Impact of DNA damage repair alterations on prostate cancer progression and metastasis

Precision Targeting in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Molecular Insights to Therapeutic Frontiers

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in men. Advances in molecular profiling have demonstrated that the androgen receptor (AR) axis, DNA damage repair pathways, and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are critical drivers of disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Despite the established benefits of hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and bone-targeting agents, mPCa commonly becomes treatment-resistant. Recent breakthroughs have highlighted the importance of identifying actionable genetic alterations, such as BRCA2 or ATM defects, that render tumors sensitive to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Parallel efforts have refined imaging-particularly prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography-to detect and localize metastatic lesions with high sensitivity, thereby guiding patient selection for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapies. Multi-omics innovations, including liquid biopsy technologies, enable the real-time tracking of emergent AR splice variants or reversion mutations, supporting adaptive therapy paradigms. Nonetheless, the complexity of mPCa necessitates combination strategies, such as pairing AR inhibition with PI3K/AKT blockade or PARP inhibitors, to inhibit tumor plasticity. Immuno-oncological approaches remain challenging for unselected patients; however, subsets with mismatch repair deficiency or neuroendocrine phenotypes may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade or targeted epigenetic interventions. We present these pivotal advances, and discuss how biomarker-guided integrative treatments can improve mPCa management.

Real-world treatment patterns and genetic testing in a metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer setting in Europe

AIM

This study described treatment patterns, reasons for treatment, and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) testing patterns in a real-world metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) population in Europe.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and patients conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, November 2022-May 2023. Physicians provided clinical characteristics, treatment and HRRm testing patterns, and reasons for treatment for eight consecutive patients with mCRPC. Most analyses were descriptive; treatment reasons were compared using Fisher's Exact test.

RESULTS

Physicians provided data for 1,737 mCRPC patients. Most patients (73%) were androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPi)-naïve at first-line (1 L) mCRPC. Here, at 1 L mCRPC, 60% of patients received ARPi and 24% chemotherapy. Of those who received ARPi prior to mCRPC (n = 291), 60% received chemotherapy at mCRPC and 21% ARPi. Overall, 37% were HRRm tested. Treatment patterns, sequencing, reasons, and HRRm testing varied by country, physician specialty, and practice setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment patterns generally followed guidelines. ARPi prescriptions prior to mCRPC were numerically higher than previously reported, however HRRm testing rates were still low meaning mCRPC patients may miss out on more effective targeted treatments.

Real-world efficacy and safety of combined first-line treatment with PARP inhibitors and novel hormonal therapy in mCRPC patients with HRR gene mutations

Objective

This study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of combining PARP inhibitors with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) as a first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations.

Methods

We enrolled 41 mCRPC patients who received at least 1 month of combined treatment with PARP inhibitors and NHT. Patients were divided into two groups: Cohort A (mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM genes) and Cohort B (mutations in other HRR genes). The primary endpoint was imaging-based progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), PSA50 response, and adverse events (AEs). To ensure accurate research results and control confounding factors, we will employ multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate key variables affecting mCRPC patient survival outcomes.

Results

This study enrolled 41 patients, 22 in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B. The median PFS for all patients was 21.8 months, and the median OS had yet to be reached. The overall ORR was 48.8%, and the DCR was 61.0%. Specifically, the median PFS for Cohort A was 21.8 months compared to 14.5 months for Cohort B. The median OS had yet to be reached for either cohort. Regarding efficacy, 81.8% of patients in Cohort A and 73.7% in Cohort B achieved a PSA50 response. Imaging assessments showed ORRs of 54.6% for Cohort A and 42.1% for Cohort B, with DCRs of 72.7% and 47.4%, respectively. 85.4% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 adverse events, and 51.2% encountered grade 3 or 4. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis focusing on PFS, the Gleason score was identified as a significant predictor (HR = 5.8, 95% CI: 1.65-20.2, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Combined first-line treatment with PARP inhibitors and NHT is effective and well-tolerated in mCRPC patients with HRR gene mutations, particularly those with BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM mutations. These findings underscore the potential of this therapeutic combination in managing mCRPC in the Chinese population, suggesting a favorable outcome for those with specific genetic backgrounds.

