Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy failed to reduce the risk of developing brain metastases in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IO) has demonstrated promising results in treating extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and the management of ES-SCLC brain metastases (BMs) is now receiving significant clinical attention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of IO in the clinical management of BMs.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2021, the study included the records of 250 patients who were diagnosed with ES-SCLC. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and the cumulative incidence of BMs were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. In addition, the Cox regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In the entire group, 85 patients had baseline BMs (IO plus chemotherapy [IO + ChT], n = 38; ChT alone, n = 47), and 165 patients (IO + ChT, n = 86; ChT alone, n = 79) did not have BMs at the time of initial diagnosis. The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The OS benefit with first-line antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy was maintained regardless of whether patients had BMs (with BMs, 17.97 vs. 13.14 months [p = .03]; without BMs, 18.46 vs. 15.05 months [p = .047]). However, in patients without BMs, IO did not delay the median time to developing brain progression (10.84 vs. 10.74 months; p = .84), and it did not significantly reduce the risk of developing intracranial metastases (the 2-year actuarial risk of developing BMs was 57.0% vs. 50.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy improved OS regardless of the presence of BMs. However, IO did not delay the median time to brain progression or reduce the risk of intracranial metastasis in patients without baseline BMs. The findings of this study have important clinical implications for the future management of BMs from ES-SCLC.

Predictive value of metabolic parameters derived from preoperative 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography for brain metastases in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Brain metastases (BMs) are common complications in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the metabolic parameters derived from preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) can predict BM development in patients with surgically resected NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 128 consecutive patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before curative surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University between November 2012 and October 2021. By drawing a volume of interest (VOI), the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor as well as the mean SUV (SUVmean) of the liver and arterial blood were measured. The tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR) and tumor-to-blood SUV ratio (TBR) were also calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the best cut-off values for positron emission tomography (PET) parameters to predict BM-free survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the predictive value of clinical variables and PET parameters.

Results

The median follow-up duration for survival patients was 23.4 months, and 15 patients (11.7%) experienced BM as the initial relapse site. The cumulative rates of BM over the course of 1, 2, and 5 years were 4.5%, 10.5%, and 17.5%, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for the prediction of BM-free survival were 7.7, 4.9, and 4.5 for SUVmax, TLR, and TBR, and 5.5 mL and 16.1 for MTV and TLG, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards model, the risk of BM was significantly associated with TLR [hazard ratio (HR) =10.712; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.958-38.801; P<0.001] and MTV (HR =3.150; 95% CI: 0.964-10.293; P=0.020) after adjusting for tumor stage, clinicopathological factors, and other PET parameters.

Conclusions

Preoperative TLR and MTV of the primary tumor may be helpful in predicting BM development in patients with surgically resected NSCLC. Tumor metabolic parameters may potentially be used to stratify the risk of BM and determine individualized surveillance strategies.

Association between age and the presence and mortality of breast cancer synchronous brain metastases in the United States: A neglected SEER analysis

Background

The extent of the relationship between age and the presence of breast cancer synchronous brain metastases (BCSBMs) and mortality has not yet been well-identified or sufficiently quantified. We aimed to examine the association of age with the presence of BCSBMs and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality outcomes using the SEER database.

Methods

Age-associated risk of the presence and survival of BCSBMs were evaluated on a continuous scale (restricted cubic spline, RCS) with logistic or Cox regression models. The main endpoints were the presence of BCSBMs and all-cause mortality or cancer-specific mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing risk models were used in survival analysis.

Results

Among 374,132 adult breast cancer patients, 1,441 (0.38%) had BMs. The presence of BCSBMs displayed a U-shaped relationship with age, with the highest point of the curve occurring at the age of 62. In both the younger (age ≤ 61) and older (age ≥ 62) groups, the observed curve showed a nearly linear relationship between age and the presence of BCSBMs. The relationship between age and all-cause mortality (ASM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was linear. Older age at diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of ASM (HR 1.019, 95% CI: 1.013-1.024, p < 0.001) and CSM (HR 1.016, 95% CI: 1.010-1.023, p < 0.001) in multivariable Cox models. Age (sHR 1.007, 95% CI 1-1.013, p = 0.049) was substantially related to a significantly increased risk of CSM in competing risk models.

