The Time for Chronotherapy in Radiation Oncology

Personalization of Cancer Treatment: Exploring the Role of Chronotherapy in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy

In the era of precision medicine, mounting evidence suggests that the time of therapy administration, or chronotherapy, has a great impact on treatment outcomes. Chronotherapy involves planning treatment timing by considering circadian rhythms, which are 24 h oscillations in behavior and physiology driven by synchronized molecular clocks throughout the body. The value of chronotherapy in cancer treatment is currently under investigation, notably in the effects of treatment timing on efficacy and side effects. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is a promising cancer treatment. However, many patients still experience disease progression or need to stop the therapy early due to side effects. There is accumulating evidence that the time of day at which ICI therapy is administered can have a substantial effect on ICI efficacy. Thus, it is important to investigate the intersections of circadian rhythms, chronotherapy, and ICI efficacy. In this review, we provide a brief overview of circadian rhythms in the context of immunity and cancer. Additionally, we outline current applications of chronotherapy for cancer treatment. We synthesize the 29 studies conducted to date that examine the impact of time-of-day administration on the efficacy of ICI therapy, its associated side effects, and sex differences in both efficacy and side effects. We also discuss potential mechanisms underlying these observed results. Finally, we highlight the challenges in this area and future directions for research, including the potential for a chronotherapeutic personalized medicine approach that tailors the time of ICI administration to individual patients' circadian rhythms.

Association of the time of day of chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab with tumor control in lung cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The circadian clock governs the expression of genes related to immunity and DNA repair. We investigated whether the time of day of radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy infusions (chemotherapy or anti-PD-L1) are associated with disease control and survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

MATERIALS/METHODS

178 consecutive patients with inoperable LA-NSCLC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab between 5/2017-8/2022 were reviewed. Outcomes evaluated included progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional control (LRC), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

At a median follow up of 48.0 mo from durvalumab initiation, median PFS and OS were 26.2 mo and 50.0 mo, respectively. Median LRC and DMFS were not reached and 41.0 mo, respectively. Receiving > 50 % (N = 23) versus ≤ 50 % (N = 155) of radiotherapy treatments within 3 h of sunset was associated with younger age; otherwise, there were no other differences between cohorts. There were no significant differences in characteristics between patients who received > 50 % (N = 23) versus ≤ 50 % (N = 155) of durvalumab infusions within 3 h of sunset. On multivariable analysis, receiving > 50 % of radiotherapy treatments within 3 h of sunset was independently associated with reduced risk for progression (HR 0.39, p = 0.017) and distant metastasis (HR 0.27, p = 0.007); conversely, receiving > 50 % of durvalumab infusions within 3 h of sunset was independently associated with increased risk for distant metastasis (HR 2.13, p = 0.025). The timing of chemotherapy was not associated with disease outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The time of day of radiotherapy and durvalumab infusion may be associated with disease control in LA-NSCLC, and the optimal time of treatment depends on the treatment modality.

Impact of the radiotherapy rhythm on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The role of chronoradiobiology in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been fully elucidated. We sought to investigate the impact of radiotherapy rhythm on the survival outcomes of individuals to explore a chronomodulated radiation strategy to improve prognosis of NPC.

METHODS

A cohort comprising non-metastatic NPC patients subjected to intensity-modulated radiotherapy at Fujian Cancer Hospital between Jan. 2016 and Dec. 2019 was assembled. Rhythmic fluctuation of radiotherapy (RFRT) was quantified based on the temporal distribution of radiation delivery. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to explore the impact of radiotherapy rhythm on all-cause mortality. The maximally selected rank statistics method was employed to discern an optimal cutoff. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of observed associations.

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed 2245 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 55 months, during which 315 individuals succumbed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis unveiled a significant correlation between prolonged RFRT and heightened mortality risk in NPC patients (HR, 1.17, 95% CI, 1.07-1.27, p < .001), a relationship robust to comprehensive adjustment for confounding variables. A cutoff value of 3 h was selected for potential clinical application, beyond which patients exhibited markedly poorer survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses consistently underscored the directional consistency of observed effects.

CONCLUSION

Our study sheds light on the potential advantages of scheduling radiotherapy sessions at consistent times. These findings have implications for optimizing radiotherapy schedules and warrant further investigation into personalized chronotherapy approaches in NPC management.

