1
|
Li F, Zhang YY, Li M, Chen SK. Microwave ablation for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review of clinical efficacy and safety. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17:101162. [PMID: 39872771 PMCID: PMC11757189 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Revised: 10/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Microwave ablation (MWA) is emerging as a highly effective treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This review explores the advantages of MWA compared to other ablative techniques such as radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation and highlights its clinical efficacy, safety, and technical considerations. MWA offers significant benefits, including higher intratumoral temperatures, larger ablation zones, and reduced susceptibility to the heat-sink effect, which make it particularly suitable for tumors near large blood vessels. This review details the patient selection criteria, procedural approaches, and the use of advanced imaging techniques to improve the precision and effectiveness of MWA. Clinical outcomes indicate that MWA achieves high rates of complete tumor ablation and long-term survival with a favorable safety profile. This review is significant because it provides updated insights into the expanding role of MWA in treating unresectable CRLM and its potential as an alternative to surgical resection for resectable tumors. By summarizing recent studies and clinical trials, this review highlights the comparative effectiveness, safety, and integration with systemic therapies of MWA. In conclusion, MWA is a promising treatment option for CRLM and offers outcomes comparable to or better than those of other ablative techniques. Future research should focus on optimizing technical parameters, integrating MWA with systemic therapies, and conducting large-scale randomized controlled trials to establish standardized treatment protocols. Advancing our understanding of MWA will enhance its application and improve long-term survival and quality of life for patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Ming Li
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Sheng-Kai Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing 401147, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hernandez MC, Fan D, Sandhu J, Mahuron K, Kessler J, Raoof M, Fakih M, Singh G, Fong Y, Melstrom LG. Recurrence patterns after complex multimodality therapy and hepatic arterial infusion for colorectal liver metastases: A reflection of biology and technique. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1254-1264. [PMID: 38505908 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS We characterized colorectal liver metastasis recurrence and survival patterns after surgical resection and intraoperative ablation ± hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) placement. We estimated patterns of recurrence and survival in patients undergoing contemporary multimodal treatments. Between 2017 and 2021, patient, tumor characteristics, and recurrence data were collected. Primary outcomes included recurrence patterns and survival data based on operative intervention. RESULTS There were 184 patients who underwent hepatectomy and intraoperative ablation. Sixty patients (32.6%) underwent HAIP placement. A total of 513 metastases were ablated, median total of 2 ablations per patient. Median time to recurrence was 31 [22-40] months. Recurrence patterns included tumor at ablative margin on first scheduled postoperative imaging (8, 4.3%), local tumor recurrence at ablative site (69, 37.5%), and non-ablated liver tumor recurrence (38, 20.6%). In patients who underwent HAIP placement, the rate of liver recurrence was reduced (45% vs 70.9%, p = 0.0001). Median overall survival was 64 [41-58] months and prolonged survival was associated with HAIP treatment (85 [66-109] vs 60 [51-70] months. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION Hepatic recurrence is common and combination of intraoperative ablation and HAIP treatments were associated with prolonged survival. These data may reflect patient selection however, future work will clarify preoperative tumor and patient characteristics that may better predict recurrence expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Hernandez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Darrell Fan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jaideep Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Kelly Mahuron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department of Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Gagandeep Singh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hallemeier CL, Sharma N, Anker C, Selfridge JE, Lee P, Jabbour S, Williams V, Liu D, Kennedy T, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kumar R, Small W, Tchelebi L, Russo S. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines. Cancer 2023; 129:3193-3212. [PMID: 37409678 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Salma Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Birth Columbia, Canada
