Effectiveness of De-Escalation in Reducing Aggression and Coercion in Acute Psychiatric Units. A Cluster Randomized Study

Nursing strategies for implementing psychosocial interventions to address violence behavior in schizophrenia: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial interventions are crucial in managing violent behavior problems in people with schizophrenia, considering the high risk to self and others. Although drug therapy plays an important role, psychotherapy approaches offer holistic solutions in reducing violent behavior that is complex and often resistant to treatment. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the literature on these psychosocial interventions is necessary to evaluate the various approaches that have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to map and synthesize existing literature on psychosocial interventions designed to reduce violent behavior in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

A scoping review was carried out by searching for articles from the CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases using the keywords "schizophrenia", "nursing". "psychosocial intervention", and "violence". Inclusion criteria included studies published in English using original research, reporting the results of a nursing intervention, full text, and a publication period of the last five years (2019-2024). Data was extracted using manual tables, and analysis was carried out descriptively qualitatively.

RESULTS

There were 12 articles that met the inclusion criteria and discussed various psychosocial interventions to reduce violent behavior in people with schizophrenia. The results showed that five types of nursing strategies, logotherapy, assertive therapy, forgiveness therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and social skills training (SST), and assertive communication and de-escalation training, consistently resulted in significant reductions in violent behavior.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to managing violent behavior in schizophrenia by utilizing psychosocial interventions that have been proven to be effective. However, the limited number of studies, heterogeneity in intervention methods, and variability in outcome assessments warrant careful interpretation of the results. Nursing implications include improvements in training and support for nurses to implement these interventions in daily clinical practice. Recommendations for future research include the need for more in-depth studies to explore effective intervention mechanisms as well as improvements in methodologically more robust study designs.

Mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: A systematic review of international prevalence, associations, outcomes, and reduction strategies

BACKGROUND

There is increasing emphasis on reducing the use and improving the safety of mechanical restraint (MR) in psychiatric settings, and on improving the quality of evidence for outcomes. To date, however, a systematic appraisal of evidence has been lacking.

METHODS

We included studies of adults (aged 18-65) admitted to inpatient psychiatric settings. We included primary randomised or observational studies from 1990 onwards that reported patterns of MR and/or outcomes associated with MR, and qualitative studies referring to an index admission or MR episode. We presented prevalence data only for studies from 2010 onwards. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted checklist for randomised/observational studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for interventional studies.

RESULTS

We included 83 articles on 73 studies from 1990-2022, from 22 countries. Twenty-six studies, from 11 countries, 2010 onwards, presented data from on proportions of patients/admissions affected by MR. There was wide variation in prevalence (<1-51%). This appeared to be mostly due to variations in standard protocols between countries and regions, which dictated use compared to other restrictive practices such as seclusion. Indications for MR were typically broad (violence/aggression, danger to self or property). The most consistently associated factors were the early phase of admission, male sex, and younger age. Ward and staff factors were inconsistently examined. There was limited reporting of patient experience or positive effects.

CONCLUSIONS

MR remains widely practiced in psychiatric settings internationally, with considerable variation in rates, but few high-quality studies of outcomes. There was a notable lack of studies investigating different types of restraint, indications, clinical factors associated with use, the impact of ethnicity and language, and evidence for outcomes. Studies examining these factors are crucial areas for future research. In limiting the use of MR, some ward-level interventions show promise, however, wider contextual factors are often overlooked.

Differentiating Therapeutic Responses That Reduce Restrictive Practice Use and Situational Aggression in an Acute Mental Health Unit

AIM

An analysis of mental health nursing de-escalation logs for 249 days from a regional adult inpatient unit in New South Wales, Australia, was completed to identify groups of cooccurring nursing therapeutic responses to aggression and examine their associations with reductions in restrictive practices and situational aggression.

DESIGN

A single-centre retrospective study was undertaken.

METHOD

Hierarchical clustering of nursing interventions established groups of cooccurring nursing responses. Poisson mixed-effect models were then used to determine the associations of the intervention clusters with restrictive practices.

RESULTS

Two intervention clusters emerged: Cluster 1 involved verbal de-escalation with active listening and rapport building, whereas Cluster 2 included additional limit setting and problem-solving, distraction, sensory modulation, environmental change and individual staff time. Cluster 1 was linked with a reduction in seclusion use by 83% [IRR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.07, 0.41), p < 0.001], physical restraint by 79% [IRR = 0.21, 95% CI (0.11, 0.40), p < 0.001] and average judged situational aggression by 1.56 [95% CI (0.86, 2.25), p < 0.001]. Cluster 2 was related to statistically insignificant increases in the three studied outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention clusters prove the value of supplementary tools in surfacing nurses' therapeutic potential. The differences in restrictive practice use between intervention clusters signal the structure and progression of forming therapeutic relationships in aid of de-escalation and the possibility of assessing de-escalation components robustly.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Acknowledging and supporting nurses' therapeutic work support the development of recovery-oriented care and a positive professional identity for nurses.

