Effectiveness of early heparin therapy on outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024

The 2024 revised edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG 2024) is published by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. This is the fourth revision since the first edition was published in 2012. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in making appropriate decisions in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, leading to improved patient outcomes. We aimed to create guidelines that are easy to understand and use for physicians who recognize sepsis and provide initial management, specialized physicians who take over the treatment, and multidisciplinary healthcare providers, including nurses, physical therapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists. The J-SSCG 2024 covers the following nine areas: diagnosis of sepsis and source control, antimicrobial therapy, initial resuscitation, blood purification, disseminated intravascular coagulation, adjunctive therapy, post-intensive care syndrome, patient and family care, and pediatrics. In these areas, we extracted 78 important clinical issues. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 42 GRADE-based recommendations, 7 good practice statements, and 22 information-to-background questions were created as responses to clinical questions. We also described 12 future research questions.

Biomarkers of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: diagnostic insights and potential therapeutic implications

Diagnosing coagulopathy in septic patients remains challenging in intensive care. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) indeed presents with complex pathophysiology, complicating timely diagnosis. Epidemiological data indicate a significant prevalence of DIC in septic patients, with mortality rates up to 60%. Despite advances, current biomarker-based diagnostic tools often fail to provide early and accurate detection. This review evaluates the utility and limitations of traditional and emerging biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and DIC. We also assess the effectiveness of anticoagulant therapy guided by biomarker-based diagnostic criteria.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024

The 2024 revised edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG 2024) is published by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. This is the fourth revision since the first edition was published in 2012. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in making appropriate decisions in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, leading to improved patient outcomes. We aimed to create guidelines that are easy to understand and use for physicians who recognize sepsis and provide initial management, specialized physicians who take over the treatment, and multidisciplinary healthcare providers, including nurses, physical therapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists. The J-SSCG 2024 covers the following nine areas: diagnosis of sepsis and source control, antimicrobial therapy, initial resuscitation, blood purification, disseminated intravascular coagulation, adjunctive therapy, post-intensive care syndrome, patient and family care, and pediatrics. In these areas, we extracted 78 important clinical issues. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 42 GRADE-based recommendations, 7 good practice statements, and 22 information-to-background questions were created as responses to clinical questions. We also described 12 future research questions.

Mediating Role of Platelet Count Increase in Unfractionated Heparin Treatment for Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Aims/Background The role of heparin in sepsis therapy has been widely debated. The controversy surrounding heparin's use as an anticoagulant in sepsis may stem from differences in sepsis definitions, study designs, timing and dosage of drug administration, treatment duration, complications, and patient severity. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal timing and dosage of heparin in patients with sepsis, identify specific subgroups that could benefit from heparin therapy, and explore laboratory markers to assess its efficacy. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV dataset. Data from patients with sepsis were extracted based on the Sepsis 3.0 criteria. Patients were categorized according to heparin use. The effectiveness of early and appropriate heparin administration was assessed, and a subgroup analysis was performed to identify patients most likely to benefit from heparin therapy. Additionally, factors mediating the improvement in sepsis prognosis following heparin treatment were analyzed. Results We recruited 4149 participants who met the inclusion criteria, with an overall 28-day mortality rate of 19.5%. There were 2192 individuals in the heparin group and 1957 in the non-heparin group. After propensity score matching, heparin therapy demonstrated a significantly greater effect on reducing both 28-day and 90-day mortality compared to the non-heparin treatment (18.1% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001; 18.8% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001). However, the heparin group had a higher incidence of major bleeding (10.9% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.001), increased use of mechanical ventilation (54.3% vs. 45.1%, p < 0.001), and a longer intensive care unit stay (3.6 vs. 2.5 days, p < 0.001) compared to the non-heparin group. Early administration of high-dose heparin improved 28-day survival. Early and adequate heparin administration was more effective than late and insufficient dosing (p < 0.01), except in patients with sepsis who had low white blood cell counts, alkalosis, or reduced platelet counts. The increase in platelet count had a significant mediating effect on the entire cohort (p < 0.001 for the causal mediation effect), with a mediation proportion of 14%. Conclusion Early and adequate heparin administration can significantly improve the prognosis of sepsis. An increase in platelet count may serve as a potential indicator of the effectiveness of heparin therapy in sepsis.

Heparin therapy in sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that affects 49 million people annually. Managing sepsis-associated coagulopathy poses a significant challenge due to its high mortality rates in intensive care. Recent reports suggest that administering heparin may offer potential survival benefits in sepsis and coronavirus disease cases. However, there is currently no established evidence supporting the use of heparin for sepsis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of heparin administration in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The searches included MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Japanese databases up to January 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized control trials (RCTs) involving adult sepsis patients receiving heparin. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and the data extraction included 28-day mortality and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

Out of 1733 initial articles, only three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis, which included 426 patients, showed no significant difference in 28-day and in-hospital mortality between the heparin and control groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.24). Subgroup analysis of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients (n = 109) also did not show a significant reduction in mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.51-1.38). Heterogeneity was zero, and no publication bias was observed. Additionally, there was significant difference in bleeding complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.99, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit of heparin administration in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Further investigation into the potential benefits of heparin is warranted. Moreover, the analysis revealed no increase in bleeding risks with heparin administration; instead, a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding was noted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (registration: CRD42023385091).

