Efficacy of Postoperative FOLFOX Versus XELOX Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer and Prognostic Value of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients Receiving XELOX

Association of Sijunzi decoction plus chemotherapy with gastrointestinal function and serum markers in patients after gastric carcinoma surgery

BACKGROUND

The deleterious effects of surgical trauma and subsequent postoperative complications pose significant challenges to the smooth recovery of patients after gastric cancer (GC) resection despite the substantial curative benefits provided by surgical interventions for GC. Hence, the investigation of more optimal and efficacious treatment approaches has become an urgent necessity in the medical community.

AIM

To investigate the association of Sijunzi decoction plus chemotherapy with the gastrointestinal function and serum markers of patients after GC surgery.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent GC surgery from June 2022 to February 2024. The control group included 45 patients who received chemotherapy (oxaliplatin + calcium folinate + 5-fluorouracil), whereas the research group consisted of 54 patients who received Sijunzi decoction therapy in addition to the treatment administered in the control group. Comparative analyses were conducted from the following perspectives: Gastrointestinal function (defecation time, intestinal gas discharge time, and hospitalization time), serum markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125, and CA199], nutritional indicators [total protein (TP) and transferrin (TRF), traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score, and grades III-IV adverse events (gastrointestinal reactions, renal/liver function impairment, and myelosuppression).

RESULTS

The two groups demonstrated similar defecation time (P > 0.05), but the intestinal gas discharge time and hospitalization time were significantly shortened in the research group (P < 0.05). Further, the research group exhibited significant CEA, CA125, and CA199 reductions after treatment, which were lower compared to the control group, as well as notable increases in TP and TRF that were statistically higher than the control group (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, the research group demonstrated an evident decrease in TCM syndrome scores in areas, such as poor appetite, epigastric distension and pain, fatigue and weakness (P < 0.01), and abdominal distension after eating, which are notably lower than those in the control group (P < 0.01), with a comparable incidence of grades III-IV adverse events (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our research results indicate that Sijunzi decoction plus chemotherapy exerts a good rehabilitation-promoting effect on gastrointestinal function in patients after GC surgery and significantly downregulates abnormally increased CEA, CA125, and CA199 levels.

Effects of perioperative treatment of resectable adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction by immunotherapy (Adebrelimab) combined with chemotherapy (XELOX): protocol for a single-center, open-labeled study (AEGIS trial, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy)

BACKGROUND

For resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), current treatment exploration primarily focuses on perioperative chemotherapy regimens combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, but the long-term survival benefits of still require further investigation, and the use of upfront immunotherapy is typically restricted to patients with metastatic MSI-H (M1 MSI-H) disease due to their potential responsiveness to immunological agents. Adebrelimab, as a novel PD-L1 antibody, has not yet been proven for its efficacy and safety in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

METHODS

The AEGIS study is a prospective, open-labeled, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. A total of 26 patients with AEG will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after perioperative neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. Secondary outcomes of the study include the objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, and pCR rate in combined positive score(CPS) ≥ 5 and MSI-H populations, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). The exploratory outcomes are the biomarkers related to therapeutic efficacy, such as PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden(TMB), Epstein-Barr virus(EBV) infection, and circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA).

DISCUSSION

This trail aims to verify the efficacy and safety of the perioperative treatment regimen of anti-PD-L1 (Adebrelimab) combined with chemotherapy (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin, XELOX) for patients with resectable AEG. Considering the differences in chemotherapy regimen tolerance between Asian and Western populations, this study intends to evaluate the suitability of Adebrelimab combined with XELOX chemotherapy for the Asian population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06482788. The trial was prospectively registered on 22 May 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06482788 .

