Normothermic regional perfusion in paediatric donation after circulatory determination of death-the Oxford position statement from ELPAT

Heart Transplantation and Donation After Circulatory Death in Children. A Review of the Technological, Logistical and Ethical Framework

Heart transplant for adults following Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) is well established in many parts of the world, including the United Kingdom (UK). Small child DCD hearts have now been recovered in the UK and internationally utilising novel technologies. Despite these recent advances, extension of this practice to pediatric cardiac transplantation has been slow and difficult despite the severe shortage of donors for children leading to a high number of deaths annually of children waiting for heart transplant. This is in direct contrast with the thriving UK programme of adult DCD heart transplant and pediatric DCD donation for non-cardiac organs. There has been insufficient action in addressing this inequality thus far. Barriers to development of a pediatric cardiac DCD programme are multifaceted: ethical concerns, technological paucity, financial and logistical hurdles. We describe the background, live issues, current developments and how we are driving resources toward a sustainable DCD programme for small children in the UK to provide valuable insights to other countries of the elements and principles at play. This is a call to responsible bodies to take urgent and achievable actions to establish an equitable paediatric DCD cardiac programme for donors, recipients and their families.

Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion: Is it ethical?

Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP), a new method of controlled donation after circulatory death, seems to provide more and better organs for patients on organ transplant waiting lists compared to standard controlled donation after circulatory death. Despite its benefits, the ethical permissibility of TA-NRP is currently a highly debated issue. The recent statement published by the American College of Physicians (ACP) highlights the reasons for these debates. Critics' main concern is that TA-NRP violates the Dead Donor Rule. This paper presents an ethical analysis of the objections raised by the ACP against TA-NRP and argues that TA-NRP is not only morally permissible but also morally required where it is financially and technically feasible. To support this conclusion, the concepts of 'resuscitation,' 'intention,' 'irreversibility,' 'permanence,' 'impossibility,' and 'respect' in the context of TA-NRP are explored. Additionally, the ethical permissibility of this procedure is evaluated through the lenses of Utilitarianism, Kantianism, the core principles of bioethics, and the Doctrine of Double Effect. This ethical analysis demonstrates why the ACP's objection lacks a solid moral foundation and conflates moral and legal considerations. This paper also argues that extra measures are needed to ensure the moral permissibility of TA-NRP, emphasizing the importance of informed consent, additional brain blood flow and activity monitoring, and a contingency plan to abort the organ procurement process if a sign of morally relevant brain activity is detected.

A scoping review of the legal and ethical challenges with the use of normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death from 2005 to 2023

Use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) to enable organ reconditioning and assessment in donation after circulatory determination of death is controversial. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles, news media, legal literature, and professional society position statements addressing ethical and/or legal issues in use of NRP in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death from January 1, 2005, to January 5, 2024. Thematic analysis, assessing the 4 principles of bioethics (autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) and subthemes identified within each, was conducted for the 112 publications meeting inclusion criteria. More than 30 publications addressed the topic in each of 2022 and 2023, vs ≤6 per year previously. Nonmaleficence was the most frequently addressed bioethical principle (111/112 publications), and the most varied, with 14 subthemes. Attitudes toward NRP differed by type of NRP: of 72 publications discussing thoracoabdominal NRP, 22 (30.6%) were "In Favor," 39 (54.2%) were "Neutral," and 11 (15.3%) were "Against"; of 44 discussing abdominal NRP, 23 (52.3%) were "In Favor," 20 (45.5%) were "Neutral," and 1 (2.3%) was "Against." Attitudes differed by authors' country, degree, and affiliation, and by the clinical focus of the publishing journal. Overall, our review shows that the ethical and legal issues raised by NRP remain unresolved, and the debate centered on nonmaleficence.

Developing and Expanding Deceased Organ Donation to Its Maximum Therapeutic Potential: An Actionable Global Challenge From the 2023 Santander Summit

On November 9 and 10, 2023, the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), under the Spanish Presidency of the Council of the European Union, convened in Santander a Global Summit entitled "Towards Global Convergence in Transplantation: Sufficiency, Transparency and Oversight." This article summarizes two distinct but related challenges elaborated at the Santander Summit by Working Group 2 that must be overcome if we are to develop and expand deceased donation worldwide and achieve the goal of self-sufficiency in organ donation and transplantation. Challenge 1: the need for a unified concept of death based on the permanent cessation of brain function. Working group 2 proposed that challenge 1 requires the global community to work toward a uniform, worldwide definition of human death, conceptually unifying circulatory and neurological criteria of death around the cessation of brain function and accepting that permanent cessation of brain function is a valid criterion to determine death. Challenge 2: reducing disparities in deceased donation and increasing organ utilization through donation after the circulatory determination of death (DCDD). Working group 2 proposed that challenge 2 requires the global community to work toward increasing organ utilization through DCDD, expanding DCDD through in situ normothermic regional perfusion, and expanding DCDD through ex situ machine organ perfusion technology. Recommendations for implementation are described.

Paediatric acute liver failure: a multidisciplinary perspective on when a critically ill child is unsuitable for liver transplantation

Paediatric acute liver failure is a devastating condition with high morbidity and mortality, which is challenging to manage for the hepatologist, intensivist, and associated specialists. Emergency liver transplantation is required for 10-20% of patients, but for 10% of critically ill children, liver transplantation is deemed unsuitable; the child might be too unwell, or the underlying cause might carry a poor prognosis. Other social, logistical, or ethical considerations are often relevant. Liver transplantation when a patient is too unwell creates perioperative risk to the child that could lead to morbidity, mortality, and potential graft wastage, which is detrimental for others on the waiting list. Donor liver scarcity should prompt an evaluation of whether a transplant is justified through a holistic multidisciplinary lens that considers medical, social, logistical, and ethical concerns. In this Review, we explore, from a multidisciplinary perspective, why a critically unwell child with paediatric acute liver failure might be unsuitable for liver transplantation.

Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion for thoracic transplantation in the United States: current state and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update regarding the state of thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (taNRP) when used for thoracic organ recovery.

RECENT FINDINGS

taNRP is growing in its utilization for thoracic organ recovery from donation after circulatory death donors, partly because of its cost effectiveness. taNRP has been shown to yield cardiac allograft recipient outcomes similar to those of brain-dead donors. Regarding the use of taNRP to recover donor lungs, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) analysis shows that taNRP recovered lungs are noninferior, and taNRP has been used to consistently recover excellent lungs at high volume centers. Despite its growth, ethical debate regarding taNRP continues, though clinical data now supports the notion that there is no meaningful brain perfusion after clamping the aortic arch vessels.

SUMMARY

taNRP is an excellent method for recovering both heart and lungs from donation after circulatory death donors and yields satisfactory recipient outcomes in a cost-effective manner. taNRP is now endorsed by the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, though ethical debate continues.