REPORTING METHOD

This study followed the applicable STROBE guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Due to the study's retrospective nature, there was no service user or public involvement.

Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain

This article explores the use of coercive measures, particularly mechanical and pharmacological restraints, in disability care settings and mental health services from a bioethical perspective, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorder, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorders. A robust bioethical framework is presented, advocating for principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, dignity, dialogical justice, distributive justice, and vulnerability. These principles are integrated to reframe interventions and promote respect for patient rights. The article provides a detailed account of the legal framework governing these practices in Spain, addressing both national and regional legislation, and emphasizing its significance in protecting human rights. Finally, practical recommendations are offered, which have proven effective in significantly reducing the need for coercive interventions. The article concludes by advocating for a transformation in clinical practices, promoting dignified and respectful care in line with a human rights framework, and moving away from unnecessary coercive measures.

Evaluating De-Escalation Training for Direct and Indirect Employees Caring for Residents With Huntington's Disease

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about reducing the challenges for caregivers and patients with Huntington's disease (HD). HD creates behavioral disturbances, cognitive decline, and motor disorder progression over the lifetime requiring some individuals to need long-term facility care.

AIMS

There are concerns about safety and confidence of employees caring for residents with HD.

METHODS

Nursing staff, administrators, and auxiliary employees were recruited from a long-term care (LTC) facility in rural Iowa, from July 2020 to August 2020. A de-escalation training intervention was delivered. The 1-day intervention included resident behaviors, planning and safety, teamwork, communication, and included role play and simulation. A pre- and post-survey measured confidence and competence in caring for people with HD before and after a training intervention. A resident medical record audit explored challenging behaviors before and after the training intervention.

RESULTS

Of 25 participants, six were registered nurses/licensed practical nurses (RNs/LPNs; 24%), four administrators (16%), eight nursing assistants (32%), and seven auxiliary employees (28%). There was improvement in employees perceived safety (33.3%), co-workers enjoyment working with HD residents (54%), understanding symptoms of HD (44.4%), confidence in job abilities (21.0%), and confidence in ability to care for patients with HD (26.3%). A medical record audit showed decreased documentation of resident aggression and care refusal post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest de-escalation training in LTC facilities increased perception of job safety, co-workers' enjoyment, understanding HD symptoms, confidence in ability to care for patients with HD, and decreased resident agitation and care refusal.

Investigating the association of mechanical restraint with somatic harmful outcomes: national register-based study

BACKGROUND

Coercive measures to manage disruptive or violent behaviour are accepted as standard practice in mental healthcare, but systematic knowledge of potentially harmful outcomes is insufficient.

AIMS

To examine the association of mechanical restraint with several predefined somatic harmful outcomes.

METHOD

We conducted a population-based, observational cohort study linking data from the Danish national registers from 2007 to 2019. The primary analyses investigated the association of mechanical restraint with somatic adverse events, using panel regression analyses (within-individual analysis) to account for repeated exposures and outcomes. Secondary between-group analyses were performed with a control group exposed to types of coercion other than mechanical restraint.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 13 022 individuals. We report a statistically significant association of mechanical restraint with thromboembolic events (relative risk 4.377, number needed to harm (NNH) 8231), pneumonia (relative risk 5.470, NNH 3945), injuries (relative risk 2.286, NNH 3240) and all-cause death (relative risk 5.540, NNH 4043) within 30 days after mechanical restraint. Estimates from the between-group analyses (comparing the exposed group with a control group of 22 643 individuals) were non-significant or indicated increased baseline risk in the control group. A positive dose-response analysis for cardiac arrest, injury and death supported a causative role of mechanical restraint in the reported associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the observed absolute risk increases were small, the derived relative risks were non-negligible considering that less restrictive interventions are available. Clinicians and decision makers should be aware of the excess risk in future decisions on the use of mechanical restraint versus alternative interventions.

