1
|
Latorzeff I, Camps-Maléa A, Supiot S, de Crevoisier R, Farcy-Jacquet MP, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Riou O, Pommier P, Artignan X, Chapet O, Créhange G, Marchesi V, Pasquier D, Sargos P. Indication and perspectives of radiation therapy in the setting of de-novo metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:49-55. [PMID: 37827959 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality in men. Each year, approximately 10% of prostate cancers are diagnosed metastatic at initial presentation. The standard treatment option for de-novo metastatic prostate cancer is androgen deprivation therapy with novel hormonal agent or with chemotherapy. Recently, PEACE-1 trial highlighted the benefit of triplet therapy resulting in the combination of androgen deprivation therapy combined with docetaxel and abiraterone. Radiotherapy can be proposed in a curative intent or to treat local symptomatic disease. Nowadays, radiotherapy of the primary disease is only recommended for de novo low-burden/low-volume metastatic prostate cancer, as defined in the CHAARTED criteria. However, studies on stereotactic radiotherapy on oligometastases have shown that this therapeutic approach is feasible and well tolerated. Prospective research currently focuses on the benefit of intensification by combining treatment of the metastatic sites and the primary all together. The contribution of metabolic imaging to better define the target volumes and specify the oligometastatic character allows a better selection of patients. This article aims to define indications of radiotherapy and perspectives of this therapeutic option for de-novo metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
| | - A Camps-Maléa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, hôpital Bretonneau, CHU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - S Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; CNRS, Nantes, France; Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - R de Crevoisier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - M-P Farcy-Jacquet
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie du Gard, CHU de Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - J-M Hannoun-Lévi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - O Riou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie de Méditerranée Occitanie, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; U1194, Inserm, Montpellier, France; IRCM, Montpellier, France
| | - P Pommier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - X Artignan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier privé Saint-Grégoire, Rennes, France
| | - O Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - G Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - V Marchesi
- Department of Medical Physics, centre Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - D Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France; UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, université de Lille, CNRS, école Centrale Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sirisreetreerux P, Poprom N, Numthavaj P, Rattanasiri S, Thakkinstian A. Efficacy of Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5714. [PMID: 38136260 PMCID: PMC10742269 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This umbrella review focused on evaluating the efficacy and adverse events of the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients receiving any treatment regimens, including ADT alone or combination treatments. METHODS This study conducted an umbrella review following the PRISMA 2020 checklist, aiming to summarize the available studies to evaluate the efficacy of medical treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. A literature search was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) that included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2023. This study summarized their findings, evaluated overlapping data (i.e., the same RCTs were included in >one SRMA), tested for excessive significance (i.e., observed number of statistically significant studies > expected number by chance) and assessed the quality of the studies. RESULTS A total of 4191 studies were identified, but only 27 were included. Among those 27 studies, 12 were network meta-analyses and 15 were direct meta-analyses. Most studies showed no statistically significant difference in overall mortality among GnRH agonists, antagonists and bilateral orchiectomy. Combination treatment is more beneficial than ADT alone in both OS and PFS outcomes with more adverse events. Nevertheless, there is no OS advantage of any combination regimen over the others. CONCLUSION Combination treatments demonstrated clear benefits in OS and PFS over ADT alone with more AEs. Further studies are needed to compare among combination treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pokket Sirisreetreerux
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.S.); (S.R.); (A.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Napaphat Poprom
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.S.); (S.R.); (A.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Pawin Numthavaj
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.S.); (S.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Sasivimol Rattanasiri
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.S.); (S.R.); (A.T.)
