Implementation mapping to plan for a hybrid trial testing the effectiveness and implementation of a behavioral intervention for HIV medication adherence and care retention

Deimplementation of ineffective and harmful medical practices: a data-driven commentary

Deimplementation is the discontinuation or abandonment of medical practices that are ineffective or of unclear effectiveness, ranging from simply unhelpful to harmful. With epidemiology expanding to include more translational sciences, epidemiologists can contribute to deimplementation by defining evidence, establishing causality, and advising on study design. An estimated 10%-30% of health care practices have minimal to no benefit to patients and should be targeted for deimplementation. The steps in deimplementation are (1) identify low-value clinical practices, (2) facilitate the deimplementation process, (3) evaluate deimplementation outcomes, and (4) sustain deimplementation, each of which is a complex project. Deimplementation science involves researchers, health care and clinical stakeholders, and patient and community partners affected by the medical practice. Increasing collaboration between epidemiologists and implementation scientists is important to optimizing health care delivery.

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of the B-OK Bottles as an Implementation Strategy for Treatment Adherence Support by Medical Case Managers

Antiretroviral therapy treatment adherence support by medical case managers is an evidence-based practice, but effectiveness may be constrained by limited understanding of antiretroviral therapy's benefits among people with HIV. We used mixed methods to evaluate the pre-implementation context of the B-OK Bottles ("B-OK") - a visual aid designed to correct HIV mental models - as an implementation strategy for treatment adherence support by medical case managers in Philadelphia. We assessed outcomes of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness among medical case managers and people with HIV. We conducted case manager focus groups at four agencies, and enrolled clients of case managers at these agencies. Clients received the B-OK intervention, a survey, and individual interviews. Among clients, we assessed implementation scales: Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, and Intervention Appropriateness Measure. During focus groups, medical case managers (N = 29) found B-OK to be highly acceptable and feasible, and that it would be appropriate as a conversation starter. Individual interviews (N = 52) also demonstrated high degrees of B-OK acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness for use by case managers. Medical case managers and people with HIV felt that B-OK could improve individual motivation for medication adherence. However, participants also identified other substantial barriers to adherence besides knowledge and understanding. Quantitative results were consistent with our qualitative findings, with high scores on implementation scales. This study suggests that B-OK would be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate as an implementation strategy for treatment adherence support by medical case managers, but that a multifaceted approach is likely needed to achieve optimal adherence.

Opportunities to Advance Equity Through Implementation Strategy Design

Background

Implementation strategies are potential tools for advancing equity goals in healthcare. Implementation scientists have increased attention to the integration of equity considerations into implementation research, but limited concrete guidance is available for developing implementation strategies to improve equity.

Main

In parallel to an active hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in two large health systems, our research team explored potential inequities in implementation across four non-study clinics, developed equity focused audit and feedback procedures, examined the feasibility of our approach, and identified design insights that could be tested in future work to inform equitable program scale-up. Based on our experiences deploying these strategies in pilot format, our research team identified key complexities meriting further examination in future work. These considerations are vital given the dearth of guidance on delivering feedback to clinicians in efforts to improve equity. Key takeaways include the importance of understanding local data culture, engaging constituents in co-design for the full feedback cycle, leveraging feedback for shared discourse, and centering multi-level strategies as part of robust implementation approaches.

Conclusion

Prioritizing health equity in implementation science requires that research teams probe, interrogate, and innovate - and in doing so, grapple with central conceptual and pragmatic considerations that arise in the design of implementation strategies. Our work emphasizes the value of bidirectional and continuous learning.

Co-designing strategies to implement long-acting injectable PrEP for sexual minority men in Chicago: a study protocol for an innovation tournament and implementation mapping

BACKGROUND

Participatory design approaches can improve successful selection and tailoring of implementation strategies by centering the voices of key constituents. To reduce incidence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the USA, co-design of implementation strategies is needed for long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA), a new form of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, among the disproportionately impacted population of sexual minority men (SMM). This manuscript describes the protocol for participatory design approaches (i.e., innovation tournament and implementation mapping) to inform implementation of CAB-LA among SMM (≥ 12 years), particularly Black and Latino populations, in Chicago.

METHODS

This research incorporates innovative methods to accomplish two objectives: (1) to crowdsource ideas for the design of implementation strategies for CAB-LA through a virtual innovation tournament and (2) to leverage the ideas from the innovation tournament to operationalize implementation strategies for CAB-LA thorough the systematic process of implementation mapping. A committee of constituents with diverse expertise and perspectives (e.g., SMM, implementation scientists, HIV clinicians, public health leadership, and community partners) will provide input throughout the design process.