Conclusion

Age had a non-linear U-shaped relationship with the presence of BCSBMs and a linear relationship with BCSBMs mortality.

Primary Tumor Resection Provides Survival Benefits for Patients with Synchronous Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Background: Brain metastases (BMs), particularly synchronous brain metastases, in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are uncommon. The survival benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is controversial. Whether PTR can bring survival benefits to patients with BMs of CRC has not been reported. Methods: From 2010 to 2016, 581 CRC patients with BMs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were divided into PTR and non-PTR groups. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival distributions. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. By controlling additional prognostic factors, a Cox proportional multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the survival benefit of PTR. Results: The median overall survival for CRC patients with synchronous BMs was 3 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 27.2% and a 2-year survival rate of 12.8%. The PTR group contained 171 patients (29.4%), whereas the non-PTR group had 410 patients (70.6%). Patients who underwent PTR had a 1-year survival rate of 40.2% compared to 21.7% in those who did not (p < 0.0001). Cox proportional analysis showed that patients ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.718, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.423−2.075, p < 0.0001) had a shorter OS than patients < 60 years of age. OS was better in CEA-negative than in CEA-positive patients (HR 0.652, 95% CI 0.472−0.899, p = 0.009). Patients in whom the primary tumor was removed had considerably improved prognoses (HR 0.654, 95% CI 0.531−0.805, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the PTR group achieved a survival advantage except for patients with CEA negative. Conclusions: Patients with synchronous BMs from CRC may benefit from primary tumor resection (PTR). Age, CEA level, and PTR were independent prognostic risk factors for CRC patients with synchronous BMs.

From Uterus to Brain: An Update on Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Treatment of Brain Metastases From Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia

In this review, we provide the state of the art about brain metastases (BMs) from gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), a rare condition. Data concerning the epidemiology, clinical presentation, innovations in therapeutic modalities, and outcomes of GTN BMs are comprehensively presented with particular attention to the role of radiotherapy, neurosurgery, and the most recent chemotherapy regimens. Good response rates have been achieved thanks to multi-agent chemotherapy, but brain involvement by GTNs entails significant risks for patients’ health since sudden and extensive intracranial hemorrhages are possible. Moreover, despite the evolution of treatment protocols, a small proportion of these patients ultimately develops a resistant disease. To tackle this unmet clinical need, immunotherapy has been recently proposed. The role of this novel option for this subset of patients as well as the achieved results so far are also discussed.

Navigate Towards the Immunotherapy Era: Value of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases

Brain metastases (BMs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have resulted in a paradigm shift in the management of advanced NSCLC. However, the value of ICIs in NSCLC patients with BMs remains unclear because patients with BMs are routinely excluded in numerous prospective trials on ICIs. Here, starting from the mechanisms of ICIs for BMs, we will reveal the value of ICIs by reviewing the efficacy and adverse effects of ICIs monotherapy as well as promising combination strategies, such as combinations with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and anti-angiogenic drugs, etc. In addition, the methods of patient selection and response assessment will be summarized to assist clinical practice and further studies.

Radiation therapy in the prevention and management of brain metastases in patients with small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this narrative review is to survey the current literature and provide treatment recommendations for the management of patients with brain metastases (BMs) from small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

BMs are very common in patients with SCLC and management has changed significantly in recent years. Radiation techniques and systemic therapies have evolved and this review will highlight these recent studies and implications on clinical practice.

