Best Supportive Care Versus Whole-Brain Irradiation, Chemotherapy Alone, or WBRT Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Brain Metastases From Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Case-Controlled Analysis

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib, as a salvage treatment for patients after failure of third-line or later-line treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has shown efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with immunotherapy for SCLC with BMs remain unclear.

METHOD

Patients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and February 2023 were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (iPFS). A waterfall diagram was used to indicate changes in intracranial lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included; 29 received anlotinib alone, and 19 were administered anlotinib plus ICI. Combination therapy, compared with anlotinib, was associated with significantly longer PFS and iPFS (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.004). Similar results were observed in patients with multiple BMs (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.002). After third-line or later-line treatments, patients treated with ICI plus anlotinib also achieved significant PFS and iPFS benefits (PFS: 8.4 months vs. 2.1 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 9.2 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002). No new or severe adverse events were observed with combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and ICI has promising intracranial and extracranial efficacy with tolerable toxicity, and may be a therapeutic option for SCLC patients with BMs.

The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy (RT) plus systemic therapy (ST) with RT alone in patients with simple brain metastasis (BM) after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

METHODS

The patients were treated at a single center from January 2011 to January 2022. BM only without metastases to other organs was defined as simple BM. The eligible patients were divided into RT alone (monotherapy arm) and RT plus ST (combined therapy arm). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of extracranial progression. After 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, two groups were compared for extracranial progression-free survival (ePFS), PFS, overall survival (OS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS).

RESULTS

133 patients were identified and 100 were analyzed (monotherapy arm: n = 50, combined therapy arm: n = 50). The ePFS of the combined therapy was significantly longer than that of the monotherapy, with a median ePFS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-19.8) in combined therapy and 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7-10.7) in monotherapy (P = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.057), OS (P = 0.309), or iPFS (P = 0.448). Multifactorial analysis showed that combined therapy was independently associated with better ePFS compared with monotherapy (HR = 0.617, P = 0.034); more than 5 BMs were associated with worse ePFS compared with 1-5 BMs (HR = 1.808, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RT alone, combined therapy improves ePFS in patients with simple BM after first-line treatment of LS-SCLC. Combined therapy and 1-5 BMs reduce the risk of extracranial recurrence.

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy failed to reduce the risk of developing brain metastases in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IO) has demonstrated promising results in treating extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and the management of ES-SCLC brain metastases (BMs) is now receiving significant clinical attention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of IO in the clinical management of BMs.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2021, the study included the records of 250 patients who were diagnosed with ES-SCLC. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and the cumulative incidence of BMs were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. In addition, the Cox regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In the entire group, 85 patients had baseline BMs (IO plus chemotherapy [IO + ChT], n = 38; ChT alone, n = 47), and 165 patients (IO + ChT, n = 86; ChT alone, n = 79) did not have BMs at the time of initial diagnosis. The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The OS benefit with first-line antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy was maintained regardless of whether patients had BMs (with BMs, 17.97 vs. 13.14 months [p = .03]; without BMs, 18.46 vs. 15.05 months [p = .047]). However, in patients without BMs, IO did not delay the median time to developing brain progression (10.84 vs. 10.74 months; p = .84), and it did not significantly reduce the risk of developing intracranial metastases (the 2-year actuarial risk of developing BMs was 57.0% vs. 50.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy improved OS regardless of the presence of BMs. However, IO did not delay the median time to brain progression or reduce the risk of intracranial metastasis in patients without baseline BMs. The findings of this study have important clinical implications for the future management of BMs from ES-SCLC.

A study of the prognosis of patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer who did or did not receive prophylactic cranial irradiation after effective chemoradiotherapy

Objective

To investigate the prognosis of patients with LS-SCLC who responded to chest chemoradiotherapy but did not receive PCI.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on LS-SCLC patients who had achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) after definitive chemoradiotherapy but did not receive PCI. The survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. The prognosis was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression model. The main endpoint was OS.

Results

Of the 500 patients with LS-SCLC admitted between June 2002 and January 2018, 327 achieved CR or PR after definitive chest chemoradiotherapy, 103 did not receive PCI, and 63 of them developed brain metastases (BM). The 1-year and 3-year OS rates in PCI group were 87.5% and 42.3% respectively, versus 70.4% and 20.9% for non-PCI group(P=0.002). The median survival time after BM was 8.7 months (range: 0.3-48.7), and 3-year OS rate was 15.0%, the median survival time of patients without BM was 20.1 months (range: 2.9-79.4), and 3-year OS was 33.4% (P=0.014). Patients with BM were subsequently treated with palliative therapy. Multivariate analysis showed that compared with no treatment, brain radiotherapy alone (HR: 0.131, 95%CI: 0.035-0.491, P=0.003) and radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy (HR: 0.039, 95%CI: 0.008-0.194, P<0.001) significantly reduced the risk of death. Multiple BM (HR: 2.391, 95%CI: 1.082-5.285, P=0.031) was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS.

Conclusion

LS-SCLC patients who achieved good response after chest chemoradiotherapy without receiving PCI were prone to develop BM and have a poor prognosis. Multiple BM was an independent adverse prognostic factor. PCI remains the standard of care for LS-SCLC patients.

