How to Choose the Correct Drug in Severe Pediatric Asthma

A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Serum NFATc3 Levels in Pediatric Patients with Bronchial Asthma: A Prospective Observational Case-Control Investigation

The early and precise diagnosis of asthma significantly impacts the long-term health outcomes of pediatric patients. The sensitivity and specificity of current biomarkers, however, are frequently limited. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 3 (NFATc3), in pediatric bronchial asthma, focusing on its diagnostic and prognostic value for disease severity and recurrence. This observational, prospective case-control study involved 200 pediatric patients with bronchial asthma and 200 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, from January 2020 to January 2023. Follow-up varied from 1 to 3 years. We measured levels of NFATc3 and inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and TNF-α via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. NFATc3 and IL-1β levels at enrollment were markedly higher in patients with acute exacerbations and those classified as severe, compared with their less severe counterparts. Throughout the study, NFATc3, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels significantly increased in severe or acutely exacerbating cases. The diagnostic value of NFATc3 was assessed through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, which showed its potential in diagnosing bronchial asthma and identifying severe cases. Spearman's analysis confirmed positive associations between peak NFATc3 and cytokine levels. Importantly, disease type, NFATc3 values at enrollment, as well as peak IL-6 levels were identified as independent risk factors for severe bronchial asthma. Elevated NFATc3 is linked with the severity of pediatric bronchial asthma and serves as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and severity prediction, emphasizing its role in guiding treatment strategies.

Biological treatments in childhood asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to update the information currently available for the use of biologics in severe asthma in children, in order to facilitate their prescription as far as possible.

RECENT FINDINGS

The appearance of biologics for the treatment of severe asthma has meant a revolutionary change in the therapeutic approach to this disease. Currently, five biologics have been approved for severe asthma in children and/or adolescents by the regulatory agencies: omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab and tezepelumab. But despite their positive results in terms of efficacy, there are still relevant points of debate that should induce caution when selecting the most appropriate biologic in a child with severe asthma. Indeed, safety is essential and, for several of the existing treatments, the availability of medium-term to long-term data in this regard is scarce.

SUMMARY

The use of biologics can facilitate the therapeutic paradigm shift from pleiotropic treatments to personalized medicine. However, the choice of the most appropriate biologics remains a pending issue. On the other hand, to the extent that several of the biologics have been available for a relatively short time, the most robust evidence in terms of efficacy and safety in children is that of omalizumab.

Biologics in severe asthma: A pragmatic approach for choosing the right treatment for the right patient

The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research.

[Diagnosis and treatment of asthma: a guideline for respiratory specialists 2023 - published by the German Respiratory Society (DGP) e. V.]

The management of asthma has fundamentally changed during the past decades. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma was developed for respiratory specialists who need detailed and evidence-based information on the new diagnostic and therapeutic options in asthma. The guideline shows the new role of biomarkers, especially blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO), in diagnostic algorithms of asthma. Of note, this guideline is the first worldwide to announce symptom prevention and asthma remission as the ultimate goals of asthma treatment, which can be achieved by using individually tailored, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs such as inhaled steroids, allergen immunotherapy or biologics. In addition, the central role of the treatment of comorbidities is emphasized. Finally, the document addresses several challenges in asthma management, including asthma treatment during pregnancy, treatment of severe asthma or the diagnosis and treatment of work-related asthma.

Severe pediatric asthma endotypes: current limits and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Although rare, pediatric severe therapy-resistant asthma (STRA) is a highly heterogeneous, resource-demanding disease that differs significantly from severe adult asthma and whose pathogenesis is still poorly understood.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the latest 10 years of English-written studies defining pediatric STRA endotypes using lung-specific techniques such as bronchoalveolar lavage and endobronchial biopsy. Results of the studies and limits on the field are discussed, together with some future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Over the years, it has become increasingly clear that 'one size does not fit all" in asthma. However, "Does an extremely tailored size fit more than one?'. Only using multicentric, longitudinal pediatric studies, will we be able to answer. Three issues could be particularly critical for future research. First, to provide, if existing, a distinction between prepuberal STRA and puberal STRA endotypes to understand the transition from pediatric to adult STRA and to design effective, tailored therapies in adolescents, usually suffering from poorer asthma control. Second, design early treatments for pediatric airway remodeling to preserve lifelong good lung function. Finally, to better characterize inflammation before and during biological therapies, to provide clues on whether to stop or change treatments.

Defining response to therapy with biologics in severe asthma: from global evaluation to super response and remission

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, monoclonal antibodies targeting Type-2 inflammatory pathways have been developed for severe asthma treatment. However, even when patients are carefully selected, the response to treatment varies.

AREAS COVERED

Different studies have evaluated response to therapy with biologics such as exacerbation reduction, symptom improvement, pulmonary function increase, improvement in QoL, or decrease of oral corticosteroids, showing that all patients do not respond to all disease aspects and leading to an extensive debate regarding the definition of response.

EXPERT OPINION

Assessing response to therapy is of great importance, but since there is no uniform definition of treatment response, the recognition of patients who really benefit from these therapies remains an unmet need. In the same context, identifying non-responding patients in which biologic therapy should be switched or substituted by alternative treatment options is of paramount importance. In this review, we present the road trip of the definition of therapeutic response to biologics in severe asthmatics by presenting the current relevant medical literature. We also present the suggested predictors of response, with an emphasis on the so-called super-responders. Finally, we discuss the recent insights regarding asthma remission as a feasible treatment goal and provide a simple algorithm for the evaluation of response.