1
|
Blending controlled-release urea and urea under ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching improves yield while mitigating carbon footprint in rainfed potato. Sci Rep 2023; 13:4018. [PMID: 36899074 PMCID: PMC10006086 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25845-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching and various urea types have been applied in rainfed agriculture, but their interactive effects on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and especially environments remain poorly understood. A three-year experiment was conducted to explore the responses of tuber yield, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, net global warming potential (NGWP), carbon footprint (CF), and net ecosystem economic budget (NEEB) of rainfed potato to two mulching practices [plastic film mulching (RM) and no plastic film mulching (NM)] and three urea types [conventional urea (U), controlled-release urea (C), and a mixture of equal amounts of conventional urea and controlled-release urea at a ratio of 1:1 (CU)] and their interactions. The results showed that RM significantly decreased cumulative N2O emissions and CH4 uptake by 4.9% and 28.4%, but significantly increased NGWP by 8.9% relative to NM. Compared with U, the C and CU produced much lower cumulative N2O emissions and NGWP and higher CH4 uptake. The interaction of mulching methods and urea type had significant influence on tuber yield and NEEB. Considering both environment and production, RMCU could not only achieve a high tuber yield and NEEB (by up to 26.5% and 42.9%, respectively), but also reduce the CF (by up to 13.7%), and therefore should be considered an effective strategy for dryland potato.
Collapse
|
2
|
Oilseed Brassica Species Diversification and Crop Geometry Influence the Productivity, Economics, and Environmental Footprints under Semi-Arid Regions. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14042230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The article presents the findings of three-year field experiments conducted during 2017–2020 on the productivity, economics, and environmental footprints of the oilseed Brassica (OSB) with species diversification and crop geometry alterations in semi-arid regions of India. The objectives of the field experimentation was to assess the system of mustard intensification (SMI) in enhancing productivity and profitability with ensuring fewer environmental footprints. The results revealed that Brassica carinata gave a maximum seed productivity (3173.8 kg ha−1) and net returns (US$ 1141.72 ha−1) under a crop geometry of 60 cm × 60 cm. Further, an increase of 38% and 54% in seed yield and net returns from B. carinata was observed over the existing traditional Brassica juncea with conventional crop geometry. The maximum energy output was also recorded from B. carinata (246,445 MJ ha−1). The broader crop geometry (60 cm × 60 cm) also resulted in maximum energy output. The environmental footprint was lesser due to increased carbon gain (CG), carbon output (CO), and carbon production efficiency (CPE) and lower greenhouse gas intensity (GHGi) in B. carinata. However, the maximum water-use efficiency (WUE) was recorded in B. juncea (19.15 kg per ha-mm), with a minimum water footprint (WFP), whereas, greater crop geometry (60 cm × 60 cm) resulted in lower WFPs and better irrigation water use. Enhanced seed yield, economics, and fewer environmental footprints were observed at broader crop geometry in B. carinata over remaining OSBs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Harrison MT, Cullen BR, Mayberry DE, Cowie AL, Bilotto F, Badgery WB, Liu K, Davison T, Christie KM, Muleke A, Eckard RJ. Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:5726-5761. [PMID: 34314548 PMCID: PMC9290661 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Livestock have long been integral to food production systems, often not by choice but by need. While our knowledge of livestock greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation has evolved, the prevailing focus has been-somewhat myopically-on technology applications associated with mitigation. Here, we (1) examine the global distribution of livestock GHG emissions, (2) explore social, economic and environmental co-benefits and trade-offs associated with mitigation interventions and (3) critique approaches for quantifying GHG emissions. This review uncovered many insights. First, while GHG emissions from ruminant livestock are greatest in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC; globally, 66% of emissions are produced by Latin America and the Caribbean, East and southeast Asia and south Asia), the majority of mitigation strategies are designed for developed countries. This serious concern is heightened by the fact that 80% of growth in global meat production over the next decade will occur in LMIC. Second, few studies concurrently assess social, economic and environmental aspects of mitigation. Of the 54 interventions reviewed, only 16 had triple-bottom line benefit with medium-high mitigation potential. Third, while efforts designed to stimulate the adoption of strategies allowing both emissions reduction (ER) and carbon sequestration (CS) would achieve the greatest net emissions mitigation, CS measures have greater potential mitigation and co-benefits. The scientific community must shift attention away from the prevailing myopic lens on carbon, towards more holistic, systems-based, multi-metric approaches that carefully consider the raison d'être for livestock systems. Consequential life cycle assessments and systems-aligned 'socio-economic planetary boundaries' offer useful starting points that may uncover leverage points and cross-scale emergent properties. The derivation of harmonized, globally reconciled sustainability metrics requires iterative dialogue between stakeholders at all levels. Greater emphasis on the simultaneous characterization of multiple sustainability dimensions would help avoid situations where progress made in one area causes maladaptive outcomes in other areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brendan Richard Cullen
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVic.Australia
| | | | - Annette Louise Cowie
- NSW Department of Primary Industries/University of New EnglandArmidaleNSWAustralia
| | - Franco Bilotto
- Tasmanian Institute of AgricultureUniversity of TasmaniaBurnieTASAustralia
| | | | - Ke Liu