DISCUSSION

This research will produce a menu of co-designed implementation strategies, which can guide plans for CAB-LA integration in Chicago and provide insights for other EHE regions. Further, as the first innovation tournament focused on HIV prevention, this research can provide a framework for participatory approaches across the care continuum. Given that the co-design of implementation strategies often does not involve the participation of individuals with lived experiences, this work will center the voices of those who will benefit most.

Increasing antiretroviral therapy adherence and retention in care among adults living with HIV in Philadelphia: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of managed problem-solving plus (MAPS+) delivered by community health workers

INTRODUCTION

To end the HIV epidemic in Philadelphia, implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP) to increase viral suppression and retention in HIV care is critical. Managed problem solving (MAPS), an EBP for antiretroviral therapy adherence, follows a problem-solving approach to empower people living with HIV (PWH) to manage their health. To overcome barriers to care experienced by PWH in Philadelphia, the EBP was adapted to include a focus on care retention and delivery by community health workers (CHWs). The adapted intervention is MAPS+. To maximise the clinical impact and reach of the intervention, evaluation of the effectiveness and implementation of MAPS+ is necessary.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This manuscript describes the protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial in 10 clinics in Philadelphia. This research incorporates innovative approaches to accomplish three objectives: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of the CHW-led MAPS+ intervention to improve viral suppression and retention in care 1 year after the individual implementation period (N=390 participants), (2) to examine the effect of the menu of implementation strategies on reach and implementation cost and (3) to examine processes, mechanisms, and sustainment of the implementation strategies for MAPS+ (N=56 participants). Due to various factors (eg, COVID-19), protocol modifications have occurred.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The institutional review board (IRB) at the city of Philadelphia serves as the primary IRB; initial approval was granted on 21 December 2020. The University of Pennsylvania and Northwestern University executed reliance agreements. A safety monitoring committee comprised experts in implementation science, biostatistics and infectious diseases oversee this study. This research will offer insights into achieving the goals to end the HIV epidemic in Philadelphia as well as implementation efforts of MAPS+ and other behavioural interventions aimed at increasing medication adherence and retention in care. Dissemination will include deliverables (eg, peer-reviewed manuscripts and lay publications) to reach multiple constituents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04560621.

"Now is the time for institutions to be investing in growing exercise programs as part of standard of care": a multiple case study examining the implementation of exercise oncology interventions

BACKGROUND

Implementation science seeks to systematically identify determinants, strategies, and outcomes within a causal pathway to help explain successful implementation. This process is applied to evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to improve their adoption, implementation, and sustainment. However, this method has not been applied to exercise oncology services, meaning we lack knowledge about implementing exercise EBIs in routine practice. This study aimed to develop causal pathways from the determinants, strategies (including mechanism of change), and implementation outcomes to explain exercise EBIs implementation in routine cancer care.

METHODS

A multiple-case study was conducted across three healthcare sites in Australia. Sites selected had implemented exercise within routine care for people diagnosed with cancer and sustained the delivery of services for at least 12 months. Four data sources informed the study: semi-structured interviews with staff, document reviews, observations, and the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (survey). Framework analysis was applied to understand the findings. The Implementation Research Logic Model was used to identify commonalities in implementation across sites and develop causal pathways.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighteen data points informed our findings. Across sites, 18 determinants and 22 implementation strategies were consistent. Sixteen determinants and 24 implementation strategies differed across sites and results of implementation outcomes varied. We identified 11 common pathways that when combined, help explain implementation processes. The mechanisms of implementation strategies operating within the pathways included (1) knowledge, (2) skills, (3) secure resources, (4) optimism, and (5) simplified decision-making processes associated with exercise; (6) relationships (social and professional) and support for the workforce; (7) reinforcing positive outcomes; (8) capability to action plan through evaluations and (9) interactive learning; (10) aligned goals between the organisation and the EBI; and (11) consumer-responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

This study developed causal pathways that explain the how and why of successful implementation of exercise EBIs in cancer care. These findings can support future planning and optimisation activities by creating more opportunities for people with cancer to access evidence-based exercise oncology services.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Understanding how to implement exercise within routine cancer care successfully is important so cancer survivors can experience the benefits of exercise.