Blood-based tumor mutational burden impacts clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor treated breast and prostate cancers

BACKGROUND

Breast and prostate tumors are known to be less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Tissue-based tumor mutation burden (tTMB) has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response to ICIs, including in these "cold tumors". In clinical practice, when tTMB is not available, blood-based TMB score (bTMB) can be used to consider treatment with ICIs.

METHODS

This retrospective, real-world study included a final cohort of metastatic breast and prostate cancer patients treated with an ICI following a liquid biopsy test. Multiple bTMB-High cut-offs were assessed. Clinical, genomic, and outcomes data were collected. We hypothesized that a cut-off of bTMB ≥10 mut/Mb is not a strong predictor of response to ICIs in this setting. The Guardant Health genomic database (GHGD) was then queried (N = 13,992) for associations of bTMB with genomic alterations.

RESULTS

In the clinical cohort (N = 48), ICI treatment is offered after a median of 3 (1-9) lines of treatment. The median bTMB is 16.4 (10-186) mut/Mb. The median time on ICI and PFS is 2.1 (0-1.7) and 3.1 months (95%CI, 1.6-4.6) respectively; no difference by MSI/MMR status (p = 0.152). Response rate among eligible patients (n = 36) is 16.7%; only N = 1/6 in bTMB <16 mut/Mb. High bMSI is associated with higher bTMB (correlation test, r = 0.66, p = 0.000). In the GHGD, patients with bTMB high have significantly more alterations than bTMB low and TP53, PIK3CA, ATM, ESR1, NF1, BRCA2, ARID1A, and APC were the most frequently altered genes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the practice of offering an ICIs based on bTMB was uncommon and did not independently predict ICI benefits in patients with refractory, advanced breast and prostate cancers.

An evaluation of talazoparib plus enzalutamide for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer diagnosis among men worldwide, with poor prognosis in its advanced stage. Treatment strategies have evolved, including the use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis).

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the clinical efficacy, safety, and future potential of combining talazoparib, a potent PARPi, with enzalutamide, a strong androgen receptor (AR) antagonist. The combination of these two drugs was evaluated by the TALAPRO-2 trial, demonstrating significant improvement in radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, particularly those with Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) gene mutations such as BRCA1/2.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging biomarkers like TMPRSS2-ERG and RB1 gene mutations have been recently reported as potential predictors of clinical outcome in the TALAPRO-2 all-comers population. Genomic markers for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are other potential drivers of response to PARPi/ARPI combination. Further investigation is needed to refine treatment strategies, including targeting non-HRR mutations, and to expand the role of this combination therapy in earlier stages of prostate cancer.

ROS: A "booster" for chronic inflammation and tumor metastasis

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a group of highly active molecules produced by normal cellular metabolism and play a crucial role in the human body. In recent years, researchers have increasingly discovered that ROS plays a vital role in the progression of chronic inflammation and tumor metastasis. The inflammatory tumor microenvironment established by chronic inflammation can induce ROS production through inflammatory cells. ROS can then directly damage DNA or indirectly activate cellular signaling pathways to promote tumor metastasis and development, including breast cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, and so on. This review aims to elucidate the relationship between ROS, chronic inflammation, and tumor metastasis, explaining how chronic inflammation can induce tumor metastasis and how ROS can contribute to the evolution of chronic inflammation toward tumor metastasis. Interestingly, ROS can have a "double-edged sword" effect, promoting tumor metastasis in some cases and inhibiting it in others. This article also highlights the potential applications of ROS in inhibiting tumor metastasis and enhancing the precision of tumor-targeted therapy. Combining ROS with nanomaterials strategies may be a promising approach to enhance the efficacy of tumor treatment.