The Impact of Chemosensitivity on the Outcome of Brain Metastases in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic differences between patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with different chemosensitivity to first-line chemotherapy who developed brain metastasis (BM) as the first site of progression.

METHODS

Patients with a BM after first-line treatment in the Tianjin Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the time-free interval (TFI) between the completion of first-line chemotherapy and the onset of the BM, the patients were divided into the chemo-sensitive group (TFI ≥ 90 days, n = 145) and the chemo-resistant group (TFI < 90 days, n = 97). The survival time, which was calculated from the diagnosis of the BM, was analyzed after the onset of brain metastasis (BM-OS). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In total, the median BM-OS was 8.4 months. The median BM-OS in the chemo-sensitive group was 8.8 months, and it was 8.0 months in the chemo-resistant group (p = 0.538). In patients without extracranial progression (n = 193), the median BM-OSes in the chemo-sensitive and chemo-resistant groups were 9.4 months and 9.7 months, respectively (p = 0.947). In patients with extracranial progression (n = 49), the median BM-OSes in the chemo-sensitive and chemo-resistant groups were 5.4 months and 4.2 months, respectively (p = 0.161). Conclusions: After the development of a BM as the first site of progression following chemotherapy in patients with SCLC, the prognosis of chemo-sensitive patients was not necessarily superior to chemo-resistant patients, especially in patients without extracranial progression.

Analysis of Immunotherapy Combined with Radiotherapy in Patients with Brain Metastasis of Driver Gene-Negative Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose. To observe the remission rate and side effects of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasis of driver gene-negative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. 152 patients with NSCLC brain metastasis admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the research objects. Patients were divided into a single group (85 cases) and a combined group (67 cases) according to treatment methods. The therapeutic effects and side effects of the single group and combined group were compared. In addition, the patients who received immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy were divided into three subgroups: A, B, and C, and the therapeutic effects and side effects of different radiotherapy modes were compared among group A [whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT)], group B (WBRT combined with local radiotherapy) and group C (local radiotherapy). Results. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the combined group were higher than those in the single group ( $P<0.05$ ). The incidence of reactive capillary hyperplasia and immune-related pneumonia in the combined group were higher than that in the single group ( $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other side effects between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ). ORR and DCR in group B were higher than those in group A ( $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects among the three groups ( $P>0.05$ ). Conclusion. Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy is effective in patients with brain metastasis of driver gene-negative NSCLC, which can improve the disease control rate without increasing the side effects. In addition, WBRT combined with local push radiotherapy is effective and safe. Clinical Study Registration Number. The Clinical study registration number is K2019086.

Parotid metastases from primary lung cancer: Case series and systematic review of the features

Most parotid metastases have been reported to come from the head and neck; however, cases metastasized from the lung are extremely rare. Missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses occurred quite a few times. Thus, accurately identifying the clinical features of parotid metastasis of lung cancer is important. However, current studies about this issue are mostly case reports, and little is known about the detailed and systematic aspects. We reported three cases of parotid metastases from lung cancer and then systematically searched similar cases through “Pub-Med” and “Web of Science”. Finally, twenty-three patients were included in the study. Eighty-three percent of which were males, and 19 patients were over 50 years old. In all cases with smoking history mentioned, 93% were smokers. The predominant pathological type was small cell lung cancer (SCLC, 13 patients, 56%). Seventeen combined with other site metastasis, while more than half of which were brain metastases. The survival time ranged from 3months-17years, and as for SCLCs, it was only 3months-40months. It can be concluded that clinical features, such as sex, age, smoking history, pathological types, and metastasis patterns, could provide valuable evidence for diagnosis. The lung seems to be the most common primary site of parotid metastases except for head and neck tumors. The two circumstances, SCLC coexisting with Warthin’s tumor and parotid small cell carcinoma with lung metastasis, should be differentiated from parotid metastasis of lung cancer with caution For cases presented as SCLC, more aggressive strategies, such as chemotherapy with immunotherapy and maintenance therapy, may be more suitable. Due to the greater tendency of brain metastasis in such diseases, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or prophylactic cranial irradiation should be applied to corresponding patients in time. Additionally, lung cancer parotid metastases may be a marker of poor prognosis.

Programmed cell death 1 pathway inhibitors improve the overall survival of small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for brain metastases with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors at our institution from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were divided into two groups. In Group A, patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy for brain metastases. In Group B, patients received chemotherapy, radiotherapy for brain metastases and at least four cycles of immunotherapy. Overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 282 patients were enrolled in our study. At the end of the study (May 12, 2021), the median overall survival was 13.3 months among 218 patients in Group A and 33.4 months among 64 patients in Group B (hazards ratio [HR] 0.320, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.189-0.545, P < 0.001). Both univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that two factors were significantly correlated with overall survival: the inclusion of immunotherapy in the regimen and the presence of extracranial metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 6.93 months in Group A and 10.73 months in Group B (HR = 0.540, 95% CI, 0.346-0.841, P = 0.006). The intracranial objective response rate of Group B was greater than that of Group A, but the intracranial disease control rate was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy for brain metastases showed promising efficacy for small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.