Comparison of the efficacy of expandable interbody fusion cage (EXP-IFC) and non-expandable interbody fusion cage (NE-IFC) in MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic retrospective study on 62 patients

Incidental Durotomy During Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Surgery with Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis of Complications and Outcomes

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the frequency, risk factors, and impact of incidental durotomy on adverse events and outcomes after TLIF with expandable interbody spacers.MethodsWe reviewed 433 consecutive patients treated by TLIF using expandable titanium interbody implants (ALTERA®, Globus Medical Inc) on 538 levels between December 2018 and September 2023. Patients with incidental durotomy (ID) and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were compared to patients without ID, focusing on patient-specific and surgery-related factors, adverse events, clinical outcomes (MacNab criteria), and radiological outcomes at discharge, 3, and 12 months.ResultsThe ID rate was 9.0% (39/433 patients). Patients with ID had lower BMI (26.1 ± 5.2 vs 28.0 ± 5.3 kg/m2, P = .03), longer surgery duration (358 ± 132 vs 305 ± 128 minutes, P = .01), and extended hospital stays (14.7 ± 12.8 vs 10.9 ± 8.2 days, P < .01). More postoperative adverse events (51.3% vs 28.7%, P = .004) with higher severity (28.2% vs 13.2% moderate to severe, P = .019) occurred at discharge. No differences were found in outcomes at 3 or 12 months. ID patients showed higher risks for impaired wound healing (adjusted OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.90-10.2; P = .001) and pulmonary embolism (adjusted OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.13-10.9; P = .029).ConclusionsIncidental durotomy was associated with longer surgery time, hospital stays, and increased early postoperative complications. While not affecting mid-to-long-term outcomes, ID increased risks for wound healing difficulties and pulmonary embolisms.

Expandable interbody cages for lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Since the early 2000s, various expandable spinal fusion cages have been developed to facilitate less invasive procedures, however, expandable cages have often been evaluated as a homogeneous group, neglecting differences in shape, size, material, expandability and lordotic adjustability. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively survey the literature on expandable spinal fusion cages, discuss their differentiating factors, and identify gaps in the literature regarding these devices.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the range of design features included in expandable interbody devices and identify which of these features are associated with improved surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of MEDLINE and Embase using the search terms "lumbar" AND "fusion" AND ("expandable cage" OR "expandable interbody") including only English language articles that contained sufficient detail to correlate a specific expandable cage design to patient outcomes. Relevant elements, including device design parameters, patient population information, details of the intervention, comparison data, outcome variables, and the timeframe were extracted. Statistical analysis was conducted to correlate patient outcomes with different device features.

RESULTS

While 387 different articles were initially identified, 49 met all the criteria for inclusion. Design differences contributed to disparate outcomes, with rectangular titanium cages featuring medial-lateral and vertical expansion and continuous lordotic adjustability being correlated with significantly improved patient-reported outcomes. The surgical approach and location were also found to be correlated with patient outcomes, indicating that confounding factors are present.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that expandable cage technologies not be considered a homogenous group, as long-term outcomes likely are dependent upon specific design characteristics. Categorizing devices based on design features such as material composition, shape, vertical expandability, horizontal expandability, and restoration of segmental lordosis may allow for more rapid identification of device characteristics associated with better outcomes.

Intraoperative Facet Joint Block Reduces Pain After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of such injections on postoperative pain.

METHODS

This double-blinded, placebo-controlled study randomized patients into 2 groups. Patients assigned to the active group received an intra-articular injection of a compound mixture of bupivacaine and triamcinolone, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of normal saline solution injection. Back and dominant leg pain were evaluated with use of a visual analog scale (VAS) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and dominant leg pain.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients who were included, 31 were randomized to the placebo group and 30 were randomized to the active group. Postoperative fentanyl consumption from patient-controlled analgesia was higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 36 hours postoperatively (p < 0.001) and decreased gradually in both groups. VAS back pain scores were significantly higher in the placebo group than in the active group at up to 48 hours postoperatively. On average, patients in the active group had a higher satisfaction score (p = 0.038) and were discharged 1.3 days earlier than those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an intraoperative facet joint block decreased pain perception during OLIF, thereby reducing opioid consumption and the severity of postoperative pain. This effect was also associated with a reduction in the length of the stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Expandable Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review

Lumbar fusion surgery for treating degenerative spinal diseases has undergone significant advancements in recent years. In addition to posterior instrumentation, anterior interbody fusion techniques have been developed along with various cages for interbody fusion. Recently, expandable cages capable of altering height, lordotic angle, and footprint within the disc space have garnered significant attention. In this manuscript, we review the current status, clinical outcomes, and future prospects of expandable cages for lumbar interbody fusion based on the existing literature. Expandable cages are suitable for minimally invasive spinal surgeries. Small-sized cages can be inserted and subsequently expanded to a larger size within the disc space. While expandable cages generally demonstrate superior clinical outcomes compared to static cages, some studies have suggested comparable or even poorer outcomes with expandable cages than static cages. Careful interpretation through additional long-term follow-ups is required to assess the utility of expandable cages. If these shortcomings are addressed and the advantages are further developed, expandable cages could become suitable surgical instruments for minimally invasive spinal surgeries.

Comparison of Outcomes between Single-Level and Double-Level Corpectomy in Thoracolumbar Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 16 Patients Using Expandable Cages

BACKGROUND Reconstruction surgery using titanium vertebral body replacements aids in spinal stability after damage. Functional evaluation includes Nurick and ASIA grading systems. This study compares outcomes of single and double-level corpectomy in patients treated with thoracolumbar reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS Records of 16 patients who underwent vertebral reconstruction with expandable cages after single (n=9) and double (n=8) corpectomy were analyzed retrospectively. Thoracal and lumbar cases were approached posteriorly (n=14). Clinical evaluation was performed by neurological examination, Nurick Scale, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Neurological Scores, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Preoperative and postoperative 3-month scores were recorded. Radiological evaluation was performed by calculation of regional angulation and postoperative recovery of vertebral body height. RESULTS Preoperatively, 2 patients had no motor or functional sensory deficits (ASIA grade E) and 6 patients were ASIA grade D. Immediately after surgery, 4 of the ASIA grade D patients improved to ASIA grade E, while 2 patients remained ASIA grade D during follow-up. Four patients were ASIA grade A; their conditions showed no improvement postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative 3-month Nurick grade was statistically significant (P=0.022). Postoperative Cobb angle improved by a mean of 5.4° (P=0.001). Improvement by at least 1 grade in neurological recovery was observed in 6 (38%) of the cases. Pain scores analyzed using the VAS changed from a mean of 7 to a mean of 2.63 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In our experience, expandable cages are useful in the restoration of different pathologies of the thoracolumbar trunk with low complication and revision rates. With expandable cages it is possible to achieve restoration of the Cobb angle, improvement in Nurick Grade and effective pain palliation.