Vertebral body tethering: An alternative to posterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis?

Reducing postoperative morbidity by diminishing chest tube drainage utilizing tranexamic acid following vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical option for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) that requires a postoperative (PO) chest tube. This study evaluates whether 48 h of PO TXA reduces chest tube (CT) drainage and retention compared to 24 h of TXA following VBT for AIS.

METHODS

Consecutively treated patients with a diagnosis of AIS who underwent VBT were assessed. Thirty-eight patients who received 48 h of PO IV TXA (48-TXA) were compared to 35 VBT patients who received 24 h of PO IV TXA (24-TXA) and 48 patients who did not receive TXA (non-TXA). TXA use in thoracic CT and thoracolumbar CT drainages were also assessed separately. Group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographics between groups. TXA significantly reduced CT drainage (p < 0.001) and retention (p < 0.001), with no differences between 24-TXA and 48-TXA (p = 0.88). Sub-analyses showed that both 24-TXA and 48-TXA reduced thoracic CT drainage (p = 0.002, p = 0.02) and retention time (p = 0.04, p = 0.007) compared to non-TXA, respectively. For thoracolumbar CT, differences were observed only between 24-TXA and non-TXA (p = 0.01, p = 0.03). TXA was an independent predictor of reduced CT drainage (p < 0.001) and retention (p < 0.001). Hospital stay, ICU stay, and complications didn't differ between TXA groups (p > 0.9, p = 0.4), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous TXA reduces CT drainage and retention after VBT for AIS for thoracic CTs. There was no additional benefit of 48-TXA over 24-TXA in decreasing overall drainage and CT retention time.

Posterior spinal fusion versus vertebral body tethering for paediatric scoliosis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is currently the gold standard technique for surgical correction of scoliosis however, there is a growing interest in non-fusion techniques like vertebral body tethering (VBT). The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes between PSF and VBT.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines with a search of the following databases to identify all comparative studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).

RESULTS

A total of 11 comparative studies with 1112 patients were included. PSF offered significantly greater percentage coronal curve correction postoperatively (P = 0.0001) and at 2 years (P < 0.00001). Time to revision (P = 0.03), number of instrumented levels (P < 0.0001), estimated blood loss (EBL) (P = 0.001), operation duration (OD) (P < 0.00001) and postoperative shoulder height difference (P < 0.00001) were significantly greater in the PSF group. Odds of unplanned surgical revisions were lower in the PSF group (P < 0.0001). Secondary outcome data showed that VBT patients had significantly lower preoperative cobb angles (P < 0.00001), a younger age at surgery (P = 0.002), less postoperative pain (P = 0.002) and lower opioid consumption (P = 0.02). VBT tether breakage events were reported at rates of 13-23%. VBT also offered faster return to sports and greater lumbar flexibility. No significant difference was seen in length of hospital stay (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PSF and VBT are viable treatment options with different pros and cons. Choice of treatment should consider individual patient characteristics and daily requirements.

How Long Can You Delay? Curve Progression While Awaiting Vertebral Body Tethering Surgery

Background: The implications of delaying surgical intervention for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) wishing to undergo vertebral body tethering (VBT) have not yet been explored. It is important to understand how these delays can impact surgical planning and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review that analyzed all AIS patients treated between 2015 and 2021 at a single tertiary center. Time to surgery from initial surgical consultation and ultimate surgical plan were assessed. Patient characteristics, potential risk factors associated with increased curve progression, and reasons for delay were also analyzed. Results: 174 patients were evaluated and 95 were scheduled for VBT. Four patients later required a change to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) due to excessive curve progression. Patients requiring PSF were shown to have significantly longer delays than those who received VBT. Additionally, longer delays, younger age, greater curve progression, and lower skeletal maturity were correlated with significant curve progression (≥5 degrees). Conclusions: Surgical delays for AIS patients awaiting VBT may lead to significant curve progression and necessitate more invasive procedures. Patients with longer delays experienced an increased risk of needing PSF instead of VBT. Of those requiring PSF, the majority were due to insurance denials. Optimizing surgical timing and shared decision-making among patients, families, and healthcare providers are essential for achieving the best outcomes.

Spinal Orthosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Overview of the Braces Provided by the National Health Service in Italy

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a lateral, rotated curvature of the spine. It is a 3-dimensional deformity that arises in otherwise healthy children at or around puberty. AIS is the most common form of scoliosis in the pediatric population. The etiology is multifactorial, including genetic and environmental factors. The incidence is roughly equal between males and females, while there is a higher risk of progression in females. Guidelines for AIS treatment identify three levels of treatment: observation, physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises, and braces. In this paper, we carried out a review of the scientific literature about the indication and success rates of the braces provided for free by the National Health Service in Italy (SSN). Despite a general consensus on the efficacy of rigid bracing treatment and its use in AIS, an important heterogeneity about the treatment is present in the scientific literature, demonstrating a high degree of variability. The overall success rate of the braces provided by the SSN is high, suggesting an important therapeutic role in the treatment of AIS. Robust guidelines are needed to ensure uniform and effective treatments.