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.S.); (S.R.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou Z, Liu S, Mei J, Liu T, Liu F, Zhang G. Systemic therapies for high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1083-1090. [PMID: 37548225 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2241985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the effectiveness of currently available systemic therapies for high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and aimed to establish the optimal treatment regimen. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of systemic therapy in patients with high-volume mHSPC. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to indirectly compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of various systemic therapies. RESULTS Eleven RCTs (6708 participants) finally met the eligibility criteria. Compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, rezvilutamide (REZ) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.77], abiraterone (ABI) (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.71), apalutamide (APA) (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.88), enzalutamide (ENZ) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80), docetaxel (DOC) (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.84), darolutamide (DAR) + DOC (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.62), and ABI + DOC (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.71) significantly improved OS in patients with high-volume mHSPC. Compared with DOC, no advantages were observed for doublet therapies, including REZ, ABI, APA, and ENZ on the basis of ADT, whereas DAR + DOC (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.82) and ABI + DOC (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.95) was associated with better OS. The ranking analysis showed that triplet therapy (DAR + DOC + ADT and ABI + DOC + ADT) had the greatest improvement in OS, followed by REZ + ADT. All the regimens showed improved PFS in patients with high-volume mHSPC. Compared with DOC, significant differences were detected for DAR + DOC, ABI + DOC, ENZ + DOC, REZ, and ENZ. According to the ranking analysis, triplet therapy ranked first, followed by ENZ and REZ. CONCLUSIONS REZ + ADT were the highest ranked doublet therapy for improvement in OS of patients with high-volume mHSPC, second only to triplet therapy (DAR + DOC + ADT and ABI + DOC + ADT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhonghan Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Shuai Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Jingchang Mei
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Guiming Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lokeshwar SD, Choksi AU, Haltstuch D, Rahman SN, Press BH, Syed J, Hurwitz ME, Kim IY, Leapman MS. Personalizing approaches to the management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: role of advanced imaging, genetics and therapeutics. World J Urol 2023; 41:2007-2019. [PMID: 37160450 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04409-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize contemporary and emerging strategies for the diagnosis and management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), focusing on diagnostic testing and therapeutics. METHODS Literature review using PUBMED-Medline databases as well as clinicaltrials.gov to include reported or ongoing clinical trials on treatment for mHSPC. We prioritized the findings from phase III randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS There have been significant changes to the diagnosis and staging evaluation of mHSPC with the integration of increasingly accurate positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers that exceed the performance of conventional computerized tomography (CT) and bone scan. Germline multigene testing is recommended for the evaluation of patients newly diagnosed with mHSPC given the prevalence of actionable alterations that may create candidacy for specific therapies. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of treatment for mHSPC, approaches to first-line treatment include the integration of multiple agents including androgen receptor synthesis inhibitors (ARSI; abiraterone) Androgen Receptor antagonists (enzalutamide, darolutamide, apalautamide), and docetaxel chemotherapy. The combination of ADT, ARSI, and docetaxel chemotherapy has recently been evaluated in a randomized trial and was associated with significantly improved overall survival including in patients with a high burden of disease. The role of local treatment to the prostate with radiation has been evaluated in randomized trials with additional studies underway evaluating the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION The staging and initial management of patients with mHSPC has undergone significant advances in the last decade with advancements in the diagnosis, treatment and sequencing of therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soum D Lokeshwar
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Ankur U Choksi
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Daniel Haltstuch
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Syed N Rahman
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Benjamin H Press
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Jamil Syed
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Michael E Hurwitz
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Isaac Y Kim
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Michael S Leapman
- Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, BML 238C, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yanagisawa T, Hata K, Narita S, Hatakeyama S, Mori K, Yata Y, Sano T, Otsuka T, Hara S, Miyajima K, Enei Y, Fukuokaya W, Nakazono M, Matsukawa A, Miki J, Habuchi T, Ohyama C, Shariat SF, Kimura T. Docetaxel versus abiraterone for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with focus on efficacy of sequential therapy. Prostate 2023; 83:563-571. [PMID: 36661102 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel (DOC) versus abiraterone (ABI) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), with a focus on the efficacy of sequential therapy, in a real-world clinical practice setting. METHODS The records of 336 patients who harbored de novo high-risk mHSPC, based on the LATITUDE criteria, and had received ADT with either DOC (n = 109) or ABI (n = 227) were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), time to 2nd-line progression (PFS2), and 2nd- and 3rd-line PFS, were compared. We used one-to-two propensity score matching to minimize the confounders. The differential efficacy of 2nd-line therapy based on agents in each arm was evaluated using the unmatched cohort as an additional interest. RESULTS After propensity score matching, 86 patients treated with DOC + ADT and 172 with ABI + ADT were available for analyses. The 3-year OS and CSS for DOC versus ABI were 76.2% versus 75.1% (p = 0.8) and 78.2% versus 78.6% (p = 1), respectively. There was no difference in the median PFS2 (49 vs. 43 months, p = 0.39), while the median time to CRPC in patients treated with ABI was significantly longer compared to those treated with DOC (42 vs. 22 months; p = 0.006). The median 2nd-line PFS (14 vs. 4 months, p < 0.001) and 3rd-line PFS (4 vs. 2 months, p = 0.012) were significantly better in the DOC group than in the ABI group. Among the unmatched cohort, after ABI for mHSPC, the median 2nd-line PFS did not differ between the patients treated with DOC and those treated with enzalutamide as 2nd-line therapy (both 3 months, p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS ADT with DOC or ABI has comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of OS, CSS, and PFS2 in patients with de novo high-risk mHSPC. Compared to DOC, ABI resulted in longer time to CRPC but worse 2nd and 3rd-line PFS. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal sequence of therapy in the upfront intensive treatment era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kenichi Hata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Atsugi City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Division of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Yata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sano
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Hara
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Enei
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Nakazono
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Division of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang L, Li C, Zhao Z, Li X, Tang C, Guan Z, Sun F, Gu J, Li N. Comparison of doublet and triplet therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1104242. [PMID: 36959793 PMCID: PMC10028133 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1104242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The best choice of first-line treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is unclear. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety determined in randomized clinical trials of doublet and triplet treatments for mHSPC. Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through July 01, 2022. Eligible studies were phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) alone, doublet therapies [ADT combined with docetaxel (DOC), novel hormonal agents (NHAs), or radiotherapy (RT)], or triplet therapies (NHA+DOC+ADT) as first-line treatments for mHSPC. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and grades 3-5 adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor burden. The effects of competing treatments were assessed by Bayesian network meta-analysis using R software. Results Ten trials with 12,298 patients comparing nine treatments were included. Darolutamide (DARO) +DOC+ADT ranked best in terms of OS benefits (OR 0·52 [95% CI 0·39-0·70]), but its advantages were all statistically insignificant compared with other therapy options except for DOC+ADT (OR 0·68 [95% CI 0·53-0·88]) and RT+ADT (OR 0·57 [95% CI 0·40-0·80]). In terms of PFS, enzalutamide(ENZA)+DOC+ADT (OR 0·32 [95% CI 0·24-0·44]) and abiraterone and prednisone (AAP) +DOC+ADT (OR 0·33 [95% CI 0·25-0·45]) ranked best. For patients with high volume disease (HVD), low volume disease (LVD), and visceral metastases, the optimal therapies were AAP+DOC+ADT (OR 0·52 [95% CI 0·33-0·83]), apalutamide+ADT (OR 0·52 [95% CI 0·26-1·05]) and DARO+DOC+ADT (OR 0·42 [95% CI 0·13-1·34]), respectively. For safety, AAP+DOC+ADT (OR 3·56 [95% CI 1·51-8·43]) ranked worst with the highest risk of grade 3-5 AEs. Conclusions Triple therapies may further improve OS and PFS but may be associated with a decrease in safety. Triplet therapies could be suggested for HVD patients, while doublet combinations should still be preferred for LVD patients. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPEROFILES/303117_STRATEGY_20220202.pdf, identifier CRD4202303117.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Wu Jieping Urology Center, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chunxing Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zichen Zhao
- Wu Jieping Urology Center, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojian Li
