Diagnosis and Treatment of Vulvo-Perineal Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the rare pathologies of the vulva

Pathologies of the vulva encompass a wide range of mesenchymal and epithelial benign and malignant lesions. Suspicion is raised by non-specific symptoms or clinical findings detected during routine gynecological examinations, and histopathology is essential for the diagnosis. The role of imaging has often been limited, but it can be essential in guiding treatment and, in some cases, in helping differential diagnosis. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can play a central role in identifying the extent of disease and planning surgical treatment. To this aim, rigorous image acquisition, correct disease evaluation in the context of vulvar anatomy and understanding of the possible differential diagnosis are essential. The aim of this article is to review the role of MRI in the evaluation of rare vulvar pathologies, focusing on different sites of origin, imaging characteristics, and local extent.

MR imaging of benign vulvar lesions: a pictorial essay

Benign vulvar lesions can be difficult to differentiate with few publications on their imaging appearances. While many vulvar lesions may be clinically diagnosed and treated, more are being detected incidentally with the increasing prevalence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis. In addition, clinicians may find imaging of benign vulvar lesions helpful for greater anatomical correlation. After reviewing the important MRI sequences for vulvar imaging and the anatomy of the vulva on MRI, this pictorial essay illustrates variety of cystic and solid benign vulvar lesions to familiarize radiologists with their common MRI appearances. Other miscellaneous pelvic lesions that can affect the vulva are also described.

Peripheral and central neuroplasticity in a mouse model of endometriosis

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is the most debilitating symptom of gynaecological disorders such as endometriosis. However, it remains unclear how sensory neurons from pelvic organs affected by endometriosis, such as the female reproductive tract, detect and transmit nociceptive events and how these signals are processed within the central nervous system (CNS). Using a previously characterized mouse model of endometriosis, we investigated whether the increased pain sensitivity occurring in endometriosis could be attributed to (i) changes in mechanosensory properties of sensory afferents innervating the reproductive tract, (ii) alterations in sensory input from reproductive organs to the spinal cord or (iii) neuroinflammation and sensitization of spinal neural circuits. Mechanosensitivity of vagina-innervating primary afferents was examined using an ex vivo single-unit extracellular recording preparation. Nociceptive signalling from the vagina to the spinal cord was quantified by phosphorylated MAP kinase ERK1/2 immunoreactivity. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine glial and neuronal circuit alterations within the spinal cord. We found that sensory afferents innervating the rostral, but not caudal portions of the mouse vagina, developed mechanical hypersensitivity in endometriosis. Nociceptive signalling from the vagina to the spinal cord was significantly enhanced in mice with endometriosis. Moreover, mice with endometriosis developed microgliosis, astrogliosis and enhanced substance P neurokinin-1 receptor immunoreactivity within the spinal cord, suggesting the development of neuroinflammation and sensitization of spinal circuitry in endometriosis. These results demonstrate endometriosis-induced neuroplasticity occurring at both peripheral and central sites of sensory afferent pathways. These findings may help to explain the altered sensitivity to pain in endometriosis and provide a novel platform for targeted pain relief treatments for this debilitating disorder.

Misdiagnosed as a perianal abscess: case report of perianal endometriosis

Perianal endometriosis represents a rare form of endometriosis occurring outside the pelvic cavity. Owing to its infrequency in clinical practice, this condition is highly susceptible to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This case report details a young female patient who was erroneously diagnosed with a perianal abscess. We conducted a para-anal mass resection under spinal anesthesia, and subsequent histopathological examination definitively confirmed the diagnosis of perianal endometriosis.

Perianal endometrioma presented as perianal abscess: report of two cases

Perianal endometriosis is a rare clinical presentation of the extrauterine appearance of endometrium reported in <1% of the cases. The condition is accompanied by perianal cyclic pain and a palpable mass. If diagnosed by physical examination only, the condition may be easily misinterpreted as a perianal abscess and treated improperly with incision, thus resulting in "abscess recurrence." Additional diagnostic imaging such as endoanal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging should be mandatory to provide an accurate diagnosis and proper treatment resulting in low recurrence rates. We present two cases of perianal endometriomas initially diagnosed and treated as perianal abscesses.

Perianal Endometriosis: An Uncommon Site for a Common Problem

Endometriosis is the presence of uterine glands and stroma outside of the uterus. It is highly prevalent in women of reproductive age. It is usually found in the pelvis, with most cases being found on the peritoneum, ovaries, or deep in the pelvis. Extraperitoneal endometriosis is uncommon. Perianal endometriosis has an incidence of only 0.2%. We present the case of a 37-year-old woman with recurrent pain and swelling in the perineum at the site of a previous episiotomy scar. Initial imaging and assessment determined this to be scar tissue. Following re-presentation, it was mistakenly diagnosed as a perianal abscess, and the patient underwent incision and drainage. The wound failed to heal with significant induration. Further assessment of the wound was undertaken under general anesthesia. An excision of the affected area was performed, with histological analysis confirming endometriosis. This case highlights that extra-peritoneal endometriosis is a rare but treatable cause of recurrent, cyclical pelvic pain and swelling in the perineum. A high index of clinical suspicion is required due to its ability to mimic other pathologies, including abscesses and cysts. The primary management of perianal endometriosis is surgical excision. Where complete excision is not possible, medical management with hormone therapy should be considered.

Clinical presentation of perineal endometriosis and prognostic nomogram after surgical resection

Background

This retrospective study evaluated the clinical features of perineal endometriosis (PEM) and established a prognostic nomogram for recurrence probability in patients treated with surgical resection.

Methods

This study enrolled 130 PEM patients who had received surgical treatment in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between January 1992 and September 2020. We collected their clinical features and conducted outpatient or telephone follow-up. The predictive nomogram was constructed based on 104 patients who had completed follow-up by July 2021. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic effects of multiple clinical parameters on recurrence. The Index of concordance (C-index) and calibration curves were used to access the discrimination ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram respectively, and the results were further validated via bootstrap resampling. Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) via risk scores of patients aimed to further access the predictive power of the model. In addition, the survival curve was depicted using Kaplan–Meier plot and compared by log-rank method.

Results

Most PEM patients had been symptomatic for 24–48 months before the lesion resection. With a median 99.00 (interquartile range: 47.25–137.50) months of postoperative observation, there were 16 (15.1%) out of 104 cases who finished follow-up reported symptomatic recurrence. On multivariate analysis of derivation cohort, multiple lesions, microscopically positive margin (mPM) and anal sphincter involvement (ASI) were selected into the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting recurrence was 0.84 (95% CI 0.77–0.91). The calibration curve for probability of recurrence for 36, 60 and 120 months showed great agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Furthermore, the AUCs of risk score for 36, 60 and 120 months were 0.89, 0.87 and 0.82 respectively.

Conclusions

PEM is a rare kind of endometriosis and surgery is the primary treatment. Multiple lesions and ASI are independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence, and wide resection with more peripheral tissue could be preferred. The proposed nomogram resulted in effective prognostic prediction for PEM patients receiving surgical excision. In addition, this predictive nomogram needs external data sets to further validate its prognostic accuracy in the future.

Episiotomy Scar Endometriosis. Case Presentation

Endometriosis is a frequent gynecological disease among women of reproductive age, a benign condition with an uncertain etiology, but with multiple theories being proposed as main mechanisms of development. Perineal endometriosis is an uncommon condition, with various theories about its pathogenesis including the contiguous propagation of endometrial tissue over the episiotomy perineal scar. A 36-year-old woman, G2 P2, presented with cyclic inflammation and pain in the episiotomy area, with significant impairment of her daily quality of life. Clinical examination revealed a palpable mass in the episiotomy area and a probable clinical diagnosis of perineal scar endometriosis was considered, with further investigation being recommended. The patient was surgically treated by local excision of the perineal mass and the histopathologic examination of the mass confirmed the diagnosis of perineal endometriosis in the episiotomy scar. Although perineal endometriosis remains a rare condition, it should be considered in all patients with an anterior vaginal delivery and a painful perineal mass during menstrual cycle, a wide excision of the affected tissue remaining the best option for a permanent cure.