Perceived Stress Levels in Adult Patients With Uveitis

Barriers to Health Care Access and Use among Racial and Ethnic Minorities with Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To investigate barriers to health care access and use among patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) across different racial and ethnic groups.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants in the nationwide All of Us Research Program who received a diagnosis of chronic NIU.

METHODS

We analyzed the health care access and use (HCA&U) and social determinants of health (SDoH) surveys. Racial and ethnic groups were defined as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, insurance type, and income were used to assess disparities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Financial and nonfinancial disparities in health care access among racial and ethnic groups.

RESULTS

Of 2452 patients with NIU, 810 patients (33%) responded to the HCA&U survey and 607 patients (24.7%) responded to the SDoH survey. Non-Hispanic Black participants reported significantly more experiences of being treated with less courtesy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-5; P = 0.003) and respect (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.8; P = 0.003), as well as receiving poorer services (aOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.9-6.9; P < 0.001) compared with non-Hispanic White participants. Individuals categorized as belonging to other minority groups were more likely to delay seeking medical care because of out-of-pocket costs (aOR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6-7.1; P = 0.001) and concerns over medical bills (aOR, 2; 95% CI, 1.05-3.8; P = 0.04). Additionally, they experienced significant delays in care because of living in rural areas with limited access to health care providers (aOR, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.4-35.6; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic minorities with NIU face significant barriers to health care use and quality, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address disparities and improve health equity in uveitis management.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Psychosocial Well-Being and Quality of Life in Uveitis: A Review

PURPOSE

As a potentially sight-threatening disease with ocular, systemic, and treatment-related complications, uveitis diminishes quality of life (QOL) and affects psychosocial well-being. This review summarizes the existing tools for evaluating psychosocial well-being and/or QOL in patients with uveitis, explores the biological and non-biological factors affecting psychosocial well-being and/or QOL, and proposes future directions for incorporating these tools into clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to June 8, 2022 was conducted, screening for articles focused on psychosocial well-being and/or QOL in patients with uveitis. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In uveitis research, the most frequently studied patient-reported outcome measures were vision-related QOL (e.g. Visual Function Questionnaire [VFQ-25]) and health-related QOL (e.g. Short Form Survey [SF-36]), followed by mental health indicators including depression and anxiety. Instruments have also been developed specific to the pediatric population (e.g. Effects of Youngsters' Eyesight on Quality of Life [EYE-Q]). Generally, studies report worse psychosocial outcomes and QOL in patients with uveitis compared to the general population. Contributory factors include both clinical (e.g. visual impairment, ocular comorbidities) and patient-related (e.g. older age, female sex) factors.

CONCLUSION

Given the heterogeneity of instruments used, it is worth considering standardization across large uveitis studies and trials. Beyond research, given the biopsychosocial effects on patients with uveitis, there are benefits to incorporating QOL and psychosocial assessments into clinical practice. Simplification of questionnaires into abridged forms, focusing on the most clinically relevant aspects of patient care, may be considered.

Uveitis Registries - A Digital Tool for Patient Care, Education, Research, and Collaboration

PURPOSE

Clinical registries are increasingly important in research and clinical advancement. This review explores and compares current uveitis registries and recommends future directions on how uveitis registries can complement one another for synergistic effect and benefit.

METHODS

From a systematic search, 861 citations were screened for longitudinal, non-interventional, and multicenter uveitis-specific registries. Additional registries were identified via consultations with uveitis experts. Characteristics of all registries were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Four registries were identified: Treatment Exit Options for Non-infectious Uveitis, AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance International Registry, Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study, and Fight Uveitis Blindness!. Despite certain differences, these registries have the overarching goal of collecting large quantities of real-world, high-quality patient data to improve the understanding of uveitis.

CONCLUSION

The four uveitis registries share similar goals and collect clinical data from overlapping geographical regions. There is vast potential for collaboration, including data sharing to further augment datasets for analysis.

Factors associated with stress-related symptoms among people with epilepsy in Ethiopia, a cross-sectional study

Introduction

Stress is a common psychological problem present in people with epilepsy and has a serious impact on the health-related satisfaction of people with epilepsy and their cohabiters. This study aimed to assess the magnitude and related factors of stress.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 301 systematically chosen people with epilepsy. The seven stress-related items of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress -21 questionnaire was used to measure stress. Data were entered using Epi Info and analyzed by SPSS version 25. Predictors with a p-value < 0.20 in the bivariate logistic regression were transferred into the multivariate model. A p-value of less than 0.05 was viewed as statistically significant.

Result

The prevalence of stress symptoms in this study was 23.9%. Daily labor occupational status with Adjusted Odds ratio [(AOR) = 0.042, 95% CI: 0.004, 0.469], onset of illness at the age of 18 years and above (AOR = 0.188, 95% CI: 0.046, 0.771), perceived stigma (AOR = 3.320, 95% CI: 1.345, 8.200), the presence of anxiety symptoms (AOR = 8.275, 95% CI: 3.345, 20.471), and belief that the condition is untreatable (AOR = 6.360, 95% CI: 1.647, 24.562) were significantly associated factors.

Conclusion

The occurrence of stress was high, and it reinforced that there is a requisite for the identification and handling of stress-related symptoms among people with epilepsy.

Non-infectious uveitis burden on quality of life and work impairment assessed through different psychometric questionnaires

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between a novel psychometric 12-item questionnaire (U-qest) and other validated questionnaires to assess quality of life and work impairment in patients with non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

Data were collected at baseline and 3 months postbaseline using U-qest and two other validated questionnaires: The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12).

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients (52.2% female) aged 47.9 ± 14.8 years (mean ± SD) were enrolled in 14 uveitis referral centres. U-qest correlated moderately with VFQ-25 and SF-12 at baseline and at 3 months. Both U-qest and VFQ-25 scores improved as disease improved; however, U-qest also detected improvement in patients for whom VFQ-25 scores did not improve. Disease activity was shown to significantly affect activity impairment. Patients and physicians expressed positive perceptions regarding the use and benefit of this instrument. U-qest showed very good reliability in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

U-qest can be considered a useful tool to assess the burden of uveitis on quality of life.