1
|
Brant EJ, May D, Eid A, Altpeter F. Comparison of genotyping assays for detection of targeted CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis in highly polyploid sugarcane. Front Genome Ed 2024; 6:1505844. [PMID: 39726635 PMCID: PMC11669508 DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1505844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is an important biofuel feedstock and a leading source of global table sugar. Saccharum hybrid cultivars are highly polyploid (2n = 100-130), containing large numbers of functionally redundant hom(e)ologs in their genomes. Genome editing with sequence-specific nucleases holds tremendous promise for sugarcane breeding. However, identification of plants with the desired level of co-editing within a pool of primary transformants can be difficult. While DNA sequencing provides direct evidence of targeted mutagenesis, it is cost-prohibitive as a primary screening method in sugarcane and most other methods of identifying mutant lines have not been optimized for use in highly polyploid species. In this study, non-sequencing methods of mutant screening, including capillary electrophoresis (CE), Cas9 RNP assay, and high-resolution melt analysis (HRMA), were compared to assess their potential for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutant screening in sugarcane. These assays were used to analyze sugarcane lines containing mutations at one or more of six sgRNA target sites. All three methods distinguished edited lines from wild type, with co-mutation frequencies ranging from 2% to 100%. Cas9 RNP assays were able to identify mutant sugarcane lines with as low as 3.2% co-mutation frequency, and samples could be scored based on undigested band intensity. CE was highlighted as the most comprehensive assay, delivering precise information on both mutagenesis frequency and indel size to a 1 bp resolution across all six targets. This represents an economical and comprehensive alternative to sequencing-based genotyping methods which could be applied in other polyploid species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor J. Brant
- Agronomy Department, Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, IFAS-Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Gainesville, FL, United States
- DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - David May
- Agronomy Department, Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, IFAS-Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Gainesville, FL, United States
- DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Ayman Eid
- Agronomy Department, Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, IFAS-Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Gainesville, FL, United States
- DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Fredy Altpeter
- Agronomy Department, Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, IFAS-Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Gainesville, FL, United States
- DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assa G, Kalter N, Rosenberg M, Beck A, Markovich O, Gontmakher T, Hendel A, Yakhini Z. Quantifying allele-specific CRISPR editing activity with CRISPECTOR2.0. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:e78. [PMID: 39077930 PMCID: PMC11381363 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Off-target effects present a significant impediment to the safe and efficient use of CRISPR-Cas genome editing. Since off-target activity is influenced by the genomic sequence, the presence of sequence variants leads to varying on- and off-target profiles among different alleles or individuals. However, a reliable tool that quantifies genome editing activity in an allelic context is not available. Here, we introduce CRISPECTOR2.0, an extended version of our previously published software tool CRISPECTOR, with an allele-specific editing activity quantification option. CRISPECTOR2.0 enables reference-free, allele-aware, precise quantification of on- and off-target activity, by using de novo sample-specific single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection and statistical-based allele-calling algorithms. We demonstrate CRISPECTOR2.0 efficacy in analyzing samples containing multiple alleles and quantifying allele-specific editing activity, using data from diverse cell types, including primary human cells, plants, and an original extensive human cell line database. We identified instances where an SNV induced changes in the protospacer adjacent motif sequence, resulting in allele-specific editing. Intriguingly, differential allelic editing was also observed in regions carrying distal SNVs, hinting at the involvement of additional epigenetic factors. Our findings highlight the importance of allele-specific editing measurement as a milestone in the adaptation of efficient, accurate, and safe personalized genome editing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Assa
- Arazi School of Computer Science, Reichman University, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
| | - Nechama Kalter
- The Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - Michael Rosenberg
- The Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - Avigail Beck
- Arazi School of Computer Science, Reichman University, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
| | - Oshry Markovich
- Rahan Meristem (1998) Ltd. Kibbutz Rosh-Hanikra, Western Galilee 2282500, Israel
| | - Tanya Gontmakher
- Rahan Meristem (1998) Ltd. Kibbutz Rosh-Hanikra, Western Galilee 2282500, Israel
| | - Ayal Hendel
- The Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - Zohar Yakhini
- Arazi School of Computer Science, Reichman University, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
- The Henry & Marilyn Taub Faculty of Computer Science, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fatima S, Khan MO, Iqbal N, Iqbal MM, Qamar H, Imtiaz M, Hundleby P, Wei Z, Ahmad N. Studying Salt-Induced Shifts in Gene Expression Patterns of Glucosinolate Transporters and Glucosinolate Accumulation in Two Contrasting Brassica Species. Metabolites 2024; 14:179. [PMID: 38668307 PMCID: PMC11052333 DOI: 10.3390/metabo14040179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Brassica crops are well known for the accumulation of glucosinolates-secondary metabolites crucial for plants' adaptation to various stresses. Glucosinolates also functioning as defence compounds pose challenges to food quality due to their goitrogenic properties. Their disruption leaves plants susceptible to insect pests and diseases. Hence, a targeted reduction in seed glucosinolate content is of paramount importance to increase food acceptance. GLUCOSINOLATE TRANSPORTERS (GTRs) present a promising avenue for selectively reducing glucosinolate concentrations in seeds while preserving biosynthesis elsewhere. In this study, 54 putative GTR protein sequences found in Brassica were retrieved, employing Arabidopsis GTR1 and GTR2 templates. Comprehensive bioinformatics analyses, encompassing gene structure organization, domain analysis, motif assessments, promoter analysis, and cis-regulatory elements, affirmed the existence of transporter domains and stress-related regulatory elements. Phylogenetic analysis revealed patterns of conservation and divergence across species. Glucosinolates have been shown to increase under stress conditions, indicating a potential role in stress response. To elucidate the role of GTRs in glucosinolate transportation under NaCl stress in two distinct Brassica species, B. juncea and B. napus, plants were subjected to 0, 100, or 200 mM NaCl. Based on the literature, key GTR genes were chosen and their expression across various plant parts was assessed. Both species displayed divergent trends in their biochemical profiles as well as glucosinolate contents under elevated salt stress conditions. Statistical modelling identified significant contributors to glucosinolate variations, guiding the development of targeted breeding strategies for low-glucosinolate varieties. Notably, GTR2A2 exhibited pronounced expressions in stems, contributing approximately 52% to glucosinolate content variance, while GTR2B1/C2 displayed significant expression in flowers. Additionally, GTR2A1 and GTR1A2/B1 demonstrated noteworthy expression in roots. This study enhances our understanding of glucosinolate regulation under stress conditions, offering avenues to improve Brassica crop quality and resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samia Fatima
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute for Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; (S.F.); (M.O.K.); (N.I.); (M.M.I.); (M.I.)
| | - Muhammad Omar Khan
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute for Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; (S.F.); (M.O.K.); (N.I.); (M.M.I.); (M.I.)
| | - Nadia Iqbal
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute for Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; (S.F.); (M.O.K.); (N.I.); (M.M.I.); (M.I.)
| | - Muhammad Mudassar Iqbal
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute for Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; (S.F.); (M.O.K.); (N.I.); (M.M.I.); (M.I.)
| | - Huma Qamar
- Oilseeds Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan;
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Muhammad Imtiaz
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute for Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; (S.F.); (M.O.K.); (N.I.); (M.M.I.); (M.I.)
| | - Penny Hundleby
- Department of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK;
| | - Zhengyi Wei
- Maize Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China
| | - Niaz Ahmad
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering College (NIBGE-C), Pakistan Institute for Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; (S.F.); (M.O.K.); (N.I.); (M.M.I.); (M.I.)
| |
Collapse
|