Toxicity of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hematological Malignancies

Haematological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in digestive system tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the hematologic toxicity profiles, toxicity spectrum, and safety rankings of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for digestive system tumors. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was anemia, while secondary outcomes included neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased, leukopenia, white blood cell (WBC) count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and febrile neutropenia (FN). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type, country category, study phase, ICI regimen, control group, chemotherapy regimen, ICI plus different chemotherapy regimens. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data according to pre-specified criteria, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.4 software was utilized to visualize the risk of bias assessments. Stata 16.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. 25 phase II and III RCTs (n = 15216) were included. The general safety of ICIs ranked from high to low for grade 1-5 anemia were as follows: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab. For grade 3-5 anemia, the general safety profile of the ICIs were as follows, from highest to lowest: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, and camrelizumab. Compared to chemotherapy, treatment-related hematologic toxicities with ICIs occurred primarily in grade 1-5 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and WBC count decreased. Taking ICI monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab were generally safer than taking chemotherapy, one ICI drug with chemotherapy, or two ICI drugs with chemotherapy. In terms of grade 1-5 hematologic toxicities, tislelizumab had the highest risk of neutropenia and leukopenia; the primary treatment-adverse events (AEs) for sintilimab was neutrophil count decreased and WBC count decreased; the primary treatment-related AE associated with nivolumab was platelet count decreased; camrelizumab posed the highest risk for lymphocyte count decreased. In terms of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities, pembrolizumab was predominantly linked to neutropenia; sintilimab showed the greatest risk for neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and lymphocyte count decreased; avelumab was most associated with WBC count decreased. FN primarily manifested as grade 3-5, with camrelizumab having the highest risk. Among agents used in gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, avelumab demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for anemia. Each treatment regimen has its unique safety profile. Early identification and management of ICI-related hematologic toxicities are essential in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024571508.

Immune checkpoints and ncRNAs: pioneering immunotherapy approaches for hematological malignancies

Hematological malignancies are typically treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy as the first-line conventional therapies. However, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a rapidly expanding field of study in cancer biology that influences the growth, differentiation, and proliferation of tumors by targeting immunological checkpoints. This study reviews the results of studies (from 2012 to 2024) that consider the immune checkpoints and ncRNAs in relation to hematological malignancies receiving immunotherapy. This article provides a summary of the latest advancements in immunotherapy for treating hematological malignancies, focusing on the role of immune checkpoints and ncRNAs in the immune response and their capacity for innovative strategies. The paper also discusses the function of immune checkpoints in maintaining immune homeostasis and how their dysregulation can contribute to developing leukemia and lymphoma. Finally, this research concludes with a discussion on the obstacles and future directions in this rapidly evolving field, emphasizing the need for continued research to fully harness the capacity of immune checkpoints and ncRNAs in immunotherapy for hematological malignancies.

Recent updates in the therapeutic uses of Pembrolizumab: a brief narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of cancer has been improved with the discovery of biological drugs that act as immune checkpoint inhibitors. In 2017, FDA designated pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor employed in immunotherapy, as the first tissue-agnostic cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To review pembrolizumab's use in oncology, gather and examine the latest discoveries regarding the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in cancer treatment.

METHODOLOGY

A literature review was conducted through PubMed(Medline) from January 2015 to December 2023 using "pembrolizumab", "cancer" and "treatment" as search terms.

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab demonstrated effectiveness as primary treatment for metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer, unresectable esophageal cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and alternative treatment for notable triple-negative breast cancer, biliary, colorectal, endometrial, renal cell, cervical carcinoma, and high microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiencies tumors. Pediatric applications include treatment for refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

Evolving research on pembrolizumab allows a deeper clinical understanding, despite challenges as variable patient responses. Pembrolizumab has emerged as a pivotal breakthrough in cancer treatment, improving patient outcomes and safety.

