1
|
Chen LE, Nittayacharn P, Exner AA. Progress and potential of nanobubbles for ultrasound-mediated drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2025:1-24. [PMID: 40353846 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2025.2505044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2025] [Revised: 04/18/2025] [Accepted: 05/08/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite much progress, nanomedicine-based drug therapies in oncology remain limited by systemic toxicity and insufficient particle accumulation in the tumor. To address these barriers, formulations responsive to external physical stimuli have emerged. One most promising system is the ultrasound stimulation of drug-loaded, gas-core particles (bubbles). Ultrasound induces bubble cavitation for cell and tissue permeabilization, triggers on-demand drug release, and provides opportunities for real-time imaging of delivery. AREAS COVERED Here, we focus on shell-stabilized, gas-core nanoparticles (also termed nanobubbles or ultrafine bubbles) and their role in ultrasound-mediated therapeutic delivery to tumors. This review frames the advantages of nanobubbles within the ongoing deficits in nanomedicine, describes mechanisms of ultrasound-mediated therapy, and details formulation techniques for nanobubble delivery systems. It then highlights the past decade of research in nanobubble-facilitated drug delivery for cancer therapy and anticipates new directions in the field. EXPERT OPINION Nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents offer a spatiotemporally triggerable therapeutic coupled with a safe, accessible imaging modality. Nanobubbles can be loaded with diverse therapeutic cargoes to treat disease and overcome numerous barriers limiting delivery to solid tumors. Close attention to formulation, characterization methods, acoustic testing parameters, and the biological mechanisms of nanobubble delivery will facilitate preclinical research toward clinical adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pinunta Nittayacharn
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
| | - Agata A Exner
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharma D, Czarnota GJ. Using ultrasound and microbubble to enhance the effects of conventional cancer therapies in clinical settings. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2025; 44:39. [PMID: 40088396 PMCID: PMC11910443 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-025-10255-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025]
Abstract
It has been demonstrated in preclinical research that the administration of microbubbles with ultrasound can augment the proapoptotic sphingolipid pathway and enhance chemotherapy or radiation therapy-induced vascular endothelial disruption resulting in enhanced tumor cell death. Specifically, ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) can increase blood vessel permeability facilitating the release of therapeutic substances in the target area. USMB can also serve as a potential radiation enhancing therapy as USMB exposure increases tumor cell death significantly as observed in preclinical models. Clinical studies have found the combination of USMB and these existing cancer therapies to be safe and also to be associated with greater tumor responses. USMB-based treatment can be applicable in a clinical setting using either ultrasound imaging or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance for precise treatment. In the latter, the ultrasound device is integrated into the MRI system platform for sonication to facilitate microbubble stimulation. In this review, we concisely present findings related to USMB and existing cancer therapies (chemotherapy and radiation therapy) in clinical trial settings. The possible underlying mechanism involved in USMB-enhanced chemotherapy or radiotherapy enhancement is also discussed. Lastly, the study concludes with some limitations and an examination of the future direction of these combined therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa Sharma
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Departments of Medical Biophysics, and Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Gregory J Czarnota
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Departments of Medical Biophysics, and Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blöck J, Li H, Collado-Lara G, Kooiman K, Rix A, Chen J, Hark C, Radermacher H, Porte C, Kiessling F. The Compression-Dominated Ultrasound Response of Poly( n-butyl cyanoacrylate) Hard-Shelled Microbubbles Induces Significant Sonoporation and Sonopermeation Effects In Vitro. ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS 2025; 8:1240-1250. [PMID: 39900350 PMCID: PMC11836932 DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.4c01551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2024] [Revised: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/05/2025]
Abstract
The process of locally increasing the permeability of cell membranes or cell layers is referred to as sonoporation or sonopermeation, respectively, and opens up perspectives for drug delivery in cancer treatment by facilitating enhanced local drug accumulation. These effects are mediated by ultrasound-activated microbubbles in close proximity to cells. Here, the selection of ultrasound settings according to the intended effect on the biological tissue remains a challenge, especially for broadly size-distributed microbubbles, which show a heterogeneous response to ultrasound. For this purpose, we have analyzed the general response of narrower size-distributed poly(n-butyl cyanoacrylate) hard-shelled microbubbles to ultrasound via ultra-high-speed imaging and evaluated their ability to stimulate sonoporation and sonopermeation in vitro compared to lipid soft-shelled microbubbles. Ultra-high-speed imaging of hard-shelled microbubbles revealed either a compression-dominated or compression-only response at peak negative acoustic pressures higher than 165 kPa and an onset of bursting at 500 kPa. The in vitro experiments demonstrated that the hard-shelled microbubbles induced significant sonoporation and sonopermeation effects, also when only compressing at 300 kPa peak neagtive pressure. Compared to soft-shelled microbubbles, the effects were less prominent, which was attributed to differences in their ultrasound responses and size distributions. This in vitro validation of hard-shelled microbubbles qualifies them for future in vivo applications, which would benefit from their narrow size distribution, thereby allowing more control of their therapeutic effect by suitably adjusting the ultrasound parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Blöck
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| | - Hongchen Li
- Biomedical
Engineering, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Gonzalo Collado-Lara
- Biomedical
Engineering, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Klazina Kooiman
- Biomedical
