Urine Assay to Measure Tenofovir Concentrations in Patients Taking Tenofovir Alafenamide

Tenofovir, emtricitabine, lamivudine and dolutegravir concentrations in plasma and urine following drug intake cessation in a randomized controlled directly observed pharmacokinetic trial to aid point-of-care testing

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to ART and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can impact patient and public health. Point-of-care testing (POCT) may aid monitoring and adherence interventions.

OBJECTIVES

We report the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir [dosed as tenofovir disoproxil (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)], emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) in plasma and urine following drug cessation to evaluate adherence targets in urine for POCT.

METHODS

Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive DTG/FTC/TAF or DTG/3TC/TDF for 15 days. Plasma and spot urine were collected on Day 15 (0-336 h post final dose). Drug concentrations were quantified using LC-MS, and non-linear mixed-effects models applied to determine drug disposition between matrices and relationship with relevant plasma [dolutegravir protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (PA-IC90 = 64 ng/mL) and minimum effective concentration (MEC = 324 ng/mL)] and urinary thresholds [tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 1500 ng/mL].

RESULTS

Of 30 individuals enrolled, 29 were included (72% female at birth, 90% Caucasian). Median (range) predicted time to plasma dolutegravir PA-IC90 and MEC were 83.5 (41.0-152) and 49.0 h (23.7-78.9), corresponding to geometric mean (90%) urine concentrations of 5.42 (4.37-6.46) and 27.4 ng/mL (22.1-32.7). Tenofovir in urine reached 1500 ng/mL by 101 h (58.6-205) with an equivalent plasma concentration of 6.20 ng/mL (4.21-8.18).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support use of a urinary tenofovir threshold of <1500 ng/mL (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimens) as a marker of three or more missed doses for a POCT platform. However, due to low dolutegravir concentrations in urine, POCT would be limited to a readout of recent dolutegravir intake (one missed dose).

Sample Matrices for Mass Spectrometry-Based Adherence Monitoring: A Systematic Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Analytical monitoring of adherence using mass spectrometry (MS) plays an important role in clinical toxicology. Unambiguous detection of drugs (of abuse) and/or their metabolites in body fluids is needed to monitor intake of medication as prescribed or to monitor abstinence as a follow-up to detoxification procedures. This study focused on the advantages and disadvantages of different sample matrices used for MS-based adherence monitoring.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified through a literature search in the PubMed database. English articles published between January 01, 2017, and December 31, 2022, were selected using the keywords "adherence assess*" or "adherence monit*" or "compliance assess*" or "compliance monit*" in combination with "mass spectrom*" in the title or abstract.

RESULTS

A total of 51 articles were identified, 37 of which were within the scope of this study. MS-based monitoring was shown to improve patient adherence to prescribed drugs. However, MS analysis may not be able to assess whether treatment was rigorously followed beyond the last few days before the sampling event, except when hair is the sample matrix. For medication adherence monitoring, blood-based analyses may be preferred because reference plasma concentrations are usually available, whereas for abstinence control, urine and hair samples have the advantage of extended detection windows compared with blood. Alternative sample matrices, such as dried blood samples, oral fluid, and exhaled breath, are suitable for at-home sampling; however, little information is available regarding the pharmacokinetics and reference ranges of drug (of abuse) concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Each sample matrix has strengths and weaknesses, and no single sample matrix can be considered the gold standard for monitoring adherence. It is important to have sufficient information regarding the pharmacokinetics of target substances to select a sample matrix in accordance with the desired purpose.

Urine Tenofovir Levels Strongly Correlate With Virologic Suppression in Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based Antiretroviral Therapy

We found that urine tenofovir (TFV) levels >1500 ng/mL strongly predict virologic suppression among people with human immunodeficiency virus taking tenofovir alafenamide (odds ratio, 5.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-20.14; P = .007). This suggests an existing point-of-care assay developed for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate will support adherence monitoring for patients on all TFV-based antiretrovirals.