Advances and clinical applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hematological malignancies

Immune checkpoints are differentially expressed on various immune cells to regulate immune responses in tumor microenvironment. Tumor cells can activate the immune checkpoint pathway to establish an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and inhibit the anti-tumor immune response, which may lead to tumor progression by evading immune surveillance. Interrupting co-inhibitory signaling pathways with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) could reinvigorate the anti-tumor immune response and promote immune-mediated eradication of tumor cells. As a milestone in tumor treatment, ICIs have been firstly used in solid tumors and subsequently expanded to hematological malignancies, which are in their infancy. Currently, immune checkpoints have been investigated as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hematological malignancies, and novel immune checkpoints, such as signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-inducible protein 8-like 2 (TIPE2), are constantly being discovered. Numerous ICIs have received clinical approval for clinical application in the treatment of hematological malignancies, especially when used in combination with other strategies, including oncolytic viruses (OVs), neoantigen vaccines, bispecific antibodies (bsAb), bio-nanomaterials, tumor vaccines, and cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells. Moreover, the proportion of individuals with hematological malignancies benefiting from ICIs remains lower than expected due to multiple mechanisms of drug resistance and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Close monitoring and appropriate intervention are needed to mitigate irAEs while using ICIs. This review provided a comprehensive overview of immune checkpoints on different immune cells, the latest advances of ICIs and highlighted the clinical applications of immune checkpoints in hematological malignancies, including biomarkers, targets, combination of ICIs with other therapies, mechanisms of resistance to ICIs, and irAEs, which can provide novel insight into the future exploration of ICIs in tumor treatment.

Using Combination therapy to overcome diverse challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have heralded a new era in immunotherapy, representing a pivotal breakthrough in cancer treatment. Their impact is profound, with ICIs standing as some of the most prescribed anticancer therapies today. Notably, their ability to induce long-term remission even after treatment cessation provides genuine hope for achieving durable cures. However, despite these strides, challenges persist in the landscape of oncology, including resistance phenomena, immune-related adverse events, and suboptimal response rates. In response to these challenges, combination therapy emerges as a promising approach, poised to enhance treatment outcomes and address limitations inherent to single-agent ICI therapy. By synergistically targeting multiple pathways, combination therapy holds the potential to augment therapeutic efficacy while mitigating toxicity and impeding the emergence of resistance mechanisms. Understanding the intricacies underlying resistance development and adverse events is paramount in devising novel and refined combination strategies. A timeline showing FDA approvals of ICIs combination is shown in Figure 1. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date examples of different combined therapy strategies that can be used to overcome various challenges regarding ICI treatment. Through the exploration of innovative therapeutic combinations, we aim to provide clinicians and researchers with actionable knowledge to optimize patient outcomes and propel the field of immuno-oncology forward.

Case report: Mutation evolution in a patient with TdT positive high grade B cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements following the treatment of concurrent follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Concurrent follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)was reported in some studies, while the diagnosis of TdT (terminal deoxynucleotydil transferase) positive high grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements ("double hit") transformed from FL/DLBCL has been rarely reported. Herein, we described the clinical features and mutation profiles of a case diagnosed with TdT positive "double hit" HGBL following the treatment of FL/DLBCL.

CASE PRESENTATION

This is a 43-year-old Chinese man who was diagnosed with low grade FL (account for 80%) combined with DLBCL (20%) at a stage of IVB. The patient presented with BCL2/IGH translocation without MYC rearrangement, as well as the expressions of CD20, CD19, CD10 and BCL2 at the initial diagnosis of FL/DLBCL. MYC rearrangement and TdT expression occurred after the treatment. The targeted sequencing revealed mutations in KMT2D, FOXO1, CREBBP, ATM, STAT6, BCL7A, DDX3X, MUC4, FGFR3, ARID5B, DDX11 and PRKCSH genes were the co-mutations shared by the FL/DLBCL and TdT positive "double hit" HGBL, while CCND3, BIRC6, ROBO1 and CHEK2 mutations specifically occurred after the treatment. The overall survival time was 37.8 and 17.8 months after the initial diagnosis of FL/DLBCL and TdT positive "double hit" HGBL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study reports a rare case of TdT positive "double hit" HGBL following the treatment of concurrent FL/DLBCL and highlights the mutation characteristics. Collectively, this study will help enrich the knowledge of TdT positive "double hit" HGBL transformed from FL/DLBCL.