Incident of violence escalation of patients with psychiatric emergencies boarding in the emergency department in the central region of Thailand and its association: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the incidence of violence escalation among psychiatric emergency patients admitted to general emergency departments in hospitals in central Thailand. In addition, patient and service delivery system factors associated with the survival time of violence escalation in 16 emergency departments in the central region of Thailand are determined. This is a prospective observational study, and the study sample includes 507 psychiatric emergency patients who are ≥ 18 years old. The patients are selected through stratified random and purposive sampling.

METHODS

Patient data-including demographic data, emergency services used, and clinical characteristics-are analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method estimates the violence escalation curve, and the log-rank test compares the violence escalation-free time between the levels of the violent behavior group. In addition, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses are performed to investigate the factors affecting violence escalation.

RESULTS

The incidence of violence escalation in psychiatric emergency patients in the emergency department is 7.3%, whereas the incidence rate of violence escalation is 3 per 100 psychiatric emergency patient visit hours. Factors affecting violence escalation include the violent behavior score at triage (aHR = 2.004; 95% CI: 1.051-3.823) and the nurse competency score (aHR = 0.147; 95% CI: 0.032-0.680).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing the violent behavior of psychiatric emergency patients at triage may assist emergency providers in monitoring patient behavior and providing early intervention to prevent the escalation of violent behavior. Furthermore, training emergency nurses in psychiatric emergency care is necessary.

A systematic review of interventions to reduce mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings

Mechanical restraint is a commonly used restrictive practice worldwide, although reducing its use is an international priority. Interventions to reduce mechanical restraint are needed if reducing mechanical restraint is to succeed. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine evaluated evidence-based interventions that seek to reduce the incidence of and/or time in mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings. The JBI framework was used to guide this systematic review. The search strategy included peer-reviewed primary research literature published between 1999 and 2023. Two authors independently conducted the systematic search, selection process and data extraction process. Forty-one studies were included in this review. Using content analysis, we grouped interventions into four categories: (I) calm-down methods, (II) staff resources, (III) legal and policy changes and (IV) changing staff culture. Interventions to reduce mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings have shown some promise. Evidence suggests that a range of interventions can reduce the incidence of and/or time in mechanical restraint. However, controlled trials were lacking and consensus was lacking across studies. Furthermore, specific findings varied widely, and reporting was inconsistent, hampering the development of interventions for this issue. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for reducing mechanical restraint in mental health inpatient settings.

Psychiatric emergencies during pregnancy and puerperium in low - And middle-income countries

Pregnancy and puerperium are critical points in women's health, and various psychiatric emergencies may worsen or manifest (for the first time) during this period. In the presence of a psychiatric emergency, the pregnancy and puerperium outcomes may be compromised. In addition to the mother being at risk, the health of the fetus and the newborn may also be compromised if the psychiatric emergency is not managed appropriately. Early detection and collaborative approaches between mental health practitioners and obstetricians are of utmost importance in women who are at risk and those living with psychiatric illnesses during pregnancy and puerperium. Practitioners should also ensure that women with impaired capacity due to psychiatric disease are treated in a non-judgmental and respectful manner, even if their autonomies have been overridden.

Implementation of guidelines on prevention of coercion and violence (PreVCo) in psychiatry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Background

Interventions to prevent the use of coercion in psychiatric hospitals have been summarized in the 2018 German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatic's comprehensive guidelines. Twelve recommendations for implementation of these guideline on psychiatric wards have been deducted and their feasibility has been tested in a pilot study, using external implementation consultants as facilitators. The objective of the PreVCo study was to test their effect in a randomised clinical trial.

Methods

Fifty-four psychiatric wards in Germany treating voluntary and involuntary patients were randomly allocated to either an intervention or to a waiting list condition. The intervention consisted of the implementation of three out of 12 suggested recommendations as selected by the ward teams, supported by external study workers. As the primary outcome measure, the number of coercive measures used per bed and month in the final 3 months of the intervention period was determined. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative duration of coercive measures used per bed and months and assaults per bed and month. Achieved guideline adherence was measured by a fidelity scale developed for this purpose during a pilot study for the PreVCo Rating Tool. After a 3-month baseline collection period under routine conditions, randomisation was done after matching wards pairwise according to frequency of coercive measures used and scores on the PreVCo Rating Tool at baseline. The duration of the intervention period was 12 months; control wards received only an initial workshop presentation of the study and completed their PreVCo ratings. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the paired t-test and conducted sensitivity analyses for different periods of observation.

