Utilization of Iodinated SpaceOAR Vue™ During Robotic Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) to Identify the Rectal-Prostate Interface and Spare the Rectum: A Case Report

Preventive efficacy of hydrocortisone enema for radiation proctitis in rectal cancer patients undergoing short-course radiotherapy: a phase II randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of hydrocortisone enema in preventing radiation proctitis in patients with rectal cancer undergoing short-course radiotherapy (SCRT).

METHODS

This phase II randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced rectal cancer (clinically staged T3-4 and/or N1-2M0). Participants received a median of 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) followed by 3-dimensional conformal SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a hydrocortisone enema (n=50) or a placebo (n=51) once daily for 5 consecutive days during SCRT. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of acute proctitis.

RESULTS

Of the 111 eligible patients, 101 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics, including sex, age, performance status, and tumor location, were comparable across the treatment arms. None of the patients experienced grade 4 acute gastrointestinal toxicity or had to discontinue treatment due to treatment-related adverse effects. Patients in the hydrocortisone arm experienced significantly less severe proctitis (P<0.001), diarrhea (P=0.023), and rectal pain (P<0.001) than those in the placebo arm. Additionally, the duration of acute gastrointestinal toxicity following SCRT was significantly shorter in patients receiving hydrocortisone (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hydrocortisone enema was associated with a significant reduction in the severity of proctitis, diarrhea, and rectal pain compared to placebo. Additionally, patients treated with hydrocortisone experienced shorter durations of gastrointestinal toxicity following SCRT. This study highlights the potential benefits of hydrocortisone enema in managing radiation-induced toxicity in rectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

XIOSIS: An X-Ray-Based Intra-Operative Image-Guided Platform for Oncology Smart Material Delivery

Image-guided interventional oncology procedures can greatly enhance the outcome of cancer treatment. As an enhancing procedure, oncology smart material delivery can increase cancer therapy's quality, effectiveness, and safety. However, the effectiveness of enhancing procedures highly depends on the accuracy of smart material placement procedures. Inaccurate placement of smart materials can lead to adverse side effects and health hazards. Image guidance can considerably improve the safety and robustness of smart material delivery. In this study, we developed a novel generative deep-learning platform that highly prioritizes clinical practicality and provides the most informative intra-operative feedback for image-guided smart material delivery. XIOSIS generates a patient-specific 3D volumetric computed tomography (CT) from three intraoperative radiographs (X-ray images) acquired by a mobile C-arm during the operation. As the first of its kind, XIOSIS (i) synthesizes the CT from small field-of-view radiographs;(ii) reconstructs the intra-operative spacer distribution; (iii) is robust; and (iv) is equipped with a novel soft-contrast cost function. To demonstrate the effectiveness of XIOSIS in providing intra-operative image guidance, we applied XIOSIS to the duodenal hydrogel spacer placement procedure. We evaluated XIOSIS performance in an image-guided virtual spacer placement and actual spacer placement in two cadaver specimens. XIOSIS showed a clinically acceptable performance, reconstructed the 3D intra-operative hydrogel spacer distribution with an average structural similarity of 0.88 and Dice coefficient of 0.63 and with less than 1 cm difference in spacer location relative to the spinal cord.

Distinguishing Physiological Ureter Uptake From an Involved Lymph Node in Staging Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Scans: Implications for Radiation Planning

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging has become a mainstay diagnostic tool in staging unfavorable primary prostate cancer (PC) and identifying sites of recurrence in previously treated PC. One of the biggest pitfalls of PSMA imaging is rapid radionucleotide excretion in the urine via the​ kidneys, ureters, and bladder.​ The positron-emission tomography (PET) images obtained show increased radiotracer activity in these structures, which can occlude or even mimic true malignant disease. We describe the diagnostic challenges encountered in differentiating benign versus malignant disease with PSMA scans. A 78-year-old male presented ​to our outpatient radiation oncology office ​with high-risk prostate cancer. His medical history was significant for ulcerative colitis (UC). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an enlarged prostate and a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) class 4 lesion. A subsequent transperineal biopsy confirmed unilateral Gleason 8 adenocarcinoma. A PSMA PET scan was read as increased uptake in the right prostate and a left external iliac node. The patient, having been initially informed of a positive lymph node metastasis, sought a second opinion,​resulting in​​ ​a CT urogram that revealed physiologic ureteral uptake. We were thus able to avoid lymph node radiation and morbidity to the surrounding bowel, already chronically inflamed with ulcerative colitis. This study ​demonstrates the ​potential for misinterpretation of PSMA uptake in the ureter as lymph node metastases. We discuss how peri-uretic activity can hinder accurate visualization of pelvic lymph node metastases. This study highlights the need for careful image interpretation of PSMA uptake patterns in order to avoid diagnostic errors and unnecessary radiation to ​at-risk​​ ​organs in prostate cancer management.

Comprehensive review of the use of hydrogel spacers prior to radiation therapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive narrative review of the published data on the impact of hydrogel spacers on rectal dosimetry and toxicity and to outline the practicalities of inserting hydrogel spacers.