Determining the acceptability of point-of-care urine tenofovir testing and its performance in predicting HIV RNA suppression

BACKGROUND

The detection of tenofovir (TFV) metabolites by point-of-care (POC) urine lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) indicates adherence to tenofovir-containing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. However, the association between urine TFV metabolites as detected by LFIA and HIV viral load suppression in people receiving TFV-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is unknown as is patient and clinician acceptability of POC urine LFIA testing in clinical practice in low- and middle-income country settings.

METHODS

We enrolled 409 people living with HIV from two HIV clinics in Lesotho and investigated the performance of POC urine LFIA TFV testing in predicting viral suppression. We interviewed 12 study participants and conducted a focus-group discussion with 5 clinicians to gather opinions on POC urine TFV testing.

RESULTS

Using a viral load threshold of 1000 copies/mL, 398 (98%) participants were virologically suppressed, and 8 were viremic. Tenofovir was detected in the urine of 405 (99%) participants. The sensitivity of the POC urine LFIA test in detecting TFV in participants with viral suppression was 99.3% (95% CI: 97.8-99.8); the specificity was 12.5% (95% CI: 0.3-52.6). The positive and negative predictive values were 98.3% and 25%, respectively. Point-of-care urine TFV testing was viewed favorably by both participants and clinicians. However, clinicians stated that the 2-3-days detection window of the assay studied limits adherence categorization.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, urine POC TFV testing demonstrated high sensitivity in predicting viral suppression, but low specificity and negative predictive value. Urine POC TFV testing was highly acceptable to participants and clinicians; however, clinicians expressed concern about its clinical utility because of its limitations. While further research is needed to assess performance in less adherent populations, this test may support adherence counseling in some clinical settings.

Brief Report: No Difference in Urine Tenofovir Levels in Patients Living With HIV on Unboosted Versus Dose-Adjusted Boosted Tenofovir Alafenamide

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is increasingly used in HIV treatment, with or without agents that require pharmacologic boosters such as ritonavir/cobicistat. Boosters increase TAF levels, so the TAF dose is lowered in single-pill combinations. We hypothesized that individuals on dose-adjusted boosted TAF would have similar urine tenofovir (TFV) concentrations to those on unboosted TAF.

SETTING/METHODS

We collected urine samples from patients with HIV on TAF, with evidence of virologic suppression and high self-reported adherence at 2 San Francisco clinics from June 2019 to January 2020. We measured urine TFV levels by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and used linear regression to compare natural log-transformed urine TFV levels for patients on boosted versus unboosted TAF.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 30 patients on unboosted TAF (25 mg daily TAF) and 15 on boosted TAF (12 on 10 mg daily TAF and 3 on 25 mg daily TAF). Patients on unboosted vs. boosted TAF had similar baseline age, weight, sex, and creatinine. In unadjusted univariate linear regression, there were no significant differences in urine TFV levels based on presence/absence of boosting after TAF dose reduction to 10 mg (geometric mean ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 2.16). This finding was unchanged in adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in urine TFV levels were seen for patients on unboosted vs. boosted dose-reduced TAF. These results have important implications for our forthcoming point-of-care urine immunoassay for TAF, implying that separate adherence cutoffs will not be necessary for patients on boosters and dose-reduced TAF. A single POC TAF immunoassay will, thus, support monitoring on most TAF-based antiretroviral therapy.

Tenofovir alafenamide nephrotoxicity: a case report and literature review

Background

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), has become the preferred drug for the treatment of HIV-1 and chronic hepatitis B infection in clinical practice. Results from clinical trials showed that it had better renal and bone mineral outcomes compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). However, as we have seen with TDF, side effects from the new medication can be more prevalent and recognized after extensive use in real world situations. Sporadic cases of acute kidney injury in patients using TAF have started to emerge.