Impact of chrono-radiotherapy on the prognosis and treatment-related toxicity in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter propensity-matched study

The timing of radiotherapy (RT) delivery has been reported to affect both cancer survival and treatment toxicity. However, the association among the timing of RT delivery, survival, and toxicity in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been investigated. We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with LA-NPC who received definitive RT at multiple institutions. The median RT delivery daytime was categorized as morning (DAY) and night (NIGHT). Seasonal variations were classified into the darker half of the year (WINTER) and brighter half (SUMMER) according to the sunshine duration. Cohorts were balanced according to baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM). Survival and toxicity outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression models. A total of 355 patients were included, with 194/161 in DAY/NIGHT and 187/168 in WINTER/SUMMER groups. RT delivered during the daytime prolonged the 5-year overall survival (OS) (90.6% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.009). However, the significance of the trend was lost after PSM (p = 0.068). After PSM analysis, the DAY cohort derived a greater benefit in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (85.6% vs. 73.4%, p = 0.021) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (89.2% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.051) in comparison with the NIGHT subgroup. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that daytime RT was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS. Furthermore, daytime RT delivery was associated with an increase in the incidence of leukopenia and radiation dermatitis. RT delivery in SUMMER influenced only the OS significantly (before PSM: p = 0.051; after PSM: p = 0.034). There was no association between toxicity and the timing of RT delivery by season. In LA-NPC, the daytime of radical RT served as an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, RT administered in the morning resulted in more severe toxic side effects than that at night, which needs to be confirmed in a future study.

A review for the impacts of circadian disturbance on urological cancers

Circadian rhythm is an internal timing system and harmonizes a variety of cellular, behavioral, and physiological processes to daily environment. Circadian disturbance caused by altered life style or disrupted sleep patterns inevitably contributes to various disorders. As the rapidly increased cancer occurrences and subsequent tremendous financial burdens, more researches focus on reducing the morbidity rather than treating it. Recently, many epidemiologic studies demonstrated that circadian disturbance was tightly related to the occurrence and development of cancers. For urinary system, numerous clinical researches observed the incidence and progress of prostate cancer were influenced by nightshift work, sleep duration, chronotypes, light exposure, and meal timing, this was also proved by many genetic and fundamental findings. Although the epidemiological studies regarding the relationship between circadian disturbance and kidney/bladder cancers were relative limited, some basic researches still claimed circadian disruption was closely correlated to these two cancers. The role of circadian chemotherapy on cancers of prostate, kidney, and bladder were also explored, however, it has not been regularly recommended considering the limited evidence and poor standard protocols. Finally, the researches for the impacts of circadian disturbance on cancers of adrenal gland, penis, testis were not found at present. In general, a better understanding the relationship between circadian disturbance and urological cancers might help to provide more scientific work schedules and rational lifestyles which finally saving health resource by reducing urological tumorigenesis, however, the underlying mechanisms are complex which need further exploration.

Temporal Considerations in Brain Metastases Radiation Therapy: The Intersection of Chronobiology and Patient Profiles

The circadian system, a vital temporal regulator influencing physiological processes, has implications for cancer development and treatment response. Our study assessed circadian timing's impact on whole-brain radiotherapy outcomes in brain metastases for personalized cancer therapy insights. The aim of the study was to evaluate circadian influence on radiation treatment timing and its correlation with clinical outcomes and to identify patient populations benefiting from interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms, considering subgroup differences and potential disparities. An IRB-approved retrospective analysis of 237 patients undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (2017-2021), receiving over 80% of treatments in the morning or afternoon, was performed. Survival analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier curves. This was a single-institution study involving patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy. Demographic, disease, and socioeconomic parameters from electronic medical records were collected. Morning treatment (n = 158) showed a trend toward improved overall survival vs. afternoon (n = 79); the median survival was 158 vs. 79 days (p = 0.20, HR = 0.84, CI95% 0.84-0.91). Subgroup benefits for morning treatment in females (p = 0.04) and trends in controlled primary disease (p = 0.11) and breast cancer metastases (p = 0.08) were observed. Black patients exhibited diminished circadian influence. The present study emphasized chronobiological factors' relevance in brain metastases radiation therapy. Morning treatment correlated with improved survival, particularly in specific subgroups. Potential circadian influence disparities were identified, laying a foundation for personalized cancer therapy and interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms for enhanced treatment efficacy.

ncRNAs-mediated TIMELESS overexpression in lung adenocarcinoma correlates with reduced tumor immune cell infiltration and poor prognosis

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has a poor prognosis. Circadian genes such as TIMELESS have been associated with several pathologies, including cancer. The expression of TIMELESS and the relationship between TIMELESS, infiltration of tumors and prognosis in LUAD requires further investigation. In this study, we investigated the expression of TIMELESS and its association with survival across several types of human cancer using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression Program. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) regulating overexpression of TIMELESS in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were explored with expression, correlation, and survival analyses. Immune cell infiltration and biomarkers were analyzed between different TIMELESS expression levels. The relationship between TIMELESS expression and immunophenoscores, which were used to predict response to immunotherapy, was evaluated. TIMELESS was identified as a potential oncogene in LUAD. NcRNA analysis showed MIR4435-2HG/hsa-miR-1-3p may interact with TIMELESS in a competitive endogenous RNA network in LUAD tumor tissues. Most immune cells were significantly decreased in TCGA LUAD tumor tissues with high TIMELESS expression except for CD4+T cells and Th2 cells. TIMELESS expression in LUAD tumor tissues was significantly negatively correlated with neutrophil biomarkers, dendritic cell biomarkers (HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, CD1C) and an immunophenoscore that predicted outcomes associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. These findings imply that ncRNAs-mediated TIMELESS overexpression in LUAD tumor tissues correlated with poor prognosis, reduced immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, and poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

XRCC1: a potential prognostic and immunological biomarker in LGG based on systematic pan-cancer analysis

X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 (XRCC1) is a pivotal contributor to base excision repair, and its dysregulation has been implicated in the oncogenicity of various human malignancies. However, a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis investigating the prognostic value, immunological functions, and epigenetic associations of XRCC1 remains lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic investigation employing bioinformatics techniques across 33 cancer types. Our analysis encompassed XRCC1 expression levels, prognostic and diagnostic implications, epigenetic profiles, immune and molecular subtypes, Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), immune checkpoints, and immune infiltration, leveraging data from TCGA, GTEx, CELL, Human Protein Atlas, Ualcan, and cBioPortal databases. Notably, XRCC1 displayed both positive and negative correlations with prognosis across different tumors. Epigenetic analysis revealed associations between XRCC1 expression and DNA methylation patterns in 10 cancer types, as well as enhanced phosphorylation. Furthermore, XRCC1 expression demonstrated associations with TMB and MSI in the majority of tumors. Interestingly, XRCC1 gene expression exhibited a negative correlation with immune cell infiltration levels, except for a positive correlation with M1 and M2 macrophages and monocytes in most cancers. Additionally, we observed significant correlations between XRCC1 and immune checkpoint gene expression levels. Lastly, our findings implicated XRCC1 in DNA replication and repair processes, shedding light on the precise mechanisms underlying its oncogenic effects. Overall, our study highlights the potential of XRCC1 as a prognostic and immunological pan-cancer biomarker, thereby offering a novel target for tumor immunotherapy.

Circadian rhythm-based cancer therapy in randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Since the 2017 Nobel Prize awarded to J. Hall, M. Rosbash and M.W. Young for their discoveries of molecular mechanisms behind the biological clock, circadian rhythm-based therapy, also known as chronotherapy, is receiving more attention in oncology and the number of anatomical sites of interest in this field is increasing. This observation is in line with the clinical evidence provided by trials on head and neck, lung, colorectal and cervical cancers, as well as the presently ongoing chronotherapy trials for breast and brain cancers.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review was to collate all randomized trials conducted on chronotherapy for various tumor sites and to appraise the evidence for chrono-oncology to advance personalized therapy. Relevant literature was collected from Pubmed/Medline databases and from clinicatrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

Current randomized clinical trials offer a certain level of evidence for the potential of chronotherapy to personalize oncologic treatment. However, comparison of trial results is hindered by the differences in timing of radiation/chemotherapy, the absence of harmonized recommendations for treatment outcome evaluation and not ultimately, the general lack of considering gender as a matched variable in trials, which was found to be a powerful factor influencing response to treatment.