RESULTS

A growing body of evidence suggests that the administration of hydrogel spacers is safe and is associated with limited peri-operative morbidity. The impact on rectal dosimetry has been clearly established and use of hydrogel spacers is associated with reduced rectal morbidity. These results have been corroborated by several Phase II and III clinical trials and subsequent meta-analysis. There are several areas for future research, including the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate stereotactic beam radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrogel spacers provide a low-morbidity method to potential reduce rectal toxicity after radiation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Data outlining sexual function and oncological outcomes are limited to date. Future studies, currently being conducted, may provide further clarification of the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate cancer management.

Polyethylene glycol-based gels for treatment of prostate cancer: pictorial review of normal placement and complications

Rectal spacers are commonly used in the radiotherapy for prostate cancers, serving as a means to protect the rectum and surrounding structures from radiation toxicity. Polyethylene Glycol-Based Gels (SpaceOAR ™ and Space-OAR Vue™, Boston Scientific) are the most commonly used rectal spacers. Given their increasingly widespread use and the relative paucity of radiology literature on this topic, it is imperative for the radiologist to recognize both the normal and abnormal placement of these polyethylene glycol-based rectal spacers, particularly as the latter may be associated with suboptimal therapy and/or complications.

Application of Hydrogel Spacer SpaceOAR Vue for Prostate Radiotherapy

Damage in the surrounding structures, including the rectum, due to unintended exposure to radiation is a large burden to bear for patients who undergo radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The use of injectable rectal spacers to distance the anterior rectum from the prostate is a potential strategy to reduce the dose of unintended radiation to the rectum. Hydrogel spacers are gaining increasing popularity in the treatment regimen for prostate cancer. After FDA approval of SpaceOAR, specialists are receiving an increasing number of referrals for hydrogel placements. In this paper, we review hydrogel spacers, the supporting clinical data, the best practices for hydrogel placement, and the risk of adverse events.

Systematic study of the iodinated rectal hydrogel spacer material discrepancy on accuracy of proton dosimetry

PURPOSE

Iodination of rectal hydrogel spacer increases the computed tomography (CT) visibility. The effect of iodinated hydrogel spacer material on the accuracy of proton dosimetry has not been fully studied yet. We presented a systematic study to determine the effect of iodination on proton dosimetry accuracy during proton therapy (PT).

METHODS

PT plans were designed for 20 prostate cancer patients with rectal hydrogel spacer. Three variations of hydrogel density were considered. First, as the ground truth, the true elemental composition of hydrogel true material (TM), verified by our measurement of spacer stopping power ratio, was used for plan optimization and Monte Carlo dose calculation. The dose distribution was recalculated with (1) no material (NM) override based on the CT intensity of the iodinated spacer, and (2) the water material (WM) override, where spacer material was replaced by water. The plans were compared with the ground truth using the metrics of gamma index (GI) and dosimetric indices.

RESULTS

The iodination of hydrogel spacer affected the proton dose distribution with the NM scenario showing the most deviation from the ground truth. The iodination of spacer resulted in a notable increase in CT intensity and led to the treatment planning systems mistreating the iodinated spacer as a high-density material. Among the structures adjacent to the target, neurovascular bundles showed the largest dose difference, up to 350 cGy or about 5% of the prescribed dose with NM. Compared to the WM scenario, dose distribution similarity and GI passing ratios were lower in the NM scenario.

CONCLUSION

The inaccurate CT intensity-based material for iodinated spacer resulted in errors in PT dose calculation. We found that the error was negligible if the iodinated spacer was replaced with water. Water density can be used as a clinically accessible and convenient alternative material override to true spacer material.

Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer

In this review we outline the current evidence for the use of hydrogel rectal spacers in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy. We review their development, summarize clinical evidence, risk of adverse events, best practices for placement, treatment planning considerations and finally we outline a framework and rationale for the utilization of rectal spacers when treating unfavorable risk prostate cancer with dose escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

Case Report: Role of an Iodinated Rectal Hydrogel Spacer, SpaceOAR Vue™, in the Context of Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy, for Enhanced Post-Operative Contouring to Aid in Accurate Implant Evaluation and Dosimetry

We present a case series of 13 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, utilizing SpaceOAR Vue™, the recent iodinated iteration of the SpaceOAR™ hydrogel rectal spacer. Low- and favorable intermediate-risk patients receiving monotherapy and unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk patients undergoing a brachytherapy boost were included. Permanent brachytherapy can result in subacute and late rectal toxicity, and precise contouring of the anterior rectal wall and posterior aspect of the prostate is essential for accurate dosimetry to confirm a safe implant. Clearly visible on non-contrast CT imaging, SpaceOAR Vue™ can substantially aid in post-implant contouring and analysis. Not previously described in the literature in the context of LDR brachytherapy, we demonstrate the added clinical benefit of placing a well-visualized rectal spacer.

Creation of a protective space between the rectum and prostate prior to prostate radiotherapy using a hydrogel spacer

The placement of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacer is a recently developed technique employed to reduce the radiation dose administered to the rectum during prostate radiotherapy. This procedure has been adopted by urologists and radiation oncologists involved in transperineal prostate biopsy and brachytherapy, and more recently by radiologists with experience in transperineal prostate procedures. Radiologists should be familiar with the product, which may be encountered on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Radiologists may wish to become involved in the delivery of this increasingly utilised procedure. This review familiarises radiologists with the technique and risks and benefits of the use of transperineal delivery of hydrogel spacers with imaging examples.