenarios. This is an existing gap between many AI based tools and their actual clinical deployment. This study works to fill the gap for AI based treatment planning by investigating a clinical robustness assessment (CRA) tool for the AI based planning methods using a phantom simulation approach. Methods A cylindrical phantom was created in the treatment planning system (TPS) with the axial dimension of 30 cm by 18 cm. Key structures involved in pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) including PTV25, PTV33, C-Loop, stomach, bowel and liver were created within the phantom. Several simulation scenarios were created to mimic multiple scenarios of anatomical changes, including displacement, expansion, rotation and combination of three. The goal of treatment planning was to deliver 25 Gy to PTV25 and 33 Gy to PTV33 in 5 fractions in simultaneous integral boost (SIB) manner while limiting luminal organ-at-risk (OAR) max dose to be under 29 Gy. A previously developed deep learning based AI treatment planning tool for pancreas SBRT was identified as the validation object. For each scenario, the anatomy information was fed into the AI tool and the final fluence map associated to the plan was generated, which was subsequently sent to TPS for leaf sequencing and dose calculation. The final auto plan's quality was analyzed against the treatment planning constraint. The final plans' quality was further analyzed to evaluate potential correlation with anatomical changes using the Manhattan plot. Results A total of 32 scenarios were simulated in this study. For all scenarios, the mean PTV25 V25Gy of the AI based auto plans was 96.7% while mean PTV33 V33Gy was 82.2%. Large variation (16.3%) in PTV33 V33Gy was observed due to anatomical variations, a.k.a. proximity of luminal structure to PTV33. Mean max dose was 28.55, 27.68 and 24.63 Gy for C-Loop, bowel and stomach, respectively. Using D0.03cc as max dose surrogate, the value was 28.03, 27.12 and 23.84 Gy for C-Loop, bowel and stomach, respectively. Max dose constraint of 29 Gy was achieved for 81.3% cases for C-Loop and stomach, and 78.1% for bowel. Using D0.03cc as max dose surrogate, the passing rate was 90.6% for C-Loop, and 81.3% for bowel and stomach. Manhattan plot revealed high correlation between the OAR over dose and the minimal distance between the PTV33 and OAR. Conclusions The results showed promising robustness of the pancreas SBRT AI tool, providing important evidence of its readiness for clinical implementation. The established workflow could guide the process of assuring clinical readiness of future AI based treatment planning tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hito
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hunter Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yibo Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ruilin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sheng Y, Zhang J, Ge Y, Li X, Wang W, Stephens H, Yin FF, Wu Q, Wu QJ. Artificial intelligence applications in intensity modulated radiation treatment planning: an overview. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:4859-4880. [PMID: 34888195 PMCID: PMC8611458 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to methods that improve and automate challenging human tasks by systematically capturing and applying relevant knowledge in these tasks. Over the past decades, a number of approaches have been developed to address different types and needs of system intelligence ranging from search strategies to knowledge representation and inference to robotic planning. In the context of radiation treatment planning, multiple AI approaches may be adopted to improve the planning quality and efficiency. For example, knowledge representation and inference methods may improve dose prescription by integrating and reasoning about the domain knowledge described in many clinical guidelines and clinical trials reports. In this review, we will focus on the most studied AI approach in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-machine learning (ML) and describe our recent efforts in applying ML to improve the quality, consistency, and efficiency of IMRT/VMAT planning. With the available high-quality data, we can build models to accurately predict critical variables for each step of the planning process and thus automate and improve its outcomes. Specific to the IMRT/VMAT planning process, we can build models for each of the four critical components in the process: dose-volume histogram (DVH), Dose, Fluence, and Human Planner. These models can be divided into two general groups. The first group focuses on encoding prior experience and knowledge through ML and more recently deep learning (DL) from prior clinical plans and using these models to predict the optimal DVH (DVH prediction model), or 3D dose distribution (dose prediction model), or fluence map (fluence map model). The goal of these models is to reduce or remove the trial-and-error process and guarantee consistently high-quality plans. The second group of models focuses on mimicking human planners' decision-making process (planning strategy model) during the iterative adjustments/guidance of the optimization engine. Each critical step of the IMRT/VMAT treatment planning process can be improved and automated by AI methods. As more training data becomes available and more sophisticated models are developed, we can expect that the AI methods in treatment planning will continue to improve accuracy, efficiency, and robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Xinyi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hunter Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Q. Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li X, Wu QJ, Wu Q, Wang C, Sheng Y, Wang W, Stephens H, Yin FF, Ge Y. Insights of an AI agent via analysis of prediction errors: a case study of fluence map prediction for radiation therapy planning. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34757945 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose.We have previously reported an artificial intelligence (AI) agent that automatically generates intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans via fluence map prediction, by-passing inverse planning. This AI agent achieved clinically comparable quality for prostate cases, but its performance on head-and-neck patients leaves room for improvement. This study aims to collect insights of the deep-learning-based (DL-based) fluence map prediction model by systematically analyzing its prediction errors.Methods.From the modeling perspective, the DL model's output is the fluence maps of IMRT plans. However, from the clinical planning perspective, the plan quality evaluation should be based on the clinical dosimetric criteria such as dose-volume histograms. To account for the complex and non-intuitive relationships between fluence map prediction errors and the corresponding dose distribution changes, we propose a novel error analysis approach that systematically examines plan dosimetric changes that are induced by varying amounts of fluence prediction errors. We investigated four decomposition modes of model prediction errors. The two spatial domain decompositions are based on fluence intensity and fluence gradient. The two frequency domain decompositions are based on Fourier-space banded frequency rings and Fourier-space truncated low-frequency disks. The decomposed error was analyzed for its impact on the resulting plans' dosimetric metrics. The analysis was conducted on 15 test cases spared from the 200 training and 16 validation cases used to train the model.Results.Most planning target volume metrics were significantly correlated with most error decompositions. The Fourier space disk radii had the largest Spearman's coefficients. The low-frequency region within a disk of ∼20% Fourier space contained most of errors that impact overall plan quality.Conclusions.This study demonstrates the feasibility of using fluence map prediction error analysis to understand the AI agent's performance. Such insights will help fine-tune the DL models in architecture design and loss function selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Li
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Yang Sheng
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Wentao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | | | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Yaorong Ge
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tekiki N, Kuroda M, Ishizaka H, Khasawneh A, Barham M, Hamada K, Konishi K, Sugimoto K, Katsui K, Sugiyama S, Watanabe K, Yoshio K, Katayama N, Ogata T, Ihara H, Kanazawa S, Asaumi J. New field-in-field with two reference points method for whole breast radiotherapy: Dosimetric analysis and radiation-induced skin toxicities assessment. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:193. [PMID: 34349992 PMCID: PMC8327075 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The usefulness of the field-in-field with two reference points (FIF w/ 2RP) method, in which the dose reference points are set simultaneously at two positions in the irradiation field and the high-dose range is completely eliminated, was examined in the present study with the aim of decreasing acute skin toxicity in adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT). A total of 573 patients with breast cancer who underwent postoperative whole breast RT were classified into 178 cases with wedge (W) method, 142 cases with field-in-field without 2 reference points (FIF w/o 2RP) method and 253 cases with FIF w/ 2RP method. Using the FIF w/ 2RP method, the high-dose range was the lowest among the three irradiation methods. The planning target volume (PTV) V105% and the breast PTV for evaluation (BPe) V105% decreased to 0.09 and 0.10%, respectively. The FIF w/ 2RP method vs. the FIF w/o 2RP method had a strong association (η) with PTV V105% (η=0.79; P<0.001) and BPe V105% (η=0.76; P<0.001). The FIF w/ 2RP method had a significant impact on lowering the skin toxicity grade in weeks 3 and 4, and increasing the occurrence of skin toxicity grade 0. The FIF w/ 2RP method vs. the W method had a moderate association with skin toxicity grade at week 3 (η=0.49; P<0.001). Using the FIF w/ 2RP method, the high-dose range V105% of the target decreased to 0%, and skin adverse events were decreased in conjunction. For patients with early-stage breast cancer, particularly patients with relatively small-sized breasts, the FIF w/ 2RP method may be an optimal irradiation method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nouha Tekiki
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kuroda
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Hinata Ishizaka
