Pérez CAZ, Toro-Monjaraz EM, Nurko S, Pérez-González O, Cadena-León J, Ignorosa-Arellano K, Cervantes-Bustamante R, Ramirez-Mayans J, Montijo Barrios E, Zárate-Mondragón F. Use of Digital Rectal Exam Compared With High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry in the Diagnosis of Dyssynergic Defecation in Pediatrics.
Neurogastroenterol Motil 2025:e70061. [PMID:
40273317 DOI:
10.1111/nmo.70061]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2025] [Accepted: 04/09/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Currently, high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) is the only way to confirm the diagnosis of defecatory dyssynergia; however, it has limitations in pediatric patients. Digital rectal examination (DRE) may suggest the presence of defecatory dyssynergia based on clinical findings, but it is not a definitive diagnostic method. Its role in pediatric patients remains unexplored. The objective of this study was to determine the usefulness of DRE as a diagnostic test for dyssynergic defecation in pediatric patients compared with HRAM.
METHODS
Patients aged 5-18 years who were referred for HRAM in a third-level hospital in Mexico City between March 2022 and September 2022 were included. Altered propulsion or impaired push effort was considered a suggestive diagnosis of dyssynergia by DRE. The results were compared with those obtained using HRAM.
RESULTS
Forty-two patients were included, of whom 50% were male, with a median age of 10.68 years (standard deviation [SD] 3.23). Dyssynergia was diagnosed by DRE in 21 patients (50%) and by HRAM in 21 patients (50%). A sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 66% were calculated for the alteration of rectal propulsion in DRE as suggestive of dyssynergia when compared to HRAM. A positive predictive value of 66% and a negative predictive value of 66% were calculated.
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES
The sensitivity and specificity of DRE for the diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation were lower than those reported for adults (75% and 85%, respectively). In some cases, DRE would be useful, especially in low-resource scenarios where HRAM is not available, and we recommend DRE prior to HRAM as a complementary approach to dyssynergic defecation.
Collapse