Case presentation

We report a case of 49-year-old Thai, HIV treatment-experienced female with hypertension presented with worsening renal function after switching her antiretroviral regimen from TDF, emtricitabine (FTC), and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) to TAF, FTC and dolutegravir (DTG) for 3 months. Kidney biopsy showed distinctive picture of tenofovir nephrotoxicity with acute tubular injury and mitochondrial injury. The possible causes of acute kidney injury and nephrotoxicity from TAF for this patient were discussed. We have extensively reviewed all published case reports of TAF-associated nephrotoxicity and summarized the essential information in this article.

Conclusion

Although TAF has less nephrotoxicity compared with TDF; renal function should always be monitored after the initiation of both drugs. Future large cohort studies are required to identify the risk factors of TAF-associated nephrotoxicity and to design an effective preventive strategy.

Lower Urine Tenofovir Concentrations Among Individuals Taking Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Implications for Point-of-Care Testing

From directly observed therapy studies, urine tenofovir (TFV) levels were 74% lower when taking tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Urine TFV remains quantifiable across a range of TAF adherence patterns, but a separate point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay with a lower TFV threshold will be needed to support TAF adherence monitoring.

Real-Time Monitoring and Point-of-Care Testing: A Review of the Current Landscape of PrEP Adherence Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Despite pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) being highly effective at preventing HIV, HIV infections among individuals prescribed PrEP continue to occur. The vast majority of these new infections occur among individuals with sub-optimal adherence. One factor that is likely to decrease HIV incidence among PrEP users is a real-time, objective measurement of adherence. Monitoring adherence to PrEP can identify those at risk of becoming lost to follow-up and therefore at greater risk of HIV infection, those in need of additional layers of support to overcome barriers to PrEP, and individuals who need enhanced adherence support.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews subjective and objective methods for monitoring PrEP including self-report, drug level monitoring (including serum, plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMC], red blood cell dried blood spots [DBS], hair, and urine) and by measuring participant interaction with the study drug (pill counts, medication event monitoring systems [MEMS] caps).

CLINICAL USE

A multitude of methods exist for monitoring and supporting adherence. Objective monitoring using DBS and urine will provide a more accurate picture of adherence compared to subjective and non-biomarker objective methods. Preliminary data show that detection of non-adherence using biomarkers, followed by augmented adherence support and counseling, is associated with improved adherence, although more research is needed. PrEP providers will need knowledge of and access to these various strategies, which will require investment and resource allocation from clinics and other PrEP care sites to provide these tools.

Monoclonal antibodies with subnanomolar affinity to tenofovir for monitoring adherence to antiretroviral therapies: from hapten synthesis to prototype development

Approximately 32 million people have died of HIV infection since the beginning of the outbreak, and 38 million are currently infected. Among strategies adopted by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS to end the AIDS global epidemic, the treatment, diagnosis, and viral suppression of the infected subjects are considered crucial for HIV prevention and transmission. Although several antiretroviral (ARV) drugs are successfully used to manage HIV infection, their efficacy strictly relies on perfect adherence to the therapy, which is seldom achieved. Patient supervision, especially in HIV-endemic, low-resource settings, requires rapid, easy-to-use, and affordable analytical tools, such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and especially the lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA). In this work, high-affinity monoclonal antibodies were generated to develop ELISA and LFIA prototypes for monitoring tenofovir (TFV), an ARV drug present in several HIV treatments. TFV was functionalized by inserting a carboxylated C5-linker at the phosphonic group of the molecule, and the synthetic derivative was conjugated to proteins for mice immunization. Through a rigorous screening strategy of hybridoma supernatants, a panel of monoclonal antibodies strongly binding to TFV was obtained. Following antibody characterization for affinity and selectivity by competitive ELISA, a LFIA prototype was developed and tentatively applied to determine TFV in simulated urine. The point-of-care test showed ultra-high detectability (the visual limit of detection was 2.5 nM, 1.4 ng mL^-1), excellent selectivity, and limited proneness to matrix interference, thus potentially making this rapid method a valuable tool for the on-site assessment of patient adherence to ARV therapy.