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Abdullah Khasawneh
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Majd Barham
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kentaro Hamada
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kohei Konishi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kohei Sugimoto
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Katsui
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Soichi Sugiyama
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kenta Watanabe
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kotaro Yoshio
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Norihisa Katayama
- Department of Radiology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760-8557, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogata
- Department of Radiology, Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Yamaguchi 740-8510, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ihara
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Okayama 708-0841, Japan
| | - Susumu Kanazawa
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Junichi Asaumi
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yoo S, Sheng Y, Blitzblau R, McDuff S, Champ C, Morrison J, O’Neill L, Catalano S, Yin FF, Wu QJ. Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100656. [PMID: 33748540 PMCID: PMC7966969 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The machine learning-based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 102 patients of breast or chest wall treatment plans were prospectively evaluated with institutional review board approval. A human planner executed MLAP to create an auto-plan via automation of fluence maps generation. If judged necessary, a planner further fine-tuned the fluence maps to reach a final plan. Planners recorded the time required for auto-planning and manual modification. Target (ie, breast or chest wall and nodes) coverage and dose homogeneity were compared between the auto-plan and final plan. RESULTS Cases without nodes (n = 71) showed negligible (<1%) differences for target coverage and dose homogeneity between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases with nodes (n = 31) also showed negligible difference for target coverage. However, mean ± standard deviation of volume receiving 105% of the prescribed dose and maximum dose were reduced from 43.0% ± 26.3% to 39.4% ± 23.7% and 119.7% ± 9.5% to 114.4% ± 8.8% from auto-plan to final plan, respectively, all with P ≤ .01 for cases with nodes (n = 31). Mean ± standard deviation time spent for auto-plans and additional fluence modification for final plans were 12.1 ± 9.3 and 13.1 ± 12.9 minutes, respectively, for cases without nodes, and 16.4 ± 9.7 and 26.4 ± 16.4 minutes, respectively, for cases with nodes. CONCLUSIONS The MLAP tool has been successfully implemented for routine clinical practice and has significantly improved planning efficiency. Clinical experience indicates that auto-plans are sufficient for target coverage, but improvement is warranted to reduce high dose volume for cases with nodal irradiation. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation of auto-planning for patient treatment and the significant importance of integrating human experience and feedback to improve MLAP for better clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sua Yoo
- Corresponding author: Sua Yoo, PhD
| | | | | | - Susan McDuff
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Colin Champ
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jay Morrison
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Leigh O’Neill
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Q. Jackie Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Barragán-Montero A, Javaid U, Valdés G, Nguyen D, Desbordes P, Macq B, Willems S, Vandewinckele L, Holmström M, Löfman F, Michiels S, Souris K, Sterpin E, Lee JA. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review. Phys Med 2021; 83:242-256. [PMID: 33979715 PMCID: PMC8184621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently become a very popular buzzword, as a consequence of disruptive technical advances and impressive experimental results, notably in the field of image analysis and processing. In medicine, specialties where images are central, like radiology, pathology or oncology, have seized the opportunity and considerable efforts in research and development have been deployed to transfer the potential of AI to clinical applications. With AI becoming a more mainstream tool for typical medical imaging analysis tasks, such as diagnosis, segmentation, or classification, the key for a safe and efficient use of clinical AI applications relies, in part, on informed practitioners. The aim of this review is to present the basic technological pillars of AI, together with the state-of-the-art machine learning methods and their application to medical imaging. In addition, we discuss the new trends and future research directions. This will help the reader to understand how AI methods are now becoming an ubiquitous tool in any medical image analysis workflow and pave the way for the clinical implementation of AI-based solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Barragán-Montero
- Molecular Imaging, Radiation and Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, UCLouvain, Belgium.
