Machine Learning Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response From Combination of Clinical and Model-Driven Data

Artificial intelligence models in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review

The aim of the presented review is to summarize the literature data on the accuracy and clinical applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) models as a valuable alternative to the current guidelines in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response and phenotyping of patients eligible for CRT implantation. This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. After a search of Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, 675 records were identified. Twenty supervised (prediction of CRT response) and 9 unsupervised (clustering and phenotyping) AI models were analyzed qualitatively (22 studies, 14,258 patients). Fifty-five percent of AI models were based on retrospective studies. Unsupervised AI models were able to identify clusters of patients with significantly different rates of primary outcome events (death, heart failure event). In comparison to the guideline-based CRT response prediction accuracy of 70%, supervised AI models trained on cohorts with > 100 patients achieved up to 85% accuracy and an AUC of 0.86 in their prediction of response to CRT for echocardiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. AI models seem to be an accurate and clinically applicable tool in phenotyping of patients eligible for CRT implantation and predicting potential responders. In the future, AI may help to increase CRT response rates to over 80% and improve clinical decision-making and prognosis of the patients, including reduction of mortality rates. However, these findings must be validated in randomized controlled trials.

Artificial intelligence and heart failure: A state-of-the-art review

Heart failure (HF) is a heterogeneous syndrome affecting more than 60 million individuals globally. Despite recent advancements in understanding of the pathophysiology of HF, many issues remain including residual risk despite therapy, understanding the pathophysiology and phenotypes of patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction, and the challenges related to integrating a large amount of disparate information available for risk stratification and management of these patients. Risk prediction algorithms based on artificial intelligence (AI) may have superior predictive ability compared to traditional methods in certain instances. AI algorithms can play a pivotal role in the evolution of HF care by facilitating clinical decision making to overcome various challenges such as allocation of treatment to patients who are at highest risk or are more likely to benefit from therapies, prediction of adverse outcomes, and early identification of patients with subclinical disease or worsening HF. With the ability to integrate and synthesize large amounts of data with multidimensional interactions, AI algorithms can supply information with which physicians can improve their ability to make timely and better decisions. In this review, we provide an overview of the AI algorithms that have been developed for establishing early diagnosis of HF, phenotyping HF with preserved ejection fraction, and stratifying HF disease severity. This review also discusses the challenges in clinical deployment of AI algorithms in HF, and the potential path forward for developing future novel learning-based algorithms to improve HF care.

Machine learning model of imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae based on MALDI-TOF-MS platform: An observational study

Background and Aim

Machine learning is an important branch and supporting technology of artificial intelligence, we established four machine learning model for the drug sensitivity of Klebsiella pneumoniae to imipenem based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and compared their diagnostic effect.

Methods

The data of MALDI-TOF-MS and imipenem sensitivity of 174 cases of K. pneumoniae isolated from clinical specimens in the laboratory of microbiology department of Tianjin Haihe Hospital from 2019 January to 2020 December were collected. The mass spectrometry and imipenem sensitivity of 70 cases of imipenem-sensitive and 70 resistant cases were randomly selected to establish the training set model, 17 cases of sensitive and 17 cases of resistant cases were randomly selected to establish the test set model. Mass spectral peak data were subjected to orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), the training set data model was established by machine learning least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, logistic regression (LR) algorithm, support vector machines (SVM) algorithm, neural network (NN) algorithm, the area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix of training set and test set model were calculated and selected by Grid search and 3-fold Cross-validation respectively, the accuracy of the prediction model was verified by test set confusion matrix.

Results

The R²Y and Q² of OPLS-DA were 0.546 and 0.0178. The AUC of the best training set and test set models were 0.9726 and 0.9100, 1.0000 and 0.8581, 0.8462 and 0.6263, 1.0000 and 0.7180 evaluated by LASSO, LR, SVM and NN model respectively. The accuracy of the LASSO, LR, SVM and NN model were 87%, 79%, 62%, and 68% in test set, respectively.

Conclusion

The LASSO prediction model of K. pneumoniae sensitivity to imipenem established in this study has a high accuracy rate and has potential clinical decision support ability.

Machine learning-powered, device-embedded heart sound measurement can optimize AV delay in patients with CRT

BACKGROUND

Continuous optimization of atrioventricular (AV) delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is mainly performed by electrical means.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop an estimation model of cardiac function that uses a piezoelectric microphone embedded in a pulse generator to guide CRT optimization.

METHODS

Electrocardiogram, left ventricular pressure (LVP), and heart sounds were simultaneously collected during CRT device implantation procedures. A piezoelectric alarm transducer embedded in a modified CRT device facilitated recording of heart sounds in patients undergoing a pacing protocol with different AV delays. Machine learning (ML) was used to produce a decision-tree ensemble model capable of estimating absolute maximal LVP (LVPmax) and maximal rise of LVP (LVdP/dtmax) using 3 heart sound-based features. To gauge the applicability of ML in AV delay optimization, polynomial curves were fitted to measured and estimated values.

RESULTS

In the data set of ∼30,000 heartbeats, ML indicated S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and S1 integral (S1 energy for LVdP/dtmax) as most prominent features for AV delay optimization. ML resulted in single-beat estimation precision for absolute values of LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax of 67% and 64%, respectively. For 20-30 beat averages, cross-correlation between measured and estimated LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax was 0.999 for both. The estimated optimal AV delays were not significantly different from those measured using invasive LVP (difference -5.6 ± 17.1 ms for LVPmax and +5.1 ± 6.7 ms for LVdP/dtmax). The difference in function at estimated and measured optimal AV delays was not statiscally significant (1 ± 3 mm Hg for LVPmax and 9 ± 57 mm Hg/s for LVdP/dtmax).

