Next-generation sequencing of homologous recombination genes could predict efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Comparative sequencing study of mismatch repair and homology-directed repair genes in endometrial cancer and breast cancer patients from Kazakhstan

Endometrial cancer has been associated with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, especially in the context of the hereditary Lynch Syndrome. More recently, pathogenic variants in genes of homology-directed repair (HDR) have also been suggested to contribute to a subset of endometrial cancers. In the present hospital-based study, we investigated the relative distribution of pathogenic MMR or HDR gene variants in a series of 342 endometrial cancer patients from the Oncology Clinic in Almaty, Kazakhstan. In comparison, we also sequenced 178 breast cancer patients from the same population with the same gene panel. Identified variants were classified according to ClinVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense prediction tools. We found 10 endometrial cancer patients (2.9%) carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in MMR genes (7 MSH6, 1 MSH2, 2 MUTYH), while 14 endometrial cancer patients (4.1%) carried pathogenic variants in HDR genes (4 BRCA2, 3 BRCA1, 3 FANCM, 2 SLX4, 1 BARD1, 1 BRIP1). In the breast cancer series, we found 8 carriers (4.5%) of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in MMR genes (2 MSH2, 2 MSH6, 4 MUTYH) while 12 patients (6.7%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic HDR gene variants (5 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 BRIP1, 1 ERRC4, 1 FANCM, 1 SLX4). One patient who developed breast cancer first and endometrial cancer later carried a novel frameshift variant in MSH6. Our results indicate that MMR and HDR gene variants with predicted pathogenicity occur at substantial frequencies in both breast and endometrial cancer patients from the Kazakh population.

Pembrolizumab With or Without Maintenance Olaparib for Metastatic Squamous NSCLC That Responded to First-Line Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors can up-regulate programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and promote immune-mediated responses and may improve efficacy of first-line anti‒programmed cell death protein 1‒based therapies in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (NCT03976362), adults with previously untreated stage IV squamous NSCLC received four cycles of induction therapy (pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel). Patients with disease control were randomized to 31 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or placebo. Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was tested at interim analysis 2 (the final PFS analysis); OS was tested at final analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 851 patients received induction treatment; 296 were randomized to pembrolizumab plus olaparib and 295 to pembrolizumab plus placebo. At interim analysis 2, with median follow-up of 27.1 months, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 8.3 (6.7‒9.7) months in the pembrolizumab plus olaparib group and 5.4 (4.1‒5.6) months in the pembrolizumab plus placebo group (hazard ratio = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63‒0.93, p = 0.0040 [not significant at a one-sided superiority boundary of p = 0.003]). At final analysis, with median follow-up of 33.4 months, median (95% CI) OS was 19.1 (15.9‒22.2) and 18.6 (16.0‒21.6) months, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.83‒1.24, p = 0.5481). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76.5% and 65.1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding olaparib to pembrolizumab as maintenance therapy for metastatic squamous NSCLC did not significantly improve PFS versus pembrolizumab plus placebo; neither PFS nor OS met the prespecified statistical significance boundary. No new safety signals were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03976362.

Genomic scarring score predicts the response to PARP inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have shown efficacy in tumours harbouring mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Somatic HRR mutations have been described in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), but PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are not yet a therapeutic option. Here we assessed the homologous recombination status of early-stage NSCLC and explored the therapeutic benefit of PARPi in preclinical models. The Genomic Scarring Score GSS (GSS) and HRR mutation profile of 136 patients were assessed. High GSS (h-GSS) was observed in 39 (28.7%) patients half of which carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic somatic HRR mutations. TP53 mutations were significantly enriched in h-GSS tumours (p < 0.001). Olaparib significantly delayed tumour growth in h-GSS but not l-GSS Patient-derived Xenografts (PDXs), while patients with h-GSS/TP53mut tumours respond favourably to adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Our functional data clearly support the idea that the use of GSS rather than the mutational status of HRR genes could select patients for administration of PARPi.