| | - Umair Javaid
- Molecular Imaging, Radiation and Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Gilmer Valdés
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, USA
| | - Paul Desbordes
- Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Benoit Macq
- Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Siri Willems
- ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven Belgium & MIRC, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Steven Michiels
- Molecular Imaging, Radiation and Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Kevin Souris
- Molecular Imaging, Radiation and Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Molecular Imaging, Radiation and Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, UCLouvain, Belgium; KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Belgium
| | - John A Lee
- Molecular Imaging, Radiation and Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, UCLouvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang W, Sheng Y, Palta M, Czito B, Willett C, Hito M, Yin FF, Wu Q, Ge Y, Wu QJ. Deep Learning-Based Fluence Map Prediction for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100672. [PMID: 33997484 PMCID: PMC8099762 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Treatment planning for pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a challenging task, especially with simultaneous integrated boost treatment approaches. We propose a deep learning (DL) framework to accurately predict fluence maps from patient anatomy and directly generate intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Methods and Materials The framework employs 2 convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to sequentially generate beam dose prediction and fluence map prediction, creating a deliverable 9-beam intensity modulated radiation therapy plan. Within the beam dose prediction CNN, axial slices of combined structure contour masks are used to predict 3-dimensional (3D) beam doses for each beam. Each 3D beam dose is projected along its beam’s-eye-view to form a 2D beam dose map, which is subsequently used by the fluence map prediction CNN to predict its fluence map. Finally, the 9 predicted fluence maps are imported into the treatment planning system to finalize the plan by leaf sequencing and dose calculation. One hundred patients receiving pancreas SBRT were retrospectively collected for this study. Benchmark plans with unified simultaneous integrated boost prescription (25/33 Gy) were manually optimized for each case. The data set was split into 80/20 cases for training and testing. We evaluated the proposed DL framework by assessing both the fluence maps and the final predicted plans. Further, clinical acceptability of the plans was evaluated by a physician specializing in gastrointestinal cancer. Results The DL-based planning was, on average, completed in under 2 minutes. In testing, the predicted plans achieved similar dose distribution compared with the benchmark plans (-1.5% deviation for planning target volume 33 V33Gy), with slightly higher planning target volume maximum (+1.03 Gy) and organ at risk maximum (+0.95 Gy) doses. After renormalization, the physician rated 19 cases clinically acceptable and 1 case requiring minor improvement. Conclusions The DL framework can effectively plan pancreas SBRT cases within 2 minutes. The predicted plans are clinically deliverable, with plan quality approaching that of manual planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Martin Hito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, New Jersey
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yu J, Goh Y, Song KJ, Kwak J, Cho B, Kim SS, Lee S, Choi EK. Feasibility of automated planning for whole-brain radiation therapy using deep learning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:184-190. [PMID: 33340391 PMCID: PMC7856520 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop automated planning for whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) using a U-net-based deep-learning model for predicting the multileaf collimator (MLC) shape bypassing the contouring processes. METHODS A dataset of 55 cases, including 40 training sets, five validation sets, and 10 test sets, was used to predict the static MLC shape. The digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) reconstructed from planning CT images as an input layer and the MLC shape as an output layer are connected one-to-one via the U-net modeling. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as the loss function in the training and ninefold cross-validation. Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) curves were constructed for assessing the automatic MLC shaping performance. Deep-learning (DL) and manually optimized (MO) approaches were compared based on the DVH curves and dose distributions. RESULTS The ninefold cross-validation ensemble test results were consistent with DSC values of 94.6 ± 0.4 and 94.7 ± 0.9 in training and validation learnings, respectively. The dose coverages of 95% target volume were (98.0 ± 0.7)% and (98.3 ± 0.8)%, and the maximum doses for the lens as critical organ-at-risk were 2.9 Gy and 3.9 Gy for DL and MO, respectively. The DL technique shows the consistent results in terms of the DVH parameter except for MLC shaping prediction for dose saving of small organs such as lens. CONCLUSIONS Comparable with the MO plan result, the WBRT plan quality obtained using the DL approach is clinically acceptable. Moreover, the DL approach enables WBRT auto-planning without the time-consuming manual MLC shaping and target contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesang Yu
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Youngmoon Goh
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kye Jin Song
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Jungwon Kwak
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Byungchul Cho
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Su San Kim
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Sang‐wook Lee
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Choi