- Wu Jieping Urology Center, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chong Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenpeng Guan
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Feng Sun, ; Jin Gu, ; Ningchen Li,
| | - Jin Gu
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Feng Sun, ; Jin Gu, ; Ningchen Li,
| | - Ningchen Li
- Wu Jieping Urology Center, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Feng Sun, ; Jin Gu, ; Ningchen Li,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Thibault C, Gandaglia G, Mori K, Kawada T, Fukuokaya W, Shim SR, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Addition to Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2022; 82:584-598. [PMID: 35995644 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the role of adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), including abiraterone acetate (ABI), apalutamide, darolutamide (DAR), and enzalutamide (ENZ), to docetaxel (DOC) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). OBJECTIVE To analyze the oncologic benefit of triplet combination therapies using ARSI + DOC + ADT, and comparing them with available treatment regimens in patients with mHSPC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases and meetings abstracts were queried in April 2022 for RCTs analyzing patients treated with first-line combination systemic therapy for mHSPC. The primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the differential outcomes in patients with low- and high-volume disease as well as de novo and metachronous metastasis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 11 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). We found that the triplet combinations outperformed DOC + ADT in terms of OS (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.84) and PFS (pooled HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.42-0.58). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- and high-volume disease in terms of an OS benefit from adding an ARSI to DOC +ADT (both HR: 0.79; p = 1). Based on NMAs, triplet therapy also outperformed ARSI + ADT in terms of OS (DAR + DOC + ADT: pooled HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and PFS (ABI + DOC + ADT: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.91, and ENZ + DOC + ADT: HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.93). An analysis of treatment ranking among de novo mHSPC patients showed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease; however, doublet therapy using ARSI + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with low-volume disease. CONCLUSIONS We found that the triplet combination therapy improves survival endpoints in mHSPC patients compared with currently available doublet treatment regimens. Our findings need to be confirmed in further head-to-head trials with longer follow-up and among various patient populations. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study suggests that triplet therapy with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, docetaxel, androgen deprivation therapy prolongs survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with the current standard doublet therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Health and Medical Informatics, Kyungnam University College of Health Sciences, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Radiotherapy to the Primary Tumor: The First Step of a Tailored Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081981. [PMID: 36010331 PMCID: PMC9407309 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
9
|
Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial-Based Network Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1155/2022/7711555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To compare the effects of different treatment strategies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) using a network meta-analysis. Methods. English databases (PubMed, Embase, and medRxiv) and Chinese databases (Wanfang and CNKI) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of mHSPC from inception to June 1, 2021. The overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) reported by the included studies were extracted from each study for network meta-analysis. Moreover, the priority ranks of the treatment methods were determined. Results. A total of 18 RCTs with 14,682 patients were included in this study. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) + apalutamide (APA) showed the highest probability of improving the OS (96.2%) and FFS (68.0%). In addition, the patients were stratified into ten subgroups as follows: low/high tumor burden (CHAARTED criteria); Gleason score ≤7/≥8; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) = 0/≥1; with/without prechemotherapy; and cooperative with/without concomitant radiotherapy. For the improvement of OS, the leading treatments were as follows: (1) ADT + enzalutamide (ENZA) (64.1%)/ADT + abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AAP) (54.3%); (2) ADT + ENZA (41.9%)/ADT + APA (39.2%); (3) ADT + ENZA (39.2%)/ADT + APA (32.1%); (4) ADT + radiotherapy (51%)/ADT + ENZA (76.7%); (5) ADT + AAP (51%)/ADT + AAP (60%). Conclusion. Three endocrine therapy drugs, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and APA, exhibited the best effects in improving the OS and FFS in all patients and subgroups; however, APA had the most prominent treatment effects. Therefore, ADT + APA should be applied as the common treatment for patients with HSPC based on objective and clinical conditions. Trial Registration. This meta-analysis has been registered on the PROSPERO website (Trial number: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/CRD42020221062).