RESULTS

This narrative review covers prophylaxis and treatment of established BMs in patients with SCLC. Studies included are based on Medline, PubMed, Google scholar searches, abstracts from conference proceedings and references from published papers.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy continue to have an important role in the prophylaxis and treatment of patients with BMs. Radiation technologies have resulted in significant reduction of toxicities and improved quality of life (QoL). There continues to be many unanswered questions and results of currently accruing trials will hopefully fill some of these gaps and refine the role of radiation therapy in the management of this condition.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitors with or without concurrent brain radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Data focusing on the synergistic effect of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs) in lung cancer is scarce.

METHODS

A total of 60 lung cancer patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors with or without brain radiotherapy were identified in this retrospective study. The primary endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) among three groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received PD-1 inhibitors and concurrent brain radiotherapy, 20 patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitors and non-concurrent brain radiotherapy, and the other 19 patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitors alone. Patients in the concurrent group achieved a higher intracranial objective response rate (iORR, 61.1% vs. 29.4% vs. 25.0%) and a higher intracranial disease control rate (iDCR, 83.3% vs. 58.8% vs. 56.3%) compared with those in the non-concurrent group and PD-1 inhibitors alone group. The median iPFS was significantly longer in the concurrent group than the non-concurrent group and the PD-1 inhibitors alone group (9.8, 5.7, and 4.8 months, P=0.039, respectively). The median PFS were 9.2, 5.7 and 4.6 months (P=0.347) in the concurrent group, non-concurrent group and PD-1 inhibitors alone group. And the median OS were not reached, 12.1 and 6.9 months (P=0.206), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the lack of concurrent brain radiotherapy was independently associated with a shorter iPFS.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1 inhibitors with concurrent brain radiotherapy achieved a higher iORR, iDCR, and iPFS in lung cancer patients with treated or newly diagnosed BMs.

Anlotinib combined with durvalumab in a patient with recurrent multifocal brain metastases of small cell lung cancer after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy and palliative radiotherapy of the lung and brain: a case report

The brain is a common metastatic site of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but systematic treatment options are limited by the blood-brain barrier. Currently, the optimal treatment regimen remains controversial, especially for patients already treated by brain radiotherapy. Anlotinib is a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has shown significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival in third-line or beyond therapy of advanced SCLC in a randomized, double-blind phase II study (ALTER1202 trial) based on a Chinese population sample. Emerging data has also suggested that immunotherapy, such as the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, has a relatively high response rate in brain metastatic SCLC, although there is a lack of large sample-size studies. Integrating anlotinib and immunotherapy for recurrent or relapsing brain metastases (BMs) of SCLC has not been previously reported, but it is possible that these two treatments may have synergistic effects and provide even better outcomes. Here, we present a case of stage III SCLC who developed lung and BMs after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) and achieved radiographic locally complete regression following whole brain irradiation (WBI) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. Durvalumab was delivered as maintenance therapy. Asymptomatic multifocal recurrence of BMs occurred after the administration of the second dose of durvalumab. After administration of combined durvalumab and anlotinib, the BMs achieved near-complete regression and no severe toxicity was reported. This suggests a potential synergistic effect of combined durvalumab and anlotinib in previously treated BMs in a patient with SCLC and may provide a direction for future clinical decisions.

Intracranial radiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibition for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the development of immunotherapy in recent years, the prognosis of patients is expected to improve due to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT). However, studies on combination therapy (ICI + intracranial RT) have reported inconsistent results, and it is unclear whether the combination has increased toxicity. By analyzing the latest relevant literature, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the effectiveness and safety of intracranial RT combined with ICI in patients with brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for published studies that compared the efficacy and safety of intracranial RT combined with ICI versus intracranial RT alone in the treatment of BMs. Overall survival (OS), local brain failure (LBF), distant brain failure (DBF), and radiation necrosis (RN) were pooled with the use of the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