Watching the clock in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant primary brain tumor, accounting for 14.2% of all diagnosed tumors and 50.1% of all malignant tumors, and the median survival time is approximately 8 months irrespective of whether a patient receives treatment without significant improvement despite expansive research (Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2015-2019. Neurooncology. 2022; 24(suppl 5):v1-v95.). Recently, important roles for the circadian clock in GBM tumorigenesis have been reported. Positive regulators of circadian-controlled transcription, brain and muscle ARNT-like 1 (BMAL1), and circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK), are highly expressed also in GBM and correlated with poor patient prognosis. BMAL1 and CLOCK promote the maintenance of GBM stem cells (GSCs) and the establishment of a pro-tumorigenic tumor microenvironment (TME), suggesting that targeting the core clock proteins may augment GBM treatment. Here, we review findings that highlight the critical role the circadian clock plays in GBM biology and the strategies by which the circadian clock can be leveraged for GBM treatment in the clinic moving forward.

Chronotherapeutics for Solid Tumors

Circadian rhythms are internal manifestations of the 24-h solar day that allow for synchronization of biological and behavioral processes to the external solar day. This precise regulation of physiology and behavior improves adaptive function and survival. Chronotherapy takes advantage of circadian rhythms in physiological processes to optimize the timing of drug administration to achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy and minimize negative side effects. Chronotherapy for cancer treatment was first demonstrated to be beneficial more than five decades ago and has favorable effects across diverse cancer types. However, implementation of chronotherapy in clinic remains limited. The present review examines the evidence for chronotherapeutic treatment for solid tumors. Specifically, studies examining chrono-chemotherapy, chrono-radiotherapy, and alternative chronotherapeutics (e.g., hormone therapy, TKIs, antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy) are discussed. In addition, we propose areas of needed research and identify challenges in the field that remain to be addressed.

Can chronoradiotherapy offer benefits to cervical cancer patients? A scoping review

The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence and evaluate the effectiveness of chronoradiotherapy interventions in cervical cancer patients. This scoping review was performed by searching in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Wenpu, and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) databases. Databases were searched for studies published in English or Chinese from inception to 21 May 2021, and reference lists of relevant reports were scanned. Two investigators independently screened eligible studies in accordance with predetermined eligibility criteria and extracted data. The included studies were summarized and analyzed. Five studies including a total of 422 patients with cervical cancer were included in the scoping review; four studies were Chinese, and one was Indian. Main themes identified included the efficiency of chronoradiotherapy and relevant toxic and side effects, including diarrhea toxicity, hematologic toxicity, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal mucositis, and skin reactions. Administration of radiotherapy at different times of the day resulted in similar efficacy. However, the toxic side effects of morning radiotherapy (MR) and evening radiotherapy (ER) differed, with radiotherapy in the evening leading to more severe hematologic toxicity and myelosuppression. There were conflicting conclusions about gastrointestinal reactions with chronoradiotherapy, and further studies are needed. Radiation responses may be associated with circadian genes, through the influence of cell cycles and apoptosis.

The effect of chronoradiotherapy on cervical cancer patients: A multicenter randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the short-term efficacy and radiotoxicity 3.543of chronoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. We also examined the overall symptom score and quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent morning radiotherapy and evening radiotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of morning radiotherapy (9:00-11:00 AM) with evening radiotherapy (7:00-9:00 PM) in cervical cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. From November 2021 to June 2022, 114 cervical cancer patients admitted to eight cancer center hospitals in Tianjin, Chongqing, Hubei, Shanxi, Shandong, Shaanxi, Hebei, and Cangzhou were randomly divided into the morning radiotherapy group (MG; N = 61) and the evening radiotherapy group (EG; N = 53). The short-term efficacy of radiotherapy on cervical cancer patients at different time points and the occurrence of radiotoxicity were explored after patients had undergone radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The total effective response (partial remission [PR] + complete remission [CR]) rate was similar across the two groups (93.5% vs. 96.3%, p > 0.05). However, the incidence of bone marrow suppression and intestinal reaction in the two groups were significantly different (p < 0.05). The patients in the MG had significantly higher Anderson symptom scores than patients in the EG (21.64 ± 7.916 vs. 18.53 ± 4.098, p < 0.05). In terms of physical activity, functional status, and overall QOL, the MG had significantly lower scores than the EG (p < 0.05). No other measures showed a significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The radiotherapy effect of the MG was consistent with that of the EG. The incidence of radiation enteritis and radiation diarrhea in the MG was significantly higher than that in the EG; however, bone marrow suppression and blood toxicity in the EG were more serious than in the MG. Because of the small sample size of the study, we only examined the short-term efficacy of radiotherapy. Therefore, further clinical trials are needed to verify the efficacy and side effects of chronoradiotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx, Registration Number: ChiCTR2100047140.

