The validity and reliability of counter movement jump height measured with the Polar Vantage V2 sports watch

Interaction between the leg recovery test and subjective measures of fatigue in handball players: short-, mid-, and long-term assessment

Background

The physical and mental demands of handball during training or competition often lead to fatigue which can impair performance. Many attempts have been made to assess the level of fatigue in athletes either by objective (neuromuscular performance) or subjective (questionnaires) measures, however, their interplay over short-, mid-, and long-term periods is currently unknown. Knowledge about both types of assessments is important as load management by coaches is traditionally based on direct adjustments following a training session, adjustments of content structure of training weeks between games, as well as adjustments of load management over the entire competitive season. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the interplay between objective and subjective fatigue measures at multiple test times throughout a handball season.

Methods

A total of 100 highly trained (Tier level 3) adolescent or young adult team handball players (23 females) took part in the study. The parameters tested were the Leg Recovery Test (LRT score) which is based on the countermovement jump height (CMJ) and was assessed by a commercial wristwatch (Polar Vantage V2) as an objective measure of neuromuscular fatigue. Additionally, on a subjective level, questionnaire-based athlete self-report measures, specifically the Perceived Recovery Status Scale (PRSS) and the Short Scale of Recovery and Strain (KEB) were assessed. We used non-parametric tests to detect differences between relevant test time points (short-term: immediately following one handball-specific training session, i.e., from T0 to T1; mid-term: over the course of three consecutive training days, i.e., from T0 to T2; long-term: over the course of 8 months of training, i.e., from T0 to T12) and linear mixed models to evaluate the interplay between objective (LRT score) and subjective (KEB score and PRSS score) measures of fatigue across one season.

Results

Non-parametric tests showed that CMJ height (p = .012) and the KEB (p < .001) were higher at T1 compared to T0 for the short-term assessment. Over the course of three consecutive training days (i.e., mid-term assessment), the CMJ height score decreased (T0 to T2: p < .001; T1 to T2: p = .018) and the PRSS score (T0 to T2: p < .001; T1 to T2: p = .003) increased. Linear mixed models revealed no significant effects of KEB or PRSS score on LRT score (i.e., CMJ height) for the short- and mid-term assessments. In terms of the long-term assessments, we detected no general direct or interaction effects of PRSS score, workload, and test time point on LRT score, except for an interaction between PRSS score and workload on LRT score (p = .032), which indicates a workload-dependent association between PRSS and the objective fatigue measure (LRT score).

Conclusion

Athlete self-reported measures of fatigue indicated significantly higher cumulative fatigue after both short- and mid-term periods, whereas this increase was observed in the LRT score only during the mid-term period. Furthermore, the absence of a relationship between the objective and subjective measures of fatigue during short- and mid-term periods suggests that these measures assess distinct types of fatigue. In the long-term assessments, the significant interaction between the PRSS score and workload on the LRT score suggests that higher workloads are associated with an increased correlation between subjective (PRSS score) and objective (LRT score) measures of fatigue. This indicates that perceived fatigue may be a more sensitive indicator of fatigue, which can be managed to maintain high levels of neuromuscular performance (LRT score). However, with higher workloads (>10 h per week), associations between the objective and subjective measures become apparent, suggesting that workload serves as a common factor influencing overall fatigue.

AI-smartphone markerless motion capturing of hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics during countermovement jumps

Recently, AI-driven skeleton reconstruction tools that use multistage computer vision pipelines were designed to estimate 3D kinematics from 2D video sequences. In the present study, we validated a novel markerless, smartphone video-based artificial intelligence (AI) motion capture system for hip, knee, and ankle angles during countermovement jumps (CMJs). Eleven participants performed six CMJs. We used 2D videos created by a smartphone (Apple iPhone X, 4K, 60 fps) to create 24 different keypoints, which together built a full skeleton including joints and their connections. Body parts and skeletal keypoints were localized by calculating confidence maps using a multilevel convolutional neural network that integrated both spatial and temporal features. We calculated hip, knee, and ankle angles in the sagittal plane and compared it with the angles measured by a VICON system. We calculated the correlation between both method's angular progressions, mean squared error (MSE), mean average error (MAE), and the maximum and minimum angular error and run statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) for hip, knee, and ankle angular progressions in the sagittal plane during the entire movement were 0.96, 0.99, and 0.87, respectively. SPM group-analysis revealed some significant differences only for ankle angular progression. MSE was below 5.7°, MAE was below 4.5°, and error for maximum amplitudes was below 3.2°. The smartphone AI motion capture system with the trained multistage computer vision pipeline was able to detect, especially hip and knee angles in the sagittal plane during CMJs with high precision from a frontal view only.

