TIDE: adjuvant tislelizumab plus donafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery: protocol for a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

Chinese Expert Consensus on the Combination of Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy with Locoregional Therapy for Intermediate/Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality; it ranks as the second most common cause of cancer deaths in China. Most HCC patients are first diagnosed at an advanced stage. In recent years, targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy has become the preferred regimen for systemic treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC, while targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy plus local treatment could further improve the efficacy in many clinical studies. To better guide the clinical treatment for effective and safe combination therapy, our interdisciplinary panel on the treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC comprising hepatologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, interventional radiologists, and traditional Chinese medicine physicians have formulated this consensus based on current clinical studies and clinical medication experience for reference. The consensus contained 15 recommendations, including the applicable population and management, local treatment selection, conversion strategy, treatment strategy after tumor progression and management of common adverse reactions.

Delivering adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in the early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a formidable challenge in oncology, demanding innovative treatment approaches. Both adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, thanks to the introduction of immunotherapy, have emerged as promising strategies in the management of HCC, aiming to reduce the risk of relapse and ultimately to improve survival.

AREAS COVERED

This review considers current evidence, ongoing clinical trials, and future strategies to elucidate the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in HCC.

EXPERT OPINION

Both adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens, notably those incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, demonstrated encouraging safety profiles and efficacy outcomes in HCC.While significant challenges persist, including optimizing patient selection and endpoint definition, the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy holds promise for maximizing the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy across all stages of HCC. Further insights into tumor biology and host immunity will shape the role of these approaches which are close to becoming reality in clinical practice.

Postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for patients of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus after hepatectomy: a propensity score matching study

Background

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a major risk factor of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. Whether postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy (I-O and MTT) is effective in reducing the risk of recurrence of HCC with minimal portal invasion after hepatectomy and improving prognosis is unknown.

Methods

We collected the data of HCC with Vp1 or Vp2 PVTT patients who underwent hepatectomy at our center between January 2019 and June 2022 from the hospital database. We utilized propensity score matching (PSM) to establish a 1:1 match between the postoperative group treated with I-O and MTT and the postoperative group without I-O and MTT. To compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups, we employed the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, we conducted Cox regression analysis to identify the prognostic factors that influence patient prognosis. To account for different high-risk factors, subgroup analyses were carried out.

Results

Among the 189 patients included in the study, 42 patients received postoperative adjuvant I-O and MTT. After PSM, the 1, 2-years RFS were 59.2%, 21.3% respectively in the I-O and MTT group and 40.8%, 9.6% respectively in the non-I-O and MTT group. The median RFS was 13.2 months for the I-O and MTT group better than 7.0 months for the non-I-O and MTT group (P = 0.028). 1, 2-years OS were 89.8%, 65.8% respectively in the I-O and MTT group and 42.4%, 27.7% respectively in the non-I-O and MTT group. The median OS was 23.5 months for the I-O and MTT group better than 17.2 months for the non-I-O and MTT group (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant I-O and MTT was a prognostic protective factor associated with OS and RFS. The most frequent AE observed in this study was pruritus, and rare AEs included decreased platelet, hypothyroidism, proteinuria, myocarditis and hypoadrenocorticism. The incidence of GRADE ≥3 AE with no deaths recorded.

Conclusion

The study suggested that postoperative adjuvant I-O and MTT strategy was beneficial to improve the prognosis of HCC patients with PVTT patients, while the therapy was safe and reliable.

Neoadjuvant therapy of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib for single huge hepatocellular carcinoma (NEO-START): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC.

METHODS

This multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint.

DISCUSSION

Synergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.

Postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Background and aim

Standardized approach to postoperative adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains elusive. This study endeavors to examine the effects of postoperative PD-1 adjuvant therapy on the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients at a heightened risk of post-surgical recurrence.

Methods

The data of HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy at our center from June 2018 to March 2023 were collected from the hospital database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to perform a 1:1 match between the postoperative anti-PD-1 antibody group and the postoperative non-anti-PD-1 antibody group. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two groups. Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify the prognostic factors affecting patient outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed for different high-risk factors.

Results

Among the 446 patients included in the study, 122 patients received adjuvant therapy with postoperative anti-PD-1 antibodies. After PSM, the PD-1 group had postoperative 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year OS rates of 93.1%, 86.8%, 78.2%, and 51.1%, respectively, while the non-PD-1 group had rates of 85.3%, 70.2%, 47.7%, and 30.0%. The PD-1 group had postoperative 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year RFS rates of 81.7%, 77.0%, 52.3%, and 23.1%, respectively, whereas the non-PD-1 group had rates of 68.4%, 47.7%, and 25.8% in 1-year, 2-year, 3-year. A multifactorial Cox regression analysis revealed that postoperative PD-1 use was a prognostic protective factor associated with OS and RFS. Subgroup analysis results indicated that HCC patients with high recurrence risks significantly benefited from postoperative anti-PD-1 antibody treatment in terms of OS and RFS.

Conclusion

For HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors and undergoing hepatectomy, postoperative adjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies can effectively improve their survival prognosis.

Neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

High rate of recurrence impaired the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) and tislelizumab therapy for resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

METHODS

41 HCC patients received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were respectively enrolled. The safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant therapy were assessed. The prognosis was evaluated and compared with that of 41 matched HCC patients who received surgery alone.

RESULTS

36 (87.8%) patients had adverse events (AEs) and only one patient had a grade 3/4 of ALT elevated. All patients performed surgery successfully and no severe postoperative complications occurred. The objective response rate (ORR) was 56.1% and 87.8% based on RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively. 15 (36.6%) patients had radiological complete tumor necrosis and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) was 13 (31.7%) and 18 (43.9%), respectively. The incidence of microvascular invasion (MVI) was 4.9% in neoadjuvant therapy patients, compared with 64.9% before propensity score matching (PSM) and 60.9% after PSM for surgery alone patients. Neoadjuvant therapy patients had a significant better prognosis than surgery alone patients (recurrence-free survival p = 0.041, overall survival p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results suggest the neoadjuvant D-TACE and tislelizumab therapy is safe and benefit to the pathological results and prognosis for patients with resectable or borderline resectable HCC.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with/without PD-1 for unresectable HCC in a multicenter retrospective study

Background & aims

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with donafenib and a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor (TACE+DP) and TACE combined with donafenib (TACE+D) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Methods

The clinical data of 388 patients with uHCC who received TACE+DP or TACE+D as first-line treatment at six Chinese academic centers from July 2021 to July 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients in the TACE+DP group received an intravenous administration of a PD-1 inhibitor every three weeks and oral donafenib (0.2 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Patients in the TACE+D group received the same dose of donafenib for 3-5 days after TACE. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The tumor response was compared between the two groups according to modified RECIST criteria. Adverse events were also analyzed between the two groups.

Results

The TACE+D group included 157 patients and the TACE+DP group included 166 patients. Patients in the TACE+DP group had a longer median OS (18.1 vs. 13.2 months, P<0.001) and longer median PFS (10.6 vs. 7.9 months, P<0.001) than those in the TACE+D group. Patients in the TACE+DP group achieved a greater objective response rate (ORR; 50.6% vs. 41.4%, P=0.019) and greater disease control rate (DCR) (89.2% vs. 82.8%, P=0.010) than those in the TACE+D group. No significant differences were found in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the TACE+DP and TACE+D groups (any grade: 92.9% vs. 94.6%, P=0.270; grade 3 or 4: 33.8% vs. 37.3%, P=0.253).

Conclusion

With favorable safety and tolerability, TACE combined with donafenib and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR compared to TACE combined with donafenib.