Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Prostate Biopsies: Contemporary Practice Patterns in Germany

Comparison of Fluoroquinolones and Other Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens for Preventing Complications in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

Our study aimed to compare the incidence of infective complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx) when adopting different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens. A multi-institutional cohort of 1150 patients who underwent TRUSBx was retrospectively analyzed. Procedures were performed between 2017 and 2019 (before and after the EMA warning about the use of fluoroquinolones for the antibiotic prophylaxis of patient candidates to TRUSBx). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of infective complications, including sepsis and/or fever. The population was stratified according to the antibiotic prophylaxis adopted: fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, prulifloxacin), cephalosporins (cefixime, ceftriaxone) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Univariable and multivariable binomial logistic regression models were used to assess the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) testing of the risk of infective complication after adjusting for each prebiopsy covariate. In total, 478 (41.6%) patients received fluoroquinolone-based prophylaxis. Among these, 443 (38.5%), 25 (2.2%) and 10 (0.9%) patients received levofloxacin prophylaxis, ciprofloxacin and prulifloxacin, respectively while 14.6% received cefixime, 20.7% received the comedication of ceftriaxone/fosfomycin and 23.1% received trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolone regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of infective complications (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03−0.48, p = 0.003 and OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06−0.43, p < 0.001, respectively). The ceftriaxone/fosfomycin (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04−0.92, p = 0.04) and fluoroquinolone (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00−0.70, p = 0.048) prophylaxis were associated with a lower risk of infective sequelae. Fluoroquinolone-based prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of infective complications after TRUSBx compared to other prophylaxis regimens although its clinical application was recently forbidden by European Medical Agency restrictions.

Recent Trends in Prostate Biopsy Complication Rates and the Role of Aztreonam in Periprocedural Antimicrobial Prophylaxis—A Nationwide Population-Based Study from Korea

An increase in the rate of complications after prostate biopsy (PB) due to increased antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a global issue. We report the safety of aztreonam as a prophylactic antibiotic in patients undergoing PB. We investigated the complication rates according to several antibiotic regimens, including aztreonam. We hypothesized that PB complications increased following a rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We examined the annual rates of complications among patients in our hospital (clinical cohort) and the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) cohort. Data regarding complications, hospitalization, emergency room (ER) visits, and febrile urinary tract infections occurring within 2 weeks after PB were recorded. The rate of complications was significantly lower in patients who received oral quinolone and intravenous aztreonam than in those who received oral quinolone. The complication rates did not increase throughout the study period. Additionally, 1754 patients from the HIRA cohort were included. The rates of complications, hospitalizations, and ER visits did not increase among these patients. Oral quinolone combined with intravenous aztreonam reduced the rate of febrile complications compared to quinolone alone and was safe to use after PB. Therefore, we recommend intravenous aztreonam with oral quinolone as a prophylactic antibiotic regimen before PB.

Antibiotic resistance in the patient with cancer: Escalating challenges and paths forward

Infection is the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer. Loss of efficacy in antibiotics due to antibiotic resistance in bacteria is an urgent threat against the continuing success of cancer therapy. In this review, the authors focus on recent updates on the impact of antibiotic resistance in the cancer setting, particularly on the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.). This review highlights the health and financial impact of antibiotic resistance in patients with cancer. Furthermore, the authors recommend measures to control the emergence of antibiotic resistance, highlighting the risk factors associated with cancer care. A lack of data in the etiology of infections, specifically in oncology patients in United States, is identified as a concern, and the authors advocate for a centralized and specialized surveillance system for patients with cancer to predict and prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Finding better ways to predict, prevent, and treat antibiotic-resistant infections will have a major positive impact on the care of those with cancer.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy : In the context of restricted indications for fluoroquinolones and antibiotic stewardship]

Hintergrund

Die transrektale Prostatastanzbiopsie (TRPB) gehört zu den häufigsten interventionell-urologischen Eingriffen in Deutschland. Es wird leitliniengerecht eine kurzeitige periprozedurale Antibiotikaprophylaxe (PAP) empfohlen. Die Indikationsrücknahme von Fluorchinolonen als PAP-Substanz durch das Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte macht die Verwendung alternativer Substanzen notwendig.