Engineering, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Anne Rix
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| | - Junlin Chen
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| | - Christopher Hark
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| | - Harald Radermacher
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| | - Céline Porte
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| | - Fabian Kiessling
- Institute
for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH
Aachen University Hospital, Forckenbeckstraße 55, 52070 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharma D, Petchiny TN, Czarnota GJ. A Promising Therapeutic Strategy of Combining Acoustically Stimulated Nanobubbles and Existing Cancer Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3181. [PMID: 39335153 PMCID: PMC11431001 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Revised: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years, ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMBs) have gained great attention because of their wide theranostic applications. However, due to their micro-size, reaching the targeted site remains a challenge. At present, ultrasound-stimulated nanobubbles (USNBs) have attracted particular interest, and their small size allows them to extravasate easily in the blood vessels penetrating deeper into the tumor vasculature. Incorporating USNBs with existing cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or radiation therapy in several preclinical models has been demonstrated to have a profound effect on solid tumors. In this review, we provide an understanding of the composition and formation of nanobubbles (NBs), followed by the recent progress of the therapeutic combinatory effect of USNBs and other cancer therapies in cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa Sharma
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Departments of Medical Biophysics, and Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Tera N. Petchiny
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| | - Gregory J. Czarnota
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Departments of Medical Biophysics, and Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yura Y, Fujita Y, Hamada M. Ultrasound Combination to Improve the Efficacy of Current Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2770. [PMID: 39123497 PMCID: PMC11311392 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is radiotherapy in which a nuclear reaction between boron-10 (10B) in tumor cells and neutrons produces alpha particles and recoiling 7Li nuclei with an extremely short range, leading to the destruction of the tumor cells. Although the neutron source has traditionally been a nuclear reactor, accelerators to generate neutron beams have been developed and commercialized. Therefore, this treatment will become more widespread. Recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) close to the body surface is considered a candidate for BNCT using the boron compound boronophenylalanine (BPA) and has been found to be highly responsive to this treatment. However, some cases recur early after the completion of the treatment, which needs to be addressed. Ultrasound is a highly safe diagnostic method. Ultrasound with microbubbles is expected to promote the uptake of BPA into tumor cells. Ultrasound also has the ability to improve the sensitivity of tumor cells to radiotherapy. In addition, high-intensity focused ultrasound may improve the efficacy of BNCT via its thermal and mechanical effects. This review is not systematic but outlines the current status of BPA-based BNCT and proposes plans to reduce the recurrence rate of HNC after BNCT in combination with ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Yura
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Oncology and Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
| | - Yusei Fujita
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Osaka 598-8577, Japan;
| | - Masakazu Hamada
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Oncology and Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jayasankar G, Koilpillai J, Narayanasamy D. A Systematic Study on Long-acting Nanobubbles: Current Advancement and Prospects on Theranostic Properties. Adv Pharm Bull 2024; 14:278-301. [PMID: 39206408 PMCID: PMC11347731 DOI: 10.34172/apb.2024.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Delivery of diagnostic drugs via nanobubbles (NBs) has shown to be an emerging field of study. Due to their small size, NBs may more easily travel through constricted blood vessels and precisely target certain bodily parts. NB is considered the major treatment for cancer treatment and other diseases which are difficult to diagnose. The field of NBs is dynamic and continues to grow as researchers discover new properties and seek practical applications in various fields. The predominant usage of NBs in novel drug delivery is to enhance the bioavailability, and controlled drug release along with imaging properties NBs are important because they may change interfacial characteristics including surface force, lubrication, and absorption. The quick diffusion of gas into the water was caused by a hypothetical film that was stimulated and punctured by a strong acting force at the gas/water contact of the bubble. In this article, various prominent aspects of NBs have been discussed, along with the long-acting nature, and the theranostical aspect which elucidates the potential marketed drugs along with clinical trial products. The article also covers quality by design aspects, different production techniques that enable method-specific therapeutic applications, increasing the floating time of the bubble, and refining its properties to enhance the prepared NB's quality. NB containing both analysis and curing properties makes it special from other nano-carriers. This work includes all the possible methods of preparing NB, its application, all marketed drugs, and products in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Damodharan Narayanasamy
