Preoperative Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Nomogram Based on Ultrasonographic Features and Clinical Indicators

Sarcomatoid change in combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma as a poor prognostic factor

Background

Sarcomatoid change is rarely seen in epithelial malignancy that can be observed in diverse organs. Although a sarcomatoid change in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is assumed to be a poor prognostic factor, this issue has not been studied due to its rare incidence. In this study, we aimed to identify the oncological impact of sarcomatoid change in patients with cHCC-CC and verify that sarcomatoid change is a poor prognostic factor for resected cHCC-CC.

Methods

Between January 2006 and December 2020, 102 patients who underwent surgical resection for cHCC-CC were retrospectively reviewed. The hazard ratio (HR) according to sarcomatoid change was calculated using other known prognostic factors for cHCC-CC. In addition, the patients were divided into two groups according to the sarcomatoid change, and their survival was compared.

Results

The multivariate analysis demonstrated that sarcomatoid change in cHCC-CC is a poor prognostic factor {disease-free survival (DFS), HR =3.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63-9.10], P=0.002; overall survival (OS), HR =3.94 (95% CI: 1.67-9.31), P=0.002}. In the survival analysis, the sarcomatoid change group displayed a worse prognosis compared to the non-sarcomatoid change group {DFS: 4.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 1.2-6.8] vs. 23.0 (IQR: 9.3-36.7) months, P=0.001; OS: 19.0 (IQR: 7.2-30.8) vs. 85.0 (IQR: 31.8-138.2) months, P=0.004}.

Conclusions

Sarcomatoid change is a poor prognostic factor for resected cHCC-CC.

Differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasonography combined with multiphase enhanced computed tomography

Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are primary liver cancers with different therapeutic methods and prognoses. This study aims to investigate the ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography (CT) features of these cancers and improve the early diagnosis rate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of 319 patients diagnosed with HCC and 124 patients diagnosed with ICC, confirmed by pathology. Results: A total of 443 patients were eligible in this study. From the perspective of clinical data, between HCC and ICC patients existed significant differences in age, gender, hepatic background, serum tumor markers of AFP and CA19.9, chronic hepatitis B/C and lymph node infiltration (p<0.05), but not in tumor size, microvascular invasion, serum tumor markers of CEA and CA125 (P>0.05). With respect to ultrasonography features, HCC patients had a higher proportion than ICC patients in splenomegaly (p=0.001), while ICC patients had a higher proportion than HCC patients in absence/not rich vascularity and intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (p<0.05). With respect to CT features, HCC patients were significantly different from ICC patients in the three-phase enhanced CT value mean, enhanced intensity and homogeneity of nodules (P<0.05). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further clarify the correlation of these indices. However, only age≤60 years (OR=1.861, P=0.045), male (OR=3.850, P<0.001), AFP>7ng/ml (OR=0.119, P<0.001), lymph node infiltration (OR=5.968, P<0.001), intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (OR=2.414, P=0.04), splenomegaly (OR=0.081, P<0.001), rim APHE (OR=3.109, P=0.002), and iso- or hyper enhancement (OR=0.188, P<0.001) were independent risk factors. Conclusions: While there are overlapping ultrasonography and CT features between HCC and ICC, the integration of tumor markers and specific imaging characteristics can be beneficial in distinguishing between the two.

Interleukin-6 and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Indices Identify Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a fatal biliary tract cancer with a dismal prognosis due to ineffective diagnostic tools with limited clinical utility. This study investigated peripheral blood indices and cytokine levels to diagnose iCCA.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from healthy subjects (n = 48) and patients with advanced-stage iCCA (n = 47) during a phase I and then phase II trial, respectively. Serum cytokines were measured using a flow cytometer. The peripheral blood indices were estimated based on laboratory data. Multi-linear regression analysis was applied, followed by a probability transformation. The cut-off value and model accuracy were determined using the receiver operating curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The interleukin-6 (IL6) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were potential predictors of iCCA [AUC = 0.91 (0.85-0.97) and 0.81 (0.68-0.93); sensitivity = 0.70 and 0.91; specificity = 0.91 and 0.85, respectively]. Patients with IL6 concentrations higher than 11.635 pg/mL (OR = 23.33, p < 0.001) or LMR lower than 7.2 (OR = 58.08, p < 0.001) are at risk of iCCA development. Patients with IL6 levels higher than 21.83 pg/mL, between 15.95 and 21.83 pg/mL, between 8.8 and 15.94 pg/mL, and lower than 8.8 pg/mL were classified as very high-, high-, intermediate-, and low-risk, respectively. Patients with an LMR between 1 and 3.37, 3.38 and 5.76, 5.77 and 7.18, and higher than 7.18 were classified as very high-, high-, intermediate-, and low-risk, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LMR is recommended for iCCA screening since the estimation is based on a routine laboratory test, which is available in most hospitals.

Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a unique type of liver tumor that contains both hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma components within a single tumor. The fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification provides a definition and diagnostic criteria for cHCC-CCA. However, the heterogeneous histomorphology and presentation resulting from variation of the proportion of each component poses challenges for clinical diagnosis and treatment. A diagnosis of cHCC-CCA may be suggested by the synchronous elevation of serum tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, a mixed enhancement pattern on imaging, and a discrepancy between the elevation of tumor marker and the imaging enhancement pattern. Histopathological examination using hematoxylin and eosin staining is considered the gold standard for diagnosing cHCC-CCA, and comprehensive examination of resection or biopsy specimens is crucial for an accurate diagnosis. Currently, there is no standard treatment for cHCC-CCA, and surgery is the mainstay. Anatomic hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy is among the recommended surgical procedures. The role of liver transplantation in the management of cHCC-CCA is still uncertain. Transarterial chemoembolization may be effective for unresectable cHCC-CCA, particularly for hypervascular tumors. However, the available evidence does not support systemic therapy for advanced cHCC-CCA. The prognosis of cHCC-CCA is generally poor, and there is no established staging system. Further research is needed to better understand the histogenesis and clinical management of cHCC-CCA. This review provides an overview of the current literature on cHCC-CCA with a focus on its clinical characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and management.

A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators to differentiate mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) from hepatic metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 343 patients with pathologically confirmed MF-ICC or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled between October 2018 and July 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation sets at a ratio of 7:3. Preoperative ultrasound features and clinical indicators were retrieved. Univariate logistic regression analysis was employed to select relevant features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model, which was presented as a nomogram in training sets. The model's performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The study included 169 patients with MF-ICC and 174 with liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, assigned to training (n=238) and validation (n=105) cohorts. The nomogram incorporated ultrasound features (tumor size, lesion number, echogenicity, tumor necrosis, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement) and clinical information (serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125). The nomogram demonstrated promising performance in differentiating these two entities in both training and validation sets, with an AUC value of 0.937 (95%CI: 0.907,0.969) and 0.916 (95%CI: 0.863,0.968), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curves confirmed good consistency between predictions and observations. Additionally, decision curve analysis confirmed the nomogram's high clinical practicability.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on ultrasound features and clinical indicators demonstrated good discrimination performance in differentiating MF-ICC from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, which may enhance clinical decision-making process in managing these challenging diagnostic scenarios.