Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs

Diagnostic investigation, intervention, and outcome for post-subtotal gastrectomy patients who present with jaundice

Purpose

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a useful diagnostic and interventional tool in patients with obstructive jaundice. In patients who had subtotal gastrectomy, however, the implementation of ERCP has become more difficult. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT, MRI/MRCP and PET/CT in lesion localization, characterization, and extent evaluation in post-subtotal gastrectomy patients who present with obstructive jaundice. The interventional methods for biliary drainage, their success rate and patient outcome were also investigated.

Methods

Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify patients hospitalized for obstructive jaundice at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, who had previously undergone subtotal gastrectomy. The clinical information, imaging and interventional examination data of those patients were retrospectively collected.

Results

Between 2018 and 2023, 36 patients with previous subtotal gastrectomy were hospitalized for ob-structive jaundice at our hospital. The majority of lesions were malignant, including 19 gastric cancer recurrence (47.5%), and 12 other malignancies (30.0%). Benign lesions included inflammatory biliary stricture, biliary stones, and IgG4-related disease. The three imaging modalities had similar performance in lesion localization and characterization, whereas PET/CT showed higher accuracy compared to MR and CT in detecting extensive disease (92.8% vs. 83.3% vs. 60.0%). Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage was applied more frequently than ERCP and surgery (69.4% vs. 25.0% vs. 5.5%), and there was no significant difference concerning technical and clini-cal success rate and complication.

Conclusion

Gastric cancer recurrence and newly-developed pancreaticobiliary malignancies were the main causes of obstructive jaundice in patients who had subtotal gastrectomy. PET/CT was superior to MRI/MRCP and contrast-enhanced CT in determining lesion extensiveness. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) was the preferred method for managing obstructive jaundice. Despite the effectiveness of interventions, a significant number of patients experienced short-term disease progression.

Difficult cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-needle-knife precut versus transpancreatic sphincterotomy on the basis of successful cannulation and adverse events

BACKGROUND

When cannulation is challenging during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the standard guidewire technique with sphincterotomy is unsuccessful, alternative cannulation techniques can be used to access the biliary tree. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of adverse events and cannulation success rates between transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) and precut sphincterotomy (PCS).

METHODS

Data from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP (GallRiks), collected from 2011 to 2022, were analyzed. A total of 105,303 ERCP procedures were recorded in GallRiks during the study period. After exclusions, the study population consisted of 47,486 ERCP procedures. Of these, 4547 received PCS and 3273 received TPS. The remaining 39,666 ERCP procedures with conventional sphincterotomy served as the control group. The primary endpoints were successful cannulation and adverse events within 30 days.

RESULTS

Successful cannulation was more frequent with the TPS technique than with the PCS technique (86.5% vs. 69.7%), but both groups had a lower cannulation rate than the control group (92.4%; OR-PCS 0.20, 95% CI 0.18-0.21; OR-TPS 0.58, 95% CI 0.52-0.64). The TPS group had a higher incidence of adverse events than the PCS group (24.1% vs. 18.8%) and both groups had a higher incidence of adverse events than the control group (15.5%; OR-PCS 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36; OR-TPS 1.71, 95% CI 1.57-1.87). Adverse events for TPS were driven by a higher incidence of pancreatitis (10.5% vs. 6.4% vs. 4.5%; OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.23-2.86) and perforation (1.6% vs. 0.8% vs. 0.5%; OR 2.99, 95% CI 2.20-4.06) compared to both PCS and control.

CONCLUSION

TPS is more successful at cannulation than PCS; however, this success comes at a higher cost in terms of adverse events, particularly pancreatitis and perforation.

Advances in minimally invasive treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice

Malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) encompasses a range of diseases stemming from malignant tumors such as cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and primary liver cancer, among others, which cause obstruction in both intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts. This obstruction may lead to elevated bilirubin levels, hepatic function impairment, and a low rate of successful surgical resection in clinical settings. There are various minimally invasive treatment options for MOJ, including endoscopic biliary drainage, ultrasound-guided procedures, and percutaneous biliary tract puncture drainage.

Efficacy and influencing factors of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice patients

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy and influencing factors of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage (PTCD) in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ).

METHODS

The study included 151 MOJ patients admitted from January 2021 to January 2024. Seventy patients in the control group received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), while 81 patients in the research group underwent PTCD. Clinical outcomes, including surgical success rate, efficacy (overall remission, high- and low-level intestinal obstruction remission), safety (bile leakage, septicemia, hemobilia, pancreatitis, and gastrointestinal bleeding), and clinical-related indicators (hospital stay, surgical cost, treatment cost), as well as serum biochemical markers (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], direct bilirubin [DBIL], and total bilirubin [TBIL]), were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing PTCD efficacy.

RESULTS

The surgical success rate was significantly higher in the research group than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Although the overall remission rates were similar between the groups (P > 0.05), the research group had a lower low-level intestinal obstruction remission rate and a higher high-level intestinal obstruction remission rate (P < 0.05). Safety profiles and changes in pre- and post-operative serum biochemical markers did not differ significantly between the groups (all P > 0.05). The research group experienced longer hospital stays and lower surgical costs compared to the control group (both P < 0.05), while treatment costs were similar (P > 0.05). Binary logistic regression identified obstruction site, and preoperative liver dysfunction as factors influencing PTCD efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

PTCD demonstrated a higher surgical success rate than ERCP in MOJ patients, with comparable overall efficacy, safety, and treatment costs. PTCD was associated with longer hospital stays and lower surgical costs. Both procedures similarly improved ALT, DBIL, and TBIL levels. PTCD showed the greatest therapeutic benefit in cases of high-level intestinal obstruction.

The clinical efficacy and safety of different biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis

Background

Currently, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are commonly employed in clinical practice to alleviate malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ). Nevertheless, there lacks a consensus regarding the superiority of either method in terms of efficacy and safety.

Aim

To conduct a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of PTCD and ERCP in treating MOJ, and to compare the therapeutic outcomes and safety profiles of these two procedures.

Methods

CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of PTCD or ERCP for MOJ. The search period was from the establishment of the databases to July 2023. After quality assessment and data extraction from the included studies, Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software.

Results

A total of 21 RCTs involving 1,693 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the surgical success rate between the two groups for patients with low biliary obstruction (P=0.81). For patients with high biliary obstruction, the surgical success rate of the PTCD group was higher than that of the ERCP group (P < 0.0001), and the overall surgical success rate of the PTCD group was also higher than that of the ERCP group (P = 0.008). For patients with low biliary obstruction, the rate of jaundice relief (P < 0.00001) and the clinical efficacy (P = 0.0005) were better in the ERCP group, while for patients with high biliary obstruction, the rate of jaundice relief (P < 0.00001) and the clinical efficacy (P = 0.003) were better in the PTCD group. There was no significant difference in the overall jaundice remission rate and clinical efficacy between the two groups (P = 0.77, 0.53). There was no significant difference in the reduction of ALT, TBIL, and DBIL before and after surgery and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both PTCD and ERCP can efficiently alleviate biliary obstruction and enhance liver function. ERCP is effective in treating low biliary obstruction, while PTCD is more advantageous in treating high biliary obstruction.