A total of 26 retrospective observation cohort studies were included, and over 1,500 patients who received ICI and intracranial RT were evaluated. Compared with intracranial RT alone, RT combined with ICI significantly improved OS in patients with BMs [HR =0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.64, P<0.001 when OS was defined from the date of diagnosis of BMs; HR =0.45, 95% CI: 0.39-0.52, P<0.001 when OS was defined from the date of RT], though the risk of RN was similar to that of RT alone (HR =1.27, 95% CI: 0.58-2.79, P=0.55). However, significant improvement in LBF and DBF was not obtained with RT combined with ICI (1-year LBF: OR =1.71, 95% CI: 0.38-7.67, P=0.48; LBF: HR =0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.87, P=0.01; 1-year DBF: OR =1.05, 95% CI: 0.47-2.33, P=0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

ICI combined with intracranial RT confers a significant OS benefit for patients with BMs without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicity, but further research regarding the specific details of combined treatment application is needed to improve the survival and quality of life of patients with BMs.

Radiation and Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Lead to Long Term Disease Control in a Metastatic RCC patient With Brain Metastases

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprises 4.2% of all new cancer cases in the United States and 30% of cases are metastatic (mRCC) at diagnosis. Brain metastatic RCC historically has poor prognosis, but the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized their care and may be successfully combined with SBRT to improve prognosis. Here, we present a case of a patient with mRCC who had brain metastases treated with concurrent immune checkpoint inhibitors and SBRT. He continues to survive with good functional status years following his initial diagnosis. We discuss the relevant history regarding treatment approach in patients with brain metastatic RCC, ongoing trials focusing on the combination of immunotherapy and radiation, and the potential and promise of the abscopal effect.

Outcomes of adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after surgical resection of brain metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

To assess the risks of local and distant failure and overall survival time in patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) to the postoperative cavity for brain metastases (BMs) compared with patients treated with adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT).

METHODS

Between July 2005 and February 2015, 196 non-randomized patients with 202 resected BMs were treated with post-operative WBRT or HFSRT at a single institution. The propensity score was included as a covariate to compare the interval to local failure, distant brain failure and overall survival time. The matching covariates consisted of the age, Karnofsky performance status, primary disease, number of BMs, extracranial disease status and presence or absence of extracranial metastases.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients (54.5%) received adjuvant WBRT, and 92 HFSRT procedures (45.5%) were delivered after surgery. A Cox model adjusted on the propensity score showed that the brain distant failure was significantly associated with treatment modality. Compared with WBRT, the patients who received HFSRT had a significantly greater risk of developing distant brain recurrence [HR =3.37 (2.13-5.33), P<0.001]. No difference was observed in local failure (HR =1.16, P=0.77) between the groups. In the propensity-matched cohort, the effect of treatment on survival was not significant (P=0.14), but it depended on the time. Within the first 20 months, the patients treated with WBRT had a 2 times higher risk of death than did patients treated with HFSRT [HR =2.17 (1.42-3.32), P=0.0003].

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the standard WBRT after the resection of BMs, stereotactic radiotherapy to the surgical bed produced a comparable local control rate to that of WBRT with a survival advantage in the first 20 months.

The effect of combining Endostar with radiotherapy on blood vessels, tumor-associated macrophages, and T cells in brain metastases of Lewis lung cancer

Background

Combining Endostar (ES) with radiotherapy (RT) has shown a promising therapeutic effect on non-small cell lung carcinoma with brain metastases (BMs) in clinical practice. However, the specific mechanism is not yet fully understood. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of ES on blood vessels, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and T cells in a tumor microenvironment treated with RT.