Skin metastasis of BRCA mutated prostate cancer: A case report and a brief review of literature

RATIONALE

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has a poor prognosis especially when harboring DNA damage repair gene mutations, nevertheless, in the case of pathogenic BRCA gene mutations, PARPi demonstrated a survival benefit and is a validated treatment. Nowadays, there is no data regarding unusual metastases after these drugs. Cutaneous metastases appear rarely in prostate cancer and were associated with a worse prognosis. Moreover, there are no consolidated data concerning skin tropism of prostate cancer cells, neither in the case of BRCA-associated cancers.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here, we report the case of a patient with a long history of BRCA1-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who developed a skin lesion on the scalp while on his fifth line of systemic therapy with olaparib. After a complete radical surgical excision, the pathology report showed prostate cancer localization.

DIAGNOSES

A diagnosis of skin metastasis from prostate cancer was reported.

OUTCOMES

The patient then continued olaparib therapy; after 7 months from excision, he experienced further bone and biochemical progression but not cutaneous progression.

LESSONS

A literature review of all reported cases of cutaneous metastasis in prostate cancer was conducted to shed light on the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of this entity. We also reviewed published cases of skin metastasis in BRCA-associated cancers with an effort to correlate skin involvement with PARPi treatment, BRCAness status, and prognosis.

Cancer cell-selective induction of mitochondrial stress and immunogenic cell death by PT-112 in human prostate cell lines

PT-112 is a novel immunogenic cell death (ICD)-inducing small molecule currently under Phase 2 clinical development, including in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), an immunologically cold and heterogeneous disease state in need of novel therapeutic approaches. PT-112 has been shown to cause ribosome biogenesis inhibition and organelle stress followed by ICD in cancer cells, culminating in anticancer immunity. In addition, clinical evidence of PT-112-driven immune effects has been observed in patient immunoprofiling. Given the unmet need for immune-based therapies in prostate cancer, along with a Phase I study (NCT#02266745) showing PT-112 activity in mCRPC patients, we investigated PT-112 effects in a panel of human prostate cancer cell lines. PT-112 demonstrated cancer cell selectivity, inhibiting cell growth and leading to cell death in prostate cancer cells without affecting the non-tumorigenic epithelial prostate cell line RWPE-1 at the concentrations tested. PT-112 also caused caspase-3 activation, as well as stress features in mitochondria including ROS generation, compromised membrane integrity, altered respiration, and morphological changes. Moreover, PT-112 induced damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) release, the first demonstration of ICD in human cancer cell lines, in addition to autophagy initiation across the panel. Taken together, PT-112 caused selective stress, growth inhibition and death in human prostate cancer cell lines. Our data provide additional insight into mitochondrial stress and ICD in response to PT-112. PT-112 anticancer immunogenicity could have clinical applications and is currently under investigation in a Phase 2 mCRPC study.

Germline and somatic testing for homologous repair deficiency in patients with prostate cancer (part 1 of 2)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Unfortunately, not all metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receive available life-prolonging systemic therapies, emphasizing the need to optimize mCRPC treatment selections. Better guidelines are necessary to determine genetic testing in prostate cancer.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

In this two-part expert opinion-based guide, we provide an expert consensus opinion on the utilization of germline and somatic testing to detect HRR alterations in patients with mCRPC. This guide was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel that convened in 2023-2024, including representatives from medical oncology, urology, radiation oncology, pathology, medical genomics, and basic science.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

We argue for the widespread adoption of germline testing in all patients with prostate cancer and for somatic mutations testing in patients at the time of recurrent/metastatic disease. In this first part, we review how genomic testing is performed. We also review how to overcome certain barriers to integrate genetic and biomarker testing into clinical practice.