- Department of Pharmaceutics, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institution of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dietrich CF, Correas JM, Cui XW, Dong Y, Havre RF, Jenssen C, Jung EM, Krix M, Lim A, Lassau N, Piscaglia F. EFSUMB Technical Review - Update 2023: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-CEUS) for the Quantification of Tumor Perfusion. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2024; 45:36-46. [PMID: 37748503 DOI: 10.1055/a-2157-2587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) is a technique to quantify tissue perfusion based on phase-specific enhancement after the injection of microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound. The guidelines of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) published in 2004 and updated in 2008, 2011, and 2020 focused on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), including essential technical requirements, training, investigational procedures and steps, guidance regarding image interpretation, established and recommended clinical indications, and safety considerations. However, the quantification of phase-specific enhancement patterns acquired with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) is not discussed here. The purpose of this EFSUMB Technical Review is to further establish a basis for the standardization of DCE-US focusing on treatment monitoring in oncology. It provides some recommendations and descriptions as to how to quantify dynamic ultrasound contrast enhancement, and technical explanations for the analysis of time-intensity curves (TICs). This update of the 2012 EFSUMB introduction to DCE-US includes clinical aspects for data collection, analysis, and interpretation that have emerged from recent studies. The current study not only aims to support future work in this research field but also to facilitate a transition to clinical routine use of DCE-US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Dietrich
- Department General Internal Medicine, Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
- Zentrum der Inneren Medizin, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitätsklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jean-Michel Correas
- Department of Adult Radiology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
- Paris Cité University, Paris, France
- CNRS, INSERM Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Xin-Wu Cui
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Roald Flesland Havre
- Department of Medicine, National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/ Wriezen, Wriezen, Germany
- Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound (BICUS), Medical University Brandenburg, Neuruppin, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Ernst Michael Jung
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Department, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Martin Krix
- Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs, Bracco Imaging, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Adrian Lim
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London and Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Imaging Department. Gustave Roussy cancer Campus. Villejuif, France. BIOMAPS. UMR 1281. CEA. CNRS. INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Dept of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lyons B, Balkaran JPR, Dunn-Lawless D, Lucian V, Keller SB, O’Reilly CS, Hu L, Rubasingham J, Nair M, Carlisle R, Stride E, Gray M, Coussios C. Sonosensitive Cavitation Nuclei-A Customisable Platform Technology for Enhanced Therapeutic Delivery. Molecules 2023; 28:7733. [PMID: 38067464 PMCID: PMC10708135 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28237733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound-mediated cavitation shows great promise for improving targeted drug delivery across a range of clinical applications. Cavitation nuclei-sound-sensitive constructs that enhance cavitation activity at lower pressures-have become a powerful adjuvant to ultrasound-based treatments, and more recently emerged as a drug delivery vehicle in their own right. The unique combination of physical, biological, and chemical effects that occur around these structures, as well as their varied compositions and morphologies, make cavitation nuclei an attractive platform for creating delivery systems tuned to particular therapeutics. In this review, we describe the structure and function of cavitation nuclei, approaches to their functionalization and customization, various clinical applications, progress toward real-world translation, and future directions for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Lyons
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Joel P. R. Balkaran
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Darcy Dunn-Lawless
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Veronica Lucian
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Sara B. Keller
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Colm S. O’Reilly
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK;
| | - Luna Hu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Jeffrey Rubasingham
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Malavika Nair
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Robert Carlisle
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Eleanor Stride
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Michael Gray
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| | - Constantin Coussios
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; (J.P.R.B.); (D.D.-L.); (V.L.); (S.B.K.); (L.H.); (J.R.); (M.N.); (R.C.); (E.S.); (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang Q, Liang X, Zhang Y, Nie H, Chen Z. A review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® and Sonazoid™ in non-hepatic organs. Eur J Radiol 2023; 167:111060. [PMID: 37657380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a dependable modality for the diagnosis of various clinical conditions. A judicious selection of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) is imperative for optimizing imaging and improving diagnosis. Approved UCAs for imaging the majority of organs include SonoVue, a pure blood agent, and Sonazoid, which exhibits an additional Kupffer phase. Despite the fact that the two UCAs are increasingly being employed, there is a lack of comparative reviews between the two agents in different organs diseases. This review represents the first attempt to compare the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, primarily including breast, thyroid, pancreas, and spleen diseases. Through comparative analysis, this review provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the performance characteristics of SonoVue and Sonazoid, with the aim of offering valuable guidance for the clinical application of CEUS. Overall, further clinical evidences are required to compare and contrast the dissimilarities between the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, enabling clinicians to make an appropriate selection based on actual clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhang
- Institution of Medical Imaging, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, China; Institution of Medical Imaging, University of South China, Hengyang, China; The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaowen Liang
- Institution of Medical Imaging, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, China; Institution of Medical Imaging, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Yanfen Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, China
| | - Hongjun Nie
- Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, China
| | - Zhiyi Chen
- Institution of Medical Imaging, The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Changsha, China; Institution of Medical Imaging, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|