Arterial Baroreflex Inhibits Muscle Metaboreflex Induced Increases in Effective Arterial Elastance: Implications for Ventricular-Vascular Coupling

Mechanisms mediating muscle metaboreflex control of cardiac output during exercise: Impaired regulation in heart failure

The ability to increase cardiac output during dynamic exercise is paramount for the ability to maintain workload performance. Reflex control of the cardiovascular system during exercise is complex and multifaceted involving multiple feedforward and feedback systems. One major reflex thought to mediate the autonomic adjustments to exercise is termed the muscle metaboreflex and is activated via afferent neurons within active skeletal muscle which respond to the accumulation of interstitial metabolites during exercise when blood flow and O2 delivery are insufficient to meet metabolic demands. This is one of the most powerful cardiovascular reflexes capable of eliciting profound increases in sympathetic nerve activity, arterial blood pressure, central blood volume mobilization, heart rate and cardiac output. This review summarizes the mechanisms meditating muscle metaboreflex-induced increases in cardiac output. Although much has been learned from studies using anaesthetized and/or decerebrate animals, we focus on studies in conscious animals and humans performing volitional exercise. We discuss the separate and interrelated roles of heart rate, ventricular contractility, ventricular preload and ventricular-vascular coupling as well as the interaction with other cardiovascular reflexes which modify muscle metaboreflex control of cardiac output. We discuss how these mechanisms may be altered in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and offer suggestions for future studies.

Muscle metaboreflex stimulates the cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex causing positive feedback amplification of sympathetic activity: effect of heart failure

Exercise intolerance is a hallmark symptom of heart failure and to a large extent stems from reductions in cardiac output that occur due to the inherent ventricular dysfunction coupled with enhanced muscle metaboreflex-induced functional coronary vasoconstriction, which limits increases in coronary blood flow. This creates a further mismatch between O2 delivery and O2 demand, which may activate the cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex (CSAR), causing amplification of the already increased sympathetic activity in a positive-feedback fashion. We used our chronically instrumented conscious canine model to evaluate if chronic ablation of afferents responsible for the CSAR would attenuate the gain of muscle metaboreflex before and after induction of heart failure. After afferent ablation, the gain of the muscle metaboreflex control of mean arterial pressure was significantly reduced before (-239.5 ± 16 to -95.2 ± 8 mmHg/L/min) and after the induction of heart failure (-185.6 ± 14 to -95.7 ± 12 mmHg/L/min). Similar results were observed for the strength (gain) of muscle metaboreflex control of heart rate, cardiac output, and ventricular contractility. Thus, we conclude that the CSAR contributes significantly to the strength of the muscle metaboreflex in normal animals with heart failure serving as an effective positive-feedback amplifier thereby further increasing sympathetic activity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The powerful pressor responses from the CSAR arise via O2 delivery versus O2 demand imbalance. Muscle metaboreflex activation (MMA) simultaneously elicits coronary vasoconstriction (which is augmented in heart failure) and profound increases in cardiac work thereby upsetting oxygen balance. Whether MMA activates the CSAR thereby amplifying MMA responses is unknown. We observed that removal of the CSAR afferents attenuated the strength of the muscle metaboreflex in normal and subjects with heart failure.

Hemodynamic responses to handgrip and metaboreflex activation are exaggerated in individuals with metabolic syndrome independent of resting blood pressure, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose

Introduction: Prior studies report conflicting evidence regarding exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses in individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Purpose: To test the hypotheses that 1) exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are exaggerated in MetS and 2) these differences may be explained by elevated resting blood pressure. Methods: Blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were evaluated in 26 participants (13 MetS) during 2 min of handgrip exercise followed by 3 min of post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), along with HR and a cumulative blood pressure index (BPI), were compared between groups using independent samples t-tests, and analyses of covariance were used to adjust for differences in resting blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and waist circumference (WC). Results: ΔSBP (∼78% and ∼54%), ΔMAP (∼67% and ∼55%), and BPI (∼16% and ∼20%) responses were significantly exaggerated in individuals with MetS during handgrip and PECO, respectively (all p ≤ 0.04). ΔDBP, ΔMAP, and BPI responses during handgrip remained significantly different between groups after independently covarying for resting blood pressure (p < 0.01), and after simultaneously covarying for resting blood pressure, FBG, and WC (p ≤ 0.03). Likewise, peak SBP, DBP, MAP, and BPI responses during PECO remained significantly different between groups after adjusting for resting blood pressure (p ≤ 0.03), with peak SBP, MAP, and BPI response remaining different between groups after adjusting for all three covariates simultaneously (p ≤ 0.04). Conclusion: These data suggest that exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are significantly exaggerated in MetS independent of differences in resting blood pressure, FBG, or WC.

