Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

A Study on the Volume Changes of the Posterior Cervical Paravertebral Muscles After Unilateral Exposure Channel-Assisted Laminoplasty

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our proposed surgical procedure named unilateral exposure channel-assisted (UCA) laminoplasty in treating degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), and the postoperative volume changes of cervical paraspinal muscles.MethodsFrom January 2020 to January 2022, 104 patients with DCM underwent unilateral open-door laminoplasty, among which, 63 patients underwent UCA laminoplasty (UCA group) and 41 patients underwent traditional laminoplasty (LP group). The radiological and clinical parameters as well as postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed before operation and during the follow-up.ResultsThe operation was completed successfully for all patients from both groups, who showed significant but comparable improvement in clinical outcome indicators including mJOA score, Neck pain VAS score, NDI score and radiological indicators including spinal canal diameter and area at the final follow-up compared to pre-operation. When conducting the intra-group comparison, less intraoperative time consumption and blood loss, less postoperative drainage and lower incidence of axial symptoms were observed in patients from UCA group than LP group. Furthermore, we found better preservation of C2-7 cobb angle, cervical curvature index (CCI) and cervical paraspinal muscle on the hinge side in patients underwent UCA laminoplasty than traditional laminoplasty.ConclusionThe UCA laminoplasty showed similar efficacy on alleviating clinical symptoms, and priority on maintaining cervical sagittal balance, minimizing intraoperative invasion, speeding up postoperative rehabilitation, reducing paraspinal muscle atrophy and postoperative axial symptoms when compared with traditional unilateral open-door laminoplasty.

Current Status and Trends of Research on Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy from the Perspective of Bibliometrics

This review was performed to analyze the research on cervical spondylotic myelopathy published during the past 25 years, summarize the developments in existing research, and predict future hotspots in the field. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview and exploration of developments in this research area. A bibliometric analysis was performed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer to quantitatively and visually analyze relevant literature from Web of Science between 1998 and 2023. Co-occurrence analysis and co-citation analysis were conducted to evaluate papers, authors, journals, countries, and keywords. In total, 1886 papers were included. The overall publication output in this field increased throughout the review period. Stable author collaboration groups were formed, with the most influential author being Fehlings M.G. Japan and the United States contributed the highest number of publications. The predicted future research hotspots include risk factor analysis, outcome prediction, and machine learning. This study provides both an overview of the research trajectory in the field of cervical spondylotic myelopathy for scholars interested in this area, as well as offering insights and references for future research directions in the field.

Personalized Biomodel of the Cervical Spine for Laboratory Laminoplasty Training

OBJECTIVE

The use of biomodels in the laboratory for studying and training cervical laminoplasty has not yet been reported. We propose the use of a cervical spine biomodel for surgical laminoplasty training.

METHODS

This is an experimental study. Ten 3D identical cervical spine biomodels were printed based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans of a patient diagnosed with spondylotic cervical myelopathy. The additive manufacturing method used fused deposition modeling and polylactic acid (PLA) was selected as the raw material. The sample was divided into 2 groups: control (n = 5; the biomodels were submitted to CT scanning) and open-door (n = 5; the biomodels were submitted to open-door laminoplasty and postoperative CT). The area and anteroposterior diameter of the vertebral canal were measured on CT scans.

RESULTS

Printing each piece took 12 hours. During the surgical procedure, there was sufficient support from the biomodels to keep them immobilized. Using the drill was feasible; however continuous irrigation was mandatory to prevent plastic material overheating. The raw material made the biomodel CT study possible. The vertebral canal dimensions increased 24.80% (0.62 cm2) in area and 24.88% (3.12 mm) in anteroposterior diameter CONCLUSIONS: The cervical spine biomodels can be used for laminoplasty training, even by using thermosensitive material such as PLA. The use of continuous irrigation is essential while drilling.

Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion for Cervical Myelopathy : A Meta-Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis investigates the outcomes of laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF) to guide effective patient selection for these 2 procedures.

BACKGROUND

Although LF traditionally offers the ability for excellent posterior decompression, it may alter cervical spine biomechanics and increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. LP aims to preserve the natural kinematics of the spine but has not been universally accepted, and may be associated with inadequate decompression, neck pain, and recurrent stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until March 2024. The outcomes studied were surgery-related outcomes [operative time (OR) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of stay], adverse events (overall complications, C5 palsy, and reoperations), radiographic outcomes (cervical lordosis, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and T1 slope angle), and patient-reported outcome measures (Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale for neck pain, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association).

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 19 were retrospective studies, 2 were prospective nonrandomized studies, and 1 was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 2128 patients were included, with 1025 undergoing LP and 1103 undergoing LF. Patients undergoing LP experienced significantly shorter operative time ( P = 0.009), less EBL ( P = 0.02), a lower rate of overall complications ( P < 0.00001) and C5 palsy ( P = 0.003), a lower T1 slope angle ( P = 0.02), and a lower Neck Disability Index ( P = 0.0004). No significant difference was observed in the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that for cervical myelopathy, LP has the benefits of shorter operative time time, less EBL, and reduced incidence of C5 palsy as well as overall complication rate. Given these findings, LP remains an important surgical option with a favorable complication profile in patients with cervical myelopathy, although careful patient selection is still paramount in choosing the right procedure for individual patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.