Self-Report Measures Assessing Aspects of Personal Recovery in Relatives and Other Informal Carers of Those With Psychosis: A Systematic Review

We-Care-Well: exploring the personal recovery of mental health caregivers through Participatory Action Research

Family caregivers play a critical role in supporting the recovery journeys of their loved ones, yet the recovery journeys of family caregivers have not been well-explored. Using a Participatory Action Research approach, we explore the personal recovery journeys of family caregivers for individuals with mental illness. This case study involved piloting and exploring the impact of a novel online workshop series offered to mental health caregivers at Ontario Shores Center for Mental Health Sciences. Recovery courses and workshops conventionally engage patients living with mental health conditions. In the current case, the recovery model is adapted to the needs and experiences of their family caregivers, resulting in a pilot workshop series called "We Care Well". Through participant-led discussions, interactive and take-home activities, and experiential learning, caregivers co-created workshop content and engaged in peer-learning on seven personal recovery-oriented topics. This included: self-care, resilience-building, non-violent communication, storytelling, and mental health advocacy. Throughout the sessions, participants implemented their learnings into their caregiving roles, and shared their experiences with the group to progress through their own recovery journeys. The We Care Well series was found to be an effective intervention to adapt and apply the personal recovery framework to mental health caregivers. PAR, and co-design are viable approaches to engage caregivers in mental health research, and can facilitate knowledge exchange, as well as relationship building with peers and program facilitators.

Moderators of treatment effect in a randomised controlled trial of single- and multi-family therapy for anorexia nervosa in adolescents and emerging adults

INTRODUCTION

Multi-family therapy for anorexia nervosa (MFT-AN) is a novel, group-based intervention that intensifies single-family therapy for anorexia nervosa (FT-AN), with the aim of improving outcomes. The current study explored treatment moderators in a randomised controlled trial (N = 167) of FT-AN and MFT-AN for young people (adolescents/emerging adults aged 13-20 years) with anorexia nervosa.

METHODS

Data were analysed using multiple linear regression. Six hypothesised baseline participant and parent factors were tested as possible moderators of treatment effect on end-of-treatment and follow-up percentage of median Body Mass Index (%mBMI); age, eating disorder symptom severity, perceived family conflict (young person and parent ratings) and parent-rated experiences of caregiving (positive and negative).

RESULTS

Greater parent-rated positive caregiving experiences moderated treatment outcomes at follow-up (β = -0.47, 95%CI: -0.91, -0.03, p = 0.04), but not end-of-treatment. Participants who had fewer parent-rated positive caregiving experiences at baseline had higher weight at follow-up if they had MFT-AN compared to FT-AN. No other hypothesised baseline factors moderated treatment outcome (p's > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The current study suggests MFT-AN may be indicated for families who present with fewer positive caregiving experiences to treatment. The MFT-AN group context may help to promote mentalisation and hope for these families, which may be harder to achieve in single-family treatment. Future research is needed to empirically evaluate how and why MFT-AN supports this group more.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN11275465, registered 29 January 2007.