Monitoring fatigue state with heart rate-based and subjective methods during intensified training in recreational runners

The purpose of this study was firstly to examine the sensitivity of heart rate (HR)-based and subjective monitoring markers to intensified endurance training; and secondly, to investigate the validity of these markers to distinguish individuals in different fatigue states. A total of 24 recreational runners performed a 3-week baseline period, a 2-week overload period, and a 1-week recovery period. Performance was assessed before and after each period with a 3000m running test. Recovery was monitored with daily orthostatic tests, nocturnal HR recordings, questionnaires, and exercise data. The participants were divided into subgroups (overreached/OR, n = 8; responders/RESP, n = 12) based on the changes in performance and subjective recovery. The responses to the second week of the overload period were compared between the subgroups. RESP improved their baseline 3000 m time (p < 0.001) after the overload period (-2.5 ± 1.0%), and the change differed (p < 0.001) from OR (0.6 ± 1.2%). The changes in nocturnal HR (OR 3.2 ± 3.1%; RESP -2.8 ± 3.7%, p = 0.002) and HR variability (OR -0.7 ± 1.8%; RESP 2.1 ± 1.6%, p = 0.011) differed between the subgroups. In addition, the decrease in subjective readiness to train (p = 0.009) and increase in soreness of the legs (p = 0.04) were greater in OR compared to RESP. Nocturnal HR, readiness to train, and exercise-derived HR-running power index had ≥85% positive and negative predictive values in the discrimination between OR and RESP individuals. In conclusion, exercise tolerance can vary substantially in recreational runners. The results supported the usefulness of nocturnal HR and subjective recovery assessments in recognizing fatigue states.

Effects of a Strength and Conditioning Offseason Program on Countermovement Jump Ground Reaction Forces in Division I American Football Players

ABSTRACT

Gillen, ZM, Burch, RF, Saucier, DN, Strawderman, L, Luczak, T, Piroli, A, Petway, AJ, and Rath, T. Effects of a strength and conditioning offseason program on countermovement jump ground reaction forces in Division I American football players. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): e86-e95, 2024-The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 10-week strength and conditioning offseason program on the ground reaction forces (GRFs) of American football players during single-leg and double-leg countermovement jumps (SLJ and CMJ, respectively). Each subject visited the laboratory twice, once for preoffseason and once for postoffseason testing. During each visit, subjects performed CMJs and SLJs for each leg. Ground reaction forces were collected by force plates to quantify unweighting, braking, propulsive, and performance metrics for each jump. In addition, an efficiency index was calculated for each jump to examine changes in vertical jump efficiency. Dependent samples t tests compared all CMJ metrics. Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance (leg × time) compared all SLJ metrics. An alpha level of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the CMJ, propulsive phase duration decreased due to the program ( p = 0.007), whereas peak braking power, peak propulsive power, mean propulsive force, and jump height increased ( p ≤ 0.012). For the SLJ, peak braking power, force at the low position, braking rate of force development, eccentric force, peak propulsive power, mean propulsive force, and jump height increased in both legs ( p ≤ 0.044). The efficiency index increased for the CMJ and the SLJ for both legs ( p ≤ 0.016). This study demonstrated that SLJ and CMJ vertical jump performance significantly increases in as few as 10 weeks of offseason strength and conditioning. Strength and conditioning programming may effectively increase vertical jump performance, as assessed by GRFs, which can be used as a simple indicator regarding changes in athletic performance.