The Clinical Experiences of Urine Metabolomics of Genitourinary Urothelial Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in Taiwan

LC-MS based urine untargeted metabolomic analyses to identify and subdivide urothelial cancer

Introduction

Urine metabolomics has been a promising technique in the liquid biopsy of urothelial cancer (UC). The comparison of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), lower tract urothelial cancer (BCa), and healthy controls (HCs) need to be performed to find related biomarkers.

Methods

In our investigation, urine samples from 35 UTUCs, 44 BCas, and 53 gender- and age-matched HCs were analyzed using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). In different groups, the differential metabolites and the disturbed metabolism pathways were explored. Transcriptomics and urine metabolomics are combined to identify the probably disturbed gene in BCa.

Results

With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.815, the panel consisting of prostaglandin I2, 5-methyldeoxycytidine, 2,6-dimethylheptanoyl carnitine, and deoxyinosine was able to discriminate UC from HCs. With an AUC of 0.845, the validation group also demonstrated strong predictive ability. UTUC and BCa without hematuria could be distinguished using the panel of 5'-methylthioadenosine, L-beta-aspartyl-L-serine, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and N'-formylkynurenine (AUC=0.858). The metabolite panel comprising aspartyl-methionine, 7-methylinosine, and alpha-CEHC glucuronide could discriminate UTUC from BCa with hematuria with an AUC of 0.83. Fatty acid biosynthesis, purine metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, pentose and glucuronate interconversions, and arachidonic acid metabolism were dysregulated when comparing UC with HCs. PTGIS and BCHE, the genes related to the metabolism of prostaglandin I2 and myristic acid respectively, were significantly associated with the survival of BCa.

Discussion

Not only could LC-HRMS urine metabolomic investigations distinguish UC from HCs, but they could also identify UTUC from BCa. Additionally, urine metabolomics combined with transcriptomics can find out the potential aberrant genes in the metabolism.

GC-MS based metabolite fingerprinting of serous ovarian carcinoma and benign ovarian tumor

The aim of this study is to identify urinary metabolomic profile of benign and malign ovarian tumors patients. Samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and metabolomic tools to define biomarkers that cause differentiation between groups. 7 metabolites were found to be different in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and benign tumors (BT). R2Y and Q2 values were found to be 0.670 and 0.459, respectively. L-tyrosine, glycine, stearic acid, turanose and L-threonine metabolites were defined as prominent biomarkers. The sensitivity of the model was calculated as 90.72% and the specificity as 82.09%. In the pathway analysis, glutathione metabolism, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, glycine serine and threonine metabolic pathway, primary bile acid biosynthesis pathways were found to be important. According to the t-test, 29 metabolites were found to be significant in urine samples of OC patients and healthy controls (HC). R2Y and Q2 values were found to be 0.8170 and 0.749, respectively. These results showed that the model has high compatibility and predictive power. Benzoic acid, L-threonine, L-pyroglutamic acid, creatinine and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid metabolites were determined as prominent biomarkers. The sensitivity of the model was calculated as 93.81% and the specificity as 98.59%. Glycine serine and threonine metabolic pathway, glutathione metabolism and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis pathways were determined important in OC patients and HC. The R2Y, Q2, sensitivity and specificity values in the urine samples of BT patients and HC were found to be 0.869, 0.794, 91.75, 97.01% and 97.18%, respectively. L-threonine, L-pyroglutamic acid, benzoic acid, creatinine and pentadecanol metabolites were determined as prominent biomarkers. Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis were significant. In this study, thanks to the untargeted metabolomic approach and chemometric methods, every group was differentiated from the others and prominent biomarkers were determined.