- Hubei Collaborative Innovation Centre for Grain Industry/School of AgricultureYangtze UniversityJingzhouChina
| | - Thomas Davison
- Livestock Productivity PartnershipUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
| | | | - Albert Muleke
- Tasmanian Institute of AgricultureUniversity of TasmaniaBurnieTASAustralia
| | - Richard John Eckard
- Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVic.Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song Q, Zhu J, Gong Z, Feng Y, Wang Q, Sun Y, Zeng X, Lai Y. Effect of straw retention on carbon footprint under different cropping sequences in Northeast China. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 28:54792-54801. [PMID: 34014477 PMCID: PMC8494689 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14316-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Inappropriate farm management practices can lead to increased agricultural inputs and changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, impacting climate change. This study was initiated in 2012 to assess the potential for straw retention to mitigate the negative environmental impact of various cropping systems on the Songnen Plain using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method combined with field survey data. Straw retention (STR) and straw removal (STM) treatments were established in continuous corn (CC) and corn-soybean rotation (CS) systems in a split-plot experiment. The effects of straw retention on the carbon footprint (CF) of cropland under different cropping systems were compared. The CF under CC was 2434-2707 kg CO2 ha-1 year-1, 49-57% higher than that under CS. Nitrogen fertilizer produced the most CO2, accounting for 66-80% of the CF. The carbon balances of the CC and CS systems with STR were positive, with annual carbon sequestrations of 9633 and 2716 kg CO2 ha-1 year-1, respectively. The carbon balance (CB) of CC-STR was 255% higher than that of CS-STR. This study demonstrates that STR under CC cultivation is an environmentally friendly practice for agricultural production, can help achieve high-yield and low-carbon production in rainfed cropland, and can support the sustainable development of grain production in Northeast China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiulai Song
- Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Combining Farming and Animal Husbandry, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jie Zhu
- Beijing Chalk Blue Sky Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100102, China
| | - Zhenping Gong
- College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
| | - Yanjiang Feng
- Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yu Sun
- Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xiannan Zeng
- Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yongcai Lai
- Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bilotto F, Harrison MT, Migliorati MDA, Christie KM, Rowlings DW, Grace PR, Smith AP, Rawnsley RP, Thorburn PJ, Eckard RJ. Can seasonal soil N mineralisation trends be leveraged to enhance pasture growth? THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 772:145031. [PMID: 33578140 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soil N mineralisation is the process by which organic N is converted into plant-available forms, while soil N immobilisation is the transformation of inorganic soil N into organic matter and microbial biomass, thereafter becoming bio-unavailable to plants. Mechanistic models can be used to explore the contribution of mineralised or immobilised N to pasture growth through simulation of plant, soil and environment interactions driven by management. PURPOSE Our objectives were (1) to compare the performance of three agro-ecosystems models (APSIM, DayCent and DairyMod) in simulating soil N, pasture biomass and soil water using the same experimental data in three diverse environments (2), to determine if tactical application of N fertiliser in different seasons could be used to leverage seasonal trends in N mineralisation to influence pasture growth and (3), to explore the sensitivity of N mineralisation to changes in N fertilisation, cutting frequency and irrigation rate. KEY RESULTS Despite considerable variation in model sophistication, no model consistently outperformed the other models with respect to simulation of soil N, shoot biomass or soil water. Differences in the accuracy of simulated soil NH4 and NO3 were greater between sites than between models and overall, all models simulated cumulative N2O well. While tactical N application had immediate effects on NO3, NH4, N mineralisation and pasture growth, no long-term relationship between mineralisation and pasture growth could be discerned. It was also shown that N mineralisation of DayCent was more sensitive to N fertiliser and cutting frequency compared with the other models. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that while superfluous N fertilisation generally stimulates immobilisation and a pulse of N2O emissions, subsequent effects through N mineralisation/immobilisation effects on pasture growth are variable. We suggest that further controlled environment soil incubation research may help separate successive and overlapping cycles of mineralisation and immobilisation that make it difficult to diagnose long-term implications for (and associations with) pasture growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Bilotto
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, 16-20 Mooreville Rd, Burnie, Australia
| | - Matthew Tom Harrison
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, 16-20 Mooreville Rd, Burnie, Australia.
| | - Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati
- Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; Science and Technology Division, Queensland Department of Environment and Science, EcoSciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Karen M Christie
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, 16-20 Mooreville Rd, Burnie, Australia
| | - David W Rowlings
- Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Peter R Grace
- Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - Andrew P Smith
- School of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia; ICRISAT, Patancheru, 502 324, Telangana, India
| | - Richard P Rawnsley
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, 16-20 Mooreville Rd, Burnie, Australia
| | | | - Richard J Eckard
- School of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|