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Chemoresistance for Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive tract, and chemotherapy plays an irreplaceable role in the comprehensive treatment of GC. However, chemoresistance makes it difficult for patients with GC to benefit steadily from chemotherapy in the long term, which ultimately leads to tumor recurrence, metastasis, and patient death. Elucidating the detailed mechanism of chemoresistance in GC and identifying specific therapeutic targets will help to solve the difficult problem of chemoresistance and improve the prognosis of patients with GC. This review summarizes and clarifies the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying chemoresistance for GC.

Deciphering drug resistance in gastric cancer: Potential mechanisms and future perspectives

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant tumor that originates from the epithelium of the gastric mucosa. The latest global cancer statistics show that GC ranks fifth in incidence and fourth in mortality among all cancers, posing a serious threat to public health. While early-stage GC is primarily treated through surgery, chemotherapy is the frontline option for advanced cases. Currently, commonly used chemotherapy regimens include FOLFOX (oxaliplatin + leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil) and XELOX (oxaliplatin + capecitabine). However, with the widespread use of chemotherapy, an increasing number of cases of drug resistance have emerged. This article primarily explores the potential mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance in GC patients from five perspectives: cell death, tumor microenvironment, non-coding RNA, epigenetics, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Additionally, it proposes feasibility strategies to overcome drug resistance from four angles: cancer stem cells, tumor microenvironment, natural products, and combined therapy. The hope is that this article will provide guidance for researchers in the field and bring hope to more GC patients.

Systemic immune inflammation index and gastric cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

The present study aimed to pool the available data on the associations between the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) and overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with gastric cancer (GC). A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases for observational studies, and a random effects model was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Pooled effect sizes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data from 30 studies (24 conducted in China) with follow-ups ranging between 15.5 and 65.6 months were analyzed. Patients with GC and high SII levels had poor OS (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.34-1.75) and recurrence free survival (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.70). These increased risks were present irrespective of the treatment strategy (surgical or non-surgical management), the sample size (<500 and ≥500) and the cut-off used to define high and low SII (<600 and ≥600 x109 cells/l). The results of this meta-analysis suggest that high pretreatment SII levels were associated with poor OS and RFS in patients with GC.

Construction of a nomogram for preoperative prediction of the risk of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The status of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) is particularly important for the formulation of clinical treatment. The purpose of this study was to construct a nomogram to predict the risk of LNM in EGC before operation.

METHODS

Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for LNM. The independent risk factors were included in the nomogram, and the prediction accuracy, discriminant ability and clinical practicability of the nomogram were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve and clinical decision curve (DCA), and 100 times ten-fold cross-validation was used for internal validation.

RESULTS

33 (11.3%) cases of AGC were pathologically confirmed as LNM. In multivariate analysis, T stage, presence of enlarged lymph nodes on CT examination, carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), undifferentiated histological type and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) were risk factors for LNM. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.86, the average area under the ROC curve of the 100-fold ten-fold cross-validation was 0.85, and the P value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.60. In addition, the clinical decision curve, net reclassification index (NRI) and Integrated Discriminant Improvement Index (IDI) showed that the nomogram had good clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that SIRI is a novel biomarker for preoperative prediction of LNM in EGC, and constructed a nomogram for preoperative prediction of the risk of LNM in EGC, which is helpful for the formulation of the clinical treatment strategies.

Preoperative peripheral blood inflammatory markers especially the fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio and novel FLR-N score predict the prognosis of patients with early-stage resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Systemic inflammation is important in the development of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic power of preoperative peripheral blood inflammatory markers and the novel FLR-N score in patients with resectable ECC.

Methods

A total of 140 patients with resectable ECC and 140 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited for the study. The Mann−Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences in inflammatory markers between groups. Kaplan−Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic power of preoperative fibrinogen, albumin, prealbumin, bilirubin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR), fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), FLR-neutrophil (FLR-N) score, and CA19-9 in patients with resectable ECC. Nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate Cox analyses.