CONCLUSION

Heart sound sensors embedded in a CRT device, powered by a ML algorithm, provide a reliable assessment of optimal AV delays and absolute LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax.

Combination of personalized computational modeling and machine learning for optimization of left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Introduction: The 30-50% non-response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) calls for improved patient selection and optimized pacing lead placement. The study aimed to develop a novel technique using patient-specific cardiac models and machine learning (ML) to predict an optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing site (ML-PS) that maximizes the likelihood of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement in a given CRT candidate. To validate the approach, we evaluated whether the distance D_PS between the clinical LV pacing site (ref-PS) and ML-PS is associated with improved response rate and magnitude. Materials and methods: We reviewed retrospective data for 57 CRT recipients. A positive response was defined as a more than 10% LVEF improvement. Personalized models of ventricular activation and ECG were created from MRI and CT images. The characteristics of ventricular activation during intrinsic rhythm and biventricular (BiV) pacing with ref-PS were derived from the models and used in combination with clinical data to train supervised ML classifiers. The best logistic regression model classified CRT responders with a high accuracy of 0.77 (ROC AUC = 0.84). The LR classifier, model simulations and Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process regression were combined to identify an optimal ML-PS that maximizes the ML-score of CRT response over the LV surface in each patient. Results: The optimal ML-PS improved the ML-score by 17 ± 14% over the ref-PS. Twenty percent of the non-responders were reclassified as positive at ML-PS. Selection of positive patients with a max ML-score >0.5 demonstrated an improved clinical response rate. The distance D_PS was shorter in the responders. The max ML-score and D_PS were found to be strong predictors of CRT response (ROC AUC = 0.85). In the group with max ML-score > 0.5 and D_PS< 30 mm, the response rate was 83% compared to 14% in the rest of the cohort. LVEF improvement in this group was higher than in the other patients (16 ± 8% vs. 7 ± 8%). Conclusion: A new technique combining clinical data, personalized heart modelling and supervised ML demonstrates the potential for use in clinical practice to assist in optimizing patient selection and predicting optimal LV pacing lead position in HF candidates for CRT.

The saga of dyssynchrony imaging: Are we getting to the point

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) has an established role in the management of patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF &lt; 35%) and widened QRS (&gt;130 msec). Despite the complex pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and the increasing evidence supporting the identification of specific electromechanical substrates that are associated with a higher probability of CRT response, the assessment of LVEF is the only imaging-derived parameter used for the selection of CRT candidates.

This review aims to (1) provide an overview of the evolution of cardiac imaging for the assessment of LV dyssynchrony and its role in the selection of patients undergoing CRT; (2) highlight the main pitfalls and advantages of the application of cardiac imaging for the assessment of LV dyssynchrony; (3) provide some perspectives for clinical application and future research in this field.

Conclusion

the road for a more individualized approach to resynchronization therapy delivery is open and imaging might provide important input beyond the assessment of LVEF.

Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology

Artificial intelligence has become ubiquitous. Machine learning, a branch of artificial intelligence, leads the current technological revolution through its remarkable ability to learn and perform on data sets of varying types. Machine learning applications are expected to change contemporary medicine as they are brought into mainstream clinical practice. In the field of cardiac arrhythmia and electrophysiology, machine learning applications have enjoyed rapid growth and popularity. To facilitate clinical acceptance of these methodologies, it is important to promote general knowledge of machine learning in the wider community and continue to highlight the areas of successful application. The authors present a primer to provide an overview of common supervised (least squares, support vector machine, neural networks and random forest) and unsupervised (k-means and principal component analysis) machine learning models. The authors also provide explanations as to how and why the specific machine learning models have been used in arrhythmia and electrophysiology studies.

Training machine learning models with synthetic data improves the prediction of ventricular origin in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

In order to determine the site of origin (SOO) in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVAs) before an ablation procedure, several algorithms based on manual identification of electrocardiogram (ECG) features, have been developed. However, the reported accuracy decreases when tested with different datasets. Machine learning algorithms can automatize the process and improve generalization, but their performance is hampered by the lack of large enough OTVA databases. We propose the use of detailed electrophysiological simulations of OTVAs to train a machine learning classification model to predict the ventricular origin of the SOO of ectopic beats. We generated a synthetic database of 12-lead ECGs (2,496 signals) by running multiple simulations from the most typical OTVA SOO in 16 patient-specific geometries. Two types of input data were considered in the classification, raw and feature ECG signals. From the simulated raw 12-lead ECG, we analyzed the contribution of each lead in the predictions, keeping the best ones for the training process. For feature-based analysis, we used entropy-based methods to rank the obtained features. A cross-validation process was included to evaluate the machine learning model. Following, two clinical OTVA databases from different hospitals, including ECGs from 365 patients, were used as test-sets to assess the generalization of the proposed approach. The results show that V2 was the best lead for classification. Prediction of the SOO in OTVA, using both raw signals or features for classification, presented high accuracy values (>0.96). Generalization of the network trained on simulated data was good for both patient datasets (accuracy of 0.86 and 0.84, respectively) and presented better values than using exclusively real ECGs for classification (accuracy of 0.84 and 0.76 for each dataset). The use of simulated ECG data for training machine learning-based classification algorithms is critical to obtain good SOO predictions in OTVA compared to real data alone. The fast implementation and generalization of the proposed methodology may contribute towards its application to a clinical routine.