Multidisciplinary approach and treatment of acral and mucosal melanoma

Combination Immunotherapy for Mucosal Melanoma: Molecular Mechanism, Research Status, and Future Directions

OPINION STATEMENT

Mucosal melanoma is a rare and aggressive subtype of melanoma, accounting for 1%-2% of new cases in the United States in 2023, and 20%-30% in China and other Asian countries. Its origin is often occult, with the lack of early clinical features, the absence of actionable driver mutations, and poor response to immunotherapy, all contributing to its poor prognosis. The rarity of this subtype leads to limited awareness and interventions. Furthermore, due to its immune evasion mechanisms, mucosal melanoma shows resistance to traditional immune checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes. Recent clinical trials have suggested that combination immunotherapy can overcome immune evasion, reduce resistance to treatment, produce synergistic anti-tumor effects, and improve survival. Epidemiological factors and clinical characteristics play significant roles in diagnosis and prognosis, while the mutational landscape influences responses to immunotherapy. This review provides an overview of these aspects and systematically discusses current research on combination therapies and emerging immunotherapy approaches for mucosal melanoma. It also explores potential future directions for treatment, aiming to enhance therapeutic strategies for this rare cancer and improve patient outcomes.

Fabrication and functional validation of a hybrid biomimetic nanovaccine (HBNV) against Kit K641E -mutant melanoma

Cancer nanovaccines hold the promise for personalization, precision, and pliability by integrating all the elements essential for effective immune stimulation. An effective immune response requires communication and interplay between antigen-presenting cells (APCs), tumor cells, and immune cells to stimulate, extend, and differentiate antigen-specific and non-specific anti-tumor immune cells. The versatility of nanomedicine can be adapted to deliver both immunoadjuvant payloads and antigens from the key players in immunity (i.e., APCs and tumor cells). The imperative for novel cancer medicine is particularly pressing for less common but more devastating KIT-mutated acral and mucosal melanomas that are resistant to small molecule c-kit and immune checkpoint inhibitors. To overcome this challenge, we successfully engineered nanotechnology-enabled hybrid biomimetic nanovaccine (HBNV) comprised of membrane proteins (antigens to activate immunity and homing/targeting ligand to tumor microenvironment (TME) and lymphoid organs) from fused cells (of APCs and tumor cells) and immunoadjuvant. These HBNVs are efficiently internalized to the target cells, assisted in the maturation of APCs via antigens and adjuvant, activated the release of anti-tumor cytokines/inhibited the release of immunosuppressive cytokine, showed a homotypic effect on TME and lymph nodes, activated the anti-tumor immune cells/downregulated the immunosuppressive immune cells, reprogram the tumor microenvironment, and showed successful anti-tumor therapeutic and prophylactic effects.

Acral Melanoma in Skin of Color: Current Insights and Future Directions: A Narrative Review

Acral melanoma (AM), also known as acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), is a rare subtype of melanoma that predominantly occurs on the palms, soles, and nail beds (Figure 1) [...].

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2024

A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to two-centimeter safety margins. For a correct stage classification and treatment decision, a sentinel lymph node biopsy shall be offered in patients with tumor thickness ≥ 1.0 mm or ≥ 0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("Tumor Board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in completely resected stage IIB-IV. In stage II only PD-1 inhibitors are approved. In stage III anti-PD-1 therapy or dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAFV600 mutated melanoma can be discussed. In resected stage IV, nivolumab can be offered, as well as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in selected, high-risk patients. In patients with clinically detected macroscopic, resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy according to pathological response and BRAF status can be offered. Neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab followed by complete surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab is also recommended. For patients with disease recurrence after (neo) adjuvant therapy, further treatment should consider the type of (neo) adjuvant therapy received as well as the time of recurrence, i.e., on or off therapy. In patients with irresectable stage III/IV disease systemic treatment is always indicated. For first line treatment PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 or LAG-3 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAFV600 mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy, in selected cases. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAFV600 mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second line. Other second line therapies include therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors not used in first line. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Is primary breast melanoma a true pathological entity? The argument against it

Background

Previous studies have reported cases of primary melanoma of the breast parenchyma (PMBP), but the pathogenesis of this disease remains poorly understood. We review the presentation and outcomes of reported cases and provide detailed pathological analysis of four additional cases. Furthermore, we discuss potential theories regarding the pathogenesis of this clinical presentation.

Results

We identified 29 published studies (n = 95 patients) and report four new cases (n = 99). Ninety-one (92 %) patients were female, with a median age of 50 years. Previous skin melanomas were reported by 56 % of patients, with the trunk being the most common location (32.7 %) followed by the upper extremities (20 %). The most common tumor location reported (n = 73) was the right (49 %) upper outer quadrant (56 %). The median time from skin melanoma diagnosis to the presence of a breast mass was 65 months (1-192). Nodal status at presentation was reported in n = 67 (68 %) patients. Of these, positive nodal metastases were seen in 40.3 %, while distant metastatic disease at presentation was reported in 30 % of patients. Surgery was performed in 66 %, being partial mastectomy (PM) the most common procedure in 82 %. Adjuvant therapy was described in 38 patients. The reported (n = 12) median survival was 11.5 (1-70) months.

Conclusion

Melanomas identified in the breast parenchyma are likely the result of nodal or hematogenous spread from previously known or unknown melanomas, and should not be considered as PMBP. Management should be multidisciplinary, including surgical excision aimed at obtaining negative margins with lymphadenectomy of clinically positive nodes and neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy.