Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent and deadly cancers globally, particularly in China. Treatment challenges remain in advanced and metastatic cases, especially in third- and fourth-line settings. The combination of targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown potential in addressing the limitations of single-agent treatments.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy (TT) alone and in combination with ICIs for metastatic CRC (mCRC).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TT alone and in combination with ICIs for mCRC. A total of 99 patients treated with regorafenib or fruquintinib, with or without ICIs, were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPW) were employed to balance baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary.

RESULTS

Patients who received combined therapy showed significantly longer median PFS rates compared to those who underwent TT in all analyses (original: 6.0 vs 3.4 months, P < 0.01; PSM: 6.15 vs 4.25 months, P < 0.05; IPW: 5.6 vs 3.3 months, P < 0.01). Although the median OS showed a trend toward improvement in the combination group, the difference was insignificant. Cox regression analysis revealed that combining TT with ICIs significantly reduced the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio = 0.38, P < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were generally manageable with both regimens, while serious AEs (grade 3-4) were primarily hypertension, fatigue, and reduced platelet counts. All AEs were controlled effectively by symptomatic treatment or discontinuation of the drug, and no treatment-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

The combination of TT with ICIs offers a significant advantage in terms of PFS for patients with advanced mCRC, accompanied by a favorable safety profile. These findings underscore the benefits of combination therapy in this setting, warranting further investigation in larger prospective clinical trials.

Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Real-World Studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most evidence has come from clinical trials with strict eligibility criteria. Understanding real-world effectiveness and safety of ICIs in CRC is important to guide routine clinical practice across diverse populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify observational studies evaluating ICI-based regimens compared to conventional or combination therapies in patients with CRC. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus) were searched from inception through March 15, 2025. Eligible studies reported at least one efficacy outcome (e.g., progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], etc.) and/or safety outcome (e.g., adverse events) among real-world populations with CRC treated with ICIs. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the key findings. Eleven real-world studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing data from 2,049 patients. In MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC, real-world findings aligned with the survival benefits observed in clinical trials, demonstrating improved PFS and OS compared to conventional therapies. For MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC, combining ICIs with other agents (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy) showed improvements but yielded conflicting results. Overall, the safety profiles were comparable to conventional therapies, with treatment-related adverse events occurring at similar rates. Real-world evidence supports the efficacy of ICI monotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC and suggests potential benefits of ICI-based combination therapies in MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC. However, most of the data are derived from small, single-center cohorts, which limit their generalizability. Further multi-center studies are needed, especially to assess the efficacy of ICI-based combination therapies in the broader CRC population.

Real world study on efficacy and safety of surufatinib in advanced solid tumors evaluation

Surufatinib is a novel, China-developed small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that demonstrates high selectivity for VEGFR, FGFR1, and CSF1R. Surufatinib has been approved for the treatment of neuroendcrine tumors, including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNEN) and non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (N-pNEN). The purpose of this retrospective study is to assess Surufatinib's safety and effectiveness in patients with various advanced solid malignancies. The general clinical statistics and follow-up data of patients treated with Surufatinib for advanced solid tumors at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between January 2021 and April 2024 were gathered. Enhanced CT was used to assess the effectiveness during that time, and cases side effects were gathered. Survival rates of different diseases were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 28 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. At the end of follow-up, treatment with Surufatinib resulted in the following outcomes: Complete response (CR) in 0 cases (0.0%), Partial response (PR) in 5 cases (17.9%), Stable disease (SD) in 7 cases (25.0%), and Progressive disease (PD) in 16 cases (57.1%). Objective response rate (ORR) and Disease control rate (DCR) were 17.9% and 42.9%, respectively. In the PNEN group, ORR was 33.3%, DCR was 66.7%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11 months, while median overall survival (mOS) was 17 months. In the N-pNEN group, ORR was 14.3%, DCR was 42.3%, mPFS was 6 months and mOS was 7 months. ORR was 8.3%, DCR was 25%, mPFS was 2 months, and mOS was 2 months. The most common adverse reactions included hypoproteinemia, proteinuria, bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal toxicity, and which of them were grade 1 to grade 2. In advanced solid tumors beyond PNEN, Surufatinib demonstrates clinically meaningful survival benefits for patients refractory to standard therapies, with a generally manageable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of dose adjustment for fruquintinib in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study with real-world settings

Background

Fruquintinib, a standard third-line treatment option for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), has been shown to significantly prolong both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients. However, we have observed that the standard dosing of fruquintinib is frequently associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects within the Chinese population, leading some patients-particularly elderly individuals-to be unable to tolerate it. This study presents a retrospective analysis to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of adjusting the administration frequency of fruquintinib in patients with mCRC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the follow-up data and clinicopathological characteristics of 99 patients with mCRC who were treated with an adjusted frequency of furquinitinib administration at our center. We conduct regular imaging follow-ups and tumor marker evaluations to assess the therapeutic efficacy in patients. PFS data are collected through these assessments, while OS and adverse effects information is obtained via structured telephone follow-ups.