Findings

Neither the number of coercive measures used per month and bed nor their cumulative duration nor the number of assaults per bed and months differed significantly between the 27 intervention wards and the 27 control wards in the final 3 months of the intervention period. The median number of coercive measures used decreased by 45% (median 0.96 (IQR 1.34)-0.53 (IQR 0.59) from baseline until the end of the intervention period on the intervention wards and by 28% (median 0.98 (IQR 1.71)-0.71 (IQR 1.08) on waiting list wards. The PreVCo Rating Tool showed a significant improvement in intervention wards compared to control wards, indicating a successful implementation.

Interpretation

The study demonstrated that guideline adherence could be significantly improved by the intervention. However, there was no evidence for an effect on the frequency or duration of coercive measures used. Spill-over effects and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-patient care might have limited the effect of the intervention. Further research from robust randomised controlled trials are necessary to identify effective interventions to reduce the use of coercion in psychiatric hospitals.

Funding

The study was funded by the German Innovationsfonds beim Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss (project no. 01VSF19037). The funder had no role in study design or data collection.

["If certain tensions are present, it affects everyone": Multiple case study on processes of coercive measures.]

"If certain tensions are present, it affects everyone": Multiple case study on processes of coercive measures. Abstract: Background: There is an urgent need to reduce coercive measures in psychiatric care. The interaction between patients, nursing staff and medical professionals influences the course of a coercive measure. Aim: The interaction before, during and after coercive measures will be described and compared from the perspectives of the parties involved in order to identify a potential for prevention and quality improvement. Methods: A multiple case study of three coercive measures was conducted, each consisting of interviews with three participants, case documentation, photos, and observation. The data material was analysed thematically with subsequent single-case and cross-case analysis. Results: The thematic analysis revealed three areas of tension: tension and relaxation, humaneness and dehumanisation, as well as safety and autonomy. The stage before coercion was characterised by interacting tensions and the influence of emotions and stress. In all cases, a verbal communication gap was present. During the coercive measure, the quality of interactions between patients and nurses determined their experience. After coercion, the impacts of the measure on the persons and their relationships as well as reflections were the focus. Conclusions: De-escalation techniques turn out to be a key issue, whereby special attention should be paid to emotional and nonverbal aspects in the future. The results underline the relevance of empathy and respect throughout the process for prevention as well as for quality of care. Debriefings of coercive measures should be conducted routinely.

Best practice recommendations on the application of seclusion and restraint in mental health services: An evidence, human rights and consensus-based approach

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Seclusion and restraint still regularly occur within inpatient mental health services. The Council of Europe requires the development of a policy on for instance age limits, techniques and time limits. However, they only define the outer limits of such a policy by indicating when rights are violated. Within these limits, many choices remain open. Staff and service managers lack clarity on safe and humane procedures. Research literature provides limited and contradictory insights on these matters. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The study resulted in 77 best practice recommendations on the practical application of restraint and seclusion as last resort intervention in inpatient youth and adult mental health services, including forensic facilities. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the development of recommendations on this topic is not only based on scientific evidence, but also on an analysis of European human rights standards and consensus within and between expert-professionals and experts-by-experience. This approach allowed to develop for the first time recommendations on time limits, asking for second opinion, and registration of seclusion and restraint. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The 77 recommendations encourage staff to focus on teamwork, safety measures, humane treatment, age and time limits, asking for second opinion, observation, evaluation and registration when applying seclusion and restraint as last resort intervention. The implementation of the best practice recommendations is feasible provided that they are combined with a broad preventive approach and with collaboration between service managers, staff (educators) and experts-by-experience. Under these conditions, the recommendations will improve safety and humane treatment, and reduce harm to both service users and staff.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Seclusion and restraint still regularly occur within inpatient mental health services. Professionals lack clarity on safe and humane procedures. Nevertheless, a detailed policy on for instance age limits, techniques and time limits is required.

AIM

We developed recommendations on the humane and safe application of seclusion, physical intervention and mechanical restraint in inpatient youth and adult mental health services, including forensic facilities.

METHOD

After developing a questionnaire based on a rapid scientific literature review and an analysis of human rights sources stemming from the Council of Europe, 60 expert-professionals and 18 experts-by-experience were consulted in Flanders (Belgium) through a Delphi-study.

RESULTS

After two rounds, all but one statement reached the consensus-level of 65% in both panels. The study resulted in 77 recommendations on teamwork, communication, materials and techniques, maximum duration, observation, evaluation, registration, second opinion and age limits.

DISCUSSION

Combining an evidence, human rights and consensus-based approach allowed for the first time to develop recommendations on time limits, asking for second opinion and registration.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

When combined with a preventive approach and collaboration between service managers, staff (educators) and experts-by-experience, the recommendations will improve safety and humane treatment, and reduce harm to service users and staff.