Dietary Inositol Reduces Fearfulness and Avoidance in Laying Hens

Effects of Cage and Floor Rearing Systems on the Metabolic Components of the Uropygial Gland in Ducks

Simple Summary

With the development of the modern poultry industry, people have gradually transformed the floor rearing system into a cage rearing system. However, due to some factors, including the environment and management, the feather condition of caged ducks is generally poor, which impairs the healthy growth of ducks and the economic efficiency of breeders. It is believed that birds usually collect secretions from their uropygial gland and smear them on their feathers and cuticle scales during preening to improve their waterproofing and resistance to pathogens, thus protecting their health and growth. Therefore, we studied the uropygial glands of ducks in different rearing systems. The results showed that the cage rearing system affected the weight and metabolic components in the uropygial gland of ducks. Caged ducks have a lower relative weight of their uropygial gland and lower levels of certain amino acids and fatty acids that contribute to their development. This allows us to better understand the causes of the poor appearance of feathers in caged ducks.

Abstract

Background: As a unique skin derivative of birds, the uropygial gland has a potential role in maintaining feather health and appearance. Cage-reared ducks usually have a worse feather condition than floor-reared ducks. We suspected that the metabolic components in the uropygial gland might play a vital role in their feather conditions. Methods: Herein, the uropygial glands of floor- and cage-reared ducks were weighed, and a nontargeted metabolic analysis was performed. Results: At 20 weeks of age, the relative weight of floor-reared duck uropygial glands was significantly higher than that of cage-reared ducks, indicating that the floor rearing system is better for inducing the development of uropygial glands. The nontargeted metabolic data revealed 1190 and 1149 differential metabolites under positive and negative ion modes, respectively. Among them, 49 differential metabolites were annotated between the two rearing systems. Three sulfur-containing amino acids, namely, 2-ketobutyric acid, L-aspartate-semialdehyde, and N-formyl-L-methionine, and some lipids, including inositol and sphingosine, might be responsible for the changes in plumage appearance among the various rearing conditions. Conclusions: The results of our study revealed the differences in the metabolic components of the uropygial gland in ducks reared under different rearing systems and found metabolic components to be possibly responsible for the poor feather condition of caged ducks.

Gut Microbiota Linked with Reduced Fear of Humans in Red Junglefowl Has Implications for Early Domestication

Domestication of animals can lead to profound phenotypic modifications within short evolutionary time periods, and for many species behavioral selection is likely at the forefront of this process. Animal studies have strongly implicated that the gut microbiome plays a major role in host behavior and cognition through the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Consequently, herein, it is hypothesized that host gut microbiota may be one of the earliest phenotypes to change as wild animals were domesticated. Here, the gut microbiome community in two selected lines of red junglefowl that are selected for either high or low fear of humans up to eight generations is examined. Microbiota profiles reveal taxonomic differences in gut bacteria known to produce neuroactive compounds between the two selection lines. Gut-brain module analysis by means of genome-resolved metagenomics identifies enrichment in the microbial synthesis and degradation potential of metabolites associated with fear extinction and reduces anxiety-like behaviors in low fear fowls. In contrast, high fear fowls are enriched in gut-brain modules from the butyrate and glutamate pathways, metabolites associated with fear conditioning. Overall, the results identify differences in the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiota across selection lines that may provide insights into the mechanistic explanations of the domestication process.

Effects of phytase supplementation and increased nutrient density on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and hypothalamic appetitive hormone expression and catecholamine concentrations in broilers from 1 to 43 days of age

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate extra-phosphoric effects of phytase and nutrient density on growth performance, meat yield, and hypothalamic appetitive hormone expression and catecholamine concentrations of broilers. Experiment 1 determined differences of digestible amino acid concentrations and AME_n using 256 Yield Plus × Ross 708 broilers (32 cages, 8 birds/cage) fed diets without or with 4,500 phytase units (FTU)/kg inclusion (16 reps/treatment). In Experiment 2, 832 Yield Plus × Ross 708 broilers (32 pens; 26 birds/pen) were provided diets in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement consisting of 2 nutrient contents (without or with increased density) and 2 phytase inclusions (0 or 4,500 FTU/kg). Increased nutrient density was formulated to contain 0.007, 0.015, 0.013, 0.021, 0.024%, and 61 kcal/kg higher digestible SAA, Lys, Thr, Val, Ile, and AME_n (from Experiment 1) respectively, compared with the control diet. Growth performance was determined at 14, 28, and 40 d of age and carcass characteristics at 41 d of age. At 43 d of age, plasma inositol, hypothalamic appetitive hormone expression, and catecholamine concentrations were determined from 4 birds/pen. Additive effects of phytase inclusion and increased nutrient density resulted in the lowest (P < 0.05) feed conversion from 1 to 40 d of age and the heaviest (P < 0.01) breast meat weights among dietary treatments. Phytase addition numerically increased feed intake (P = 0.06) and BW gain (P = 0.051) compared with birds fed diets without phytase from 1 to 40 d of age. Plasma inositol and dopamine concentrations were 2.3- and 1.2-fold higher (P < 0.01), respectively, in broilers fed phytase-added diets than birds fed diets without phytase inclusion. However, mRNA expression of neuropeptide Y, agouti-related peptide, proopiomelanocortin, cholecystokinin A receptor, ghrelin, and serotonin concentration were not different (P > 0.05) among treatments. These data indicated additive effects of phytase supplementation and increased nutrient density on growth performance and meat accretion of broilers. However, the influence of phytase on feed intake warrants future research.