Results

There were 99 patients with mCRC treated with fruquintinib monotherapy at an adjusted dosing frequency. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the 99 patients on fruquintinib monotherapy was 4.1 months and the median overall survival (mOS) was 11.4 months following the adjustment of dosing frequency, the overall response rate (ORR) was 2.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was recorded at 40.4% within the fruquintinib monotherapy. Overall, after receiving oral administration of fruquintinib at the modified frequency, no grade 3 or higher adverse reactions occurred in all patients.

Conclusions

Our results showed that the administration of fruquintinib at an adjusted dosing frequency has not significantly impacted the efficacy while demonstrating a favorable safety profile. However, this conclusion necessitates further validation through prospective clinical trials with a larger sample size.

Efficacy observation of sequential TAS-102 following regorafenib as a later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a cohort study

Background

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited options for later-line treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 have shown significant benefit and are recommended as later-line treatment for mCRC. This study aimed to investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 sequentially after regorafenib progression.

Methods

This population-based cohort study retrospectively collected data of 30 patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 sequentially after regorafenib at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital and the Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University from January 1, 2020, to October 1, 2023. PFS and OS were considered to be the endpoints of this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to analyze the OS, PFS, and risk factors.

Results

Among the 30 patients included in the study, the median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 3.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.09-5.59]. OS was divided into two categories: OS1, the time from regorafenib initiation to death; OS2, the time from TAS-102 initiation to death. The median OS1 (mOS1) was 18.7 months [95% CI: 16.3-not available (NA)], and the median OS2 (mOS2) was 16.1 months (95% CI: 8.08-NA). The mPFS was 3.65 and 3.83 months (P=0.68) in the regorafenib monotherapy group and combination therapy group, respectively, while the mOS1 was unreached in the regorafenib monotherapy group and was 18.7 months in the regorafenib combination therapy group (P=0.64). Meanwhile, the mOS1 was 17.5 and 20.7 months in the TAS-102 monotherapy group and TAS-102 combination therapy group, respectively (P=0.53). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses revealed that curative surgery was an independent predictive factor for PFS.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the availability of sequential treatment options including regorafenib followed by TAS-102 prolongs the OS of patients compared to conventional monotherapy approaches. During the sequential treatment, regorafenib or TAS-102 combined with other therapeutic agents did not significantly differ from monotherapy, further investigation is required through large-scale trials.

Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fruquintinib, a VEGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent clinical practice has shown that combining fruquintinib with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors can achieve better efficacy.The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of combining PD-1inhibitors with fruquintinib.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI up to 28 August 2024 for studies comparing fruquintinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors to fruquintinib alone. RevMan software was used to perform meta-analyses of survival data for the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 9 retrospective cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included, involving a total of 716 patients. Compared with the monotherapy group, the combination therapy group had a greater Overall Response Rate [RR = 2.45,95% CI (1.83, 3.56), p < 0.00001], Disease Control Rate [RR = 1.37,95% CI (1.64,4.79), p = 0.0002], and progression-free survival [HR = 0.64,95% CI (0.49, 0.84), p = 0.001]. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. The incidence of adverse effects was identical in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Fruquintinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors was more effective than fruquintinib alone in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, with acceptable safety.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (registration number CRD42024583116).

Enhancing Colorectal Cancer Treatment Through VEGF/VEGFR Inhibitors and Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Colorectal cancer, ranking as the third most prevalent malignancy globally, substantially benefits from both immunotherapy and VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors. Nevertheless, the use of monotherapy proves inadequate in effectively tackling the heterogeneity of tumors and the intricacies of their microenvironment, frequently leading to drug resistance and immune evasion. This situation underscores the pressing need for innovative strategies aimed at augmenting the effectiveness and durability of treatments. Clinical research demonstrates that the combination of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors (primarily including VEGF/VEGFR-targeted drugs and multi-kinase inhibitors) with immune checkpoint inhibitors creates a synergistic effect in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Our analysis explores how VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors recalibrate the tumor microenvironment, modulate immune cell functions, and influence the expression of immune checkpoints and cytokines. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the preclinical and clinical feasibility of these combined therapeutic approaches. Despite the potential for toxicity, the significant benefits and prospective applications of these strategies warrant thorough exploration. Exploring the synergistic mechanisms of these combined treatments has the potential to inaugurate a new paradigm in oncology, enabling more personalized and efficacious treatment modalities. Additionally, the synergy between VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors and nascent immunotherapies emerges as a promising field of inquiry.