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan F, Jones K, Lyon P. Immune checkpoint inhibition: a future guided by radiology. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220565. [PMID: 36752570 PMCID: PMC10321249 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The limitation of the function of antitumour immune cells is a common hallmark of cancers that enables their survival. As such, the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) acts as a paradigm shift in the treatment of a range of cancers but has not yet been fully capitalised. Combining minimally and non-invasive locoregional therapies offered by radiologists with ICI is now an active field of research with the aim of furthering therapeutic capabilities in medical oncology. In parallel to this impending advancement, the "imaging toolbox" available to radiologists is also growing, enabling more refined tumour characterisation as well as greater accuracy in evaluating responses to therapy. Options range from metabolite labelling to cellular localisation to immune checkpoint screening. It is foreseeable that these novel imaging techniques will be integrated into personalised treatment algorithms. This growth in the field must include updating the current standardised imaging criteria to ensure they are fit for purpose. Such criteria is crucial to both appropriately guide clinical decision-making regarding next steps of treatment, but also provide reliable prognosis. Quantitative approaches to these novel imaging techniques are also already being investigated to further optimise personalised therapeutic decision-making. The therapeutic potential of specific ICIs and locoregional therapies could be determined before administration thus limiting unnecessary side-effects whilst maintaining efficacy. Several radiological aspects of oncological care are advancing simultaneously. Therefore, it is essential that each development is assessed for clinical use and optimised to ensure the best treatment decisions are being offered to the patient. In this review, we discuss state of the art advances in novel functional imaging techniques in the field of immuno-oncology both pre-clinically and clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraaz Khan
- Foundation Doctor, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
| | - Keaton Jones
- Academic Clinical Lecturer Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lyon
- Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mimmo A, Pegoraro F, Rhaiem R, Montalti R, Donadieu A, Tashkandi A, Al-Sadairi AR, Kianmanesh R, Piardi T. Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Pooled Oncological Analyses. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051305. [PMID: 35267612 PMCID: PMC8909068 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represents the best curative option; however, few patients are candidates for surgery. Microwave ablation (MWA) can be a valid alternative in selected patients. This systematic review reports the oncological results of MWA for CRLM. The literature available on the Web was analyzed for reports concerning MWA for resectable CRLM, published before January 2021. Finally, 12 papers concerning MWA complications, recurrence-free (RF) cases, patients free from local recurrence (FFLR), and overall survival rates (OS) were selected. Global RF rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 65.1%, 44.6%, and 34.3%, respectively. Global FFLR at 3, 6, and 12 months were 96.3%, 89.6%, and 83.7%, respectively. Global OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86.7%, 59.6%, and 44.8%, respectively. A better FFLR was achieved with an MWA surgical approach at 3, 6, and 12 months, with 97.1%, 92.7%, and 88.6%, respectively. Surgical MWA for CRLM smaller than 3 cm was a safe and valid option. MWA can be entered as part of the flowchart decision of CRLM curative treatment, especially for use in the parenchyma-sparing strategy and as a complement to surgery. Abstract (1) Background: colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the most common extra-lymphatic metastases in colorectal cancer; however, few patients are fit for curative surgery. Microwave ablation (MWA) showed promising outcomes in this cohort of patients. This systematic review and pooled analysis aimed to analyze the oncological results of MWA for CRLM. (2) Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and the Wiley Online Library databases were searched for reports published before January 2021. We included papers assessing MWA, treating resectable CRLM with curative intention. We evaluated the reported MWA-related complications and oncological outcomes as being recurrence-free (RF), free from local recurrence (FFLR), and overall survival rates (OS). (3) Results: Twelve out of 4822 papers (395 patients) were finally included. Global RF rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 65.1%, 44.6%, and 34.3%, respectively. Global FFLR rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 96.3%, 89.6%, and 83.7%, respectively. Global OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86.7%, 59.6%, and 44.8%, respectively. A better FFLR was reached using the MWA surgical approach at 3, 6, and 12 months, with reported rates of 97.1%, 92.7%, and 88.6%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Surgical MWA treatment for CRLM smaller than 3 cm is a safe and valid option. This approach can be safely included for selected patients in the curative intent approaches to treating CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mimmo
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesca Pegoraro
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Alix Donadieu
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
| | - Ahmad Tashkandi
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
| | - Abdul Rahman Al-Sadairi
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
| | - Reza Kianmanesh
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France; (F.P.); (R.R.); (A.D.); (A.T.); (A.R.A.-S.); (R.K.)
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Research Unit Ea3797 VieFra, Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Reims Medical Faculty, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France;
| |
Collapse
|