Cancer, metastasis, and the epigenome

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide and disease burden is expected to increase globally throughout the next several decades, with the majority of cancer-related deaths occurring in metastatic disease. Cancers exhibit known hallmarks that endow them with increased survival and proliferative capacities, frequently as a result of de-stabilizing mutations. However, the genomic features that resolve metastatic clones from primary tumors are not yet well-characterized, as no mutational landscape has been identified as predictive of metastasis. Further, many cancers exhibit no known mutation signature. This suggests a larger role for non-mutational genome re-organization in promoting cancer evolution and dissemination. In this review, we highlight current critical needs for understanding cell state transitions and clonal selection advantages for metastatic cancer cells. We examine links between epigenetic states, genome structure, and misregulation of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, and discuss how recent technologies for understanding domain-scale regulation have been leveraged for a more complete picture of oncogenic and metastatic potential.

False-Positive Circulating Tumor DNA Results Do Not Explain Lack of Efficacy for PARP Inhibitors in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring ATM and CHEK2 Mutations

False-positive ctDNA results do not explain lack of efficacy for PARPi in patients with ATMm and CHEK2m CRPC.

Germline Sequencing of DNA Damage Repair Genes in Two Hereditary Prostate Cancer Cohorts Reveals New Disease Risk-Associated Gene Variants

Rare, inherited variants in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes have a recognised role in prostate cancer (PrCa) susceptibility. In addition, these genes are therapeutically targetable. While rare variants are informing clinical management in other common cancers, defining the rare disease-associated variants in PrCa has been challenging. Here, whole-genome and -exome sequencing data from two independent, high-risk Australian and North American familial PrCa datasets were interrogated for novel DDR risk variants. Rare DDR gene variants (predicted to be damaging and present in two or more family members) were identified and subsequently genotyped in 1963 individuals (700 familial and 459 sporadic PrCa cases, 482 unaffected relatives, and 322 screened controls), and association analyses accounting for relatedness (MQLS) undertaken. In the combined datasets, rare ERCC3 (rs145201970, p = 2.57 × 10-4) and BRIP1 (rs4988345, p = 0.025) variants were significantly associated with PrCa risk. A PARP2 (rs200603922, p = 0.028) variant in the Australian dataset and a MUTYH (rs36053993, p = 0.031) variant in the North American dataset were also associated with risk. Evaluation of clinicopathological characteristics provided no evidence for a younger age or higher-grade disease at diagnosis in variant carriers, which should be taken into consideration when determining genetic screening eligibility criteria for targeted, gene-based treatments in the future. This study adds valuable knowledge to our understanding of PrCa-associated DDR genes, which will underpin effective clinical screening and treatment strategies.

Novel frontiers in urogenital cancers: from molecular bases to preclinical models to tailor personalized treatments in ovarian and prostate cancer patients

Over the last few decades, the incidence of urogenital cancers has exhibited diverse trends influenced by screening programs and geographical variations. Among women, there has been a consistent or even increased occurrence of endometrial and ovarian cancers; conversely, prostate cancer remains one of the most diagnosed malignancies, with a rise in reported cases, partly due to enhanced and improved screening efforts.Simultaneously, the landscape of cancer therapeutics has undergone a remarkable evolution, encompassing the introduction of targeted therapies and significant advancements in traditional chemotherapy. Modern targeted treatments aim to selectively address the molecular aberrations driving cancer, minimizing adverse effects on normal cells. However, traditional chemotherapy retains its crucial role, offering a broad-spectrum approach that, despite its wider range of side effects, remains indispensable in the treatment of various cancers, often working synergistically with targeted therapies to enhance overall efficacy.For urogenital cancers, especially ovarian and prostate cancers, DNA damage response inhibitors, such as PARP inhibitors, have emerged as promising therapeutic avenues. In BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, PARP inhibitors like olaparib and niraparib have demonstrated efficacy, leading to their approval for specific indications. Similarly, patients with DNA damage response mutations have shown sensitivity to these agents in prostate cancer, heralding a new frontier in disease management. Furthermore, the progression of ovarian and prostate cancer is intricately linked to hormonal regulation. Ovarian cancer development has also been associated with prolonged exposure to estrogen, while testosterone and its metabolite dihydrotestosterone, can fuel the growth of prostate cancer cells. Thus, understanding the interplay between hormones, DNA damage and repair mechanisms can hold promise for exploring novel targeted therapies for ovarian and prostate tumors.In addition, it is of primary importance the use of preclinical models that mirror as close as possible the biological and genetic features of patients' tumors in order to effectively translate novel therapeutic findings "from the bench to the bedside".In summary, the complex landscape of urogenital cancers underscores the need for innovative approaches. Targeted therapy tailored to DNA repair mechanisms and hormone regulation might offer promising avenues for improving the management and outcomes for patients affected by ovarian and prostate cancers.

