Genetically predicted iron status was associated with the risk of prostate cancer

A causal inference study exploring the impact of iron status on the risk of thyroid cancer based on two-sample mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Thyroid cancer is prone to early lymph node metastasis.This study investigated the influence of iron status on thyroid cancer risk and its mediating role in the relationship between thyroid cancer incidence and thyroid cancer-related exposure factors.

METHOD

Utilizing iron status-related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms as instrumental variables, the research analyzed summary data on iron status and thyroid cancer from Genome-Wide Association Studies following the Two-sample Mendelian randomization guidelines, primarily using the Inverse-variance weighted method, with Mendelian randomization-Egger method, weighted median method, simple mode, and weighted mode as supplementary analyses. The reliability and robustness of the results were assessed using the Leave-one-out analysis and Cochran's Q Test.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that the iron status has a vital causal relationship with the occurrence of thyroid cancer. The Inverse-variance weighted model results revealed Iron || id:ieu-a-1049: OR = 1.409, 95%CI = (1.043, 1.904), P < 0.05; Ferritin || id:ieu-a-1050: OR = 2.029, 95% CI = (1.081, 3.808), P < 0.05; Transferrin Saturation || id:ieu-a-1051: OR = 1.337, 95%CI = (1.058, 1.690), P < 0.05. The reliability and robustness of these results were further supported by the Leave-one-out analysis and Cochran's Q Test (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study establishes a certain causal link between iron status and thyroid cancer, indicating that transferrin saturation, serum ferritin and serum iron are associated with thyroid cancer incidence.

Mendelian randomization evidence based on European ancestry for the causal effects of leukocyte telomere length on prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Several lines of evidence suggest that leukocyte telomere length (LTL) can affect the development of prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

Here, we employed single nucleoside polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables (IVs) for LTL (n = 472,174) and conducted Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate their causal impact on PCs (79,148 patients/61,106 controls and 6311 patients/88,902 controls).

RESULTS

Every 1-s.d extension of LTL increased the risk of PCs by 34%. Additionally, the analysis of candidate mediators between LTL and PCs via two-step Mendelian randomization revealed that among the 23 candidates, Alzheimer's disease, liver iron content, sex hormone binding global levels, naive CD4-CD8-T cell% T cell, and circulating leptin levels played substantial mediating roles. There is no robust evidence to support the reverse causal relationship between LTL and the selected mediators of PCs. Adjusting for the former four mediators, rather than adjusting for circulating leptin levels, decreased the impact of LTL on PCs.

CONCLUSION

This study provides potential intervention measures for preventing LTL-induced PCs.

Risk factors for prostate cancer: An umbrella review of prospective observational studies and mendelian randomization analyses

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing in older males globally. Age, ethnicity, and family history are identified as the well-known risk factors for prostate cancer, but few modifiable factors have been firmly established. The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate various factors modifying the risk of prostate cancer reported in meta-analyses of prospective observational studies and mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from the inception to January 10, 2022, updated on September 9, 2023, to identify meta-analyses and MR studies on prostate cancer. Eligibility criteria for meta-analyses were (1) meta-analyses including prospective observational studies or studies that declared outcome-free at baseline; (2) evaluating the factors of any category associated with prostate cancer incidence; and (3) providing effect estimates for further data synthesis. Similar criteria were applied to MR studies. Meta-analysis was repeated using the random-effects inverse-variance model with DerSimonian-Laird method. Quality assessment was then conducted for included meta-analyses using AMSTAR-2 tool and for MR studies using STROBE-MR and assumption evaluation. Subsequent evidence grading criteria for significant associations in meta-analyses contained sample size, P values and 95% confidence intervals, 95% prediction intervals, heterogeneity, and publication bias, assigning 4 evidence grades (convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, or weak). Significant associations in MR studies were graded as robust, probable, suggestive, or insufficient considering P values and concordance of effect directions. Finally, 92 selected from 411 meta-analyses and 64 selected from 118 MR studies were included after excluding the overlapping and outdated studies which were published earlier and contained fewer participants or fewer instrument variables for the same exposure. In total, 123 observational associations (45 significant and 78 null) and 145 causal associations (55 significant and 90 null) were categorized into lifestyle; diet and nutrition; anthropometric indices; biomarkers; clinical variables, diseases, and treatments; and environmental factors. Concerning evidence grading on significant associations, there were 5 highly suggestive, 36 suggestive, and 4 weak associations in meta-analyses, and 10 robust, 24 probable, 4 suggestive, and 17 insufficient causal associations in MR studies. Twenty-six overlapping factors between meta-analyses and MR studies were identified, with consistent significant effects found for physical activity (PA) (occupational PA in meta: OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80, 0.94; accelerator-measured PA in MR: OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.72), height (meta: OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.12; MR: OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.15, for aggressive prostate cancer), and smoking (current smoking in meta: OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.80; smoking initiation in MR: OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.97). Methodological limitation is that the evidence grading criteria could be expanded by considering more indices.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale study, we summarized the associations of various factors with prostate cancer risk and provided comparisons between observational associations by meta-analysis and genetically estimated causality by MR analyses. In the absence of convincing overlapping evidence based on the existing literature, no robust associations were identified, but some effects were observed for height, physical activity, and smoking.