Impact of early heparin therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis associated acute kidney injury: a retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database

Background: Inflammatory-coagulation dysfunction plays an increasingly important role in sepsis associated acute kidney injury (SAKI). This study aimed to investigate whether early heparin therapy improves survival in patients with SAKI. Methods: Patients with SAKI were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received heparin subcutaneously within 48 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the control group, who received no heparin. The primary endpoint was ICU mortality, the secondary outcomes were 7-day, 14-day, 28-day, and hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM), marginal structural Cox model (MSCM), and E-value analyses were performed. Results: The study included 5623 individuals with SAKI, 2410 of whom received heparin and 3213 of whom did not. There were significant effects on ICU and 28-day mortality in the overall population with PSM. MSCM further reinforces the efficacy of heparin administration reduces ICU mortality in the general population. Stratification analysis with MSCM showed that heparin administration was associated with decreased ICU mortality at various AKI stages. Heparin use was also associated with reduced 28-day mortality in patients with only female, age >60 years, and AKI stage 3, with HRs of 0.79, 0.77, and 0.60, respectively (p < 0.05). E-value analysis suggests robustness to unmeasured confounding. Conclusion: Early heparin therapy for patients with SAKI decreased ICU mortality. Further analysis demonstrated that heparin therapy was associated with reduced 28-day mortality rate in patients only among female, age > 60 years and AKI stage 3.

Thromboinflammation in acute injury: infections, heatstroke, and trauma

Tissue microcirculation is essential for the maintenance of organ homeostasis. Following acute infections, activation of coagulation and inflammation, which are critical interconnected responses, lead to thromboinflammation and microthrombosis, thereby contributing to multiorgan dysfunction. Sepsis is the most common underlying disease and has been extensively studied. However, the COVID-19 pandemic further illustrated the pathomechanisms of diseases in which thromboinflammation plays a critical role. During thromboinflammation, injury to monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and endothelial cells, along with coagulation and complement activation, was further characterized. Thrombin is pivotal in orchestrating thrombosis and inflammation and has long been considered a potential therapeutic target in sepsis. Although thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism with heparins is part of standard management for COVID-19, it also potentially attenuates organ dysfunction due to thrombotic sequela. In contrast, the effectiveness of anticoagulation with heparin, antithrombin, or thrombomodulin to reduce mortality has not conclusively been proven in sepsis. Nonetheless, thromboinflammation has also been reported as an important pathophysiologic mechanism in other critical illnesses, including heatstroke, trauma, and ischemia/reperfusion injury, and may provide a potential therapeutic target for future clinical studies.

Risk stratification utilizing sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, antithrombin activity, and demographic data in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a frequent complication in patients with sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Anticoagulant therapy may be appropriate for certain patients with DIC, particularly those with increased disease severity and deficiency in the physiologic anticoagulant antithrombin. We retrospectively analyzed post-marketing survey data from 1562 patients with sepsis-associated DIC and antithrombin activity of 70% or less. All the patients were treated with antithrombin concentrates. Baseline sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, DIC score, and antithrombin activity were assessed. Cox multivariate regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of variables used to assess mortality. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to classify the risk of 28-day mortality. COX multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant association of age, sex, baseline SOFA score, baseline antithrombin activity, and the presence of pneumonia or skin/soft tissue infection with increased mortality. The area under the curve of SOFA score or antithrombin activity for mortality was 0.700 and 0.614, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly higher in patients with SOFA score ≥ 12 and antithrombin activity < 47%. The decision tree analysis accurately classified the risk of death into high (> 40%), medium (40%-20%), and low (< 20%) categories in 86.1% of the cohort. Twenty eight-day mortality can be strongly predicted using baseline SOFA score, antithrombin activity, infection site, age, and sex as variables in the clinical decision tree for patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

Impact of early heparin therapy on outcomes in patients with solid malignancy associated sepsis: a marginal structural model causal analyse

Background: Previous studies documented that heparin can inhibit the invasion and metastasis of tumors, but its role on outcomes in patients with solid malignancy complicated sepsis remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in critically ill patients with solid malignancy associated sepsis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. The primary endpoint was intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, secondary outcomes were thrombosis and hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM), marginal structural Cox model (MSCM), cox proportional hazards model, stratification analysis and E-value were used to account for baseline differences, time-varying confounding and unmeasured variables. Results: A total of 1,512 patients with solid malignancy complicated sepsis were enrolled, of which 683 in the heparin group with intensive care unit mortality, thrombosis rate and hospital mortality were 9.7%, 5.4%, 16.1%, and 829 in the non-heparin group with ICU mortality, thrombosis rate and hospital mortality were 14.6%, 12.5%, 22.6%. Similar results were observed on outcomes for patients with PSM (ICU mortality hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.92), thrombosis rate (HR 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.68); hospital mortality HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.99). marginal structural Cox model further reinforced the efficacy of heparin in reducing ICU mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.68). Logistic regression and Cox regression model showed heparin use also markedly reduced thrombosis (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.26-0.68; p < 0.001) and hospital mortality (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-0.99; p = 0.043). Stratification analysis with the MSCM showed an effect only those with digestive system cancer (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.69). Conclusion: Early heparin therapy improved outcomes in critically ill patients with solid malignancy complicated sepsis. These results are evident especially in those with digestive system cancer. A prospective randomized controlled study should be designed to further assess the relevant findings.

Research Progress of Macromolecules in the Prevention and Treatment of Sepsis

Sepsis is associated with high rates of mortality in the intensive care unit and accompanied by systemic inflammatory reactions, secondary infections, and multiple organ failure. Biological macromolecules are drugs produced using modern biotechnology to prevent or treat diseases. Indeed, antithrombin, antimicrobial peptides, interleukins, antibodies, nucleic acids, and lentinan have been used to prevent and treat sepsis. In vitro, biological macromolecules can significantly ameliorate the inflammatory response, apoptosis, and multiple organ failure caused by sepsis. Several biological macromolecules have entered clinical trials. This review summarizes the sources, efficacy, mechanism of action, and research progress of macromolecular drugs used in the prevention and treatment of sepsis.