Heartbreaker: Detection and prevention of cardiotoxicity in hematological malignancies

Cancer survivors are at significant risk of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality; patients with hematologic malignancies have a higher rate of death due to heart failure compared to all other cancer subtypes. The majority of conventional hematologic cancer treatments is associated with increased risk of acute and long-term CV toxicity. The incidence of cancer therapy induced CV toxicity depends on the combination of patient characteristics and on the type, dose, and duration of the therapy. Early diagnosis of CV toxicity, appropriate referral, more specific cardiac monitoring follow-up and timely interventions in target patients can decrease the risk of CV adverse events, the interruption of oncological therapy, and improve the patient's prognosis. Herein, we summarize the CV effects of conventional treatments used in hematologic malignancies with a focus on definitions and incidence of the most common CV toxicities, guideline recommended early detection approaches, and preventive strategies before and during cancer treatments.

Immune checkpoint blockade in hematological malignancies: current state and future potential

Malignant cells are known to evade immune surveillance by engaging immune checkpoints which are negative regulators of the immune system. By restoring the T-lymphocyte mediated anti-tumor effect, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors but have met rather modest success in hematological malignancies. Currently, the only FDA approved indications for ICI therapy are in classic hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. Multiple clinical trials have assessed ICI therapy alone and in combination with standard of care treatments in other lymphomas, plasma cell neoplasms and myeloid neoplasms but were noted to have limited efficacy. These trials mostly focused on PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. Recently, there has been an effort to target other T-lymphocyte checkpoints like LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT along with improving strategies of PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. Drugs targeting the macrophage checkpoint, CD47, are also being tested. Long term safety and efficacy data from these ongoing studies are eagerly awaited. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the key takeaways from the reported results of completed and ongoing studies of these therapies in the context of hematological malignancies.

Preliminary assessment of cardiotoxicity in chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

As a novel anticancer therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy may lead to cardiotoxic reactions. However, the exact incidence remains unclear. Our study aimed to preliminarily assess the prevalence of cardiotoxicity after CAR T cell treatment using a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for potentially relevant studies. All types of relevant clinical studies were screened and assessed for risk bias. In most instances, random-effect models were used for data analysis, and heterogeneity between studies was evaluated. Standard quality assessment tools were used to assess quality. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022304611). Eight eligible studies comprising 3567 patients, including seven observational studies and one controlled study, were identified. The incidence of cardiovascular events was 16.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.138-0.200, P < 0.01)]. Arrhythmia was the most common disorder, with an incidence of 6.5% (95% CI 0.029-0.115, P < 0.01). The occurrence of cardiotoxicity was associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with a prevalence of 18.7% (95% CI 0.107-0.315, P < 0.01). Moreover, such adverse reactions were more common when CRS > 2 (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.29, P < 0.01). The risk of cardiotoxicity was not notably higher in patients receiving CAR T cell therapy than in those receiving traditional anticancer treatment. However, sufficient attention should be paid to this. And further evidence from large-scale clinical trials are needed.

Immune-related adverse events induced by programmed death protein-1 inhibitors from the perspective of lymphoma immunotherapy

Lymphoma, which is highly malignant, stems from lymph nodes and lymphoid tissue. Lymphoma cells express programmed death-ligand 1/2 (PD-L1/PD-L2), which binds with programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) to establish inhibitory signaling that impedes the normal function of T cells and allows tumor cells to escape immune system surveillance. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) have been introduced into the lymphoma treatment algorithm and have shown remarkable clinical efficacy and greatly improve prognosis in lymphoma patients. Accordingly, the number of lymphoma patients who are seeking treatment with PD-1 inhibitors is growing annually, which results in an increasing number of patients developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The occurrence of irAEs inevitably affects the benefits provided by immunotherapy, particularly when PD-1 inhibitors are applied. However, the mechanisms and characteristics of irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors in lymphoma need further investigation. This review article summarizes the latest research advances in irAEs during treatment of lymphoma with PD-1 inhibitors. A comprehensive understanding of irAEs incurred in immunotherapy can help to achieve better efficacy with PD-1 inhibitors in lymphoma.

Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Diseases

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is an increasingly common cause of morbidity and mortality as the list of culprit drugs continues to grow. Unfortunately, DI-ILD is difficult to study, diagnose, prove, and manage. This article attempts to raise awareness of the challenges in DI-ILD and discusses the current clinical landscape.

Resistance mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibition in lymphoma: Focusing on the tumor microenvironment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the therapeutic strategies of multiple types of malignancies including lymphoma. However, efficiency of ICIs varies dramatically among different lymphoma subtypes, and durable response can only be achieved in a minority of patients, thus requiring unveiling the underlying mechanisms of ICI resistance to optimize the individualized regimens and improve the treatment outcomes. Recently, accumulating evidence has identified potential prognostic factors for ICI therapy, including tumor mutation burden and tumor microenvironment (TME). Given the distinction between solid tumors and hematological malignancies in terms of TME, we here review the clinical updates of ICIs for lymphoma, and focus on the underlying mechanisms for resistance induced by TME, which play important roles in lymphoma and remarkably influence its sensitivity to ICIs. Particularly, we highlight the value of multiple cell populations (e.g., tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, M2 tumor-associated macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells) and metabolites (e.g., indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and adenosine) in the TME as prognostic biomarkers for ICI response, and also underline additional potential targets in immunotherapy, such as EZH2, LAG-3, TIM-3, adenosine, and PI3Kδ/γ.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal carcinoma in the United States

Background

The national Comprehensive Cancer Network has suggested pembrolizumab as a second-line therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10. However, despite the increased survival rate associated with pembrolizumab in these patient population, the high cost of pembrolizumab may influence its antitumor effect. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy as second-line treatments for esophageal carcinoma (EC) based on KEYNOTE-181 trial.

Methods

A Markov model was constructed using TreeAge 2021 based on three different groups: all intent-to-treat patients (ITT population), patients with ESCC (ESCC population), and patients with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (CPS ≥10 population). Incremental cost, Incremental effect, Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. Analyses were conducted on the setting of a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 from the US perspective.

Results

The ICERs for pembrolizumab were $157,589.545 per QALY, $60,238.823 per QALY, and $100,114.929 per QALY compared with chemotherapy in the ITT, ESCC, and CPS≥10 populations, respectively. The ICER of the ITT population was higher than $150,000, suggesting that pembrolizumab was not a cost-effective treatment scheme in patients with a PD-L1 CPS ≤ 10 or esophageal adenocarcinoma. The ICER was < $150,000 in the ESCC and CPS≥10 populations, indicating that pembrolizumab was cost-effective in these two subgroups.

Conclusion

The determining of pembrolizumab as a cost-effective second-line therapy for EC in the United States depends on the histologic type and PD-L1 expression.

Comparative Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Cancers: Developments and Challenges

Simple Summary

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has greatly changed the treatment landscape of multiple malignancies. However, the wide administration of ICIs is mainly obstructed by the low response rate and several life-threatening adverse events. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify sets of biomarkers to predict which patients will respond to ICIs. In this review, we discuss the recently investigated molecular and clinical determinants of ICI response, from the aspects of tumor features, clinical features, as well as tumor microenvironment.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Both remarkable and durable responses have been observed in patients with melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other malignancies. However, the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has demonstrated meaningful clinical responses and benefits in only a subset of patients. In addition, several severe and life-threatening adverse events were observed in these patients. Therefore, the identification of predictive biomarkers is urgently needed to select patients who are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy. PD-L1 expression level is the most commonly used biomarker in clinical practice for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, negative PD-L1 expression cannot reliably exclude a response to a PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Other factors, such as tumor microenvironment and other tumor genomic signatures, appear to impact the response to ICIs. In this review, we examine emerging data for novel biomarkers that may have a predictive value for optimizing the benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.