Results

Patients with resectable ECC had significantly higher levels of neutrophils, monocytes, fibrinogen, FLR, FAR, FPR, NLR, PLR, and MLR and lower levels of lymphocytes, albumin, and prealbumin than HCs (all P < 0.01). Albumin, prealbumin, and FPR had a good ability to distinguish between ECC patients with total bilirubin < 34 µmol/L and HCs (AUCs of 0.820, 0.827, and 0.836, respectively). Kaplan−Meier analysis showed that high neutrophil, fibrinogen, FLR, FAR, PLR, MLR, and FLR-N score values were associated with poor survival in patients with resectable ECC. Multivariate analyses indicated that neutrophils (P = 0.022), FLR (P = 0.040), FLR-N score (P < 0.0001), and positive lymph node metastasis (P = 0.016) were independent factors for overall survival (OS). Nomogram were developed to predict OS for patients with ECC.

Conclusion

The prognostic roles of inflammatory markers in patients with resectable ECC were different. The preoperative neutrophil count, FLR and FLR-N score could serve as noninvasive markers for predicting the prognosis of resectable ECC.

Prognostic importance of the preoperative New-Naples prognostic score for patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The wide applicability of the Naples prognostic score (NPS) is still worthy of further study in gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to construct a New-NPS based on the differences in immunity and nutrition in patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal tumors to help obtain an individualized prediction of prognosis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from April 2014 to September 2016. The cutoff values of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), serum albumin (Alb), and total cholesterol (TC) were calculated by ROC curve analysis. ROC and t-ROC were used to evaluate the accuracy of the prognostic markers. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze the overall survival probability. Univariate and multivariate analyses based on Cox risk regression were used to show the independent predictors. The nomogram was made by R studio. The predictive accuracy of nomogram was assessed using a calibration plot, concordance index (C-index), and decision curve.

RESULTS

A total of 737 patients were included in training cohort, 411 patients were included in validation cohort. ROC showed that the New-NPS was more suitable for predicting the prognosis of GC patients. NPS = 2 indicated a poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that CEA (P = 0.026), Borrmann type (P = 0.001), pTNM (P < 0.001), New-NPS (P < 0.001), and nerve infiltration (P = 0.035) were independent risk factors for prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The New-NPS based on the cutoff values of NLR, LMR, Alb, and TC is not only suitable for predicting prognosis but can also be combined with clinicopathological characteristics to construct a nomogram model for GC patients.

Optimal First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment strategies for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients continue to advance with the generation of more data from clinical trials that are permitting us to refine the use of immunotherapy in combination with other treatment modalities. While the frontline therapy for metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma has become more complicated with the approval of combination regimens, it is also yielding better outcomes. These treatment strategies can now be individualized to fit patient circumstances and goals as well as the biomarker profile of their individual tumors leading to an increased likelihood of treatment related remissions and extended median survivals. Comprehensive genomic profiling at diagnosis should now be standard to allow the management team to customize each patient's treatment plan based on the genetic abnormalities discovered in their tumor. By refining these targeted approaches, we will see decreased toxicities and increased survival.

Current Advances and Outlook in Gastric Cancer Chemoresistance: A Review

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of the lesion is the standard primary treatment of gastric cancer. Unfortunately, most patients are already in the advanced stage of the disease when they are diagnosed with gastric cancer. Alternative therapies, such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy, can achieve only very limited benefits. The emergence of cancer drug resistance has always been the major obstacle to the cure of tumors. The main goal of modern cancer pharmacology is to determine the underlying mechanism of anticancer drugs.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we mainly review the latest research results related to the mechanism of chemotherapy resistance in gastric cancer, the application of natural products in overcoming the chemotherapy resistance of gastric cancer, and the new strategies currently being developed to treat tumors based on immunotherapy and gene therapy.

CONCLUSION

The emergence of cancer drug resistance is the main obstacle in achieving alleviation and final cure for gastric cancer. Mixed therapies are considered to be a possible way to overcome chemoresistance. Natural products are the main resource for discovering new drugs specific for treating chemoresistance, and further research is needed to clarify the mechanism of natural product activity in patients. .