Ziele

Im Rahmen der Studie wurde die klinische Praxis der PAP bei TRPB mit Fokus auf infektiöse Komplikationen im Vergleich zwischen Fluorchinolon- und Cotrimoxazol-PAP evaluiert.

Methodik

Es handelt sich um eine retrospektive monozentrische Auswertung klinischer Routinedaten von Patienten mit TRPB zwischen 03.01.2019 und 28.01.2021.

Ergebnisse

Es wurden 508 erwachsene männliche Patienten eingeschlossen, das mediane Alter betrug 68 Jahre. 55,9 % erhielten eine Cotrimoxazol-PAP, 40,0 % eine Fluorchinolon-PAP. Insgesamt traten in 5,5 % postinterventionelle Komplikationen auf, davon 50,0 % infektiöse Komplikationen. Der Vergleich von Cotrimoxazol- und Fluorchinolon-PAP ergab keinen Unterschied der Komplikationsraten. Bei aufgrund von Komplikationen durchgeführten mikrobiologischen Urinuntersuchungen zeigten sich Erregernachweise mit Resistenz gegenüber der zuvor eingesetzten PAP im Sinne einer Selektion.

Schlussfolgerung

Eine Cotrimoxazol-PAP für TRPB ist verglichen mit dem bisherigen Standard einer Fluorchinolon-PAP nicht mit vermehrt infektiösen Komplikationen assoziiert. Die präinterventionelle Analyse von Keimspektrum und Resistenz ermöglicht den Einsatz einer gezielten Prophylaxe und kann somit Komplikationen reduzieren.

Prostate biopsy techniques and pre-biopsy prophylactic measures: variation in current practice patterns in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The clinical landscape of prostate biopsy (PB) is evolving with changes in procedures and techniques. Moreover, antibiotic resistance is increasing and influences the efficacy of pre-biopsy prophylactic regimens. Therefore, increasing antibiotic resistance may impact on clinical care, which probably results in differences between hospitals. The objective of our study is to determine the (variability in) current practices of PB in the Netherlands and to gain insight into Dutch urologists' perceptions of fluoroquinolone resistance and biopsy related infections.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was prepared using SurveyMonkey® platform and distributed to all 420 members of the Dutch Association of Urology, who work in 81 Dutch hospitals. Information about PB techniques and periprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis was collected. Urologists' perceptions regarding pre-biopsy antibiotic prophylaxis in an era of antibiotic resistance was assessed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one responses (38.3%) were analyzed representing 65 (80.3%) of all Dutch hospitals performing PB. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) was performed in 64 (98.5%) hospitals. 43.1% of the hospitals (also) used other image-guided biopsy techniques. Twenty-three different empirical prophylactic regimens were reported among the hospitals. Ciprofloxacin was most commonly prescribed (84.4%). The duration ranged from one pre-biopsy dose (59.4%) to 5 days extended prophylaxis. 25.2% of the urologists experienced ciprofloxacin resistance as a current problem in the prevention of biopsy related infections and 73.6% as a future problem.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in practice patterns among Dutch urologists. TRUSPB is the most commonly used biopsy technique, but other image-guided biopsy techniques are increasingly used. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not standardized and prolonged prophylaxis is common. The wide variation in practice patterns and lack of standardization underlines the need for evidence-based recommendations to guide urologists in choosing appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for PB in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance.

Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war

BACKGROUND

Prostate biopsy is a standard tool for diagnosing prostate cancer, with more than 4 million procedures performed worldwide each year. Infectious complications and economic burden are reportedly rising with continued use of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, despite the transperineal approach being associated with less infectious complications.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

In this review, the contemporary literature on pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, causative organisms and emerging approaches for prevention of infectious complications are outlined.

