Sacral Curvature in Addition to Sacral Ratio to Assess Sacral Development and the Association With the Type of Anorectal Malformations

Urogenital anomalies in children with anorectal malformations: a single institution observational study

Introduction

Anorectal malformations (ARM) consist of a range of anomalies that occur in approximately 3.5 in 10,000 live births. Though variable, about half of these patients present with an associated genitourinary abnormality. Considering this high prevalence, this study aimed to assess the specific occurrence of urogenital anomalies in patients with anorectal malformations.

Methods

An institution-based observational study was conducted on 156 patients with anorectal malformation, all of whom were screened for urogenital anomalies. Data were collected using a pre-structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS (IBM) Version 26 software. Relevant statistical analysis was performed, and the results are presented in tables.

Results and discussion

Of the 156 patients with ARM studied for associated urogenital anomalies, 91 (58.3%) were females with a male-to-female ratio of 0.7:1 and a median age of 12 months (IQR = 1-24). Forty-six of them (29.5%) had urogenital anomalies, of whom 22 (14.1%) had isolated urologic anomalies and 20 (12.8%) had both urologic and genital anomalies. Renal anomalies were found in 34 (21.8%) patients. The association between gender and genital anomalies was significant, χ 2 (1), N = 156 = 4.09, p = 0.04. The type of ARM has a highly significant association with genital anomalies χ 2 (11), N = 156 = 21.95, p = 0.009. Males were less likely to exhibit urogenital anomalies [OR = 0.386, 95% CI (0.15-0.995), p = 0.048]. Children with complex ARM have 3.4 times genital and 2.3 times urinary anomalies than less complex forms. In summary, urogenital anomalies are the most common anomalies occurring in association with anorectal malformation. Genital anomalies have an association with gender with more occurrence in females. Children with complex anorectal malformations have a higher chance of urogenital anomalies.

Determination of voiding pressure in infants with normal lower urinary tracts: Exploring the possible effect of sacral development

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between sacral underdevelopment, as defined by subnormal sacral ratio (SR) measurements, with increased maximum detrusor voiding pressure (P det. Max) in infants.

METHODS

In this 2007-2015 retrospective cohort study, the medical records of all infants who underwent a pyeloplasty due to congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction were added. Their P det. Max was evaluated through the suprapubic catheter utilized for urinary drainage intraoperatively, without imposing any additional risk of urethral catheterization on the infant. SR was calculated via the plain kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) radiography film obtained during the voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) evaluation before the surgery. Participants were categorized into SR < 0.74 or SR ≥ 0.74. P det. Max was subsequently compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were included in our analysis. Twenty-eight (62.2%) patients had a (SR < 0.74), while 17 (37.8%) had a (SR ≥ 0.74). P det. Max was shown to be significantly higher in the SR < 0.74 compared to the SR ≥ 0.74 group (167.5 ± 60.8 vs. 55.7 ± 17.9 cmH2O, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age and sex, SR remained a significant contributor to P det. Max (p < 0.001). Physiologic detrusor sphincter dyscoordination (PDSD) rate was significantly higher in the SR < 0.74 versus SR ≥ 0.74 group (100.0% vs. 70.6%, respectively; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Lumbosacral underdevelopment, as indicated by subnormal sacral ratios, is associated with sphincter-detrusor dyscoordination, which causes PDSD and can ultimately result in higher P det. Max in infants.

Does sacral ratio have any impact on success rate of biofeedback therapy in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction?

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the possible impact of patients' sacral ratios (SRs) on response to biofeedback (BF) therapy in pediatric patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort conducted from 2016 to 2018 in our tertiary medical center, we included the medical records of all pediatric patients with LUTD who were nominated for BF due to having abnormal uroflowmetry patterns and simultaneous increase in electromyography (EMG) activity. Ten sessions of weekly animated BF were performed for each patient. All patients underwent a complete urological evaluation, uroflowmetry with simultaneous EMG and post-void residual measurement before and after treatment. SRs were calculated based on plain anteroposterior lumbosacral radiographs. Patients were then divided into normal SR (≥0.74) and low SR (<0.74) and outcomes were compared between them.

RESULTS

Of the total 86 patients included in our study, 48 (55.8%) had a normal SR (≥0.74), while 38 (44.2%) had a low SR (<0.74). Our data revealed that BF therapy significantly improved maximum and average urinary flow rates, urine volume, daytime urinary incontinence, enuresis, urinary urgency and constipation; irrespective of the patients' SRs (all P < 0.001). Our between-groups analyses showed that after the completion of BF, the SR ≥ 0.74 group had significantly higher maximum urinary flow rate (mean difference [95%CI]: 7.7 [5.4, 10.0], P < 0.001) (Figure) and urine volume (mean difference [95%CI]: 49.9 [19.5, 80.4], P = 0.002) and significantly lower diurnal urinary incontinence (4.2% vs. 21.1%, P = 0.020), enuresis (4.2% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.040) and constipation (2.1% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.004) compared to the SR < 0.74 group.

DISCUSSION

SR has been proposed as a reliable indicator of bony pelvis growth and subsequent lumbosacral neurodevelopment. Additionally, larger SR values are associated with better postoperative sphincter function in children with urological and anorectal malformations. Our results demonstrated that after completion of BF, the normal SR group had a significantly better improvement of some of the uroflowmetry indicators and LUTD-associated symptoms compared to the low SR group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings implied that although BF therapy is an efficient treatment for children with LUTD, irrespective of their sacral development; children with enhanced sacral development may benefit from better clinical response, especially in terms of LUTD-associated symptoms.

