Optimizing the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutations

The BRAF gene is an important signaling molecule in human cells that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. When the BRAF gene mutates, it can lead to abnormal activation of the signaling pathway, which promotes cell proliferation, inhibits cell apoptosis, and ultimately contributes to the occurrence and development of cancer. BRAF mutations are widely present in various cancers, including malignant melanoma, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hairy cell leukemia, among others. BRAF is an important target for the treatment of various solid tumors, and targeted combination therapies, represented by BRAF inhibitors, have become one of the main treatment modalities for a variety of BRAF-mutation-positive solid tumors. Dabrafenib plus trametinib, as the first tumor-agnostic therapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 years and older harboring a BRAF V600E mutation with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This is also the first time a BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination has been approved for use in pediatric patients. As research into the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF mutations advances, standardizing the detection of BRAF mutations and the clinical application of BRAF inhibitors becomes increasingly important. Therefore, we have established a universal and systematic strategy for diagnosing and treating solid tumors with BRAF mutations. In this expert consensus, we (1) summarize the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of BRAF mutations in different solid tumors, (2) provide recommendations for the selection of genetic testing methods and platforms, and (3) establish a universal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring BRAF mutations.

AKR1C4 regulates the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy through ferroptosis modulation

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health concern, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies to enhance treatment efficacy. In this study, we investigated the role of AKR1C4 in CRC and its impact on chemotherapy response.

METHODS

AKR1C4 stable knockout CRC cell lines were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The impact of AKR1C4 depletion on chemotherapy sensitivity was assessed using Sulforhodamine B assay. Long-term, low-dose drug induction with increasing concentrations of 5FU, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin were employed to establish acquired chemoresistant CRC cell lines. Ferroptosis induction and inhibition were examined through total iron content and lipid peroxidation measurements.

RESULTS

We found that AKR1C4 knockout enhances CRC cell sensitivity to chemotherapy, specifically by inducing ferroptosis. The enzymatic activity of AKR1C4 is crucial for regulating chemotherapy sensitivity in CRC cells, as evidenced by the inability of a Y55A mutant to reverse the sensitizing effect. Additionally, AKR1C4 inhibitors enhance chemotherapy sensitivity by inducing ferroptosis. Notably, AKR1C4 depletion resensitizes the acquired chemoresistant CRC cells to chemotherapy, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for overcoming acquired chemoresistance. Clinical analysis reveals that high AKR1C4 expression is associated with poor prognosis in CRC patients undergoing chemotherapy, highlighting its significance as a prognostic marker and a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

CONCLUSION

This study illuminates the multifaceted role of AKR1C4 in CRC, demonstrating its significance in regulating chemotherapy sensitivity, overcoming acquired resistance, and impacting clinical outcomes. The insights provided may pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies in CRC management.

Binimetinib in combination with nivolumab or nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously treated microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS mutations in an open-label phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND

In patients with previously treated RAS-mutated microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a multicenter open-label phase 1b/2 trial was conducted to define the safety and efficacy of the MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor binimetinib in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab (anti-PD-1) or nivolumab and another ICI, ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4).

METHODS

In phase 1b, participants were randomly assigned to Arm 1A (binimetinib 45 mg twice daily [BID] plus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks [Q4W]) or Arm 1B (binimetinib 45 mg BID plus nivolumab 480 mg Q4W and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 8 weeks [Q8W]) to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of binimetinib. The MTD/RP2D was defined as the highest dosage combination that did not cause medically unacceptable dose-limiting toxicities in more than 35% of treated participants in Cycle 1. During phase 2, participants were randomly assigned to Arm 2A (binimetinib MTD/RP2D plus nivolumab) or Arm 2B (binimetinib MTD/RP2D plus nivolumab and ipilimumab) to assess the safety and clinical activity of these combinations.

RESULTS

In phase 1b, 21 participants were randomized to Arm 1A or Arm 1B; during phase 2, 54 participants were randomized to Arm 2A or Arm 2B. The binimetinib MTD/RP2D was determined to be 45 mg BID. In phase 2, no participants receiving binimetinib plus nivolumab achieved a response. Of the 27 participants receiving binimetinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, the overall response rate was 7.4% (90% CI: 1.3, 21.5). Out of 75 participants overall, 74 (98.7%) reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs), of whom 17 (22.7%) reported treatment-related serious AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D binimetinib regimen had a safety profile similar to previous binimetinib studies or nivolumab and ipilimumab combination studies. There was a lack of clinical benefit with either drug combination. Therefore, these data do not support further development of binimetinib in combination with nivolumab or nivolumab and ipilimumab in RAS-mutated MSS mCRC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03271047 (09/01/2017).