Clinical and molecular significance of homologous recombination deficiency positive non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese population: An integrated genomic and transcriptional analysis

Objective

The clinical significance of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and prostate cancer has been established, but the value of HRD in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully investigated. This study aimed to systematically analyze the HRD status of untreated NSCLC and its relationship with patient prognosis to further guide clinical care.

Methods

A total of 355 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients were retrospectively enrolled. HRD status was assessed using the AmoyDx Genomic Scar Score (GSS), with a score of ≥50 considered HRD-positive. Genomic, transcriptomic, tumor microenvironmental characteristics and prognosis between HRD-positive and HRD-negative patients were analyzed.

Results

Of the patients, 25.1% (89/355) were HRD-positive. Compared to HRD-negative patients, HRD-positive patients had more somatic pathogenic homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations, higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (P<0.001), and fewer driver gene mutations (P<0.001). Furthermore, HRD-positive NSCLC had more amplifications in PI3K pathway and cell cycle genes, MET and MYC in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutant NSCLC, and more PIK3CA and AURKA in EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC. HRD-positive NSCLC displayed higher tumor proliferation and immunosuppression activity. HRD-negative NSCLC showed activated signatures of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II, interferon (IFN)-γ and effector memory CD8+ T cells. HRD-positive patients had a worse prognosis and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) to targeted therapy (first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs) (P=0.042). Additionally, HRD-positive, EGFR/ALK wild-type patients showed a numerically lower response to platinum-free immunotherapy regimens.

Conclusions

Unique genomic and transcriptional characteristics were found in HRD-positive NSCLC. Poor prognosis and poor response to EGFR-TKIs and immunotherapy were observed in HRD-positive NSCLC. This study highlights potential actionable alterations in HRD-positive NSCLC, suggesting possible combinational therapeutic strategies for these patients.

Carboplatin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with molecular alterations of the DNA damage repair pathway: the PRO-CARBO phase II trial

Introduction

DNA damage repair genes are altered in 20-35% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Poly-ADP (Adénosine Diphosphate)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) showed significant activity for these selected tumors, especially with homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency. These alterations could also predict platinum sensitivity. Although carboplatin was inconclusive in unselected mCRPC, the literature suggests an anti-tumoral activity in mCRPC with HHR gene alterations. We aimed to assess the efficacy of carboplatin monotherapy in mCRPC patients with HRR deficiency.

Methods

This prospective multicenter single-arm two-stage phase II addressed mCRPC men with HRR somatic and/or germline alterations, pretreated with ⩾2 taxane chemotherapy regimens and one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor. Prior PARPi treatment was allowed. Enrolled patients received intravenous carboplatin (AUC5) every 21 days for 6-9 cycles. The primary endpoint was the best response rate according to adapted PCWG3 guidelines: radiological response (RECIST 1.1 criteria) and/or biological response [⩾50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline].

Results

A total of 15 out of 16 enrolled patients started carboplatin treatment. Genomic alterations were identified for BRCA2 (n = 5), CDK12 (n = 3), ATM (n = 3) CHEK2 (n = 2), CHEK1 (n = 1), and BRCA1 (n = 1) genes. Objective response (partial biological response + stable radiological response) was achieved in one patient (6.7%), carrying a BRCA2 mutation and not pre-treated with PARPi; stable disease was observed for five patients (33.5%). Among seven patients (46.7%) with previous PARPi treatment, four patients (57.1%) had a stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 1.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.8-9.5] and 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.3-19.5), respectively. The most common severe (grade 3-4) treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia (66.7%), anemia (66.7%), and nausea (60%). Overall, 8 (53.3%) patients experienced a severe hematological event.

Conclusion

The study was prematurely stopped as pre-planned considering the limited activity of carboplatin monotherapy in heavily pre-treated, HHR-deficient mCRPC patients. Larger experience is needed in mCRPC with BRCA alterations.

Trial registration

NCT03652493, EudraCT ID number 2017-004764-35.