Developments on tumour site-specific chrono-oncology towards personalised treatment

Research into chronotherapy has seen notable developments over the past decades, with a clear focus on the identification of circadian clock genes as potential treatment targets. Moreover, new factors are investigated, such as gender and the role of cancer stem cells in influencing the outcome of chronomodulated treatments. These factors could add to the arsenal of parameters that assist with patient stratification and treatment personalisation. Literature analysis showed that certain anatomical sites received more attention and the associated studies reported clinically significant results, even though some findings are contradictory. The aim of this work was to review the existing studies on chrono-oncology using a tumour site-specific approach and to highlight the status of research in various cancers. Inconsistencies in data reporting, the nature of the studies and the highly heterogeneous patient characteristics, highlight the need for well-designed randomised controlled trials to elucidate the real potential of chronotherapy in oncology.

Impact of Circadian Rhythms on the Development and Clinical Management of Genitourinary Cancers

The circadian system is an innate clock mechanism that governs biological processes on a near 24-hour cycle. Circadian rhythm disruption (i.e., misalignment of circadian rhythms), which results from the lack of synchrony between the master circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) and the environment (i.e., exposure to day light) or the master clock and the peripheral clocks, has been associated with increased risk of and unfavorable cancer outcomes. Growing evidence supports the link between circadian disruption and increased prevalence and mortality of genitourinary cancers (GU) including prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. The circadian system also plays an essential role on the timely implementation of chronopharmacological treatments, such as melatonin and chronotherapy, to reduce tumor progression, improve therapeutic response and reduce negative therapy side effects. The potential benefits of the manipulating circadian rhythms in the clinical setting of GU cancer detection and treatment remain to be exploited. In this review, we discuss the current evidence on the influence of circadian rhythms on (disease) cancer development and hope to elucidate the unmet clinical need of defining the extensive involvement of the circadian system in predicting risk for GU cancer development and alleviating the burden of implementing anti-cancer therapies.

Chronoradiobiology of Breast Cancer: The Time Is Now to Link Circadian Rhythm and Radiation Biology

Circadian disruption has been linked to cancer development, progression, and radiation response. Clinical evidence to date shows that circadian genetic variation and time of treatment affect radiation response and toxicity for women with breast cancer. At the molecular level, there is interplay between circadian clock regulators such as PER1, which mediates ATM and p53-mediated cell cycle gating and apoptosis. These molecular alterations may govern aggressive cancer phenotypes, outcomes, and radiation response. Exploiting the various circadian clock mechanisms may enhance the therapeutic index of radiation by decreasing toxicity, increasing disease control, and improving outcomes. We will review the body’s natural circadian rhythms and clock gene-regulation while exploring preclinical and clinical evidence that implicates chronobiological disruptions in the etiology of breast cancer. We will discuss radiobiological principles and the circadian regulation of DNA damage responses. Lastly, we will present potential rational therapeutic approaches that target circadian pathways to improve outcomes in breast cancer. Understanding the implications of optimal timing in cancer treatment and exploring ways to entrain circadian biology with light, diet, and chronobiological agents like melatonin may provide an avenue for enhancing the therapeutic index of radiotherapy.

Does timing matter in radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma? An experimental study in mice

This study investigates whether a chronotherapeutic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may improve treatment efficacy and mitigate side effects on non-tumoral liver (NTL). HCC was induced in Per2::luc mice which were irradiated at four time points of the day. Proliferation and DNA-double strand breaks were analyzed in irradiated and nonirradiated animals by detection of Ki67 and γ-H2AX. Prior to whole animal experiments, organotypic slice cultures were investigated to determine the dosage to be used in whole animal experiments. Irradiation was most effective at the proliferation peaks in HCC at ZT02 (early inactivity phase) and ZT20 (late activity phase). Irradiation effects on NTL were minimal at ZT20. As compared with NTL, nonirradiated HCC revealed disruption in daily variation and downregulation of all investigated clock genes except Per1. Irradiation affected rhythmic clock gene expression in NTL and HCC at all ZTs except at ZT20 (late activity phase). Irradiation at ZT20 had no effect on total leukocyte numbers. Our results indicate ZT20 as the optimal time point for irradiation of HCC in mice at which the ratio between efficacy of tumor treatment and toxic side effects was maximal. Translational studies are now needed to evaluate whether the late activity phase is the optimal time point for irradiation of HCC in man.