RESULTS

Management of infectious complications after TRUSB has caused significant financial burden on health systems. The most frequent causative agents of infectious complications after prostate biopsy are Gram-negative bacilli are particularly concerning in the era of antibiotic resistance. Increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones and beta-lactam antibiotics has complicated traditional preventive measures. Patient- and procedure-related risk factors, reported by individual studies, can contribute to infectious complications after prostate biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent literature shows that the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy results in higher infectious complication rate than the transperineal prostate biopsy. NAATs, recently introduced technique to detect FQr may detect all antibiotic-resistant rectal microbiota members-included MDRs-although the technique still has limitations and economical burdens. Transient solutions are escalating antibiotic prophylaxis and widening the indications for TPB.

Turkish Urologists' preferences regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) is very important in preventing infectious complications, and in this study, we aimed to evaluate the antibiotic preferences of Turkish urologist for transrectal PB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The survey about PB and antibiotic prophylaxis behaviors was administered to urologists working in Turkey who had previously participated in at least one international and one national congress.

RESULTS

A total of 237 urologists were included in the study. Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PB was performed by 234 (98.7%) participants. Rectal swabbing prior to PB was not performed by 227 (95.8%) participants. The most common complication associated with PB was prostatitis (63%), followed by urinary tract infection (29%). Only 25.7% of Turkish urologists reported a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our participants often administered antibiotic prophylaxis for a period of 3, 5, or 7 days (16%, 21.1%, 35.9%, respectively). The most common antibiotic agent preferred for prophylaxis was ciprofloxacin (65%).

CONCLUSION

The biopsy behavior of Turkish urologists was mostly compatible with the literature, but it was revealed that Turkish urologists do not prefer single-dose antibiotic therapy, and their practice patterns regarding the administration of pre-biopsy rectal swabbing are inconsistent with the literature.

Antimicrobial Lubricant Did Not Reduce Infection Rate in Transrectal Biopsy Patients in a Large Randomized Trial Due to Low Complication Rates

BACKGROUND

Transrectal prostate biopsy (pbx) is the most frequent outpatient procedure in the urological field. Septic complications are a major health issue.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate complication rates with or without an antimicrobial lubricant.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1000 patients received pbx between 2013 and 2015. Information about complications was collected by a 3-wk questionnaire. Return rate was 73.2% (n=732).

INTERVENTION

Randomization for pbx with the instillation of an antimicrobial lubricant (intervention group, n=385) or the standard lubricant (control group, n=347) was performed.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable analyses assessed the association between infectious complications at biopsy and use of an antimicrobial lubricant, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), history of urogenitourinary infections, and several other confounders.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The use of an antimicrobial lubricant did not reduce infection rate. Overall complication rate was very low. Of all patients, 69.3% described the procedure as pain free. Fever ≥38.5°C was reported in overall 1.9% of patients. Urinary retention with catheterization occurred in 3.1%. Most common complications were hematospermia (47.4%), macrohematuria (23.8%), and rectal bleeding (7.4%). Readmission rate was 1% (n=7). In multivariable analyses, IPSS and previous infectious complications were associated with a higher risk of infectious complications. Our results stem from a large German single center and therefore are limited to this patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant reduction was shown in infectious complications in the intervention group with the antimicrobial agent. Low incidence of those complications may be the underlying cause. Severe morbidity at pbx is uncommon. Specifically, the rate of infection was very low.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Severe complications at prostate biopsy are rare. Among participants, 69.3% had no pain. Fever was rare (1.9% of patients). Voiding issues with catheterization occurred in 3.1%. Most common complications were blood in the semen (47.4%), urine (23.8%), or stool (7.4%). Men with voiding issues or previous infectious complications had a higher risk of infectious complications.