Effect of short-term high tryptophan diet fed to sows on their subsequent piglet behavior

Housing sows in groups create the challenge of decreasing fighting amongst sows. One proposed method to do so is to feed a high tryptophan diet, but the effect on the fetus is unknown. To investigate this, 66 sows were fed one of three diets: Control (0.14% SID tryptophan), Medium (0.28% SID tryptophan), or High (0.42% SID tryptophan), from days 28 to 35 of gestation. Sows gestated in standard gestation stalls. Blood samples were taken on day 27 prior to and on day 35 after tryptophan supplementation. On days 1, 2, and 3, nursing bouts were observed so as to record disputes and displacements from teat competition. The piglets' activity and fighting were recorded on days 3, 7, and 11 from 0700 to 1700 h. On day 12, four piglets per litter were blood sampled: two to be used in later behavior tests and two to act as controls for blood cortisol levels. On day 14, the two behavior test piglets from each litter were subjected to a 10-min Isolation Test and 5-min Human Approach Test. On day 15, the behavior test piglets were paired by sex and treatment (for example, a male Medium piglet paired with another male Medium piglet from a different crate) and each pair was subjected to a 10-min Social Challenge Test and immediately blood sampled. Piglet cortisol and serotonin did not differ among treatments (P > 0.10). There were no differences (P > 0.10) for number born (12.7 ± 0.4), born alive (11.7 ± 0.4), or mortality (1.1 ± 0.2). Behavior during nursing bouts was similar, with no treatment differences in number of disputes or displacements, and similar bout lengths among treatments (199.5 ± 4.6 s, P > 0.10). No differences were detected for any of the variables for Isolation or the Human Approach Tests (P > 0.10). During the Social Challenge Test, High piglets had more contacts approaching the head of the companion piglet than did either Medium or Control piglets (14.3 ± 1.1, 10.7 ± 1.1, and 9.69 ± 0.8, respectively, P < 0.02). Total number of aggressive interactions during the test tended to be greater for Medium piglets compared to High piglets (9.3 ± 1.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.9, P < 0.07). Time budget data of the litter indicate that piglets from all three treatments spent equal amounts of time active and inactive (P > 0.10). Aggression was low with 0.3 ± 0.04% of piglets displaying aggressive behavior. Feeding high concentrations of tryptophan for a short duration early in gestation does not have a negative impact on sows' subsequent offspring.

Contrasting the effects of phytase and pure myo-inositol on the performance, digestibility, blood and egg yolk inositol levels and digestion physiology of laying hens

ABSRACT1. An experiment was designed to compare the effects of supplementing laying hen diets with phytase and myo-inositol (inositol).2. Five diets were formulated: high balanced protein (HBP - 840 mg of Dlys/hen/day), HBP with inositol (HBP+I - 0.16%), reduced balance protein (RBP - 672 mg of Dlys/hen/day), RBP with inositol (RBP+I - 0.16%) and RBP with phytase (RBP+P - 3000 FTU/kg).3. Laying hen production, inositol concentrations, digestive tract morphology, amino acid digestibility and intestinal inositol transporters transcript abundance were evaluated. Data were analysed with a one-way ANOVA in SAS 9.4. Contrasts were used to assess the effect of protein, inositol, phytase and phytase vs. inositol. Differences were accepted when P ≤ 0.05.4. No effect on hen-day egg production or feed efficiency was found. However, feed intake and the incidence of abnormally shaped eggs were 0.77 g/h/d and 0.17% higher, respectively, in inositol treatments. Inositol decreased egg specific gravity from 1.088 to 1.0865.5. Inositol concentration in egg yolk was similar among HBP+I, RBP+I and RBP+P, and higher than for the HBP and RBP diet groups. Both gizzard and ileal digesta were enriched in inositol in all supplemented treatments, and phytase supplementation decreased the level of IP5 and IP6 in the gizzard and ileum. Generally, neither phytase or inositol affected amino acid digestibility.6. Inositol increased transcript abundance of alkaline phosphatase in the ileum, while phytase upregulated duodenal alkaline phosphatase and SMIT1, jejunal SMIT2 and reduced ileal HMIT and SMIT1 abundance.7. In conclusion, no effect of phytase or inositol was found for laying hen production performance or amino acid digestibility, but egg quality was reduced by inositol supplementation. Inositol concentration in egg yolk was similar among supplemented treatments.