Methods

BM models were established by stereotactic and intracarotid injection of luciferase-Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells into female C57BL mice. The animals were randomly divided into 4 groups: normal saline (NS), ES, RT, and ES plus radiotherapy (ES + RT) groups. Tumor size was determined with the IVIS imaging system. Tumor specimens were stained with CD34 and α-SMA to investigate tumor vascular changes. The proportions of TAMs, CD4⁺ T cells, and CD8⁺ T cells in tumor tissues were determined by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. The expressions of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and CXCR4 were deduced using western blotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

ES + RT significantly suppressed tumor growth compared to the other 3 groups. RT decreased M1 and increased M2 in microglial cells and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) relative to NS, while ES had the opposite effect. The ratio of CD8⁺T/CD4⁺T was increased in the ES + RT group compared to the other 3 groups. Tumor vascular maturity (α-SMA⁺/CD34⁺) was increased while HIF-1α was significantly suppressed in the ES + RT group. CXCR4 expression, which is involved in TAM recruitment, increased following RT, whereas, ES attenuated its expression.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that ES can promote the normalization of tumor blood vessels and increase the anti-tumor immune-related immune cells infiltrating the tumor following RT treatment.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis

Background

Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are particularly prone to development of brain metastases (BMs). Newer anti-ALK treatments have demonstrated far greater intracranial efficacy. Here we performed a meta-analysis with the aim of assessing the efficacy of ALK inhibitors on BMs.

Methods

A search of published trials was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Data were pooled using the number of events/number of evaluable patients (non-small cell lung cancer patients with BMs) according to fixed or random effect models. Intracranial efficacy was assessed through overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses for baseline BMs, previous treatment with ALK inhibitor, study type, and current ALK inhibitor were made.

Results

Twenty studies accounting for 2,715 patients were included. The pooled iORR was 48% (95% CI: 32-63%) in fifteen single-arm studies. The overall DCR was 65% (95% CI: 60-69%) from three studies include available data. The iORR was 79% (95% CI: 64-91%), 45% (24-67%), 48% (34-63%), 18% (13-24%) in patients receiving alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, and crizotinib, respectively. Five randomized studies assessed the intracranial efficacy of anti-ALK agents versus chemotherapy, the pooled RR for iORR was 3.54 (95% CI: 2.38-5.26), and the pooled HR for iPFS was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.36-0.75; P=0.71) estimated in 2 studies.

Conclusions

Despite the limitation from lack of published clinical data, our results showed that ALK inhibitors are effective at the brain site regardless of previous anti-ALK treatments, systemic therapy with ALK inhibitors should be considered as a preferred approach over for controlling BMs from ALK-positive NSCLC.

Achievements and future developments of ALK-TKIs in the management of CNS metastases from ALK-positive NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the paradigm of personalized treatment of human cancer. Several oncogenic druggable alterations have been so far identified, with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements being one of the newest and most appealing. Presence of ALK fusions is associated with some particular clinical and pathological features, including a preferential seeding into the central nervous system (CNS). In addition, ALK rearrangements are recognized as the strongest predictor for benefit of anti-ALK therapy. Crizotinib, the first ALK inhibitor (ALK-I) licensed in clinical practice, is the standard of care for newly diagnosed patients. Unfortunately, within the first year of treatment the majority of patients become insensitive to crizotinib, with approximately one third of them developing brain metastases (BMs). Optimal management of BMs is one of the major challenges in treating ALK positive NSCLC. Several novel and highly CNS penetrant ALK-Is are currently under investigation and available data clearly indicated their ability in controlling intracranial disease.

State of the art of chemotherapy for the treatment of central nervous system metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without molecular drivers. Despite a low penetration of central nervous system (CNS), chemotherapy drugs demonstrated encouraging activity against CNS metastases from NSCLC. Based on the available data, chemotherapy should be considered as an important part of the multidisciplinary treatment of CNS metastases. Particularly, platinum-based regimens represent the most active combinations and pemetrexed is associated with a meaningful clinical benefit for patients with non-squamous histology. How to integrate chemotherapy and radiotherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs) is still debated. Although flawed by some limitations, the available evidence suggests a role for upfront chemotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC patients with synchronous, asymptomatic BMs, thus allowing a delay of radiotherapy. Despite the introduction of modern and more effective chemotherapy, however, the prognosis of NSCLC patients with CNS metastases remains poor, especially for those with progressive BMs or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC).