Multiparametric MRI may Help to Identify Patients With Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Clinical Bladder Outlet Obstruction Scheduled for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)

Cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy in incidental prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

To test for cancer specific mortality (CSM) differences after either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) in incidental prostate cancer (IPCa) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015), IPCa patients were identified. Cumulative incidence plots as well as competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted to address CSM after adjustment for other-cause mortality (OCM). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was performed to test for CSM differences between RP and RT according to Gleason sum (GS 6,7, and 8-10).

RESULTS

Of 1,466 IPCa patients, 770 (53%) underwent RP vs. 696 (47%) RT. Incidental PCa RT patients were older, and exhibited higher PSA, higher proportion of Gleason sum 8-10, and higher clinical T stage. In cumulative incidence plots, 5-year CSM rates adjusted for OCM were 0.9 for RP vs. 6.8% for RT (Δ = 5.9%). After multivariable adjustment for clinical characteristics (age, PSA, Gleason sum, and clinical T stage) as well as for OCM, RP was associated with a protective hazard ratio (HR) of 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15 - 0.78, p value = .01). Within Gleason sum 8-10 IPCA patients, RP was associated with a protective HR of 0.31 (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Incidental PCa RT-treated patients exhibited less favorable clinical characteristics than their RP counterparts. Despite full adjustment, RP was associated with a protective effect relative to RT. This effect exclusively applied to the Gleason sum 8-10 subgroup. In consequence, IPCa patients harboring Gleason sum 8-10 should ideally be considered for RP instead of RT.

Optimal PSA density threshold for prostate biopsy in benign prostatic obstruction patients with elevated PSA levels but negative MRI findings

PURPOSE

This study was designed to identify a useful clinical parameter or model for prostate biopsy in surgery-indicated benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with elevated PSA levels and negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and pathological data from patients who were diagnosed with BPH and admitted to the inpatient department for surgery between January 2010 and September 2020. Clinical data, including age, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, F/T PSA ratio, prostate volume, and PSA density (PSAD), were used for comprehensive analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to develop a predictive model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to assess the diagnostic value of the predictive model, PSA concentration, F/T PSA ratio and PSAD.

RESULTS

A total of 318 patients were included in the study, 8.2% (26/318) of whom were histologically diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that PSAD was the only independent predictor of PCa biopsy. ROC curve analysis of PCa detection revealed a larger area under the curve (AUC) for the predictive model (AUC 0.855) and for PSAD (AUC 0.848) than for PSA (AUC 0.722) or the F/T PSA ratio (AUC 0.635). DCA demonstrated that the optimal strategy would be to restrict biopsies to men with a PSAD of 0.30 ng/ml/cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that for BPH patients with surgical indications who present with PSA abnormalities and negative imaging findings, the use of a new PSAD threshold of 0.30 ng/ml/cm3 could facilitate convenient and sound biopsy decisions. This approach could reduce the complications and length of hospital stay associated with biopsies and reduce hospital costs.

Modern predictors and management of incidental prostate cancer at holmium enucleation of prostate

BACKGROUND

To evaluate contemporary preoperative risk factors and subsequent postoperative management of incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) and incidental clinically significant prostate cancer (icsPCa, Grade Group [GG] ≥ 2 PCa).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 811 men undergoing Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) (January 2021-July 2022) were identified. Advanced preoperative testing was defined as prostate health index (PHI), prostate MRI, and/or negative preoperative biopsy. Descriptive statistics (Whitney-Mann U test, Chi-squared test) and multivariable logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

iPCa and icsPCa detection rates were 12.8% (104/811) and 4.4% (36/811), respectively. Advanced preoperative testing (406/811, 50%) was associated with younger age and higher (prostate specific antigen) PSA, prostate volume, and PSA density. On multivariable analysis, PHI ≥ 55 was associated with iPCa (OR 6.91, 95% CI 1.85-26.3, p = 0.004), and % free PSA (%fPSA) was associated with icsPCa (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67, 0.94, p = 0.01). GG1 disease comprised the majority of iPCa (65%, 68/104) with median 1% involvement. iPCa patients were followed with active surveillance (median follow up 9.3 months), with higher risk patients receiving prostate MRI and confirmatory biopsy. Three patients proceeded to radical prostatectomy or radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of MRI and advanced biomarkers, the majority of iPCa following HoLEP is low volume GG1 suitable for active surveillance. A tentative follow-up strategy is proposed. Patients with PHI ≥ 55 or low %fPSA, even with negative prostate MRI, can consider preoperative prostate biopsy before HoLEP.

Do Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) lesions predict holmium laser enucleation of prostate outcomes?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for prostate cancer (PCa) screening and risk stratification and is helpful for surgical planning for patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). There are few studies investigating the correlation between MRI Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) lesion characteristics and HoLEP pathology and outcomes.

METHODS

We performed retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLEP between January 2021 and August 2023 by a single surgeon. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics and outcomes were analyzed for all patients who had a documented preoperative prostate MRI.

RESULTS

There were 334 patients without a pre-existing diagnosis of PCa and with a preoperative prostate MRI, of which 140 (42%) had at least one PIRADS lesion. There was a total of 203 PIRADS lesions: 91 (45%) in the peripheral zone (PZ), 106 (52%) in the transition zone (TZ), and 6 (2%) not specified. Incidental PCa was noted in 44 (13%) patients at time of HoLEP. Presence or location of lesion was not significantly associated with rate or grade of incidental PCa on pathology. Greater number of lesions and lesion size correlated with longer procedure times. Lesion number, size, or grade were not found to correlate with cancer grade or rate of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Grade, presence, location, size, and number of PIRADS lesions on preoperative prostate MRI for patients with an appropriate prior PCa workup were not significantly associated with incidental PCa or higher PCa grade on HoLEP pathology.

Incidental Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Is Common After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of incidental prostate cancer detection (iPCa) after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). The published rate of iPCa after HoLEP is widely variable from 7% to 23% and we aim to define preoperative risk factors for iPCa to inform risk-adjusted preoperative evaluation for PCa.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing HoLEP from 2018 to 2022 were included and comprehensive clinical data abstracted from a prospectively maintained database. iPCa was defined as a diagnosis of PCa on pathologic examination of the HoLEP specimen. Patients with and without iPCa were compared with respect to preoperative clinical variables.

RESULTS

Of 913 HoLEP patients, 183 (20%) were diagnosed with iPCa. Most patients (95%) had a preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), 9% had negative MRI, and 30% had negative prostate biopsy. On multivariable analysis, PSA density (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03, 1.10; P < .001), preoperative biopsy status (OR 0.47, CI 0.30, 0.75; P = .002), and current 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use (OR 0.64, CI 0.43, 0.97; P = .034), were associated with iPCa diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

In a significantly prescreened population, we identified a 20% rate of iPCa after HoLEP. Preoperative characteristics associated with iPCa diagnosis included increasing age, increasing PSA density, and current 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use. However, these factors alone may be of limited clinical utility to prospectively identify patients at high risk of iPCa diagnosis. We suggest and advocate for development of a standardized, risk-adapted evaluation focused on expanded use of imaging and selective biopsy to prioritize identification of clinically significant PCa prior to nononcologic surgery.

The Impact of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Treatment Strategies for Incidental Prostate Cancer after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) on treatment strategies for incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) after holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP); Methods: Data from 1781 men who underwent HoLEP for clinical bladder outlet obstruction between September 2009 and March 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Among patients with confirmed iPCa, those with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels < 10 ng/mL and who underwent mpMRI 3 months after HoLEP were included. Pathologic results, including Gleason grade (GG) and tumor volume, were identified. mpMRI was interpreted using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2). Treatment strategies for iPCa according to GG alone, or according to a combination of Gleason grade and mpMRI, were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Of 1764 men with serum PSA levels < 10 ng/mL, iPCa was confirmed in 64 (3.6%) after HoLEP. Of the 62 men who underwent mpMRI, the median (IQR) age at the time of HoLEP was 72.5 (66.5-78.0) years. The median PSA level and prostate volume were 3.49 (1.82-5.03) ng/mL and 49.6 (38.5-85.4) cm³, respectively. The pathologic results of iPCa were as follows: GG1 = 42 (67.7%), GG2 = 13 (21.0%), GG3 = 2 (3.2%), GG4 = 1 (1.6%), and GG5 = 4 (6.5%). Of the patients with GG1 and GG2, 78.6% (33/42) and 53.8% (7/13), respectively, underwent active surveillance (AS). However, of 42 patients with GG1, 27 (64.3%) had a PI-RADSv2 score of 2, and 24 (88.9%) of them underwent AS. Of the 13 patients with GG2, 4 (80%) with a PI-RADSv2 score of 2 underwent AS. All patients with GG 3-5 were clinically expected to have locally advanced PCa and be treated with radiotherapy and/or ADT.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with iPCa of GG 1-2 after HoLEP, mpMRI helps to establish a treatment strategy by allowing risk stratification to select those who should be considered for AS or active treatment.

Natural history of incidentally diagnosed prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus on the management plan for incidental prostate cancer (IPCa) after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). This study aims to investigate the natural course of this disease and suggest appropriate treatment in real clinical practice.

METHODS

The medical records of a prospective cohort of patients with LUTS/BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2008 and December 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent HoLEP for palliative purpose of prostate cancer control were excluded. The natural history of IPCa was assessed by the clinician in a descriptive manner for each treatment option.

RESULTS

Among 2630 patients, 141 (5.4%) were diagnosed with IPCa after HoLEP. Pathologic T stage and magnetic resonance imaging results were highly associated with the physician's primary treatment decision-making for IPCa. Active surveillance (AS) was performed in 80% of patients, of whom 90% underwent follow-up without intervention, while the remaining 10% underwent deferred active treatment with a median follow-up of 46.3 months due to International Society of Urological Pathology grade group upgrading or increasing core involvement percentage. Meanwhile, 20% of patients underwent immediate active treatment. With a median follow-up period of 88.3 months after treatment, only one of 25 patients had biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of IPCa after HoLEP was 5.4%, and among these, approximately 20% proceeded with immediate definitive therapy and an additional 6% ultimately received definitive therapy within a median of 4 years of AS but showed excellent oncological outcomes.

Incidental detection of localized prostate cancer with low PSA by computed tomography scan: A report of two cases

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels play an important role in the screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The recommended PSA cut-off in PCa screening is 4 ng/ml. We report two cases of localized PCa with low PSA levels that were incidentally found by computed tomography (CT) performed for another disease.

Relationships between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and prostate cancer

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a size-independent surgical option for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with excellent, durable functional outcomes. The prevalence of LUTS secondary to BPH and prostate cancer both increase with age, although the two diseases develop independently. Urologists often face a diagnostic dilemma, as men with LUTS secondary to BPH might also present with an elevated PSA and, therefore, need a diagnostic work-up to exclude prostate cancer. Nevertheless, ~15% of men with a negative elevated PSA work-up will undergo HoLEP and will be diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer at the time of HoLEP. Indeed, prostate cancer is often found in men undergoing HoLEP, and this situation can be challenging to manage. Variables associated with the detection of incidental prostate cancer, strategies to reduce incidental prostate cancer, as well as the natural history and management of this condition have been extensively studied, but further work in this area is still needed.

Incidental prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate-A narrative review

Prostate cancer can be detected incidentally after surgical therapy for benign prostatic obstruction such as holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), thus called incidental prostate cancer (iPCa). We aimed to review the studies on iPCa detected after HoLEP and investigate its prevalence. A detailed search of original articles was conducted via the PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library and Cochrane Library databases in the last 10 years up to 1 May 2021 with the following search string solely or in combination: "prostate cancer", "prostate carcinoma", "holmium laser enucleation of the prostate" and "HoLEP". We identified 19 articles to include in our analysis and divided them into six main categories: HoLEP versus open prostatectomy and/or transurethral resection of the prostate in terms of iPCa, oncological and functional outcomes, the role of imaging modalities in detecting iPCa, predictive factors of iPCa, the role of prostate-specific antigen kinetics in detecting iPCa and the management of iPCa after HoLEP. We found that the iPCa after HoLEP rate ranges from 5.64% to 23.3%. Functional and oncological outcomes were reported to be encouraging. Oncological treatment options are available in a wide range.

Utilizing Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Self-assess Enucleation Ratio in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

OBJECTIVE

To determine if transition zone (TZ) volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates closely with specimen weight and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and to determine if this correlation improved with increased experience. We hypothesize that information from a preoperative MRI can be leveraged to self-assess competency in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

METHODS

From August 2018 to June 2021 567 men were identified who underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon and had their data entered into a database. Ninety-seven men were identified who had an MRI in our image archives. A radiologist blinded to the specimen weight measured the transition zone (TZ) using image analysis software. TZ volume was then correlated with specimen weight for the entire study period and subdivided into four consecutive periods. Preoperative and Postoperative PSA data was analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventeen percent of men who underwent HoLEP at our institution had an MRI preoperatively. The TZ to total prostate volume ratio was 70%. The overall correlation coefficient between TZ volume and specimen weight was 0.914 (P-value <.001). There was no statistically significant improvement in correlation coefficient over time when divided into four equal subgroups. Median PSA reduction was 91% (7.9-0.7 ng/dL).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRI derived TZ volume correlates closely with specimen weight. We present a reference cohort from a high volume HoLEP center to facilitate HoLEP learners to self-assess competency. Lack of increased correlation over time is likely due to an experienced HoLEP surgeon who is on the flatter portion of his learning curve.