Collapse
|
10
|
Yanagisawa T, Kimura T, Mori K, Suzuki H, Sano T, Otsuka T, Iwamoto Y, Fukuokaya W, Miyajima K, Enei Y, Sakanaka K, Matsukawa A, Onuma H, Obayashi K, Tsuzuki S, Hata K, Shimomura T, Miki J, Egawa S. Abiraterone acetate versus nonsteroidal antiandrogen with androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate 2022; 82:3-12. [PMID: 34559410 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although prostate cancer is a very common form of malignancy in men, the clinical significance of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with abiraterone acetate versus the nonsteroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide has not yet been verified in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The present study was designed to initiate this verification in real-world Japanese clinical practice. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the records of 312 patients with high-risk mHSPC based on LATITUDE criteria and had received ADT with bicalutamide (n = 212) or abiraterone acetate (n = 100) between September 2015 and December 2020. Bicalutamide was given at 80 mg daily and abiraterone was given at 1000 mg daily as four 250-mg tablets plus prednisolone (5-10 mg daily). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were compared. The prognostic factor for time to CRPC was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Patients in the bicalutamide group were older, and more of them had poor performance status (≧2), than in the abiraterone group. Impaired liver function was noted in 2% of the bicalutamide group and 16% of the abiraterone group (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 22.5 months for bicalutamide and 17 months for abiraterone (p < 0.001). Two-year OS and CSS for bicalutamide versus abiraterone was 77.8% versus 79.5% (p = 0.793) and 81.1% versus 82.5% (p = 0.698), respectively. Median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the abiraterone group than in the bicalutamide group (NA vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Gleason score ≧9, high alkaline phosphatase, high lactate dehydrogenase, liver metastasis, and bicalutamide were independent prognostic risk factors for time to CRPC. Abiraterone prolonged the time to CRPC in patients with each of these prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS Despite limitations regarding the time-dependent bias, ADT with abiraterone acetate significantly prolonged the time to CRPC compared to bicalutamide in patients with high-risk mHSPC. However, further study with longer follow-up is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Suzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sano
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuya Iwamoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Enei
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keigo Sakanaka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hajime Onuma
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koki Obayashi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Shimomura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harada K, Shiota M, Minato A, Matsumoto M, Tomisaki I, Fujisawa M, Fujimoto N. Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: From "All-Comers" to "Personalized" Approach. Onco Targets Ther 2021; 14:2967-2974. [PMID: 33981146 PMCID: PMC8107048 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s306345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard treatment for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) was androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for >7 decades, and this was termed the “all-comers” approach. A remarkable evolution in the treatment of mCSPC has been noted in the previous several years. High-quality clinical trials have shown that the addition of docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, to ADT improves the overall survival (OS) as compared to ADT alone. The first 2 trials demonstrated the benefits of docetaxel and abiraterone acetate in terms of OS in high-volume and high-risk cancer subgroups, respectively. The later trials indicated that upfront combination therapies were associated with improved OS in all patients, irrespective of tumor volume and risk category. Upfront combination therapies are becoming a standard of care for all patients with mCSPC. However, meta-analyses have failed to show that all upfront combination therapies provide significant survival benefits in all patient subgroups. In the low-volume subgroup, significance was observed only for treatment with enzalutamide and radiation to the prostate. Men with low-volume low-risk cancer who have favorable response to ADT achieve long-term survival with ADT only, and toxicities induced by combination therapies would exceed the benefit for these patients. Treatments should be tailored to each patient because mCSPC has marked diversity in its biological and clinical features. Recent advances in diagnostic and molecular technologies will provide useful prognostic and predictive biomarkers, and the treatment strategy will shift from the “for all-comers” to the “individualized” approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Harada
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Akinori Minato
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, 807-8556, Japan
| | - Masahiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, 807-8556, Japan
| | - Ikko Tomisaki
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, 807-8556, Japan
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Naohiro Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, 807-8556, Japan
| |
Collapse
|