Blood flow restriction training activates the muscle metaboreflex during low-intensity sustained exercise

Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) employs partial vascular occlusion of exercising muscle and has been shown to increase muscle performance while using reduced workload and training time. Numerous studies have demonstrated that BFRT increases muscle hypertrophy, mitochondrial function, and beneficial vascular adaptations. However, changes in cardiovascular hemodynamics during the exercise protocol remain unknown, as most studies measured blood pressure before the onset and after the cessation of exercise. With reduced perfusion to the exercising muscle during BFRT, the resultant accumulation of metabolites within the ischemic muscle could potentially trigger a large reflex increase in blood pressure, termed the muscle metaboreflex. At low workloads, this pressor response occurs primarily via increases in cardiac output. However, when increases in cardiac output are limited (e.g., heart failure or during severe exercise), the reflex shifts to peripheral vasoconstriction as the primary mechanism to increase blood pressure, potentially increasing the risk of a cardiovascular event. Using our chronically instrumented conscious canine model, we utilized a 60% reduction in femoral blood pressure applied to the hindlimbs during steady-state treadmill exercise (3.2 km/h) to reproduce the ischemic environment observed during BFRT. We observed significant increases in heart rate (+19 ± 3 beats/min), stroke volume (+2.52 ± 1.2 mL), cardiac output (+1.21 ± 0.2 L/min), mean arterial pressure (+18.2 ± 2.4 mmHg), stroke work (+1.93 ± 0.2 L/mmHg), and nonischemic vascular conductance (+3.62 ± 1.7 mL/mmHg), indicating activation of the muscle metaboreflex.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) increases muscle mass, strength, and endurance. There has been minimal consideration of the reflex cardiovascular responses that could be elicited during BFRT sessions. We showed that during low-intensity exercise BFRT may trigger large reflex increases in blood pressure and sympathetic activity due to muscle metaboreflex activation. Thus, we urge caution when employing BFRT, especially in patients in whom exaggerated cardiovascular responses may occur that could cause sudden, adverse cardiovascular events.

Arterial Baroreflex Dysfunction Promotes Neuroinflammation by Activating the Platelet CD40L/Nuclear Factor Kappa B Signaling Pathway in Microglia and Astrocytes

Arterial baroreflex (ABR) dysfunction has previously been associated with neuroinflammation, the most common pathological feature of neurological disorders. However, the mechanisms mediating ABR dysfunction-induced neuroinflammation are not fully understood. In the present study, we investigated the role of platelet CD40 ligand (CD40L) in neuroinflammation in an in vivo model of ABR dysfunction, and microglia and astrocyte activation in vitro. ABR dysfunction was induced in Sprague‒Dawley rats by sinoaortic denervation (SAD). We used ELSA and immunofluorescence to assess the effect of platelet CD40L on glial cell polarization and the secretion of inflammatory factors. By flow cytometry, we found that rats subjected to SAD showed a high level of platelet microaggregation and upregulation of CD40L on the platelet surface. The promotion of platelet invasion and accumulation was also observed in the brain tissues of rats subjected to SAD. In the animal model and cultured N9 microglia/C6 astrocytoma cells, platelet CD40L overexpression promoted neuroinflammation and activated M1 microglia, A1 astrocytes, and the nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) signaling pathway. These effects were partially blocked by inhibiting platelet activity with clopidogrel or inhibiting CD40L-mediated signaling. Our results suggest that during ABR dysfunction, CD40L signaling in platelets converts microglia to the M1 phenotype and astrocytes to the A1 phenotype, activating NFκB and resulting in neuroinflammation. Thus, our study provides a novel understanding of the pathogenesis of ABR dysfunction-induced neuroinflammation and indicates that targeting platelet CD40L is beneficial for treating central nervous system (CNS) disorders associated with ABR dysfunction.