Clinical Progress of Fruquintinib in Colorectal Cancer: An Overview

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Conventional treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have limited effects on advanced and metastatic CRC (mCRC). Fruquintinib, a novel and highly selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, has shown significant efficacy and tolerance in treating mCRC. The FRESCO and FRESCO-2 trials demonstrated that fruquintinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival and the overall survival of refractory mCRC patients, establishing it as the standard third-line treatment strategy for mCRC. In addition, the combination of fruquintinib with other anticancer drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated potential for enhanced efficacy, which warrants further exploration. In this review, we aimed to systematically summarize the current knowledge about the pharmacological mechanisms, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse events, and corresponding treatment options of fruquintinib and provide an update on the clinical trials related to fruquintinib in CRC by conducting a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and consulting the relevant clinical trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and the ChiCTR website, aiming to offer new insights into the role of fruquintinib in the comprehensive treatment of CRC.

Clinical research progress of fruquintinib in the treatment of malignant tumors

Malignant tumors represent an important cause of mortality within the global population. Tumor angiogenesis, recognized as one of the key hallmarks of malignant tumors, is crucial for supplying essential nutrients and oxygen for tumor growth. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) are key drivers of tumor angiogenesis. Targeted therapeutic interventions not only effectively inhibit tumor growth by specifically blocking tumor angiogenesis but have also made breakthroughs in the treatment of malignant tumors. Fruquintinib, an anti-angiogenic small molecule drug developed independently in China, functions as a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high selectivity. It effectively curtails tumor growth by binding to and inhibiting VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3. Additionally, fruquintinib offers several advantages including minimal off-target toxicity, robust resistance profiles, and commendable efficacy. This agent can be used alone or in combination with other treatments. It has shown high effectiveness and survival benefits across various malignant tumors such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and other malignant tumors. Therefore, this article conducts a systematic review encompassing the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of fruquintinib. Through this review, we aimed to offer a reference for the clinical application and subsequent development of fruquintinib.

Synergistic Effects of Fruquintinib Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Fruquintinib has received approval for the management of patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, combination of fruquintinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is yet to be extensively studied. This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and prognostic indicators of treatment regimen combining fruquintinib with ICIs in mCRC patients.

METHODS

We analyzed data from mCRC patients who were administered fruquintinib either as a monotherapy or in conjunction with ICIs following conventional chemotherapy. Parameters such as the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of adverse events were meticulously evaluated. Furthermore, the relationship between blood markers and patient prognosis was examined.

RESULTS

A total of 72 mCRC patients were included in this study, with a median observation period of 48 months, 19 were treated with fruquintinib alone, while 53 received a combination therapy involving fruquintinib and ICIs. The combined therapy group exhibited superior ORR and DCR compared to the fruquintinib monotherapy group. Additionally, significant improvements in OS and PFS were observed in the combined treatment group. The occurrence of adverse events was generally manageable and well-tolerated across both groups, with no significant difference in incidence rates. Notably, albumin levels were identified as a prognostic marker for PFS and OS in the univariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of fruquintinib with ICIs demonstrated enhanced clinical efficacy and improved survival outcomes compared to fruquintinib monotherapy in mCRC patients. The safety of the combination regimen was deemed manageable and acceptable.

Regorafenib monotherapy as the later-line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter real-world study

Background

Colorectal cancer is one of the tumors with the highest morbidity and mortality rates in China and the world. Regorafenib is a targeted drug for standard third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib monotherapy has shown certain efficacy in the elderly population, but more robust evidence is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosing characteristics, prognosis, and safety of regorafenib monotherapy in elderly Chinese patients with mCRC.

Methods

This retrospective study comprised elderly patients (aged ≥60 years) with mCRC who received regorafenib monotherapy as a third-line or above treatment in 10 hospitals from August 2017 to June 2020. We analyzed the association between different dosing regimens and prognosis. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

In total, 203 patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS was 3.88 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.48-5.65], and the median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI: 8.94-12.1). There was no significant difference in the survival curves between the different dosage groups. The multivariate Cox analysis showed a significant benefit in OS in the high final daily dose group (120-160 mg/day) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.84, P=0.01], which was further confirmed by the propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. No significant association was found between the initial daily dose and prognosis. Nor was any significant association found between PFS and drug dosage. Subsequently, an age subgroup analysis was conducted using 70 years as the cut-off value. In those aged <70 years, the application of higher final doses (120-160 mg/day) was significantly associated with the prolongation of OS compared to a final dose of 80 mg/day [HR (95% CI): 0.38 (0.16-0.91), P=0.03], and the prolongation of OS was predominantly observed in the 120 mg/day dose group [HR (95% CI): 0.24 (0.09-0.67), P=0.006]. Besides, we observed a statistically insignificant increase in the incidence of AEs in the higher dose group compared to the lower dose group.