Efficacy of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors by Individual Genes in Homologous Recombination Repair Gene-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis

PURPOSE

We performed a pooled analysis of multiple trials of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to investigate the efficacy of PARPi in each individual homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutated (m) gene.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We pooled patient-level data from trials of PARPi in mCRPC that reported mutation status in individual HRR genes. Any HRR gene with available data across all the randomized trials of PARPi in first-line mCRPC was selected. The hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; by blinded independent review) and overall survival (OS) of a PARPi plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) relative to placebo plus an ARPI in the pool of three randomized trials in first-line mCRPC were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In ATMm (N = 268), rPFS HR was 1.05 (0.74 to 1.49) and OS HR was 1.18 (0.82 to 1.71). In BRCA1m (N = 64), rPFS HR was 0.51 (0.23 to 1.1) and OS HR was 0.74 (0.34 to 1.61). In BRCA2m (N = 422), rPFS HR was 0.31 (0.23 to 0.42) and OS HR was 0.66 (0.49 to 0.89). In CDK12m (N = 164), rPFS HR was 0.50 (0.32 to 0.80) and OS HR was 0.63 (0.39 to 0.99). In CHEK2m (N = 172), rPFS HR was 1.06 (0.67 to 1.66) and OS HR was 1.53 (0.95 to 2.46). In PALB2m (N = 41) rPFS HR was 0.52 (0.23 to 1.17) and OS HR was 0.78 (0.34 to 1.8).

CONCLUSION

In this pooled analysis, benefit from PARPi appeared greatest for patients with BRCA1m, BRCA2m, CDK12m, and PALB2m. Given limitations of this exploratory analysis, the apparent lack of benefit from PARPi in patients with CHEK2m or ATMm should be further explored in future clinical trials.

Mutational spectrum of DNA damage and mismatch repair genes in prostate cancer

Over the past few years, a number of studies have revealed that a significant number of men with prostate cancer had genetic defects in the DNA damage repair gene response and mismatch repair genes. Certain of these modifications, notably gene alterations known as homologous recombination (HRR) genes; PALB2, CHEK2 BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and genes for DNA mismatch repair (MMR); MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are connected to a higher risk of prostate cancer and more severe types of the disease. The DNA damage repair (DDR) is essential for constructing and diversifying the antigen receptor genes required for T and B cell development. But this DDR imbalance results in stress on DNA replication and transcription, accumulation of mutations, and even cell death, which compromises tissue homeostasis. Due to these impacts of DDR anomalies, tumor immunity may be impacted, which may encourage the growth of tumors, the release of inflammatory cytokines, and aberrant immune reactions. In a similar vein, people who have altered MMR gene may benefit greatly from immunotherapy. Therefore, for these treatments, mutational genetic testing is indicated. Mismatch repair gene (MMR) defects are also more prevalent than previously thought, especially in patients with metastatic disease, high Gleason scores, and diverse histologies. This review summarizes the current information on the mutation spectrum and clinical significance of DDR mechanisms, such as HRR and MMR abnormalities in prostate cancer, and explains how patient management is evolving as a result of this understanding.