Correlation between congenital pelvic floor muscle development assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative defecation

OBJECTIVE

Children with congenital anorectal malformation (CAM) experience challenges with defecation. This study aims to assess defecation in preschool-age children with CAM and to evaluate the correlation between pelvic floor muscle developed assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and postoperative defecation.

METHODS

We collected clinical data and MRI results from 89 male children with CAM. The bowel function scores for children with Perineal (cutaneous) fistula, Rectourethral fistula(Prostatic or Bulbar), and Rectovesical fistula were computed. MRI scans were subjected to image analysis of the striated muscle complex (SMC). The association between pelvic floor muscle score and bowel function score was examined using the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test.

RESULTS

We observed that 77.4% of the SMC scores by MRI for Perineal fistula were good. The Rectourethral fistula SMC score was 40.6% for moderate and 59.4% for poor. The SMC score for Rectovesical fistula was 100% for moderate. Furthermore, 77.4% of patients with Perineal fistula had bowel function scores (BFS) ≥ 17 points. Among those with Rectourethral fistula and Rectovesical fistula, 12.5% and 0 had BFS ≥ 17 points, respectively. An analysis of muscle development and bowel function in patients with Rectovesical fistula, Rectourethral fistula, and Perineal fistula revealed a correlation between SMC development and BFS. Subgroup analysis showed that the Perineal fistula had statistical significance; however, the Rectourethral fistula and Rectovesical fistula were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

A correlation exists between pelvic floor muscle development and postoperative defecation in children with Perineal fistula.

Bowel function and features of bowel dysfunction in preschool children with anorectal malformation type rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistula

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) of the rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistula type (RPF/RVF) generally have a good prognosis but may be accompanied by bowel dysfunction, especially constipation. Bowel dysfunction in preschoolers may persist into adolescence and adulthood, exerting a negative effect on their quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate bowel function and identify the features of bowel dysfunction in preschoolers with RPF/RVF across type and sex differences. A total of 159 preschoolers with RPF/RVF (male RPF group, n = 95; female RPF group, n = 26; RVF, n = 38) and 128 normal control preschoolers (control group, n = 128; female control group, n = 35), according to the bowel function score (BFS) obtained through a questionnaire survey, the BFS items in the questionnaire, and the clinical characteristics of patients were compared among groups. The rates of bowel dysfunction (BFS < 17) were 27.2% and 50.0% in the RPF and RVF groups, respectively. Normal rates of BFS items, namely, ability to hold back defecation, feels/reports of the urge to defecate, frequency of defecation, and constipation, in the RPF and RVF groups were significantly lower than those in the control and female control groups (all p < 0.05). After subgroup analysis among the male RPF, female RPF, and RVF groups, higher rates of normal bowel function and ability to hold back defecation were found in the male RPF group than in the female RPF and RVF groups (p < 0.05). Normal rates of feels/reports of the urge to defecate were higher in the male and female RPF groups than in the RVF group (all p < 0.05). The rate of never soiling in the male RPF group was significantly higher than that in the RVF group (p < 0.05).  Conclusions: In patients with RPF/RVF, bowel dysfunction is still prevalent, characterized by inadequate ability to hold back defecation, inability to feel/report the urge to defecate, soil, less frequent defecation, and constipation. However, male RPF patients had better overall bowel function than female RPF or RVF patients, including more adequate ability to hold back defecation and feels/reports of the urge to defecate and slighter soiling, which may be linked to early age at surgery, low occurrences of low sacral ratio, and tethered cord in male RPF.  Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 09/01/2023 (NCT05716230). What is Known: • Rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistula (RPF/RVF) of the anorectal malformation (ARM) type has a good prognosis but may cause bowel dysfunction, especially constipation. • Bowel dysfunction at preschool age may lead to social and psychological disorders that undermine the quality of life in adolescence and adulthood. What is New: • Bowel function in preschoolers with RPF/RVF was deeply evaluated in a relatively large number of patients and normal control children. • Features of bowel dysfunction in RPF/RVF preschoolers across type and gender differences were identified in this study.

Evaluation of Anal Sphincter with High Resolution Anorectal Manometry and 3D Reconstruction in Patients with Anorectal Malformation

BACKGROUND

Patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) need long-term follow-up, in order to evaluate fecal continence; the main predictors of longer-term success are the type of ARM, associated anomalies and sacral integrity. Three-Dimensional High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (3D-HRAM) gives detailed information on pressure on the anal complex profile. Our objective was to analyze anal sphincter activity in ARM patients with 3D-HRAM establishing the correlation between manometric and clinical data.

METHODS

Forty ARM patients were submitted to 3D-HRAM: manometric, anatomical and clinical scores were correlated with each other and with the bowel management response (BM).

RESULTS

A positive correlation between all scores and types of ARM was found: in high ARM and in patients with spinal anomalies (regardless to ARM type) lower scores were reported and even after BM they did not achieve good continence.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-HRAM gives detailed data on the functional activity of the anal sphincter complex. Our study revealed a correlation between manometric parameters and clinical outcomes, confirming spinal malformations and ARM type as the most important prognostic risk factors for a bad outcome. Specific sphincteric defects can also be explored with manometry, allowing for tailored bowel management strategies.