- Department of Radiation OncologyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Archibald-Heeren B, Byrne M, Hu Y, Liu G, Collett N, Cai M, Wang Y. Single click automated breast planning with iterative optimization. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:88-97. [PMID: 33016622 PMCID: PMC7700918 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To present the development of an in‐house coded solution for treatment planning of tangential breast radiotherapy that creates single click plans by emulating the iterative optimization process of human dosimetrists. Method One hundred clinical breast cancer patients were retrospectively planned with an automated planning (AP) code incorporating the hybrid intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) approach. The code automates all planning processes including plan generation, beam generation, gantry and collimator angle determination, open segments and dynamic IMRT fluence and calculations. Thirty‐nine dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics taken from three international recommendations were compared between the automated and clinical plans (CP), along with median interquartile analysis of the DVH distributions. Total planning time and delivery QA were also compared between the plan sets. Results Of the 39 planning metrics analyzed 23 showed no significant difference between clinical and automated planning techniques. Of the 16 metrics with statistically significant variations, 2 were improved in the clinical plans in comparison to 14 improved in the AP plans. Automated plans produced a greater number of ideal plans against international guidelines as per EviQ (AP:77%, CP:68%), RTOG 1005 (AP:80%, CP:71%), and London Cancer references (AP:80%, CP:75%). Delivery QA results for both techniques were equivalent. Automated planning techniques resulted in an average reduction in planning time from 23 to 5 minutes. Conclusion We have introduced an automated planning code with iterative optimization that produces equivalent quality plans to manual clinical planning. The resultant change in workflow results in a reduction in treatment planning times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mikel Byrne
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Yunfei Hu
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Guilin Liu
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Meng Cai
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Yang Wang
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang W, Sheng Y, Wang C, Zhang J, Li X, Palta M, Czito B, Willett CG, Wu Q, Ge Y, Yin FF, Wu QJ. Fluence Map Prediction Using Deep Learning Models - Direct Plan Generation for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Front Artif Intell 2020; 3:68. [PMID: 33733185 PMCID: PMC7861344 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2020.00068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Treatment planning for pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a difficult and time-consuming task. In this study, we aim to develop a novel deep learning framework to generate clinical-quality plans by direct prediction of fluence maps from patient anatomy using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Materials and Methods: Our proposed framework utilizes two CNNs to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy fluence maps and generate deliverable plans: (1) Field-dose CNN predicts field-dose distributions in the region of interest using planning images and structure contours; (2) a fluence map CNN predicts the final fluence map per beam using the predicted field dose projected onto the beam's eye view. The predicted fluence maps were subsequently imported into the treatment planning system for leaf sequencing and final dose calculation (model-predicted plans). One hundred patients previously treated with pancreas SBRT were included in this retrospective study, and they were split into 85 training cases and 15 test cases. For each network, 10% of training data were randomly selected for model validation. Nine-beam benchmark plans with standardized target prescription and organ-at-risk constraints were planned by experienced clinical physicists and used as the gold standard to train the model. Model-predicted plans were compared with benchmark plans in terms of dosimetric endpoints, fluence map deliverability, and total monitor units. Results: The average time for fluence-map prediction per patient was 7.1 s. Comparing model-predicted plans with benchmark plans, target mean dose, maximum dose (0.1 cc), and D95% absolute differences in percentages of prescription were 0.1, 3.9, and 2.1%, respectively; organ-at-risk mean dose and maximum dose (0.1 cc) absolute differences were 0.2 and 4.4%, respectively. The predicted plans had fluence map gamma indices (97.69 ± 0.96% vs. 98.14 ± 0.74%) and total monitor units (2,122 ± 281 vs. 2,265 ± 373) that were comparable to the benchmark plans. Conclusions: We develop a novel deep learning framework for pancreas SBRT planning, which predicts a fluence map for each beam and can, therefore, bypass the lengthy inverse optimization process. The proposed framework could potentially change the paradigm of treatment planning by harnessing the power of deep learning to generate clinically deliverable plans in seconds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Xinyi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Brian Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Christopher G Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sheng Y, Zhang J, Wang C, Yin FF, Wu QJ, Ge Y. Incorporating Case-Based Reasoning for Radiation Therapy Knowledge Modeling: A Pelvic Case Study. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 18:1533033819874788. [PMID: 31510886 PMCID: PMC6743195 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819874788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge models in radiotherapy capture the relation between patient anatomy and dosimetry to provide treatment planning guidance. When treatment schemes evolve, existing models struggle to predict accurately. We propose a case-based reasoning framework designed to handle novel anatomies that are of same type but vary beyond original training samples. A total of 105 pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy cases were analyzed. Eighty cases were prostate cases while the other 25 were prostate-plus-lymph-node cases. We simulated 4 scenarios: Scarce scenario, Semiscarce scenario, Semiample scenario, and Ample scenario. For the Scarce scenario, a multiple stepwise regression model was trained using 85 cases (80 prostate, 5 prostate-plus-lymph-node). The proposed workflow started with evaluating the feature novelty of new cases against 5 training prostate-plus-lymph-node cases using leverage statistic. The case database was composed of a 5-case dose atlas. Case-based dose prediction was compared against the regression model prediction using sum of squared residual. Mean sum of squared residual of case-based and regression predictions for the bladder of 13 identified outliers were 0.174 ± 0.166 and 0.459 ± 0.508, respectively (P = .0326). For the rectum, the respective mean sum of squared residuals were 0.103 ± 0.120 and 0.150 ± 0.171 for case-based and regression prediction (P = .1972). By retaining novel cases, under the Ample scenario, significant statistical improvement was observed over the Scarce scenario (P = .0398) for the bladder model. We expect that the incorporation of case-based reasoning that judiciously applies appropriate predictive models could improve overall prediction accuracy and robustness in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|