Conclusions

Regorafenib monotherapy was shown to be efficacious in the elderly population, but further evidence is needed for guidance. Based on our multicenter real-world investigation, the final daily dose was significantly associated with OS. For those aged <70 years, maintaining the final dose at 120 mg/day may have prognostic advantages. The suggested medication protocol requires validation through comprehensive clinical trials.

A nomogram construction and multicenter validation for predicting overall survival after fruquintinib application in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Fruquintinib is a third-line and subsequent targeted therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Identifying survival predictors after fruquintinib is crucial for optimizing the clinical use of this medication.

Objectives

We aimed to identify factors influencing the prognosis of patients with mCRC treated with fruquintinib and to leverage these insights to develop a nomogram model for estimating survival rates in this patient population.

Design

Multicenter retrospective observational study.

Methods

We collected patient data from January 2019 to October 2023, with one healthcare institution's data serving as the training cohort and the other three hospitals' data serving as the multicenter validation cohort. The nomogram for overall survival was calculated from Cox regression models, and variable selection was screened using the univariate Cox regression analysis with additional variables based on clinical experience. Model performance was measured by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, decision curve analyses (DCA), and utility (patient stratification into low-risk vs high-risk groups).

Results

Data were ultimately collected on 240 patients, with 144 patients included in the training cohort and 96 included in the multicenter validation cohort. Predictors included in the nomogram were CA199, body mass index, T stage, the primary site of the tumor, and other metastatic and pathological differentiation. The C-index of the nomogram in the training set and multicenter validation was 0.714 and 0.729, respectively. The models were fully calibrated and their predictions aligned closely with the observed data. DCA curves indicated the promising clinical benefits of the predictive model. Finally, the reliability of the model was also verified through the risk classification using the nomogram.

Conclusions

We constructed a nomogram for mCRC treated with fruquintinib based on six variables that may be used to assist in personalizing the use of the drug.

Efficacy comparison of fruquintinib, regorafenib monotherapy or plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib (R) and fruquintinib (F) are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, but both have limited efficacy. Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) CRC. Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F, R, F plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and R plus PD-1 inhibitors (RP), it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.

AIM

To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital, and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.

RESULTS

A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F (n = 70), R (n = 67), F plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) (n = 95) and RP (n = 81) groups. The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the F, R, FP, and RP groups was 3.5 months, 3.6 months, 4.9 months, and 3.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months, 15.7 months, 16.7 months, and 14.1 months. The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate (DCR) (P = 0.044) and 6-month PFS (P = 0.014) and exhibited a better trend in PFS (P = 0.057) compared with F, and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP (P = 0.030). RP did not confer a significant survival benefit; instead, the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS (P = 0.080) compared with RP. No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR, while RP is not better than R. FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP, but F and R had similar clinical efficacy. Therefore, FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.

Efficacy comparison of fruquintinib, regorafenib monotherapy or plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib (R) and fruquintinib (F) are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, but both have limited efficacy. Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) CRC. Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F, R, F plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and R plus PD-1 inhibitors (RP), it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.

AIM

To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital, and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.

RESULTS

A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F (n = 70), R (n = 67), F plus PD-1 inhibitor (FP) (n = 95) and RP (n = 81) groups. The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the F, R, FP, and RP groups was 3.5 months, 3.6 months, 4.9 months, and 3.0 months, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months, 15.7 months, 16.7 months, and 14.1 months. The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate (DCR) (P = 0.044) and 6-month PFS (P = 0.014) and exhibited a better trend in PFS (P = 0.057) compared with F, and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP (P = 0.030). RP did not confer a significant survival benefit; instead, the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS (P = 0.080) compared with RP. No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR, while RP is not better than R. FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP, but F and R had similar clinical efficacy. Therefore, FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Treatment-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

Therapeutic regimens are relatively scarce among patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to determine the feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC retrospectively.

Methods

A total of 68 patients with previously treated metastatic CRC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included in this study retrospectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, therapeutic outcomes and safety profile during administration were collected and briefly analyzed. All subjects were followed up regularly. Therapeutic outcomes, including drug response and prognosis, were presented, and a safety profile was depicted to illustrate the adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 68 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included in the final analysis. Best therapeutic response during treatment indicated that partial response was observed in 11 patients, stable disease was noted in 41 patients, and progressive disease was found in 16 patients, producing an objective response rate of 16.2% (95% CI: 8.4%-27.1%) and a disease control rate of 76.5% (95% CI: 64.6%-85.9%). Prognostic analysis suggested that the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 68 patients was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.01-7.59), and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.5 months (95% CI: 9.40-15.60). Of the 11 patients who responded, the median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI: 2.89-10.53). Safety profile during treatment showed that patients experienced adverse reactions regardless of grade, and grade ≥3 adverse reactions were found in 61 patients (89.7%) and 41 patients (60.3%), respectively. Common adverse reactions were hypertension, myelosuppression (including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia), fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC preliminarily in clinical practice. This conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.